Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
24 North Carolina opinions name it 3 courts 1987–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Braswellgreen2 sentences2026CALVO-HERNANDEZ Opinion of the Court To establish IAC, a “defendant must satisfy a two part test.” State v. Braswell, 312 N.C. 553, 562 , 324 S.E.2d 241, 248 (1985). “ ‘First, the defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient.’ ” Id. at 562 , 324 S.E.2d at 248 (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L. 2026CALVO-HERNANDEZ Opinion of the Court To establish IAC, a “defendant must satisfy a two part test.” State v. Braswell, 312 N.C. 553, 562 , 324 S.E.2d 241, 248 (1985). “ ‘First, the defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient.’ ” Id. at 562 , 324 S.E.2d at 248 (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L. | 4 | 5 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2026CALVO-HERNANDEZ Opinion of the Court To establish IAC, a “defendant must satisfy a two part test.” State v. Braswell, 312 N.C. 553, 562 , 324 S.E.2d 241, 248 (1985). “ ‘First, the defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient.’ ” Id. at 562 , 324 S.E.2d at 248 (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L. 2026CALVO-HERNANDEZ Opinion of the Court To establish IAC, a “defendant must satisfy a two part test.” State v. Braswell, 312 N.C. 553, 562 , 324 S.E.2d 241, 248 (1985). “ ‘First, the defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient.’ ” Id. at 562 , 324 S.E.2d at 248 (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L. | 2 | 3 |
State v. Hinnantgreen2 sentences2026ALCANTAR-CONRADO Opinion of the Court Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment require a two- part analysis: “(1) whether the declarant’s statements were made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment; and (2) whether the declarant’s statements were reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment.” State v. Hinnant, 351 N.C. 277, 284 , 523 S.E.2d 663, 667 (2000) (citation omitted). 2026ALCANTAR-CONRADO Opinion of the Court Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment require a two- part analysis: “(1) whether the declarant’s statements were made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment; and (2) whether the declarant’s statements were reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment.” State v. Hinnant, 351 N.C. 277, 284 , 523 S.E.2d 663, 667 (2000) (citation omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Golds v. Central Express, Inc.green2 sentences2012In order to determine whether our courts may exercise personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant, we apply a two part test: “(1) Does a statutory basis for personal jurisdiction exist, and (2) If so, does the exercise of this jurisdiction violate constitutional due process?” Golds v. Central Express, Inc., 142 N.C. 2012In order to determine whether our Court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant, we apply a two part test: “(1) Does a statutory basis for personal jurisdiction exist, and (2) If so, does the exercise of this jurisdiction violate constitutional due process?” Golds v. Central Express, Inc., 142 N.C. | 2 | 2 |
In Re Bakergreen2 sentences2005See In re Baker, 158 N.C.App. 491, 494 , 581 S.E.2d 144, 146 (2003). 2005See In re Baker, 158 N.C.App. 491, 494 , 581 S.E.2d 144, 146 (2003). | 2 | 2 |
Sykes v. Health Network Solutions, Inc.green1 sentence2019To determine whether this exception applies, the Court must conduct a two- part inquiry: “(1) the entity or person whose conduct is being challenged must be a member of a learned profession, and (2) the challenged conduct must constitute a rendering of professional services.” Sykes v. Health Network Sols, Inc., 828 S.E.2d 467, 472 (N.C. 2019); Wheeless v. Maria Parham Med. | 1 | 1 |
Plasman v. Decca Furniture (USA), Inc.green1 sentence2019On the question of what constitutes a substantial right that will be adversely affected, “a two part test has developed—the right itself must be substantial and the deprivation of that substantial right must potentially work injury to [the appellant] if not corrected before appeal from final judgment.” Plasman v. Decca Furniture (USA), Inc., 800 S.E.2d 761, 768 (N.C. | 1 | 1 |
