30 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2024 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Morgan v. Eadsgreen2 sentences2023Hamilton No. C- 190490, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 194 , 2 (Jan. 27, 2021) (“It is ‘a bedrock principle of appellate practice in Ohio’ that an appeals court is limited to the record of proceedings before the trial court,” quoting Morgan v. Eads, 104 Ohio St.3d 142 , 2004-Ohio-6110 , 818 N.E.2d 1157 , ¶ 13). 2021Although Rao alleges ¶ 9, citing Morgan v. Eads, 104 Ohio St.3d 142 , 2004-Ohio-6110 , ¶ 13 ("a bedrock principle of appellate practice in Ohio is that an appeals court is limited to the record of the proceedings at trial"). | 5 | 10 |
In re Adoption of Y.E.F. (Slip Opinion)green2 sentences2024See In re Adoption of Y.E.F., 2020-Ohio-6785 , ¶ 40 (DeWine., J., dissenting) (“The final-order requirement is a long-standing feature of appellate jurisdiction with its origins in the English common law.”). 2024See In re Adoption of Y.E.F., 2020-Ohio-6785 , ¶ 40 (DeWine., J., dissenting) (“The final-order requirement is a long-standing feature of appellate jurisdiction with its origins in the English common law.”). | 2 | 2 |
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Penagreen2 sentences1999See, also, Adarand, 515 U.S. at 222 , 115 S.Ct. at 2110 , 132 L.Ed.2d at 178-179 (“With Croson , the Court finally agreed that the Fourteenth Amendment requires strict scrutiny of all race-based action by state and local governments”). 1999See, also, Adarand, 515 U.S. at 222 , 115 S.Ct. at 2110 , 132 L.Ed.2d at 178-179 (“With Croson , the Court finally agreed that the Fourteenth Amendment requires strict scrutiny of all race-based action by state and local governments”). | 2 | 2 |
Allied-Signal, Inc. Ex Rel. Bendix Corp. v. Director, Division of Taxationgreen2 sentences2019It is a bedrock principle " 'that a State may not tax value earned outside its borders.' " Corrigan v. Testa , 149 Ohio St.3d 18 , 2016-Ohio-2805 , 73 N.E.3d 381 , ¶ 17, quoting Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation , 504 U.S. 768 , 777, 112 S.Ct. 2251 , 119 L.Ed.2d 533 (1992). 2019It is a bedrock principle " 'that a State may not tax value earned outside its borders.' " Corrigan v. Testa , 149 Ohio St.3d 18 , 2016-Ohio-2805 , 73 N.E.3d 381 , ¶ 17, quoting Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation , 504 U.S. 768 , 777, 112 S.Ct. 2251 , 119 L.Ed.2d 533 (1992). | 1 | 2 |
United States v. Roland Henry, A/K/A Roachgreen1 sentence2022Moreover, unlike an encounter on the street or along a highway, an in-home arrest puts the officer at the disadvantage of being on his adversary's "turf." Perry County, Case No. 21-CA-00014 8 An ambush in a confined setting of unknown configuration is more to be feared than it is in open, more familiar surroundings. {¶ 18} "In balancing the Government's interests against an individual's Fourth Amendment rights, it is a bedrock principle that 'it would be unreasonable to require that police officers take unnecessary risks in the performance of their duties.' " U.S. v. Henry, 48 F.3d 1282, 1285 | 1 | 1 |
Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Clubgreen2 sentences2022This means that the court could award a sum of zero. 20 January Term, 2022 463 U.S. 680, 684 , 103 S.Ct. 3274 , 77 L.Ed.2d 938 (1983) (“ ‘Our basic point of reference’ when considering the award of attorney’s fees is the bedrock principle known as the ‘ “American Rule” ’ ”). 2022This means that the court could award a sum of zero. 20 January Term, 2022 463 U.S. 680, 684 , 103 S.Ct. 3274 , 77 L.Ed.2d 938 (1983) (“ ‘Our basic point of reference’ when considering the award of attorney’s fees is the bedrock principle known as the ‘ “American Rule” ’ ”). | 1 | 1 |
Gannett Co. v. DePasqualegreen2 sentences2019See Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368, 386 , 99 S.Ct. 2898 , 61 L.Ed.2d 608 (1979), fn. 15 (“For many centuries, both civil and criminal trials have traditionally been open to the public.”). 2019See Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368, 386 , 99 S.Ct. 2898 , 61 L.Ed.2d 608 (1979), fn. 15 (“For many centuries, both civil and criminal trials have traditionally been open to the public.”). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Richardsgreen1 sentence2016See also United States v. Richards, 659 F.3d 527, 538 (6th Cir.2011) (noting that "the majority of federal courts have eschewed the use of a specific search protocol and, instead, have employed the Fourth Amendment's bedrock principle of reasonableness on a case-by-case basis"). {¶ 43} In this respect, federal courts have approved search warrants allowing access to the entire contents of an email account "in order to conduct a search for emails within the limited categories contained in the warrant." In re A Warrant for All Content & Other Information Associated with the Email Account xxxxxxx@ | 1 | 1 |
