Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1927–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Felipe Salinasgreen1 sentence2026See United States v. Salinas, 543 F. App’x 458, 467 (5th Cir. 2013) (the independent investigation requirement “may be superfluous”); United States v. Baez, 983 F.3d 18 1029, 1039 (8th Cir. 2020) (recognizing that its application of the requirement has been inconsistent). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kohny v. Dunbar
green
2 sentences1940There is no question raised in this case as to the soundness of the rule announced in Kohny v. Dunbar, 21 Ida. 258 , 121 Pac. 544 , Ann. 1940There is no question raised in this case as to the soundness of the rule announced in Kohny v. Dunbar, 21 Ida. 258 , 121 Pac. 544 , Ann. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Brady v. Place
green
2 sentences1934It would seem that petitioner has placed himself within the rule announced in Brady v. Place , 41 Idaho 747 , 242 P. 314 , 243 P. 654 , wherein it is held that a party seeking to enforce a statute or to avail himself of its provisions may not question its constitutionality. 1934It would seem that petitioner has placed himself within the rule announced in Brady v. Place , 41 Idaho 747 , 242 P. 314 , 243 P. 654 , wherein it is held that a party seeking to enforce a statute or to avail himself of its provisions may not question its constitutionality. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
On Motion to Retax Costs
neutral
1 sentence1934It would seem that petitioner has placed himself within the rule announced in Brady v. Place , 41 Idaho 747 , 242 P. 314 , 243 P. 654 , wherein it is held that a party seeking to enforce a statute or to avail himself of its provisions may not question its constitutionality. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Vignolo v. Superior Court
neutral
2 sentences1930When that time arrives, and it is fast approaching, the occasion for dissertations by eminent lawyers, jurists and laymen upon the ‘sporting theory of justice’ will have ceased.” And, in Vignolo v. Superior Court, 85 Cal. App. 461 , 259 Pac. 491 , the court, in an action originating in the justice court and appealed to the superior court, denied a writ of certiorari upon the ground that the petitioner had “voluntarily participated in the" trial de novo in the Superior Court, without objection being made to the jurisdiction of that Court to try the action anew.” Of the soundness of this princip 1930When that time arrives, and it is fast approaching, the occasion for dissertations by eminent lawyers, jurists and laymen upon the ‘sporting theory of justice’ will have ceased.” And, in Vignolo v. Superior Court, 85 Cal. App. 461 , 259 Pac. 491 , the court, in an action originating in the justice court and appealed to the superior court, denied a writ of certiorari upon the ground that the petitioner had “voluntarily participated in the" trial de novo in the Superior Court, without objection being made to the jurisdiction of that Court to try the action anew.” Of the soundness of this princip | 1 | 1930–1930 |
First National Bank v. Steers
neutral
1 sentence1928St. 174, 75 Pac. 225 .) Even though claim and delivery were the ‘one action,’ respondent here is not the mortgagor and it is by no means certain that he could raise that question.” The reasoning of these cases, and other reasons enumerated hereafter, support the soundness of the rule permitting the mortgagee to protect his interests, independently of the mortgage, where his mortgaged property has passed into the hands of third parties. | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. Parramore
green
1 sentence1927(Cudahy Packing Co. v. Parramore, 263 U. S. 418 , 30 A. L. | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.