16 Indiana opinions name it 3 courts 1974–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re DKgreen2 sentences2020See In re D.K., 968 N.E.2d 792, 796 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) (upholding the trial court’s judicial notice of the records of a related CHINS proceeding at the outset of a hearing to terminate parental rights). 2018See In re D.K. , 968 N.E.2d 792 , 796 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) (upholding the trial court's judicial notice of the records of a related CHINS proceeding at the outset of a hearing to terminate parental rights). | 2 | 2 |
B-Dry Owners Ass'n v. B-Dry System, Inc.green1 sentence2025“Generally, stipulations may not be withdrawn absent grounds such as fraud, mistake, undue influence, or grounds of a similar nature.” B-Dry Owners Ass’n v. B-Dry Sys., Inc., 636 N.E.2d 161, 165 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994), trans. denied. [31] At the outset of the hearing, the parties jointly stipulated Father’s weekly gross income was $3,173. | 1 | 1 |
In the Matter of the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of N.C. (Minor Child), and C.G.G. (Father) v. The Indiana Department of Child Servicesgreen1 sentence2019See id. at 1267 . | 1 | 1 |
Moore v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Ind. Appellate Rule 46(A)(8)(a); Moore v. State, 869 N.E.2d 489, 491-92 (Ind.Ct.App.2007). | 1 | 1 |
Moryl v. Ransonegreen1 sentence2015Moryl v. Ransone, 4 N.E.3d 1133, 1136 (Ind.2014) (quoting Bielat v. Folta, 141 Ind.App. 452, 454 , 229 N.E.2d 474, 476 (1967)). [32] Lake County stated at the outset of the hearing before the trial court that it was “alleging various violations of the zoning ordinance.... ” Transcript at 2. | 1 | 1 |
Bielat v. FOLTAgreen2 sentences2015Moryl v. Ransone, 4 N.E.3d 1133, 1136 (Ind.2014) (quoting Bielat v. Folta, 141 Ind.App. 452, 454 , 229 N.E.2d 474, 476 (1967)). [32] Lake County stated at the outset of the hearing before the trial court that it was “alleging various violations of the zoning ordinance.... ” Transcript at 2. 2015Moryl v. Ransone, 4 N.E.3d 1133, 1136 (Ind.2014) (quoting Bielat v. Folta, 141 Ind.App. 452, 454 , 229 N.E.2d 474, 476 (1967)). [32] Lake County stated at the outset of the hearing before the trial court that it was “alleging various violations of the zoning ordinance.... ” Transcript at 2. | 1 | 1 |
Lambert v. Stategreen1 sentence2009See Lambert, 743 N.E.2d at 746 . [38] Pruitt's final claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel was initially framed as a freestanding claim of trial court error in his post-conviction petition. ( See App. to Br. of Pet.-Appellant 648.) The PC court found at the outset that this claim was "barred by procedural default because [it was] fully available for direct appeal but [was] not raised." Id. at 649. | 1 | 1 |
Ramsey v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Developmentgreen1 sentence2006An appellant who proceeds pro se is "held to the same established rules of procedure that a trained legal counsel is bound to follow and, therefore, must be prepared to accept the consequences of his or her action." Thacker v. Wentzel, 797 N.E.2d 342, 345 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (quoting Ramsey v. Review Bd. of Indiana Dep't of Workforce Dev., 789 N.E.2d 486, 487 (Ind.Ct.App.2008) (quotation marks omitted)). | 1 | 1 |
Thacker v. Wentzelgreen1 sentence2006An appellant who proceeds pro se is "held to the same established rules of procedure that a trained legal counsel is bound to follow and, therefore, must be prepared to accept the consequences of his or her action." Thacker v. Wentzel, 797 N.E.2d 342, 345 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (quoting Ramsey v. Review Bd. of Indiana Dep't of Workforce Dev., 789 N.E.2d 486, 487 (Ind.Ct.App.2008) (quotation marks omitted)). | 1 | 1 |
Matter of Drurygreen1 sentence1996In re Drury, 602 N.E.2d 1000, 1002 (Ind.1992). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Paul J. Livers II v. State of Indiana
green
1 sentence2014He states at the outset of his standard of review that “[t]he evidence is insufficient to support the conviction for attempted armed robbery.” Id. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Fraley v. Minger
green
1 sentence2009Fraley v. Minger, 829 N.E.2d 476 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Clark v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
green
