Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1896–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Marriage of Hudsongreen1 sentence1989A court may therefore adjudicate custody under the [UCCJA] without acquiring personal jurisdiction over an absent party given reasonable attempts to furnish notice of the proceedings.' In re Marriage of Hudson, 434 N.E.2d 107, 117 (Ind. App. 1982), cert. denied 459 U.S. 1202 (1983); see Unif. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Shaffer v. Heitner
green
2 sentences1989Ed. 95 , 66 S. Ct. 154 (1945), to bring an action under the UCCJA. ‘Rather, custody is in effect an adjudication of a child’s status, which falls under the status exception of Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186 , 97 S.Ct. 2569 , 53 L. 1989Ed. 95 , 66 S. Ct. 154 (1945), to bring an action under the UCCJA. ‘Rather, custody is in effect an adjudication of a child’s status, which falls under the status exception of Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186 , 97 S.Ct. 2569 , 53 L. | 3 | 1988–1989 |
International Shoe Co. v. Washington
green
2 sentences1989Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 , 90 L.Ed. 95 , 66 S.Ct. 154 (1945), to bring an action under the UCCJA. `Rather, custody is in effect an adjudication of a child's status, which falls under the status exception of Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186 , 97 S.Ct. 2569 , 53 L.Ed.2d 683 (1977). 1989Ed. 95 , 66 S. Ct. 154 (1945), to bring an action under the UCCJA. ‘Rather, custody is in effect an adjudication of a child’s status, which falls under the status exception of Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186 , 97 S.Ct. 2569 , 53 L. | 2 | 1989–1989 |
Jackson v. City of Kansas City
red
2 sentences2013And then after reviewing Kansas caselaw on assumption of risk, the court concluded it “remains viable and continues to constitute an absolute bar to recovery by an injured employee.” 235 Kan. at 306 . 2013The court first observed: “The status of the defense of assumption of risk after introduction of comparative fault has presented a thorny problem for a number of jurisdictions.” 235 Kan. at 301 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Hudson v. Hudson
green
1 sentence1989A court may therefore adjudicate custody under the [UCCJA] without acquiring personal jurisdiction over an absent party given reasonable attempts to furnish notice of the proceedings.' In re Marriage of Hudson, 434 N.E.2d 107, 117 (Ind. App. 1982), cert. denied 459 U.S. 1202 (1983); see Unif. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Van Matre v. Sankey
green
1 sentence1896This case was cited with approval by the Supreme Court of Illinois in Van Matre v. Sankey et al., 148 Ill. 536 , where it was held that a decree adopting-a child is a declaration by competent authority operative to change its status, and ipso facto, to render it that which the law declares it to be — an heir of the person adopting, and to make it capable of inheriting from him in all respects as if it were his own child, born in wedlock; and it may inherit property in other-states than that in which the adoption was had from its adopting parent. | 1 | 1896–1896 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.