disputed claim in Minnesota

2017Council, 587 N.W.2d 838, 842 (Minn. 1999) (identifying as “indi-cia of quasi-judicial actions ... (1) investigation into a disputed claim and weighing of evidentiary facts; (2) application of those facts to a prescribed standard; and (3) a binding decision regarding the. disputed claim”).

2016Quasi-judicial actions include the following: “(1) investigation into a disputed claim and weighing of evidentiary facts; (2) application of those facts to a prescribed standard; and (3) a binding decision regarding the disputed claim.” Id.

2008Indeed, O’Rourke acknowledges that the ACA contains “no express admission of liability.” Use of the ACA for impeachment purposes would require viewing Dr. Buckmaster’s decision not to contest the BPM’s allegations as an admission, thereby undermining rule 408. 7 See Esser, 212 Minn. at 199, 3 N.W.2d at 5 (concluding that settlement was irrelevant because “[w]here, as here, there was no admission, but a compromise and settlement of a disputed claim, an inference of admission of liability is not permissible”).

2008Indeed, O’Rourke acknowledges that the ACA contains “no express admission of liability.” Use of the ACA for impeachment purposes would require viewing Dr. Buckmaster’s decision not to contest the BPM’s allegations as an admission, thereby undermining rule 408. 7 See Esser, 212 Minn. at 199, 3 N.W.2d at 5 (concluding that settlement was irrelevant because “[w]here, as here, there was no admission, but a compromise and settlement of a disputed claim, an inference of admission of liability is not permissible”).

2004See Press v. City of Minneapolis, 553 N.W.2d 80, 83-84 (Minn.App. 1996) (finding that a municipal board's interpretation of an ordinance did not involve quasi-judicial conduct).

2004See Press v. City of Minneapolis, 553 N.W.2d 80, 83-84 (Minn.App.1996) (finding that a municipal board’s interpretation of an ordinance did not involve quasi-judicial conduct).

2017“We. review a quasi-judicial decision rendered by a city under a limited and nonintrusive standard of review.” Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 823 N.W.2d 627, 635 (Minn. 2012) (quotation omitted); see also Gustafson v. Comm’r of Human Servs., 884 N.W.2d 674, 686 (Minn. App. 2016) (stating that certiorari review of quasi-judicial decision “seeks to ‘minimize the judicial intrusion into administrative decision-making' and to ‘avoid usurpation of the executive body’s .administrative prerogatives’ ” (quoting Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Auth., 693 N.W.2d 426, 429 (Minn. 2005))).

2017“We. review a quasi-judicial decision rendered by a city under a limited and nonintrusive standard of review.” Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 823 N.W.2d 627, 635 (Minn. 2012) (quotation omitted); see also Gustafson v. Comm’r of Human Servs., 884 N.W.2d 674, 686 (Minn. App. 2016) (stating that certiorari review of quasi-judicial decision “seeks to ‘minimize the judicial intrusion into administrative decision-making' and to ‘avoid usurpation of the executive body’s .administrative prerogatives’ ” (quoting Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Auth., 693 N.W.2d 426, 429 (Minn. 2005))).

2017“We. review a quasi-judicial decision rendered by a city under a limited and nonintrusive standard of review.” Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 823 N.W.2d 627, 635 (Minn. 2012) (quotation omitted); see also Gustafson v. Comm’r of Human Servs., 884 N.W.2d 674, 686 (Minn. App. 2016) (stating that certiorari review of quasi-judicial decision “seeks to ‘minimize the judicial intrusion into administrative decision-making' and to ‘avoid usurpation of the executive body’s .administrative prerogatives’ ” (quoting Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Auth., 693 N.W.2d 426, 429 (Minn. 2005))).

2017The three characteristics of a quasi-judicial decision are “(1) an investigation into a disputed claim and the weighing of evidentiary facts; (2) the application of those facts to a prescribed standard; and (3) a binding decision regarding a disputed claim.” Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester, 868 N.W.2d 655, 662 (Minn. 2015), cert. denied 136 S. Ct. 849 (2016).

2016Quasi-legislative actions involve the board’s administrative power to “make policy, including rules or regulations, within the framework of an enabling statute.” Kmart Corp. v. County of Stearns, 710 N.W.2d 761, 770 (Minn. 2006).

2001The in-dicia of quasi-judicial actions are "(1) investigation into a disputed claim and weighing of evidentiary facts; (2) application of those facts to a prescribed standard; and (3) a binding decision regarding the disputed claim.” Maye v. University of Minnesota, 615 N.W.2d 383, 386 (Minn.App.2000) (quoting Minnesota Ctr. for Envtl.

1999See Nybladh v. Peoples State Bank, 247 Minn. 88, 96 , 76 N.W.2d 492, 498 (1956).

1999See Nybladh v. Peoples State Bank, 247 Minn. 88, 96 , 76 N.W.2d 492, 498 (1956).

1991See Sanborn v. Commissioners of Rice County, 9 Minn. 273 (Gil.) 258, 262-63 (1864) (declaring unconstitutional legislation requiring county corn- *125 missioners to decide claims of Sanborn against a school district).

1974Don Kral Inc. v. Lindstrom, 286 Minn. 37, 41 , 173 N. W. 2d 921, 924 (1970).

1974Don Kral Inc. v. Lindstrom, 286 Minn. 37, 41 , 173 N. W. 2d 921, 924 (1970).

1974We hold only that on the record before us there is inadequate evidence of a mutual agreement to compromise a disputed claim such as we held necessary in Butch Levy Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Sallblad, 267 Minn. 283, 291 , 126 N. W. 2d 380, 385 (1964).

1974We hold only that on the record before us there is inadequate evidence of a mutual agreement to compromise a disputed claim such as we held necessary in Butch Levy Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Sallblad, 267 Minn. 283, 291 , 126 N. W. 2d 380, 385 (1964).

1903See Martin v. Elwood, 35 Minn. 309 , 29 N. W. 135 .

1903See Martin v. Elwood, 35 Minn. 309 , 29 N. W. 135 .