Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1939–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Werner v. Hearst Publications, Inc.green2 sentences2009Likewise, in Werner v. Hearst Publications, Inc., 65 Cal.App.2d 667 , 151 P.2d 308, 312 (1944), individuals who sent a letter to an investigator for a state bar association complaining about an attorney did not institute the show cause proceeding against the attorney, where the local bar association committee made an independent investigation and one of its members signed the complaint initiating the proceeding. 2009Likewise, in Werner v. Hearst Publications, Inc., 65 Cal.App.2d 667 , 151 P.2d 308, 312 (1944), individuals who sent a letter to an investigator for a state bar association complaining about an attorney did not institute the show cause proceeding against the attorney, where the local bar association committee made an independent investigation and one of its members signed the complaint initiating the proceeding. | 1 | 1 |
Stanwyck v. Hornegreen2 sentences2009This holding was reaffirmed in Stanwyck v. Horne, 146 Cal.App.3d 450 , 194 Cal.Rptr. 228, 234 (1983).” 963 S.W.2d at 686 . 2009This holding was reaffirmed in Stanwyck v. Horne, 146 Cal.App.3d 450 , 194 Cal.Rptr. 228, 234 (1983).” 963 S.W.2d at 686 . | 1 | 1 |
Nikolic v. City of Montgomerygreen1 sentence2000See Nikolic v. City of *Page 464 Montgomery , 441 So.2d 997 , 1000 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983) (even though defendants' disorderly conduct occurred while they were attempting to legally apprehend "lawless patrons" in a local bar, the evidence was sufficient to establish disorderly conduct). | 1 | 1 |
Alabama Public Service Commission v. Redwing Carriers, Inc.green2 sentences1983See Alabama Public Service Commission v. Redwing Carriers, Inc. , 281 Ala. 111 , 199 So.2d 653 (1967). 1983See Alabama Public Service Commission v. Redwing Carriers, Inc. , 281 Ala. 111 , 199 So.2d 653 (1967). | 1 | 1 |
Selby v. Moneygreen1 sentence1983See Selby v. Money , 403 So.2d 218 , 220 (Ala. 1981). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Davis v. Board of Educ. City of St. Louis
green
2 sentences2009This holding was reaffirmed in Stanwyck v. Horne, 146 Cal.App.3d 450 , 194 Cal.Rptr. 228, 234 (1983).” 963 S.W.2d at 686 . 2009This holding was reaffirmed in Stanwyck v. Horne, 146 Cal.App.3d 450 , 194 Cal.Rptr. 228, 234 (1983)." 963 S.W.2d at 686 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Talley v. State
neutral
2 sentences2000Cf. Tally v. State , 12 Ala. App. 314 , 68 So. 567 (Ala.App. 1915) (in a prosecution for using obscene or insulting language to a woman, a defendant is not permitted to testify that he meant nothing offensive by his statements). 2000Cf. Tally v. State , 12 Ala. App. 314 , 68 So. 567 (Ala.App. 1915) (in a prosecution for using obscene or insulting language to a woman, a defendant is not permitted to testify that he meant nothing offensive by his statements). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Toups
green
1 sentence1995In reaching its conclusion, the appellate court noted that in matters of mere local concern or in which a local rule determines the rights and liabilities between the parties, the issue becomes whether applying the local rule would “necessarily work a material prejudice to any characteristic feature of the general maritime law, or interfere with the proper harmony or uniformity of that law in its international or interstate relations.” Id. at 546 , quoting Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. Rohde, 257 U.S. 469 , 42 S.Ct. 157 , 66 L.Ed. 321 (1922); See Davis, supra; Millers’ Indemnity Underwriters | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. Rohde
green
