death error (Tennessee) · Go Syfert
← Tennessee issues

death error in Tennessee

5 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1917–2022 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Reid green
tenn · 2002
2 sentences

2004The supreme court affirmed this court's holding in State v. Reid , that the exclusion of prospective jurors by a trial court because of their moral or religious based reluctance to impose the death is not error. 91 S.W.3d at 289-90 .

2004The supreme court affirmed this court’s holding in State v. Reid, that the exclusion of prospective jurors by a trial court because of their moral or religious based reluctance to impose the death is not error. 91 S.W.3d at 289-90 .

22003–2004
State of Tennessee v. Jessie Dotson green
tenn · 2014
1 sentence

2022Id.

12022–2022
Grant v. North American Casualty Co. green
minn · 1903
2 sentences

1919We think the following authorities answer these questions : The case of Grant v. North American Casualty Co., 88 Minn., 397 , 93 N. W., 312 , involved a sick benefit claim under the terms of the policy as well as a death claim.

1919We think the following authorities answer these questions : The case of Grant v. North American Casualty Co., 88 Minn., 397 , 93 N. W., 312 , involved a sick benefit claim under the terms of the policy as well as a death claim.

11919–1919
McGuinness v. Court Elm City, Foresters of America green
conn · 1905
2 sentences

1917McGuinness v. Court Elm City No. 1, 78 Conn., 43 , 60 Atl., 1023 , 3 Ann.

1917McGuinness v. Court Elm City No. 1, 78 Conn., 43 , 60 Atl., 1023 , 3 Ann.

11917–1917

Where else courts name it

NY 28 (1889–2026) TX 16 (1924–2015) MO 15 (1905–2015) OH 14 (1932–2017) LA 10 (1977–2010) NJ 10 (1954–2010) PA 10 (1936–2000) IL 8 (1902–1995) KS 7 (1914–2002) VA 7 (1968–2011) GA 6 (1923–2008) FL 6 (1944–2008) CA 5 (1938–2024) NE 5 (1911–1989) TN 5 (1917–2022) AL 5 (1917–2008) OK 4 (1916–2004) ID 4 (1943–2020) AZ 4 (1965–2005) WA 4 (1922–2006) OR 4 (1976–1980) MI 4 (1954–2004) MD 4 (1901–1996) RI 3 (2001–2008) IA 3 (1968–2025) AR 3 (1935–2001) MS 2 (1968–1968) CO 2 (1957–1959) CT 2 (1996–2026) NC 2 (1906–2025) ME 2 (2018–2018) MA 2 (1962–1967) KY 2 (1884–1932) WV 2 (1917–1982) SC 2 (1996–2001)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check