reaffirmed rule (Minnesota) · Go Syfert
← Minnesota issues

reaffirmed rule in Minnesota

5 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1943–1987 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Myersgreen
minn · 1984 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
1 sentence

1986Id. at 610.

11
Sobania v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.green
minn · 1985 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
1 sentence

1985In Sobania v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co., 371 N.W.2d 197, 200 (Minn. 1985), this court reaffirmed the principle that underinsured motorist coverage may not be reduced by amounts paid by one legally liable if that would prevent the insured from being made whole.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Colorado v. Bertine green
scotus · 1987
2 sentences

1987Id. at-, 107 S.Ct. at 743 .

1987Id. at-, 107 S.Ct. at 743 .

11987–1987
State, Department of Public Welfare v. Zutz neutral
minn · 1971
1 sentence

1973“When a party in good faith gives due notice of appeal and omits through mistake to do any other act necessary to perfect the appeal, the district court may permit an amendment on such terms as may be just.” In the recent case of In re Estate of Meyer, 290 Minn. 83 , 186 N. W. 2d 535 (1971), this court both reaffirmed the rule that compliance with Minn. St. 525.712 for service of notice of appeal is a jurisdictional requirement and defined the term “adverse party” as used in the statute.

11973–1973
In Re Estate of Meyer neutral
minn · 1971
1 sentence

1973“When a party in good faith gives due notice of appeal and omits through mistake to do any other act necessary to perfect the appeal, the district court may permit an amendment on such terms as may be just.” In the recent case of In re Estate of Meyer, 290 Minn. 83 , 186 N. W. 2d 535 (1971), this court both reaffirmed the rule that compliance with Minn. St. 525.712 for service of notice of appeal is a jurisdictional requirement and defined the term “adverse party” as used in the statute.

11973–1973
Carpenters & Joiners Union, Local No. 213 v. Ritter's Cafe green
scotus · 1942
2 sentences

1943The case of Carpenters & Joiners Union, etc. v. Ritter’s Cafe, 315 U. S. 722 , 62 S. Ct. 807 , 86 L. ed. 1143, is not in point.

1943The case of Carpenters & Joiners Union, etc. v. Ritter’s Cafe, 315 U. S. 722 , 62 S. Ct. 807 , 86 L. ed. 1143, is not in point.

11943–1943
American Federation of Labor v. Swing red
scotus · 1941
2 sentences

1943R. 1200, 1203, it was held that picketing will be restrained where it is attended with acts of violence and the continuation of the picketing excites fears that violence will be resumed; but the court reaffirmed the rule in the Thornhill case, saying: “Peaceful picketing is the workingman’s means of communication.” In A. F. of L. v. Swing, 312 U. S. 321 , 61 S. Ct. 568 , 85 L. ed. 855, the court held that the constitutional guarantee of freedom of discussion by peaceful picketing is not limited to cases where the controversy is between an employer and his employes.

1943R. 1200, 1203, it was held that picketing will be restrained where it is attended with acts of violence and the continuation of the picketing excites fears that violence will be resumed; but the court reaffirmed the rule in the Thornhill case, saying: “Peaceful picketing is the workingman’s means of communication.” In A. F. of L. v. Swing, 312 U. S. 321 , 61 S. Ct. 568 , 85 L. ed. 855, the court held that the constitutional guarantee of freedom of discussion by peaceful picketing is not limited to cases where the controversy is between an employer and his employes.

11943–1943

Where else courts name it

CA 49 (1924–2023) IL 45 (1911–2021) TX 45 (1928–2023) PA 35 (1953–2025) AL 27 (1891–2025) NJ 24 (1938–2021) FL 24 (1940–2018) NY 23 (1876–2016) OH 22 (1954–2026) MS 19 (1932–2026) NC 17 (1930–2022) MD 17 (1911–2019) OK 16 (1905–2007) OR 15 (1967–2022) CT 14 (1983–2011) KY 14 (1931–2022) AR 13 (1845–2004) IN 13 (1939–2020) WI 12 (1948–2010) VA 12 (1936–2019) MI 11 (1915–2020) LA 11 (1924–2025) TN 11 (1930–2010) NE 11 (1946–1997) MO 11 (1887–2020) AZ 10 (1937–2025) WA 10 (1910–2022) SC 9 (1913–2023) KS 9 (1991–2013) MT 8 (1952–2009) DC 8 (1893–2021) MA 7 (1975–2015) NM 7 (1896–1998) UT 7 (1933–2023) HI 7 (1983–2015) ID 6 (1966–2015) GA 6 (1925–1986) CO 6 (1972–2010) WV 5 (1993–2016) MN 5 (1943–1987) RI 5 (1983–2009) WY 4 (1976–2018) NV 4 (1953–2024) ME 3 (1944–1976) IA 3 (1929–1935) DE 3 (1985–2022) SD 3 (1910–1991) ND 2 (1903–1942) NH 2 (1972–1991)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check