Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1983–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Mendenhallgreen2 sentences2010See, e.g., State v. Ray, 290 Conn. 602, 605-606 , 967 A.2d 148 (2009) (defendant who sold crack cocaine to undercover police officer charged with violating, inter alia, § 21a-279 [a]); State v. Johnson, 286 Conn. 427, 430, 432 , 944 A.2d 297 (2008) (defendant in possession of crack cocaine charged with violating, inter alia, § 21a-279 [a]). 8 The defendant malees no claims under the Connecticut constitution as part of this appeal, and accordingly, we limit our analysis to the federal constitution. 9 Although it is not relevant in the present ease, which deals solely with a protective search fo 2010See, e.g., State v. Ray, 290 Conn. 602, 605-606 , 967 A.2d 148 (2009) (defendant who sold crack cocaine to undercover police officer charged with violating, inter alia, § 21a-279 [a]); State v. Johnson, 286 Conn. 427, 430, 432 , 944 A.2d 297 (2008) (defendant in possession of crack cocaine charged with violating, inter alia, § 21a-279 [a]). 8 The defendant malees no claims under the Connecticut constitution as part of this appeal, and accordingly, we limit our analysis to the federal constitution. 9 Although it is not relevant in the present ease, which deals solely with a protective search fo | 1 | 1 |
State v. Boydgreen2 sentences2010See, e.g., State v. Ray, 290 Conn. 602, 605-606 , 967 A.2d 148 (2009) (defendant who sold crack cocaine to undercover police officer charged with violating, inter alia, § 21a-279 [a]); State v. Johnson, 286 Conn. 427, 430, 432 , 944 A.2d 297 (2008) (defendant in possession of crack cocaine charged with violating, inter alia, § 21a-279 [a]). 8 The defendant malees no claims under the Connecticut constitution as part of this appeal, and accordingly, we limit our analysis to the federal constitution. 9 Although it is not relevant in the present ease, which deals solely with a protective search fo 2010See, e.g., State v. Ray, 290 Conn. 602, 605-606 , 967 A.2d 148 (2009) (defendant who sold crack cocaine to undercover police officer charged with violating, inter alia, § 21a-279 [a]); State v. Johnson, 286 Conn. 427, 430, 432 , 944 A.2d 297 (2008) (defendant in possession of crack cocaine charged with violating, inter alia, § 21a-279 [a]). 8 The defendant malees no claims under the Connecticut constitution as part of this appeal, and accordingly, we limit our analysis to the federal constitution. 9 Although it is not relevant in the present ease, which deals solely with a protective search fo | 1 | 1 |
State v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2010See, e.g., State v. Ray, 290 Conn. 602, 605-606 , 967 A.2d 148 (2009) (defendant who sold crack cocaine to undercover police officer charged with violating, inter alia, § 21a-279 [a]); State v. Johnson, 286 Conn. 427, 430, 432 , 944 A.2d 297 (2008) (defendant in possession of crack cocaine charged with violating, inter alia, § 21a-279 [a]). 8 The defendant malees no claims under the Connecticut constitution as part of this appeal, and accordingly, we limit our analysis to the federal constitution. 9 Although it is not relevant in the present ease, which deals solely with a protective search fo 2010See, e.g., State v. Ray, 290 Conn. 602, 605-606 , 967 A.2d 148 (2009) (defendant who sold crack cocaine to undercover police officer charged with violating, inter alia, § 21a-279 [a]); State v. Johnson, 286 Conn. 427, 430, 432 , 944 A.2d 297 (2008) (defendant in possession of crack cocaine charged with violating, inter alia, § 21a-279 [a]). 8 The defendant malees no claims under the Connecticut constitution as part of this appeal, and accordingly, we limit our analysis to the federal constitution. 9 Although it is not relevant in the present ease, which deals solely with a protective search fo | 1 | 1 |
State v. Raygreen1 sentence2010See, e.g., State v. Ray, 290 Conn. 602, 605-606 , 967 A.2d 148 (2009) (defendant who sold crack cocaine to undercover police officer charged with violating, inter alia, § 21a-279 [a]); State v. Johnson, 286 Conn. 427, 430, 432 , 944 A.2d 297 (2008) (defendant in possession of crack cocaine charged with violating, inter alia, § 21a-279 [a]). 8 The defendant malees no claims under the Connecticut constitution as part of this appeal, and accordingly, we limit our analysis to the federal constitution. 9 Although it is not relevant in the present ease, which deals solely with a protective search fo | 1 | 1 |
