local rule in Maryland

2022Const. Servs., Inc. v. Simpson, 372 Md. 434, 448-49 (2002) (provision of rule governing garnishment actions effected a substantive change in the cause of action that exceeded the Court’s rulemaking authority). 47 See, e.g., Whitaker v. Prince George’s County, 307 Md. 368 (1986) (rule granting power to assign cases to a circuit court administrative judge was within the rulemaking power under §18(a)). 42 Whether the rules and administrative tolling order fell within the Court’s rulemaking powers related to “practice and procedure” The “practice and procedure” category includes cases in which the

2022Const. Servs., Inc. v. Simpson, 372 Md. 434, 448-49 (2002) (provision of rule governing garnishment actions effected a substantive change in the cause of action that exceeded the Court’s rulemaking authority). 47 See, e.g., Whitaker v. Prince George’s County, 307 Md. 368 (1986) (rule granting power to assign cases to a circuit court administrative judge was within the rulemaking power under §18(a)). 42 Whether the rules and administrative tolling order fell within the Court’s rulemaking powers related to “practice and procedure” The “practice and procedure” category includes cases in which the

2017And, in Eastern Tar Products, the Court declined to invalidate a local requirement that an application for tax exemption be submitted by a date certain rather than “before the annual revision and correction of the tax lists,” as State law had required. 176 Md. at 294 .

2017And, in Eastern Tar Products, the Court declined to invalidate a local requirement that an application for tax exemption be submitted by a date certain rather than “before the annual revision and correction of the tax lists,” as State law had required. 176 Md. at 294 .

1973Ass’n, 262 Md. 360 , 277 A. 2d 600 (1971): “We have held that the right to a jury trial may be subjected to reasonable regulation and that a local rule of court requiring that an affirmative written election for a jury trial be made at the time of the filing of the first pleading does not offend the constitutional guarantee, Houston v. Lloyd's Consumer Acceptance Corp., 241 Md. 10 , 215 A. 2d 192 (1965), a limitation which has been made applicable to all courts by *494 Rule 343, which became effective before Bettum brought suit.

1973Ass’n, 262 Md. 360 , 277 A. 2d 600 (1971): “We have held that the right to a jury trial may be subjected to reasonable regulation and that a local rule of court requiring that an affirmative written election for a jury trial be made at the time of the filing of the first pleading does not offend the constitutional guarantee, Houston v. Lloyd's Consumer Acceptance Corp., 241 Md. 10 , 215 A. 2d 192 (1965), a limitation which has been made applicable to all courts by *494 Rule 343, which became effective before Bettum brought suit.

1975If the evidence is sufficient to show fairly to the reasonable satisfaction of the trial judge that the expert witness proffered is familiar with the local standard concerned, that witness, otherwise qualified, may testify as an expert with respect to the standard.” 22 Md.

1975If the evidence is sufficient to show fairly to the reasonable satisfaction of the trial judge that the expert witness proffered is familiar with the local standard concerned, that witness, otherwise *500 qualified, may testify as an expert with respect to the standard.” Raitt v. Johns Hopkins Hospital, supra, 22 Md.

1973Ass’n, 262 Md. 360 , 277 A. 2d 600 (1971): “We have held that the right to a jury trial may be subjected to reasonable regulation and that a local rule of court requiring that an affirmative written election for a jury trial be made at the time of the filing of the first pleading does not offend the constitutional guarantee, Houston v. Lloyd's Consumer Acceptance Corp., 241 Md. 10 , 215 A. 2d 192 (1965), a limitation which has been made applicable to all courts by *494 Rule 343, which became effective before Bettum brought suit.

1973Ass’n, 262 Md. 360 , 277 A. 2d 600 (1971): “We have held that the right to a jury trial may be subjected to reasonable regulation and that a local rule of court requiring that an affirmative written election for a jury trial be made at the time of the filing of the first pleading does not offend the constitutional guarantee, Houston v. Lloyd's Consumer Acceptance Corp., 241 Md. 10 , 215 A. 2d 192 (1965), a limitation which has been made applicable to all courts by *494 Rule 343, which became effective before Bettum brought suit.

1973Segal v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pennsylvania, 250 F. Supp. 936 (D.

1971Segal v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pennsylvania, 250 F. Supp. 936 (D.Md. 1966).

2021The AOC contends that the Edit Table, a purely administrative document, unambiguously is not “a local rule, policy, or directive that governs the operation of the court.” Id.

2011We note that "[Counsel would be well served when relying on foreign unreported decisions, to refer the court to a local rule of the decision’s jurisdiction of origin that would permit its citation in that jurisdiction.” Holloman v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., 162 Md.App. 332 , 342 n. 5, 873 A.2d 1261 (2005). 3 .