2 sentences1995In reaching its conclusion, the appellate court noted that in matters of mere local concern or in which a local rule determines the rights and liabilities between the parties, the issue becomes whether applying the local rule would “necessarily work a material prejudice to any characteristic feature of the general maritime law, or interfere with the proper harmony or uniformity of that law in its international or interstate relations.” Id. at 546 , quoting Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. Rohde, 257 U.S. 469 , 42 S.Ct. 157 , 66 L.Ed. 321 (1922); See Davis, supra; Millers’ Indemnity Underwriters 1995In reaching its conclusion, the appellate court noted that in matters of mere local concern or in which a local rule determines the rights and liabilities between the parties, the issue becomes whether applying the local rule would “necessarily work a material prejudice to any characteristic feature of the general maritime law, or interfere with the proper harmony or uniformity of that law in its international or interstate relations.” Id. at 546 , quoting Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. Rohde, 257 U.S. 469 , 42 S.Ct. 157 , 66 L.Ed. 321 (1922); See Davis, supra; Millers’ Indemnity Underwriters | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. Braud
green
2 sentences1995In reaching its conclusion, the appellate court noted that in matters of mere local concern or in which a local rule determines the rights and liabilities between the parties, the issue becomes whether applying the local rule would “necessarily work a material prejudice to any characteristic feature of the general maritime law, or interfere with the proper harmony or uniformity of that law in its international or interstate relations.” Id. at 546 , quoting Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. Rohde, 257 U.S. 469 , 42 S.Ct. 157 , 66 L.Ed. 321 (1922); See Davis, supra; Millers’ Indemnity Underwriters 1995In reaching its conclusion, the appellate court noted that in matters of mere local concern or in which a local rule determines the rights and liabilities between the parties, the issue becomes whether applying the local rule would “necessarily work a material prejudice to any characteristic feature of the general maritime law, or interfere with the proper harmony or uniformity of that law in its international or interstate relations.” Id. at 546 , quoting Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. Rohde, 257 U.S. 469 , 42 S.Ct. 157 , 66 L.Ed. 321 (1922); See Davis, supra; Millers’ Indemnity Underwriters | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Weeks v. EAST ALABAMA WATER, ETC.
green
1 sentence1988Weeks, supra. Counts 2 and 3 Count 2 of Klein's complaint petitioned the court for a writ of mandamus directing the Board and the Committee to vacate the order of the Committee affirming the recommendations and findings of the local hearing committee. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
O'Neill v. Delaney
neutral
1 sentence1940Harris et al. v. Backman, et al., 160 Or. 520 , 86 P.2d 456 ; Low et al. v. Harris et al., 7 Cir., 90 F.2d 783 ; O’Neill v. Delaney, Sup.Ct., 158 N.Y.S. 665 ; Lumber and Sawmill Workers Union No. 2623 et al. v. International Woodworkers of America, etc., 197 Wash. 491 , 85 P.2d 1099 ; Local No. 2508 Lumber & Sawmill Workers, et al. v. Cairns, et al., 197 Wash. 476 , 85 P.2d 1109 ; 63 C.J. 662, § 11. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Low v. Harris
neutral