United Illuminating Co. v. City of New Havengreen2 sentences2002See also United Illuminating Co. v. New Haven, 240 Conn. 422, 434-35 , 692 A.2d 742 (1997). 2002See also United Illuminating Co. v. New Haven, 240 Conn. 422, 434-35 , 692 A.2d 742 (1997). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Turner v. United States
green
2 sentences1994“In Griffin , the court reaffirmed the rule, under federal law, set forth in Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398, 420 , 90 S. Ct. 642 , 24 L. 1994“In Griffin , the court reaffirmed the rule, under federal law, set forth in Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398, 420 , 90 S. Ct. 642 , 24 L. | 2 | 1993–1994 |
United States v. Matlock
green
2 sentences1987Ed. 2d 854 ] (1973), the Court reaffirmed the principle that the search of property, without warrant and without probable cause, but with proper consent voluntarily given, is valid under the Fourth Amendment.’ United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 165-66 , 94 S. Ct. 988 , 39 L. 1987Ed. 2d 854 ] (1973), the Court reaffirmed the principle that the search of property, without warrant and without probable cause, but with proper consent voluntarily given, is valid under the Fourth Amendment.’ United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 165-66 , 94 S. Ct. 988 , 39 L. | 2 | 1983–1987 |
State v. Kitchens
green
1 sentence2011As it pertains to the issue under review, the court reaffirmed that a claim of instructional error may be deemed waived “when the defense failed to take exception to, and acquiesced in, the jury instructions following one or more opportunities to review them.” Id., 480 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Wasfi v. Chaddha
green
2 sentences2010In support of this argument, Casper relies primarily on Wasfi v. Chaddha, 218 Conn. 200 , 588 A.2d 204 (1991), in which this court reaffirmed the principle that, when “the treatment or procedure is one of choice among competent physicians, a physician cannot be held [liable for] malpractice in selecting the one which, according to his best judgment, is best suited to the patient’s needs.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 208 . 2010In support of this argument, Casper relies primarily on Wasfi v. Chaddha, 218 Conn. 200 , 588 A.2d 204 (1991), in which this court reaffirmed the principle that, when “the treatment or procedure is one of choice among competent physicians, a physician cannot be held [liable for] malpractice in selecting the one which, according to his best judgment, is best suited to the patient’s needs.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 208 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Lees v. Middlesex Insurance
green
1 sentence1999"In Mead v. Burns , . . . we concluded that a CUTPA claim based on an alleged unfair claim settlement practice prohibited by [CUIPA] required proof, as under CUIPA, that the unfair settlement practice had been committed or performed by the defendant `with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice.'" Id., 850 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Coppola v. Coppola
green
2 sentences1998Coppola v. Coppola, 243 Conn. 657 , 707 A.2d 281 (1998). 1998Coppola v. Coppola, 243 Conn. 657 , 707 A.2d 281 (1998). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
United States v. Raul Martinez
green
1 sentence1997Remmer v. United States , 347 U.S. 227 , 229 (1954)" United States v. Martinez , 14 F.3d 543 , 550 (1994). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Remmer v. United States
green
1 sentence1997Remmer v. United States , 347 U.S. 227 , 229 (1954)" United States v. Martinez , 14 F.3d 543 , 550 (1994). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Steiger
green
