18 Nebraska opinions name it 1 courts 1902–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Purser v. Corpus Christi State National Bankgreen2 sentences1991As the Supreme Court of Arkansas said in Purser v. Corpus Christi State Nat’l Bk., 256 Ark. 452, 459 , 508 S.W.2d 549, 553 (1974), We have long recognized that a judgment debtor has a right to defend against a foreign judgment sought to be enforced in the courts of this state, but not on defenses that could have been made in the action in which the judgment was rendered. [Citations omitted.] Under the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution, Art. 4, § 1, such a judgment is as conclusive on collateral attack, except for the defenses of fraud in the procurement of the judg 1991As the Supreme Court of Arkansas said in Purser v. Corpus Christi State Nat’l Bk., 256 Ark. 452, 459 , 508 S.W.2d 549, 553 (1974), We have long recognized that a judgment debtor has a right to defend against a foreign judgment sought to be enforced in the courts of this state, but not on defenses that could have been made in the action in which the judgment was rendered. [Citations omitted.] Under the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution, Art. 4, § 1, such a judgment is as conclusive on collateral attack, except for the defenses of fraud in the procurement of the judg | 2 | 2 |
Anglim v. Anglimgreen2 sentences1955See, also, Anglim v. Anglim, 140 Neb. 133 , 299 N. W. 346 ; Repp v. Repp, 156 Neb. 45 , 54 N. W. 2d 238 . 1955See, also, Anglim v. Anglim, 140 Neb. 133 , 299 N. W. 346 ; Repp v. Repp, 156 Neb. 45 , 54 N. W. 2d 238 . | 1 | 1 |
Yarborough v. Yarboroughgreen2 sentences1950See, Yarborough v. Yarborough, 290 U. S. 202 , 54 S. Ct. 181, 189, note 19 , 78 L. 1950See, Yarborough v. Yarborough, 290 U. S. 202 , 54 S. Ct. 181, 189, note 19 , 78 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Fall v. Eastin
green
2 sentences1959First, Fall v. Fall, supra, decided on rehearing by this court on July 12, 1907, and affirmed in Fall v. Eastin, supra, stressed the point that the courts of this state did not at that time have any statutory power and authority to award the real estate of a husband as alimony in a divorce case, and that the courts of this state would not be compelled under the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution of the United States to recognize an award or order such as that at bar contained in the decree of another state which the equity courts of this state could not themselves lawfully render 1930In Fall v. Eastin, 215 U. S. 1 , it was held: “A court not having jurisdiction of the res cannot affect it by its decree nor by a deed made by a master in accordance with the decree.” And further held: “The full faith and credit clause of the Constitution does not extend the jurisdiction of the courts of one state to property situated, in another state, but only makes the judgment conclusive on the merits of the claim or subject-matter of the suit; and the courts of the state in which land is situated do not deny full faith and credit to a decree of courts of another state, or to a master’s de | 2 | 1930–1959 |
Young v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America
green
2 sentences2023Young v. Order of United Commercial Travelers, 142 Neb. 566 , 7 N.W.2d 81 (1942). 2023Young v. Order of United Commercial Travelers, 142 Neb. 566 , 7 N.W.2d 81 (1942). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Yost v. Yost
green
2 sentences1999While the full faith and credit clause of the federal constitution requires one state to give recognition to the judgments of another state, that recognition does not extend where the original jurisdiction of the original forum court is suspect, Yost v. Yost. 161 Neb. 164 , 72 N.W.2d 689 (1955). 1999While the full faith and credit clause of the federal constitution requires one state to give recognition to the judgments of another state, that recognition does not extend where the original jurisdiction of the original forum court is suspect, Yost v. Yost. 161 Neb. 164 , 72 N.W.2d 689 (1955). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Estin v. Estin
green
2 sentences1975Ed. 365 , the court stated: “It is settled by repeated decisions of this Court that the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution requires that the judgment of a State court which had jurisdiction of the parties and the subject-matter in suit, shall be given in the courts of every other State the same credit, validity and effect which it has in the State where it was rendered, and be equally conclusive upon the merits; and that only such defenses as would be good to a suit thereon in that State can be relied on in the courts of any other State.” In Estin v. Estin, 334 U. S. 541 , 68 S. 1975Ed. 365 , the court stated: “It is settled by repeated decisions of this Court that the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution requires that the judgment of a State court which had jurisdiction of the parties and the subject-matter in suit, shall be given in the courts of every other State the same credit, validity and effect which it has in the State where it was rendered, and be equally conclusive upon the merits; and that only such defenses as would be good to a suit thereon in that State can be relied on in the courts of any other State.” In Estin v. Estin, 334 U. S. 541 , 68 S. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'n