In re a Warrant for All Content & Other Information Associated with the Email Account xxxxxxx@ Gmail.com Maintained at Premises Controlled by Google, Inc.green1 sentence2016See also United States v. Richards, 659 F.3d 527, 538 (6th Cir.2011) (noting that "the majority of federal courts have eschewed the use of a specific search protocol and, instead, have employed the Fourth Amendment's bedrock principle of reasonableness on a case-by-case basis"). {¶ 43} In this respect, federal courts have approved search warrants allowing access to the entire contents of an email account "in order to conduct a search for emails within the limited categories contained in the warrant." In re A Warrant for All Content & Other Information Associated with the Email Account xxxxxxx@ | 1 | 1 |
State v. Adamsgreen1 sentence2016The bedrock principle in Ohio remains that " 'when new and additional charges arise from the same facts as did the original charge and the state knew of such facts at the time of the initial indictment, the time within which trial is to begin on the additional charge is subject to the same statutory limitations period that is applied to the original charge.' " State v. Adams, 43 Ohio St.3d 67, 68 (1989), quoting State v. Clay, 9 Ohio App.3d 216 (11th Dist.1983). | 1 | 1 |
California v. Trombettagreen2 sentences2011According to Phelps, the unpreserved clips may have shown Land with a knife earlier in the night, and that fact could have bolstered his provocation defense and led to an acquittal on the aggravated-murder charge and a conviction on the reduced charge of voluntary manslaughter. {¶11} In accordance with the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause’s requirement of “fundamental fairness” in criminal prosecutions, a defendant must be afforded a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.3 This bedrock principle has led to the development of case law in “ ‘the area of constitutionally g 2011According to Phelps, the unpreserved clips may have shown Land with a knife earlier in the night, and that fact could have bolstered his provocation defense and led to an acquittal on the aggravated-murder charge and a conviction on the reduced charge of voluntary manslaughter. {¶11} In accordance with the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause’s requirement of “fundamental fairness” in criminal prosecutions, a defendant must be afforded a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.3 This bedrock principle has led to the development of case law in “ ‘the area of constitutionally g | 1 | 1 |
Arizona v. Youngbloodgreen2 sentences2011According to Phelps, the unpreserved clips may have shown Land with a knife earlier in the night, and that fact could have bolstered his provocation defense and led to an acquittal on the aggravated-murder charge and a conviction on the reduced charge of voluntary manslaughter. {¶11} In accordance with the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause’s requirement of “fundamental fairness” in criminal prosecutions, a defendant must be afforded a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.3 This bedrock principle has led to the development of case law in “ ‘the area of constitutionally g 2011According to Phelps, the unpreserved clips may have shown Land with a knife earlier in the night, and that fact could have bolstered his provocation defense and led to an acquittal on the aggravated-murder charge and a conviction on the reduced charge of voluntary manslaughter. {¶11} In accordance with the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause’s requirement of “fundamental fairness” in criminal prosecutions, a defendant must be afforded a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.3 This bedrock principle has led to the development of case law in “ ‘the area of constitutionally g | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bensongreen2 sentences2011According to Phelps, the unpreserved clips may have shown Land with a knife earlier in the night, and that fact could have bolstered his provocation defense and led to an acquittal on the aggravated-murder charge and a conviction on the reduced charge of voluntary manslaughter. {¶11} In accordance with the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause’s requirement of “fundamental fairness” in criminal prosecutions, a defendant must be afforded a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.3 This bedrock principle has led to the development of case law in “ ‘the area of constitutionally g 2011According to Phelps, the unpreserved clips may have shown Land with a knife earlier in the night, and that fact could have bolstered his provocation defense and led to an acquittal on the aggravated-murder charge and a conviction on the reduced charge of voluntary manslaughter. {¶11} In accordance with the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause’s requirement of “fundamental fairness” in criminal prosecutions, a defendant must be afforded a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.3 This bedrock principle has led to the development of case law in “ ‘the area of constitutionally g | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Johnstonegreen1 sentence2000See, generally, Brown , supra . