Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 1911–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Eastline Corp. v. Marion Apartments, Ltd.green2 sentences2007Therefore, "the writing requirement contained in the contract could itself be waived by the subsequent conduct of the parties." Id. (citing Eastline Corp. v. Marion Apartments, Ltd., 524 So.2d 582, 584 (Miss.1988)). ¶ 31. 2006Therefore, “the writing requirement contained in the contract could itself be waived by the subsequent conduct of the parties.” Id. (citing Eastline Corp. v. Marion Apartments, Ltd., 524 So. 2d 582, 584 (Miss. 1988)). ¶31. | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Canizaro v. Mobile Communications Corp. of Am.
green
2 sentences2007Therefore, "the writing requirement contained in the contract could itself be waived by the subsequent conduct of the parties." Id. (citing Eastline Corp. v. Marion Apartments, Ltd., 524 So.2d 582, 584 (Miss.1988)). ¶ 31. 2006Therefore, “the writing requirement contained in the contract could itself be waived by the subsequent conduct of the parties.” Id. (citing Eastline Corp. v. Marion Apartments, Ltd., 524 So. 2d 582, 584 (Miss. 1988)). ¶31. | 2 | 2006–2007 |
Tanner v. Walsh
neutral
2 sentences1978In Tanner v. Walsh, 184 Miss. 147 , 183 So. 278 (1938), a pre-code case, we stated: (2) What we are, in effect, asked by the appellant to do is to engraft an exception on the statute by interpreting it as if it contained, after the words, "for a longer term than one year," the following or similar words: "unless the lessor, when making the lease, promises the lessee to observe it without its being reduced to writing, and permits the lessee to expend money on the leased premises in reliance on such promise." This we cannot do, for this Court, contrary to the course pursued by some others, has u 1978In Tanner v. Walsh, 184 Miss. 147 , 183 So. 278 (1938), a pre-code case, we stated: (2) What we are, in effect, asked by the appellant to do is to engraft an exception on the statute by interpreting it as if it contained, after the words, "for a longer term than one year," the following or similar words: "unless the lessor, when making the lease, promises the lessee to observe it without its being reduced to writing, and permits the lessee to expend money on the leased premises in reliance on such promise." This we cannot do, for this Court, contrary to the course pursued by some others, has u | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Delta Lumber Co. v. Wall
neutral
2 sentences1978Delta Lumber Co. v. Wall, 119 Miss. 350 , 80 So. 782 (1919) is the only case we have found where this Court has recognized "estoppel" as an exception to the writing requirement of the statute of frauds provision. 1978Delta Lumber Co. v. Wall, 119 Miss. 350 , 80 So. 782 (1919) is the only case we have found where this Court has recognized "estoppel" as an exception to the writing requirement of the statute of frauds provision. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Washington v. Soria
green
1 sentence1911Washington v. Soria, 73 Miss. 665 , 19 South. 485 , 55 Am. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.