green
2 sentences1972Co. v. Industrial Accident Comm., 306 U. S. 493 , 59 S. Ct. 629 , 83 L. 1972Co. v. Industrial Accident Comm., 306 U. S. 493 , 59 S. Ct. 629 , 83 L. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Ramsey v. Hutchinson
neutral
1 sentence1958L. 222, 223, 187 A. 650, 651 . | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Field
green
2 sentences1958In view of that holding the full faith and credit clause would require us to follow it, even if we were of a different view, which we are not.” In Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Field, 311 U. S. 169 , 61 S. Ct. 176 , 85 L. 1958In view of that holding the full faith and credit clause would require us to follow it, even if we were of a different view, which we are not.” In Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Field, 311 U. S. 169 , 61 S. Ct. 176 , 85 L. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Lippincott v. Lippincott
green
2 sentences1955Lippincott v. Lippincott, 141 Neb. 186 , 3 N. W. 2d 207 , 140 A. L. 1955Lippincott v. Lippincott, 141 Neb. 186 , 3 N. W. 2d 207 , 140 A. L. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Coe v. Coe
green
2 sentences1955In Coe v. Coe, 334 U. S. 378 , 68 S. Ct. 1094 , 92 L. 1955In Coe v. Coe, 334 U. S. 378 , 68 S. Ct. 1094 , 92 L. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Repp Ex Rel. Danielson v. Repp
green
2 sentences1955See, also, Anglim v. Anglim, 140 Neb. 133 , 299 N. W. 346 ; Repp v. Repp, 156 Neb. 45 , 54 N. W. 2d 238 . 1955See, also, Anglim v. Anglim, 140 Neb. 133 , 299 N. W. 346 ; Repp v. Repp, 156 Neb. 45 , 54 N. W. 2d 238 . | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Matthews v. Matthews
green
2 sentences1953The appellee relies on the case of Matthews v. Matthews, 247 N. Y. 32 , 159 N. E. 713 , and other cases of like holding to the effect that in a divorce or separation action against a nonresident defendant served by publication, the court may determine the custody of children who are within the state. 1953The appellee relies on the case of Matthews v. Matthews, 247 N. Y. 32 , 159 N. E. 713 , and other cases of like holding to the effect that in a divorce or separation action against a nonresident defendant served by publication, the court may determine the custody of children who are within the state. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Fauntleroy v. Lum
green
2 sentences1952Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U. S. 230 , 28 S. Ct. 641 , 52 L. 1952Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U. S. 230 , 28 S. Ct. 641 , 52 L. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Haddock v. Haddock
red
1 sentence1941“The mere domicile within the state of one party to the marriage does not give the courts of that state jurisdiction to render a decree of divorce enforceable in all the other states by virtue of the full faith and credit clause of the federal Constitution against a nonresident who did not appear and was only constructively served with notice of the pendency of the action.” Haddock v. Haddock, 26 S. Ct. 525 . | 1 | 1941–1941 |
McGuire v. Phelan-Shirley Co.
green
1 sentence1933In McGuire v. Phelan-Shirley Co., 111 Neb. 609 , the employee, McGuire, lived in Nebraska, and the employer, Phelan-Shirley Company, had its principal place of business in Omaha. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Fall v. Fall
neutral
1 sentence1930In Fall v. Eastin, 215 U. S. 1 , it was held: “A court not having jurisdiction of the res cannot affect it by its decree nor by a deed made by a master in accordance with the decree.” And further held: “The full faith and credit clause of the Constitution does not extend the jurisdiction of the courts of one state to property situated, in another state, but only makes the judgment conclusive on the merits of the claim or subject-matter of the suit; and the courts of the state in which land is situated do not deny full faith and credit to a decree of courts of another state, or to a master’s de | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum v. Green
green
1 sentence1920Supreme Council, Royal Arcanum v. Green, 237 U. S. 531 , 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 724; Hartford Life Ins. | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Andrews v. Andrews
green
1 sentence1902Andrews v. Andrews, 188 U. S., 14 . | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.