Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Oklahoma opinions name it 3 courts 1943–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Frade v. Costagreen2 sentences2001MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc., 565 So.2d 1332, 1338 (Fla.1990), quoting, Frade v. Costa, 342 Mass. 5 , 171 N.E.2d 863, 865 (1961). 2001MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc., 565 So.2d 1332, 1338 (Fla.1990), quoting, Frade v. Costa, 342 Mass. 5 , 171 N.E.2d 863, 865 (1961). | 1 | 1 |
MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc.green2 sentences2001Mac-Kenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc., 565 So.2d 1332, 1338 (Fla.1990), quoting, Frade v. Costa, 342 Mass. 5 , 171 N.E.2d 863, 865 (1961). 2001MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc., 565 So.2d 1332, 1338 (Fla.1990), quoting, Frade v. Costa, 342 Mass. 5 , 171 N.E.2d 863, 865 (1961). | 1 | 1 |
Texas Oklahoma Express v. Sorensongreen2 sentences1997Texas Oklahoma Express v. Sorenson, 652 P.2d 285, 287 (Okla.1982); Oklahoma County Sheriff v. Hunter, 615 P.2d 1007, 1008 (Okla.1980). 1997Texas Oklahoma Express v. Sorenson, 652 P.2d 285, 287 (Okla.1982); Oklahoma County Sheriff v. Hunter, 615 P.2d 1007, 1008 (Okla. 1980). | 1 | 1 |
Oklahoma County Sheriff v. Huntergreen2 sentences1997Texas Oklahoma Express v. Sorenson, 652 P.2d 285, 287 (Okla.1982); Oklahoma County Sheriff v. Hunter, 615 P.2d 1007, 1008 (Okla.1980). 1997Texas Oklahoma Express v. Sorenson, 652 P.2d 285, 287 (Okla.1982); Oklahoma County Sheriff v. Hunter, 615 P.2d 1007, 1008 (Okla. 1980). | 1 | 1 |
Sizemore v. Dillgreen2 sentences1943See, in this connection, Sizemore v. Dill, 93 Okla. 176 , 220 P. 352 ; Home State Bank v. Haynes, 144 Okla. 190 , 290 P. 338 ; Stull v. Hoehn, 191 Okla. 190 , 126 P. 2d 1007 . 1943See, in this connection, Sizemore v. Dill, 93 Okla. 176 , 220 P. 352 ; Home State Bank v. Haynes, 144 Okla. 190 , 290 P. 338 ; Stull v. Hoehn, 191 Okla. 190 , 126 P. 2d 1007 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Stone v. CSX Transportation, Inc.green1 sentence2002But see Stone v. CSX Transp., Inc., 37 F.Supp.2d 789, 795 (S.D.W.Va.1999) (using state negligence law as the local rule for purposes of determining whether a claim was saved under § 20106). 41 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McMillian v. Holcomb
green
2 sentences1997Our treatment of the local rule in question is perfectly consistent with 12 O.S. § 696.2, and McMillian, supra. 1997Our treatment of the local rule in question is perfectly consistent with 12 O.S. § 696.2, and McMillian, supra . [1] The terms of Art. 5, § 46, Okl. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Hood
green
2 sentences1994For an example of the General Counsel’s proper use of a county bar association’s grievance committee services, see Hood, supra note 6 , 406 P.2d at 979 . 15 . 1994For an example of the General Counsel’s proper use of a county bar association’s grievance committee services, see Hood, supra note 6 , 406 P.2d at 979 . 15 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Frazier v. Heebe
green
2 sentences1989In Frazier v. Heebe, ___ U.S. ___, 107 S.Ct. 2607 , 96 L.Ed. 2d 557 (1987), the Court specifically rejected the argument that such residency requirement facilitated the efficient administration of justice, because nonresident attorneys allegedly are less competent and less available to the court than resident attorneys, and noted that a client may have a number of excellent reasons to select a non-local lawyer. 1989In Frazier v. Heebe, ___ U.S. ___, 107 S.Ct. 2607 , 96 L.Ed. 2d 557 (1987), the Court specifically rejected the argument that such residency requirement facilitated the efficient administration of justice, because nonresident attorneys allegedly are less competent and less available to the court than resident attorneys, and noted that a client may have a number of excellent reasons to select a non-local lawyer. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Supreme Court of NH v. Piper
green
