Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
169 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2024 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mart v. Hillgreen2 sentences2014The supreme court’s two part test for appellate review of a factual finding requires: “1) The appellate court must find from the record that there is a reasonable factual basis for the finding of the trial court, and 2) The appellate court must further determine that the record establishes that the finding is not clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous).” Mart v. Hill, 505 So.2d 1120, 1127 (La.1987). 2009In Mart v. Hill, 505 So.2d 1120, 1127 (La.1987), the Supreme Court set out a two part test for the reversal of fact finder’s determinations: 1„1) The appellate court must find for the record that a reasonable factual basis does not exist for the finding of the trial court. 2) The appellate court must further determine that the record establishes that the finding is clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous.) In Langenstein’s first and second assignments of error, Langenstein’s argues that the trial court committed manifest error in finding that Ms. LaFleur did not violate Louisiana Revised Statute 2 | 7 | 10 |
State v. Fullergreen2 sentences2017The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is to be assessed by the two part test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); State v. Fuller, 454 So.2d 119 (La.1984). 2016Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are assessed by the two part test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); State v. Fuller, 454 So.2d 119 (La. 1984). | 5 | 89 |
Stobart v. State Through DOTDgreen2 sentences2003In Stobart v. State through Dept. of Transp. and Development, 617 So.2d 880, 882 (La.1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court outlined a two part test for the reversal of a fact finder’s determinations: 1) The appellate court must find from the record that a reasonable factual basis does not exist for the finding of the trial court, and 2) the appellate court must further determine that the record establishes that the finding is clearly | ¡¡wrong or manifestly erroneous. 1998In Stobart v. State, Through DOTD, 617 So.2d 880 (La.1993), the court reiterated that application of this standard involves a two part inquiry for reversal of factual findings. | 4 | 14 |
B & L ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Crumpgreen2 sentences1990Arceneaux, 365 So.2d at 1333 ; B and L Associates, Inc. v. Crump, 369 So.2d 1094, 1095 (La.App. 1st Cir.1979). 1988Arceneaux, 365 So.2d at 1333 ; B and L Associates, Inc. v. Crump, 369 So.2d 1094, 1095 (La.App. 1st Cir.1979). | 4 | 4 |
Arceneaux v. Dominguegreen2 sentences1999The Louisiana Supreme Court developed a two part test for reviewing factual issues on appeal in Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330, 1333 (La.1978). 1998The Louisiana Supreme Court developed a two part test for reviewing factual issues on appeal in Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330, 1333 (La.1978). | 3 | 11 |
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.green2 sentences2023Procedurally, “[t]he standard of review for a JNOV on appeal is a two part inquiry.” Id., p. 5, 774 So. 2d at 89 . 2017“The standard of review for a JNOV on appeal is a two part inquiry.” Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445, p. 5 (La. 11/28/00), 774 So.2d 84, 89 . | 1 | 5 |
State v. Sparrowgreen2 sentences1998In evaluating Mr. Anderson's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, we apply the standard set forth in State v. Sparrow, 612 So.2d 191 (La.App. 4 Cir.1992): The relator's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is to be assessed by the two part test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); State v. Fuller, 454 So.2d 119 (La.1984). 1997In evaluating defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel we apply the standard set forth by this Court in State v. Sparrow, 612 So.2d 191, 199 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1992): The relator's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is to be assessed by the two part test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); State v. Fuller, 454 So.2d 119 (La.1984). | 1 | 2 |
Rousset v. Smithgreen1 sentence2022App. 4 Cir. 9/23/15), 176 So.3d 632, 648 (citing Scarberry v. Entergy Corp., 13-0214, p. 16 (La. | 1 | 1 |