1 sentence1940Harris et al. v. Backman, et al., 160 Or. 520 , 86 P.2d 456 ; Low et al. v. Harris et al., 7 Cir., 90 F.2d 783 ; O’Neill v. Delaney, Sup.Ct., 158 N.Y.S. 665 ; Lumber and Sawmill Workers Union No. 2623 et al. v. International Woodworkers of America, etc., 197 Wash. 491 , 85 P.2d 1099 ; Local No. 2508 Lumber & Sawmill Workers, et al. v. Cairns, et al., 197 Wash. 476 , 85 P.2d 1109 ; 63 C.J. 662, § 11. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Harris Ex Rel. Carpenters Union No. 2573 v. Backman
green
2 sentences1940Harris et al. v. Backman, et al., 160 Or. 520 , 86 P.2d 456 ; Low et al. v. Harris et al., 7 Cir., 90 F.2d 783 ; O’Neill v. Delaney, Sup.Ct., 158 N.Y.S. 665 ; Lumber and Sawmill Workers Union No. 2623 et al. v. International Woodworkers of America, etc., 197 Wash. 491 , 85 P.2d 1099 ; Local No. 2508 Lumber & Sawmill Workers, et al. v. Cairns, et al., 197 Wash. 476 , 85 P.2d 1109 ; 63 C.J. 662, § 11. 1940Harris et al. v. Backman, et al., 160 Or. 520 , 86 P.2d 456 ; Low et al. v. Harris et al., 7 Cir., 90 F.2d 783 ; O’Neill v. Delaney, Sup.Ct., 158 N.Y.S. 665 ; Lumber and Sawmill Workers Union No. 2623 et al. v. International Woodworkers of America, etc., 197 Wash. 491 , 85 P.2d 1099 ; Local No. 2508 Lumber & Sawmill Workers, et al. v. Cairns, et al., 197 Wash. 476 , 85 P.2d 1109 ; 63 C.J. 662, § 11. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Local No. 2508 Lumber & Sawmill Workers v. Cairns
green
2 sentences1940Harris et al. v. Backman, et al., 160 Or. 520 , 86 P.2d 456 ; Low et al. v. Harris et al., 7 Cir., 90 F.2d 783 ; O’Neill v. Delaney, Sup.Ct., 158 N.Y.S. 665 ; Lumber and Sawmill Workers Union No. 2623 et al. v. International Woodworkers of America, etc., 197 Wash. 491 , 85 P.2d 1099 ; Local No. 2508 Lumber & Sawmill Workers, et al. v. Cairns, et al., 197 Wash. 476 , 85 P.2d 1109 ; 63 C.J. 662, § 11. 1940Harris et al. v. Backman, et al., 160 Or. 520 , 86 P.2d 456 ; Low et al. v. Harris et al., 7 Cir., 90 F.2d 783 ; O’Neill v. Delaney, Sup.Ct., 158 N.Y.S. 665 ; Lumber and Sawmill Workers Union No. 2623 et al. v. International Woodworkers of America, etc., 197 Wash. 491 , 85 P.2d 1099 ; Local No. 2508 Lumber & Sawmill Workers, et al. v. Cairns, et al., 197 Wash. 476 , 85 P.2d 1109 ; 63 C.J. 662, § 11. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Lumber & Sawmill Workers Union No. 2623 v. International Woodworkers of America, Local No. 49
neutral
2 sentences1940Harris et al. v. Backman, et al., 160 Or. 520 , 86 P.2d 456 ; Low et al. v. Harris et al., 7 Cir., 90 F.2d 783 ; O’Neill v. Delaney, Sup.Ct., 158 N.Y.S. 665 ; Lumber and Sawmill Workers Union No. 2623 et al. v. International Woodworkers of America, etc., 197 Wash. 491 , 85 P.2d 1099 ; Local No. 2508 Lumber & Sawmill Workers, et al. v. Cairns, et al., 197 Wash. 476 , 85 P.2d 1109 ; 63 C.J. 662, § 11. 1940Harris et al. v. Backman, et al., 160 Or. 520 , 86 P.2d 456 ; Low et al. v. Harris et al., 7 Cir., 90 F.2d 783 ; O’Neill v. Delaney, Sup.Ct., 158 N.Y.S. 665 ; Lumber and Sawmill Workers Union No. 2623 et al. v. International Woodworkers of America, etc., 197 Wash. 491 , 85 P.2d 1099 ; Local No. 2508 Lumber & Sawmill Workers, et al. v. Cairns, et al., 197 Wash. 476 , 85 P.2d 1109 ; 63 C.J. 662, § 11. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Gwin, White & Prince, Inc. v. Henneford
green
1 sentence1939The vice characteristic of those which have been held invalid is that they have placed on the commerce burdens of such a nature as to be capable in point of substance, of being imposed * * * with equal right by every state which the commerce touches, merely because interstate commerce is being done, so that without the protection of the commerce clause it would bear cumulative burdens not imposed on local commerce. ****** “Taxation measured by gross receipts from interstate commerce has been sustained when fairly apportioned to the commerce carried on within the taxing state * * * and in other | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.