1 sentence1989In deciding whether the discrimination bears a close or substantial relationship to the State's objective, the Court has considered the availability of less restrictive means. 470 U.S. at 284 , 84 L.Ed.2d at 213 . ¶ 7 However, the Court held that although a lawyer is "an officer of the court," he does not hold a position that can be entrusted only to a "full-fledged member of the political community." Therefore, the New Hampshire bar residency requirement was not based on a "substantial" reason, and the difference in treatment between residents and nonresidents did not bear a close or substant | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Roth v. United States
green
2 sentences1973In Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 485 , 77 S.Ct. 1304, 1309 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1498 (1957), the United States Supreme Court held that “obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.” Thus the states have been free to regulate obscenity excluding certain areas such as private possession. 1973In Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 485 , 77 S.Ct. 1304, 1309 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1498 (1957), the United States Supreme Court held that “obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.” Thus the states have been free to regulate obscenity excluding certain areas such as private possession. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Jacobellis v. Ohio
green
2 sentences1973Defendants argue the failure to include the “utterly without redeeming social value” test, Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 418-419 , 86 S.Ct. 975 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1 (1966), and failure to specify that the “Contemporary community standard” to be applied is a national, not a local standard, Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 , 84 S.Ct. 1676 , 12 L.Ed.2d 793 (1964), renders our statutes unconstitutional on their face. 1973Defendants argue the failure to include the “utterly without redeeming social value” test, Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 418-419 , 86 S.Ct. 975 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1 (1966), and failure to specify that the “Contemporary community standard” to be applied is a national, not a local standard, Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 , 84 S.Ct. 1676 , 12 L.Ed.2d 793 (1964), renders our statutes unconstitutional on their face. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
A Book Named \John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure\" v. Attorney General of Massachusetts"
green
2 sentences1973Defendants argue the failure to include the “utterly without redeeming social value” test, Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 418-419 , 86 S.Ct. 975 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1 (1966), and failure to specify that the “Contemporary community standard” to be applied is a national, not a local standard, Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 , 84 S.Ct. 1676 , 12 L.Ed.2d 793 (1964), renders our statutes unconstitutional on their face. 1973Defendants argue the failure to include the “utterly without redeeming social value” test, Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 418-419 , 86 S.Ct. 975 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1 (1966), and failure to specify that the “Contemporary community standard” to be applied is a national, not a local standard, Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 , 84 S.Ct. 1676 , 12 L.Ed.2d 793 (1964), renders our statutes unconstitutional on their face. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Home State Bank of Arcadia v. Haynes
neutral
2 sentences1943See, in this connection, Sizemore v. Dill, 93 Okla. 176 , 220 P. 352 ; Home State Bank v. Haynes, 144 Okla. 190 , 290 P. 338 ; Stull v. Hoehn, 191 Okla. 190 , 126 P. 2d 1007 . 1943See, in this connection, Sizemore v. Dill, 93 Okla. 176 , 220 P. 352 ; Home State Bank v. Haynes, 144 Okla. 190 , 290 P. 338 ; Stull v. Hoehn, 191 Okla. 190 , 126 P. 2d 1007 . | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Stull v. Hoehn
neutral
2 sentences1943See, in this connection, Sizemore v. Dill, 93 Okla. 176 , 220 P. 352 ; Home State Bank v. Haynes, 144 Okla. 190 , 290 P. 338 ; Stull v. Hoehn, 191 Okla. 190 , 126 P. 2d 1007 . 1943See, in this connection, Sizemore v. Dill, 93 Okla. 176 , 220 P. 352 ; Home State Bank v. Haynes, 144 Okla. 190 , 290 P. 338 ; Stull v. Hoehn, 191 Okla. 190 , 126 P. 2d 1007 . | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.