Osherow v. Ernst & Young, LLP (In Re Intelogic Trace, Inc.)green1 sentence2015That finding is determined by a two part inquiry: (1) whether, and to what extent, the plaintiff had actual or imputed awareness, during the first proceeding, of a real potential for the currently asserted claim, and (2) whether the tribunal in the earlier litigation possessed the procedural mechanisms that would have allowed the plaintiff to assert such a claim.n See In re Paige, 610 F.3d 865, 873-74 (5th Cir.2010); In re Intelogic Trace, Inc., 200 F.3d 382, 388 (5th Cir.2000); Matter of Howe, 913 F.2d 1138 , 1144-1145 (5th Cir.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Ries v. Paige (In Re Paige)green2 sentences2015That finding is determined by a two part inquiry: (1) whether, and to what extent, the plaintiff had actual or imputed awareness, during the first proceeding, of a real potential for the currently asserted claim, and (2) whether the tribunal in the earlier litigation possessed the procedural mechanisms that would have allowed the plaintiff to assert such a claim.n See In re Paige, 610 F.3d 865, 873-74 (5th Cir.2010); In re Intelogic Trace, Inc., 200 F.3d 382, 388 (5th Cir.2000); Matter of Howe, 913 F.2d 1138 , 1144-1145 (5th Cir.1990). 2015As the Fifth Circuit has explained about this additional test, “[ojnly if we determine that the claims asserted here could and should have been asserted in the earlier ... proceeding are [the] claims barred by res judicata.” In re Paige, 610 F.3d at 873 . | 1 | 1 |
| Scott v. Hosp. Serv. Dist. No. 1green | 1 | 1 |
| Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheriesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Ragsdalegreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Colartegreen | 1 | 1 |
| De Reyes v. Marine Mgt. and Consultinggreen | 1 | 1 |
| Schneckloth v. Bustamontegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2019The claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is assessed under the two- part test from Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 1984 ). 2019The claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is assessed under the two- part test from Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 1984 ). | 103 | 1986–2019 |
State v. Ratcliff
green
2 sentences2001State v. Seiss, 428 So.2d 444 (La.1983); State v. Ratcliff, 416 So.2d 528 (La.1982); State v. Garland, 482 So.2d 133 (La.App. 4 Cir.1986); State v. Landry, 499 So.2d 1320 (La.App. 4 Cir.1986). 17The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is to be assessed by the two part test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); State v. Fuller, 454 So.2d 119 (La.1984). 2000State v. Seiss, 428 So.2d 444 (La.1983); State v. Ratcliff, 416 So.2d 528 (La.1982); State v. Garland, 482 So.2d 133 (La.App. 4 Cir.1986); State v. Landry, 499 So.2d 1320 (La.App. 4 Cir.1986). | /The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is to be assessed by the two part test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); State v. Fuller, 454 So.2d 119 (La.1984). | 4 | 1987–2001 |
State v. Seiss
green
2 sentences2001State v. Seiss, 428 So.2d 444 (La.1983); State v. Ratcliff, 416 So.2d 528 (La.1982); State v. Garland, 482 So.2d 133 (La.App. 4 Cir.1986); State v. Landry, 499 So.2d 1320 (La.App. 4 Cir.1986). 17The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is to be assessed by the two part test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); State v. Fuller, 454 So.2d 119 (La.1984). 2000State v. Seiss, 428 So.2d 444 (La.1983); State v. Ratcliff, 416 So.2d 528 (La.1982); State v. Garland, 482 So.2d 133 (La.App. 4 Cir.1986); State v. Landry, 499 So.2d 1320 (La.App. 4 Cir.1986). | /The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is to be assessed by the two part test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); State v. Fuller, 454 So.2d 119 (La.1984). | 4 | 1987–2001 |
State v. Garland
green
2 sentences2001State v. Seiss, 428 So.2d 444 (La.1983); State v. Ratcliff, 416 So.2d 528 (La.1982); State v. Garland, 482 So.2d 133 (La.App. 4 Cir.1986); State v. Landry, 499 So.2d 1320 (La.App. 4 Cir.1986). 17The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is to be assessed by the two part test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); State v. Fuller, 454 So.2d 119 (La.1984). 2000State v. Seiss, 428 So.2d 444 (La.1983); State v. Ratcliff, 416 So.2d 528 (La.1982); State v. Garland, 482 So.2d 133 (La.App. 4 Cir.1986); State v. Landry, 499 So.2d 1320 (La.App. 4 Cir.1986). | /The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is to be assessed by the two part test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); State v. Fuller, 454 So.2d 119 (La.1984). | 3 | 1999–2001 |