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ishmail
green
2 sentences2020Thus, “[a] reviewing court cannot add matter to the record before it, which was not a part of the trial court’s proceedings, and then decide the appeal on the basis of the new matter.” State v. Ishmail, 54 Ohio St.2d 402 , 377 N.E.2d 500 (1978), paragraph one of the syllabus. 2020Thus, “[a] reviewing court cannot add matter to the record before it, which was not a part of the trial court’s proceedings, and then decide the appeal on the basis of the new matter.” State v. Ishmail, 54 Ohio St.2d 402 , 377 N.E.2d 500 (1978), paragraph one of the syllabus. | 4 | 2004–2020 |
Terry v. Ohio
green
2 sentences2022Moreover, unlike an encounter on the street or along a highway, an in-home arrest puts the officer at the disadvantage of being on his adversary's "turf." Perry County, Case No. 21-CA-00014 8 An ambush in a confined setting of unknown configuration is more to be feared than it is in open, more familiar surroundings. {¶ 18} "In balancing the Government's interests against an individual's Fourth Amendment rights, it is a bedrock principle that 'it would be unreasonable to require that police officers take unnecessary risks in the performance of their duties.' " U.S. v. Henry, 48 F.3d 1282, 1285 2022Moreover, unlike an encounter on the street or along a highway, an in-home arrest puts the officer at the disadvantage of being on his adversary's "turf." Perry County, Case No. 21-CA-00014 8 An ambush in a confined setting of unknown configuration is more to be feared than it is in open, more familiar surroundings. {¶ 18} "In balancing the Government's interests against an individual's Fourth Amendment rights, it is a bedrock principle that 'it would be unreasonable to require that police officers take unnecessary risks in the performance of their duties.' " U.S. v. Henry, 48 F.3d 1282, 1285 | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. McNeill
green
2 sentences2020State v. McNeill, 137 Ohio App.3d 34, 40 , 738 N.E.2d 23 (9th Dist.2000) (direct appeals limited to the trial court record); Morgan v. Eads, 104 Ohio St.3d 42 , 2004-Ohio-6110 , 818 N.E.2d 1157 , ¶ 13 (“a bedrock principle of appellate practice * * * is that an appeals court is limited to the record of the proceedings at trial”). {¶143} Based on the foregoing, Jabrown’s fifth assigned error lacks merit. {¶144} The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. 2020State v. McNeill, 137 Ohio App.3d 34, 40 , 738 N.E.2d 23 (9th Dist.2000) (direct appeals limited to the trial court record); Morgan v. Eads, 104 Ohio St.3d 42 , 2004-Ohio-6110 , 818 N.E.2d 1157 , ¶ 13 (“a bedrock principle of appellate practice * * * is that an appeals court is limited to the record of the proceedings at trial”). {¶143} Based on the foregoing, Jabrown’s fifth assigned error lacks merit. {¶144} The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Corrigan v. Testa (Slip Opinion)
green
2 sentences2019It is a bedrock principle " 'that a State may not tax value earned outside its borders.' " Corrigan v. Testa , 149 Ohio St.3d 18 , 2016-Ohio-2805 , 73 N.E.3d 381 , ¶ 17, quoting Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation , 504 U.S. 768 , 777, 112 S.Ct. 2251 , 119 L.Ed.2d 533 (1992). 2019It is a bedrock principle " 'that a State may not tax value earned outside its borders.' " Corrigan v. Testa , 149 Ohio St.3d 18 , 2016-Ohio-2805 , 73 N.E.3d 381 , ¶ 17, quoting Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation , 504 U.S. 768 , 777, 112 S.Ct. 2251 , 119 L.Ed.2d 533 (1992). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Baker Botts L.L.P. v. ASARCO LLC
green