2011We note that "[Counsel would be well served when relying on foreign unreported decisions, to refer the court to a local rule of the decision’s jurisdiction of origin that would permit its citation in that jurisdiction.” Holloman v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., 162 Md.App. 332 , 342 n. 5, 873 A.2d 1261 (2005). 3 .

2001In Snyder v. Cearfoss, 187 Md. 635, 639 , 51 A. 2d 264 , we held that a plea of limitations was in time under a local rule, where filed within ten days after a demurrer was overruled, although we referred to the practice in Maryland of requiring such pleas to be filed by the rule day.

2001In Snyder v. Cearfoss, 187 Md. 635, 639 , 51 A. 2d 264 , we held that a plea of limitations was in time under a local rule, where filed within ten days after a demurrer was overruled, although we referred to the practice in Maryland of requiring such pleas to be filed by the rule day.

1999The trial judge, rather than appointing individual counsel for the indigent criminal defendants, made a general appointment of all members of the local bar “for the purpose of arraigning the defendants and then of course anticipating] [the defendants] to continue to help them if no counsel appears.” Powell, 287 U.S. at 53 , 53 S.Ct. at 58 , 77 L.Ed. at 163 .

1999The trial judge, rather than appointing individual counsel for the indigent criminal defendants, made a general appointment of all members of the local bar “for the purpose of arraigning the defendants and then of course anticipating] [the defendants] to continue to help them if no counsel appears.” Powell, 287 U.S. at 53 , 53 S.Ct. at 58 , 77 L.Ed. at 163 .

1998Unlike some states’ rules which are promulgated by a local bar association, Maryland’s rules of legal ethics are adopted by the Court of Appeals “in the exercise of its inherent Constitutional authority to regulate the practice of law.” Id. at 163 , 707 A.2d at 816 .

1998Unlike some states’ rules which are promulgated by a local bar association, Maryland’s rules of legal ethics are adopted by the Court of Appeals “in the exercise of its inherent Constitutional authority to regulate the practice of law.” Id. at 163 , 707 A.2d at 816 .

1986In Curley, sufficient knowledge was found on the part of an entrustor who knew of six serious moving violations on the entrustee driver’s part within a five-year period prior to the accident, four of which were of the same nature as that which caused the automobile accident in that case. 270 Md. at 252-53 , 311 A.2d 231 .

1986In Curley, sufficient knowledge was found on the part of an entrustor who knew of six serious moving violations on the entrustee driver’s part within a five-year period prior to the accident, four of which were of the same nature as that which caused the automobile accident in that case. 270 Md. at 252-53 , 311 A.2d 231 .

1986In fact, the entrustor would go to a local bar to retrieve the driver, and with knowledge that he had been drinking, send the driver in a gasoline truck out on deliveries. 243 Md. 291, 297-99 , 221 A.2d 342 (1966).

1986In fact, the entrustor would go to a local bar to retrieve the driver, and with knowledge that he had been drinking, send the driver in a gasoline truck out on deliveries. 243 Md. 291, 297-99 , 221 A.2d 342 (1966).

1982In Anonymous v. Baker, 360 U.S. 287 , 79 S.Ct. 1157 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1234 (1959), appellants had been found in contempt for refusing to answer pertinent questions put to them as witnesses summoned in a state judicial inquiry into alleged improper practices at the local bar.

1982In Anonymous v. Baker, 360 U.S. 287 , 79 S.Ct. 1157 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1234 (1959), appellants had been found in contempt for refusing to answer pertinent questions put to them as witnesses summoned in a state judicial inquiry into alleged improper practices at the local bar.

1979This is so because those parts of any local rule which are contrary to or inconsistent with the Maryland Rules are abrogated by the latter.” Id. at 248 .

1976In Ellis v. Ellis, 19 Md.

1974Walter v. State, 4 Md.

1967Nothing here is remotely analogous to the change in state law that occurred in Bell v. Maryland, 378 U. S. 226 , or to the intervening judgments of this Court that took place in Patterson v. Alabama, 294 U. S. 600 , and in Dorchy v. Kansas, 264 U. S. 286 .

1967Nothing here is remotely analogous to the change in state law that occurred in Bell v. Maryland, 378 U. S. 226 , or to the intervening judgments of this Court that took place in Patterson v. Alabama, 294 U. S. 600 , and in Dorchy v. Kansas, 264 U. S. 286 .

1967Nothing here is remotely analogous to the change in state law that occurred in Bell v. Maryland, 378 U. S. 226 , or to the intervening judgments of this Court that took place in Patterson v. Alabama, 294 U. S. 600 , and in Dorchy v. Kansas, 264 U. S. 286 .