State v. Landry
green
2 sentences2001State v. Seiss, 428 So.2d 444 (La.1983); State v. Ratcliff, 416 So.2d 528 (La.1982); State v. Garland, 482 So.2d 133 (La.App. 4 Cir.1986); State v. Landry, 499 So.2d 1320 (La.App. 4 Cir.1986). 17The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is to be assessed by the two part test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); State v. Fuller, 454 So.2d 119 (La.1984). 2000State v. Seiss, 428 So.2d 444 (La.1983); State v. Ratcliff, 416 So.2d 528 (La.1982); State v. Garland, 482 So.2d 133 (La.App. 4 Cir.1986); State v. Landry, 499 So.2d 1320 (La.App. 4 Cir.1986). | /The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is to be assessed by the two part test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); State v. Fuller, 454 So.2d 119 (La.1984). | 3 | 1999–2001 |
State v. Washington
green
2 sentences2009State v. Washington, 491 So.2d 1337 (La.1986). 2002State v. Washington, 491 So.2d 1337 (La. 1986). | 2 | 2002–2009 |
Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of Cleveland
green
2 sentences2002In Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of Cleveland, Ohio, 409 U.S. 249 , 93 S.Ct. 493 , 34 L.Ed.2d 454 (1972), a case involving an airplane crash into navigable waters, the Court provided a two part test for maritime tort jurisdiction known as the "locality plus nexus" test, which provides that for a tort to fall under admiralty jurisdiction of the court, it must occur on or over navigable waters and the tort must "bear a significant relationship to traditional maritime activity." Id., 93 S.Ct. at 504 . 2002In Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of Cleveland, Ohio, 409 U.S. 249 , 93 S.Ct. 493 , 34 L.Ed.2d 454 (1972), a case involving an airplane crash into navigable waters, the Court provided a two part test for maritime tort jurisdiction known as the "locality plus nexus" test, which provides that for a tort to fall under admiralty jurisdiction of the court, it must occur on or over navigable waters and the tort must "bear a significant relationship to traditional maritime activity." Id., 93 S.Ct. at 504 . | 2 | 2001–2002 |
Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government v. Person
neutral
1 sentence2024Lafayette City -Parish Consolidated Government v. Person, 2012- 0307 La. 10 / 16/ 12), 100 So. 3d 293 , 297- 98. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Hammons v. St. Paul ex rel. St. Paul
green
1 sentence2022In Hammons, 12-0346, pp. 5-6, 101 So.3d at 1010-11 , this Court set forth the two- part inquiry that appellate courts use when reviewing the district court’s determination to grant or deny a JNOV: First, using the same criteria the trial court uses in deciding whether to grant JNOV, the appellate court must determine if the trial court erred. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
NorthShore Regional Medical Center, L.L.C. v. Dill
green
1 sentence2020Northshore Regional Medical Center, 94 So. 3d at 162 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis
green
2 sentences2018While the term "seaman" is not defined in the Jones Act, the United States Supreme Court in Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis , 515 U.S. 347 , 368, 115 S.Ct. 2172 , 2190, 132 L.Ed.2d 314 (1995), articulated a two part test. 2018While the term "seaman" is not defined in the Jones Act, the United States Supreme Court in Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis , 515 U.S. 347 , 368, 115 S.Ct. 2172 , 2190, 132 L.Ed.2d 314 (1995), articulated a two part test. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Howe v. Vaughan
green
1 sentence2015That finding is determined by a two part inquiry: (1) whether, and to what extent, the plaintiff had actual or imputed awareness, during the first proceeding, of a real potential for the currently asserted claim, and (2) whether the tribunal in the earlier litigation possessed the procedural mechanisms that would have allowed the plaintiff to assert such a claim.n See In re Paige, 610 F.3d 865, 873-74 (5th Cir.2010); In re Intelogic Trace, Inc., 200 F.3d 382, 388 (5th Cir.2000); Matter of Howe, 913 F.2d 1138 , 1144-1145 (5th Cir.1990). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Bigelow v. CRESCENT TITLE, LLC
green
1 sentence2012In Bigelow v. Crescent Title, LLC, 08-0932, p. 6 (La.App. 4 Cir. 10/15/08), 997 So.2d 83, 87 , this Court explained that the standard of review for a JNOV is a two part inquiry. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Kern v. Southport Mill, Ltd.