2 sentences2019The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized this bedrock principle and recently affirmed that “the American Rule has roots in our common law reaching back to at least the 18th Century * * *.” Baker Botts L.L.P. v. ASARCO, L.L.C., 576 U.S. __ , 135 S.Ct. 2158 , 192 L.Ed.2d 208 (2015) (refusing to create a “judicial exception” to the American Rule to allow recovery of attorney fees for work performed in defending a fee application in Bankruptcy Court per Section 330(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code). 2019The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized this bedrock principle and recently affirmed that “the American Rule has roots in our common law reaching back to at least the 18th Century * * *.” Baker Botts L.L.P. v. ASARCO, L.L.C., 576 U.S. __ , 135 S.Ct. 2158 , 192 L.Ed.2d 208 (2015) (refusing to create a “judicial exception” to the American Rule to allow recovery of attorney fees for work performed in defending a fee application in Bankruptcy Court per Section 330(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State ex rel. Ohio Congress of Parents & Teachers v. State Board of Education
green
2 sentences2018Ohio Congress of Parents & Teachers v. State Bd. of Edn. , 111 Ohio St.3d 568 , 2006-Ohio-5512 , 857 N.E.2d 1148 , ¶ 53. 2018Ohio Congress of Parents & Teachers v. State Bd. of Edn. , 111 Ohio St.3d 568 , 2006-Ohio-5512 , 857 N.E.2d 1148 , ¶ 53. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories
green
2 sentences2017And the “appellant bears the burden of showing error by reference to matters on the record.” Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories, 61 Ohio St.2d 197, 199 , 400 N.E.2d 384 (1980). 2017And the “appellant bears the burden of showing error by reference to matters on the record.” Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories, 61 Ohio St.2d 197, 199 , 400 N.E.2d 384 (1980). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Smith v. Phillips
green
2 sentences2016It is a bedrock principle of law that the trier of fact decide cases “solely on the evidence before it.” Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209, 217 , 102 S.Ct. 940 , 71 L.Ed.2d 78 (1982). 2016It is a bedrock principle of law that the trier of fact decide cases “solely on the evidence before it.” Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209, 217 , 102 S.Ct. 940 , 71 L.Ed.2d 78 (1982). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Clay
green
1 sentence2016The bedrock principle in Ohio remains that " 'when new and additional charges arise from the same facts as did the original charge and the state knew of such facts at the time of the initial indictment, the time within which trial is to begin on the additional charge is subject to the same statutory limitations period that is applied to the original charge.' " State v. Adams, 43 Ohio St.3d 67, 68 (1989), quoting State v. Clay, 9 Ohio App.3d 216 (11th Dist.1983). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Geeslin
green
1 sentence2011No. C-050810, 2007-Ohio-3307, at ¶65 . 7 Youngblood at 58 . 8 State v. Geeslin, 116 Ohio St.3d 252 , 2007-Ohio-5239 , 878 N.E.2d 1 , syllabus, following Youngblood, supra. 5 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS partaking of the nature of fraud. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal
green
2 sentences2011According to Phelps, the unpreserved clips may have shown Land with a knife earlier in the night, and that fact could have bolstered his provocation defense and led to an acquittal on the aggravated-murder charge and a conviction on the reduced charge of voluntary manslaughter. {¶11} In accordance with the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause’s requirement of “fundamental fairness” in criminal prosecutions, a defendant must be afforded a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.3 This bedrock principle has led to the development of case law in “ ‘the area of constitutionally g 2011According to Phelps, the unpreserved clips may have shown Land with a knife earlier in the night, and that fact could have bolstered his provocation defense and led to an acquittal on the aggravated-murder charge and a conviction on the reduced charge of voluntary manslaughter. {¶11} In accordance with the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause’s requirement of “fundamental fairness” in criminal prosecutions, a defendant must be afforded a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.3 This bedrock principle has led to the development of case law in “ ‘the area of constitutionally g | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Myles, C-050810 (6-29-2007)
neutral
1 sentence2011No. C-050810, 2007-Ohio-3307, at ¶65 . 7 Youngblood at 58 . 8 State v. Geeslin, 116 Ohio St.3d 252 , 2007-Ohio-5239 , 878 N.E.2d 1 , syllabus, following Youngblood, supra. 5 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS partaking of the nature of fraud. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. King
green
1 sentence2003State v. King (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 158 , 162-163 , citing State ex rel. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.