Madison Cablevision, Inc. v. City of Morgantongreen2 sentences2015In Madison Cablevision, Inc. v. City of Morganton this Court articulated a two- part test for determining if a spending statute complies with the requirements of the North Carolina Constitution as found in Article V, Section 2(1), which is quoted above and known as the “public purpose” clause. 325 N.C. 634, 646 , 386 S.E.2d 200 , 207 (1989). 2015In Madison Cablevision, Inc. v. City of Morganton this Court articulated a two- part test for determining if a spending statute complies with the requirements of the North Carolina Constitution as found in Article V, Section 2(1), which is quoted above and known as the “public purpose” clause. 325 N.C. 634, 646 , 386 S.E.2d 200 , 207 (1989). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hallgreen1 sentence2012“The trial court’s determination [of the ‘limited mental capacity’ mitigating factor] involves a two part inquiry: (1) whether the defendant suffers from a limited mental capacity (or from ‘immaturity’) and (2) if so, its effect on his culpability for the offense.” Id. at 455, 355 S.E.2d at 255 (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Laddgreen2 sentences2005See id. (holding first that a constitutional violation had occurred and then conducting analysis to determine if it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt); Elmore, 337 N.C. at 792 , 448 S.E.2d at 502 (conducting the same analysis). 2005See id. (holding first that a constitutional violation had occurred and then conducting analysis to determine if it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt); Elmore, 337 N.C. at 792 , 448 S.E.2d at 502 (conducting the same analysis). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Elmoregreen2 sentences2005See id. (holding first that a constitutional violation had occurred and then conducting analysis to determine if it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt); Elmore, 337 N.C. at 792 , 448 S.E.2d at 502 (conducting the same analysis). 2005See id. (holding first that a constitutional violation had occurred and then conducting analysis to determine if it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt); Elmore, 337 N.C. at 792 , 448 S.E.2d at 502 (conducting the same analysis). | 1 | 1 |
United Buying Group, Inc. v. Colemangreen2 sentences1993United Buying Group, Inc. v. Coleman, 296 N.C. 510, 513 , 251 S.E.2d 610, 613 (1979). 1993United Buying Group, Inc. v. Coleman, 296 N.C. 510, 513 , 251 S.E.2d 610, 613 (1979). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re OC
green
2 sentences2015In re O.C., 171 N.C.App. 457 , 464, 615 S.E.2d 391 , 396 (2005). 2014App. 457, 464-65 , 615 S.E.2d 391, 396 , disc. review denied, 360 N.C. 64 , 623 S.E.2d 587 (2005). [T]o find grounds to terminate a parent’s rights under [section] 7B-1111(a)(2), the trial court must perform a two part analysis. | 2 | 2014–2015 |
Vick v. Davis
green
2 sentences1987State v. Moore, 317 N.C. 275 , 345 S.E.2d 217 (1986). 1987State v. Moore, 317 N.C. 275 , 345 S.E. 2d 217 (1986). | 2 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Moore
green
2 sentences1987State v. Moore, 317 N.C. 275 , 345 S.E.2d 217 (1986). 1987State v. Moore, 317 N.C. 275 , 345 S.E. 2d 217 (1986). | 2 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Thornton
green
2 sentences2020“Rule 803(4) [Statements for Medical Diagnosis or Treatment] requires a two- part inquiry: (1) whether the declarant’s statements were made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment; and (2) whether the declarant’s statements were reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment.” Id. at 649–50, 582 S.E.2d at 311 (citing State v. Hinnant, 351 N.C. 277, 284 , 523 S.E.2d 663, 667 (2000)). 2020“Rule 803(4) [Statements for Medical Diagnosis or Treatment] requires a two- part inquiry: (1) whether the declarant’s statements were made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment; and (2) whether the declarant’s statements were reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment.” Id. at 649–50, 582 S.E.2d at 311 (citing State v. Hinnant, 351 N.C. 277, 284 , 523 S.E.2d 663, 667 (2000)). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
In re O.C.
green
1 sentence2015In re O.C., 171 N.C.App. 457 , 464, 615 S.E.2d 391 , 396 (2005). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
In re O.C.
green
1 sentence2014App. 457, 464-65 , 615 S.E.2d 391, 396 , disc. review denied, 360 N.C. 64 , 623 S.E.2d 587 (2005). [T]o find grounds to terminate a parent’s rights under [section] 7B-1111(a)(2), the trial court must perform a two part analysis. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
In Re JDS
green
1 sentence2014App. 457, 464-65 , 615 S.E.2d 391, 396 , disc. review denied, 360 N.C. 64 , 623 S.E.2d 587 (2005). [T]o find grounds to terminate a parent’s rights under [section] 7B-1111(a)(2), the trial court must perform a two part analysis. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Colvin
green
1 sentence2012The limited mental capacity must have “significantly reducefd] the [defendant’s] culpability for the offense.” State v. Colvin, 90 N.C. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Buck v. Heavner
green
1 sentence2001Buck v. Heavner, 93 N.C. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Dillon v. Numismatic Funding Corp.
green
2 sentences1999Dillon v. Funding Corp., 291 N.C. 674 , 231 S.E.2d 629 (1977). 1999Dillon v. Funding Corp., 291 N.C. 674 , 231 S.E.2d 629 (1977). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Whitley v. Columbia Lumber Mfg. Co.
green
1 sentence1992Id., 336 S.E.2d 364 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.