green
2 sentences2007Kern v. Southport Mill, 174 La. 432 , 141 So. 19 (1932). 2007Kern v. Southport Mill, 174 La. 432 , 141 So. 19 (1932). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Weatherford v. Commercial Union Ins.
green
1 sentence2005Weatherford v. Commercial Union Ins., 94-1793, 94-1927 (La.2/20/95) 650 So.2d 763 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Namet v. United States
green
2 sentences2005Nonetheless, this court applied the two part test set forth in Namet v. United States, 373 U.S. 179 , 83 S.Ct. 1151 , 10 L.Ed.2d 278 (1963), to determine whether reversible error had been committed when the witness refused to answer in the presence of the jury. 2005Nonetheless, this court applied the two part test set forth in Namet v. United States, 373 U.S. 179 , 83 S.Ct. 1151 , 10 L.Ed.2d 278 (1963), to determine whether reversible error had been committed when the witness refused to answer in the presence of the jury. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Carter v. CITY PARISH GOVERNMENT, ETC.
green
1 sentence2004The Supreme Court, in Carter v. City Parish Government, Etc., 423 So.2d 1080 (La.1982), established a two part analysis to be used to determine if the “arising-out-of-use” provision of an uninsured motorist policy has been met. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Martin v. Heritage Manor South
green
1 sentence2004Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), 784 So.2d 627 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Sisson v. Ruby
green
2 sentences2002Our next inquiry turns to the two part test enunciated in Sisson, 497 U.S. 358 , 110 S.Ct. 2892 , 111 L.Ed.2d 292 . 2002Our next inquiry turns to the two part test enunciated in Sisson, 497 U.S. 358 , 110 S.Ct. 2892 , 111 L.Ed.2d 292 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
| State v. Jason green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| Foremost Insurance v. Richardson green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Harlow v. Fitzgerald
green
2 sentences2001In its oral reasons for judgment, the trial court found Secretary Stalder had qualified immunity for discretionary functions under the two part test enunciated in Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982). 2001In its oral reasons for judgment, the trial court found Secretary Stalder had qualified immunity for discretionary functions under the two part test enunciated in Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| State v. Karston green | 1 | 2000–2000 |
| State v. Johnson green | 1 | 1999–1999 |
| State v. Perez green | 1 | 1999–1999 |
| Robinson v. Dunn green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Reed v. Direct Installers green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Robinson v. Dunn green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Kyle v. City of New Orleans green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| McLain v. Glenwood Regional Medical Center green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Stubbs v. Parish of East Baton Rouge green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Picou v. Terrebonne Parish Sheriff's Office green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Kirby v. Illinois green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| United States v. Ash green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Coleman v. Alabama green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| McDermott International, Inc. v. Wilander green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| State v. Johnson neutral | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| cluster 248059 green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| State v. Messiah green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| Ratcliff v. Town of Mandeville green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.