1 sentence1999The assessor must identify the causes of obsolescence and then quantify the amount of obsolescence to be applied.” Id. at 1238 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Indiana Department of State Revenue, Inheritance Tax Division v. Estate of Roberts
green
2 sentences1998At the outset of its analysis, the Roberts Court stated that section 6-4.1-2-5 “clearly placed the burden on [the survivor] to prove that one-half of the jointly held property ‘belonged to him.’ ” Id. at 1336 . 1998In addition, the Roberts Court observed that section 6-4.1-2-5 is silent as to “what type and how much evidence is sufficient to carry this burden.” Id. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Maudlin
green
1 sentence1983State v. Maudlin, supra; Whitaker v. St. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Taylor v. State
green
2 sentences1981Appellant observes at the outset of this claim that there was much controverted evidence, but he acknowledges that when this Court reviews a claim of insufficiency it will consider only the evidence favorable to the State and reasonable inferences that can be drawn therefrom, and that the conviction will be set aside only if there is a lack of evidence of probative value from which a trier of fact could reasonably infer that a defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, citing Rogers v. State, (1972) 154 Ind.App. 445 , 290 N.E.2d 135 ; and Taylor v. State, (1972) 259 Ind. 25 , 284 N.E.2d 77 1981Appellant observes at the outset of this claim that there was much controverted evidence, but he acknowledges that when this Court reviews a claim of insufficiency it will consider only the evidence favorable to the State and reasonable inferences that can be drawn therefrom, and that the conviction will be set aside only if there is a lack of evidence of probative value from which a trier of fact could reasonably infer that a defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, citing Rogers v. State, (1972) 154 Ind.App. 445 , 290 N.E.2d 135 ; and Taylor v. State, (1972) 259 Ind. 25 , 284 N.E.2d 77 | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Rogers v. State
neutral
2 sentences1981Appellant observes at the outset of this claim that there was much controverted evidence, but he acknowledges that when this Court reviews a claim of insufficiency it will consider only the evidence favorable to the State and reasonable inferences that can be drawn therefrom, and that the conviction will be set aside only if there is a lack of evidence of probative value from which a trier of fact could reasonably infer that a defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, citing Rogers v. State, (1972) 154 Ind.App. 445 , 290 N.E.2d 135 ; and Taylor v. State, (1972) 259 Ind. 25 , 284 N.E.2d 77 1981Appellant observes at the outset of this claim that there was much controverted evidence, but he acknowledges that when this Court reviews a claim of insufficiency it will consider only the evidence favorable to the State and reasonable inferences that can be drawn therefrom, and that the conviction will be set aside only if there is a lack of evidence of probative value from which a trier of fact could reasonably infer that a defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, citing Rogers v. State, (1972) 154 Ind.App. 445 , 290 N.E.2d 135 ; and Taylor v. State, (1972) 259 Ind. 25 , 284 N.E.2d 77 | 1 | 1981–1981 |
State v. Smithers
green
2 sentences1974State v. Smithers (1971), 256 Ind. 512 , 269 N.E.2d 874 ; Pokraka v. Lummus Co. (1951), 230 Ind. 523 , 104 N.E.2d 669 . .The findings and judgment of the trial court here are negative in legal contemplation. 1974State v. Smithers (1971), 256 Ind. 512 , 269 N.E.2d 874 ; Pokraka v. Lummus Co. (1951), 230 Ind. 523 , 104 N.E.2d 669 . .The findings and judgment of the trial court here are negative in legal contemplation. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Pokraka v. Lummus Co.
green
2 sentences1974State v. Smithers (1971), 256 Ind. 512 , 269 N.E.2d 874 ; Pokraka v. Lummus Co. (1951), 230 Ind. 523 , 104 N.E.2d 669 . .The findings and judgment of the trial court here are negative in legal contemplation. 1974State v. Smithers (1971), 256 Ind. 512 , 269 N.E.2d 874 ; Pokraka v. Lummus Co. (1951), 230 Ind. 523 , 104 N.E.2d 669 . .The findings and judgment of the trial court here are negative in legal contemplation. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.