2 sentences1996For instance, in State v. Steiger, 218 Conn. 349, 384 , 590 A.2d 408 (1991), the court affirmed a three judge panel’s rejection of an extreme emotional disturbance defense since “there was no reasonable explanation for the defendant’s actions . . . .” (Emphasis added.) Also, the court in State v. D’Antuono, 186 Conn. 414, 422 , 441 A.2d 846 (1982), stated that a panel “was not bound to conclude that [the defendant’s testimony] provided ‘a reasonable explanation or excuse’ for his actions.” (Emphasis added.) Finally, in State v. Raguseo, supra, 127, the court reaffirmed its standard for interpr 1996For instance, in State v. Steiger, 218 Conn. 349, 384 , 590 A.2d 408 (1991), the court affirmed a three judge panel’s rejection of an extreme emotional disturbance defense since “there was no reasonable explanation for the defendant’s actions . . . .” (Emphasis added.) Also, the court in State v. D’Antuono, 186 Conn. 414, 422 , 441 A.2d 846 (1982), stated that a panel “was not bound to conclude that [the defendant’s testimony] provided ‘a reasonable explanation or excuse’ for his actions.” (Emphasis added.) Finally, in State v. Raguseo, supra, 127, the court reaffirmed its standard for interpr | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. D'ANTUONO
green
2 sentences1996For instance, in State v. Steiger, 218 Conn. 349, 384 , 590 A.2d 408 (1991), the court affirmed a three judge panel’s rejection of an extreme emotional disturbance defense since “there was no reasonable explanation for the defendant’s actions . . . .” (Emphasis added.) Also, the court in State v. D’Antuono, 186 Conn. 414, 422 , 441 A.2d 846 (1982), stated that a panel “was not bound to conclude that [the defendant’s testimony] provided ‘a reasonable explanation or excuse’ for his actions.” (Emphasis added.) Finally, in State v. Raguseo, supra, 127, the court reaffirmed its standard for interpr 1996For instance, in State v. Steiger, 218 Conn. 349, 384 , 590 A.2d 408 (1991), the court affirmed a three judge panel’s rejection of an extreme emotional disturbance defense since “there was no reasonable explanation for the defendant’s actions . . . .” (Emphasis added.) Also, the court in State v. D’Antuono, 186 Conn. 414, 422 , 441 A.2d 846 (1982), stated that a panel “was not bound to conclude that [the defendant’s testimony] provided ‘a reasonable explanation or excuse’ for his actions.” (Emphasis added.) Finally, in State v. Raguseo, supra, 127, the court reaffirmed its standard for interpr | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Dime Savings Bank v. Pomeranz
green
2 sentences1995This court reaffirmed the principle that “a deficiency judgment rendered after the expiration of the ninety days allowed by the statute is not void for want of jurisdiction of the court to render it.” Id., 583 . 1995We also stated, however, “that unless the party against whom [the deficiency judgment] is rendered consents to its being entered or waives the objection it is erroneous.” Id. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Stankiewicz v. Zoning Board of Appeals
green
1 sentence1992This same situation was recently discussed in protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic Pollution, Inc. v. Planning and Zoning Commission, 220 Conn. 527 , 544-545 (1991) in which the court reaffirmed the principle that "`reasons' given by certain members of the commission did not amount to a formal collective official statement of the Commission." In footnote 15 therein, the Court commented on its decision in Stankiewicz v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 211 Conn. 76 , 77-78 (1989) in which it affirmed the Appellate Court's ruling that the trial court was obliged to search the record where t | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission
green
1 sentence1992This same situation was recently discussed in protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic Pollution, Inc. v. Planning and Zoning Commission, 220 Conn. 527 , 544-545 (1991) in which the court reaffirmed the principle that "`reasons' given by certain members of the commission did not amount to a formal collective official statement of the Commission." In footnote 15 therein, the Court commented on its decision in Stankiewicz v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 211 Conn. 76 , 77-78 (1989) in which it affirmed the Appellate Court's ruling that the trial court was obliged to search the record where t | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.