Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1886–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Petschowgreen2 sentences2005See People v. Petschow, 119 P.3d 495 , 2004 WL 2136945 (Colo.App. 2005See People v. Petschow, 119 P.3d 495 , 2004 WL 2136945 (Colo.App. | 1 | 1 |
B. B. Woodson, Trustee v. Bernard P. Chamberlain, in the Matter of Sterling R. Deckergreen1 sentence1999When a payment of'a judgment is made and accepted under such circumstances as to indicate an intention to finally compromise and settle a disputed claim, an appeal may be foreclosed, but, under such circumstances, it is the mutual manifestation of an intention to bring the litigation to a definite conclusion upon a basis acceptable to all parties which bars a subsequent appeal, not the bare fact of payment of the judgment.”); Woodson v. Chamberlain, 317 F.2d 245, 246 (4th Cir.1963) ("Unless there is some contemporaneous agreement not to appeal, implicit in a compromise of the claim after judgm | 1 | 1 |
People v. Westgreen1 sentence1988Instead, the instruction “explicitly informed the jury that the element of 'sexual contact’ required not *1255 only that there be an intentional touching ... but also that the sexual contact ‘was for the purpose of sexual arousal, gratification, or abuse’ ” Id. at 629 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Scott v. Warner
neutral
2 sentences1915And in Scott v. Warner, 2 Lans. 49 , it was said that if a disputed claim for damages be compromised, the settlement is a sufficient consideration for the note given thereon." Such settlements are especially favored by the law in case of family differences, and it is universally held that such settlements made in good faith are upon sufficient consideration. 1886And in Scott v. Warner, 2 Lans. 49 , it was said that, if a disputed claim for damages be compromised, the settlement is a sufficient consideration for the note given thereon. | 2 | 1886–1915 |
Sunahara v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences2024Stated otherwise, in the same way that it would be absurd to bar the discovery of reserves and settlement authority but not the evaluations that led to them, Sunahara , ¶ 25, 280 P.3d at 657 , it would be absurd to bar the admission of settlement offers proffered to establish the amount of a disputed claim but not the evaluations from which those settlement offers were developed. ¶23 Accordingly, we agree with the conclusion of the division below that an insurer's internal settlement evaluation is inadmissible as evidence of undisputed benefits owed. 2024Stated otherwise, in the same way that it would be absurd to bar the discovery of reserves and settlement authority but not the evaluations that led to them, Sunahara , ¶ 25, 280 P.3d at 657 , it would be absurd to bar the admission of settlement offers proffered to establish the amount of a disputed claim but not the evaluations from which those settlement offers were developed. ¶23 Accordingly, we agree with the conclusion of the division below that an insurer's internal settlement evaluation is inadmissible as evidence of undisputed benefits owed. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
United States v. Davis
green
1 sentence2017Id. at 859 . ¶ 52 In contrast to the circumstances in Davis, the detective with whom Butson spoke was a government agent employed by the Colorado Springs Police Department, and the discussion related to criminal charges brought by the District Attorney’s Office in the 24 exercise of its investigative or enforcement authority. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Main Electric, Ltd. v. Printz Services Corp.
green
1 sentence2001Corp., 980 P.2d 522 (Colo.1999)(to render an appeal moot, acceptance of benefits under a judgment must be attended by cireumstances indicating an intention by both parties to settle and compromise the disputed claim). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Horn Waterproofing Corp. v. Bushwick Iron & Steel Co.
green
2 sentences1987Id. at 330 , 488 N.E.2d at 62 , 497 N.Y.S.2d at 315 . 1987Id. at 330 , 488 N.E.2d at 62 , 497 N.Y.S.2d at 315 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Staley v. Nazarenus
neutral
2 sentences1961Such settlements are encouraged by the courts, supported so far as legally possible, and protected even in case of doubtful claims. 5 R.C.L. p 878, §3.” Staley, et al. v. Nazarenus, 86 Colo. 326, 328 , 281 Pac. 358 . 1961Such settlements are encouraged by the courts, supported so far as legally possible, and protected even in case of doubtful claims. 5 R.C.L. p 878, §3.” Staley, et al. v. Nazarenus, 86 Colo. 326, 328 , 281 Pac. 358 . | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Civil Service Commission v. Casey
neutral
2 sentences1923Civil Service Com. of Denver v. Casey, 67 Colo. 398 , 181 Pac. 193 , does not present the case of a disputed claim but the question of the right of a wrongfully discharged officer to a certification of his salary by the civil service commission. 1923Civil Service Com. of Denver v. Casey, 67 Colo. 398 , 181 Pac. 193 , does not present the case of a disputed claim but the question of the right of a wrongfully discharged officer to a certification of his salary by the civil service commission. | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Board of Capitol Managers v. Rusan
neutral
2 sentences1923In Board v. Rusan, 72 Colo. 197 , 210 Pac. 328 , the relator was an employee of the state which cannot be sued, therefore there was no remedy at law. 1923In Board v. Rusan, 72 Colo. 197 , 210 Pac. 328 , the relator was an employee of the state which cannot be sued, therefore there was no remedy at law. | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.