Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 2005–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jackson v. Virginiared1 sentence2011When an accused challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court’s standard of review is whether, after considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the 8 State, “any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979); see Tenn. R. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rimmergreen1 sentence2010As we have previously observed, “pattern jury instructions are only suggestions for a trial court because they are 'not officially approved by this Court or by the General Assembly and should be used only after careful analysis.' ” State v. Rimmer, 250 S.W.3d 12, 30 (Tenn.2008) (quoting State v. Hodges, 944 S.W.2d 346, 354 (Tenn.1997)). 10 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hodgesgreen1 sentence2010As we have previously observed, “pattern jury instructions are only suggestions for a trial court because they are 'not officially approved by this Court or by the General Assembly and should be used only after careful analysis.' ” State v. Rimmer, 250 S.W.3d 12, 30 (Tenn.2008) (quoting State v. Hodges, 944 S.W.2d 346, 354 (Tenn.1997)). 10 . | 1 | 1 |
McClellan v. McClellangreen1 sentence2005See McClellan, 873 S.W.2d at 351-52 (holding that a wife’s threat to file a divorce action did not amount to duress); Golden v. Hood, No. E1999-02443-COA-MR3-CV, 2000 WL 122195 , at *2 (Tenn. Ct. App. E.S., filed January 26, 2000) (holding that an alleged threat to withdraw as the party’s counsel if the party fails to sign the proposed mediation agreement did not constitute duress); see also 86 C.J.S. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bland
green
1 sentence2019Id., Sentencing Comm’n. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Majors
green
1 sentence2018As we are able to glean from the post-conviction court’s order denying relief and 1 This opinion will only address the issue raised in the Petitioner’s appellate brief. 2 We note that “[i]t is the appellant’s duty to compile the record necessary for resolution of the issues presented to an appellate court.” State v. Majors, 318 S.W.3d 850 , 865 n.12 (Tenn. 2010). -2- as is pertinent to our review, the petitions alleged that trial counsel was ineffective for failing “to request a forensic mental evaluation,” for failing “to call a psychological expert to testify” in support of the Petitioner’s | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.