Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
21 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1919–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Estherville Ford, Inc.green2 sentences2025Rental, Ltd. v. Estherville Ford, Inc., 313 N.W.2d 538, 541 (Iowa 1981). 1986“A judgment entered in one State must be respected in another [under the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution] provided that the first State had jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter.” Hall, 440 U.S. at 421 , 99 S.Ct. at 1188 , 59 L.Ed.2d at 425 ; see National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Estherville Ford, Inc., 313 N.W.2d 538, 541 (Iowa 1981). | 4 | 4 |
Thompson v. Thompsongreen2 sentences2001However, “custody orders [have] held a peculiar status under the full faith and credit doctrine.” Thompson v. Thompson, 484 U.S. 174, 180 , 108 S.Ct. 513, 516 , 98 L.Ed.2d 512, 520 (1988). 2001However, “custody orders [have] held a peculiar status under the full faith and credit doctrine.” Thompson v. Thompson, 484 U.S. 174, 180 , 108 S.Ct. 513, 516 , 98 L.Ed.2d 512, 520 (1988). | 2 | 2 |
R.S. v. Pacificare Life & Health Insurancegreen1 sentence2024Ins., 867 P.2d 1260 , 1266 n.20 (Okla. 1994) (barring second suit in Oklahoma after first litigating policy coverage in Arkansas, despite the second suit purportedly being under Oklahoma law, because “the issue of which state’s law applies has been litigated” and “[w]hether the Arkansas court correctly decided which law applied is inconsequential”); R.S. v. PacifiCare Life & Health Ins., 128 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1, 12 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011) (barring second suit in California after first litigating in Missouri, despite second suit bringing an insurance tort claim not cognizable under Missouri law, becau | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Marriage of Cervettigreen1 sentence1999Under both the PKPA and the UCCJA the premise is that a state court should not modify the decree of another state unless that other state no longer retains jurisdiction in the matter. 28 U.S.C. § 1738A(d); In re Marriage of Cervetti, 497 N.W.2d 897, 899-900 (Iowa 1993). 1 The PKPA is intended to extend the full faith and credit clause (Art. | 1 | 1 |
Hansen v. Haagensengreen1 sentence1991Hansen v. Haagensen, 178 N.W.2d 325, 328 (Iowa 1970). | 1 | 1 |
Hilton v. Guyotgreen2 sentences1986He relies on the principle that judgments of foreign countries are not entitled to enforcement as of right under the full faith and credit clause of the federal constitution, see Hilton v. Guyot, 159 U.S. 113, 164-65 , 16 S.Ct. 139, 143-44 , 40 L.Ed. 95, 100 (1895), and are enforceable only under principles of comity. 1986He relies on the principle that judgments of foreign countries are not entitled to enforcement as of right under the full faith and credit clause of the federal constitution, see Hilton v. Guyot, 159 U.S. 113, 164-65 , 16 S.Ct. 139, 143-44 , 40 L.Ed. 95, 100 (1895), and are enforceable only under principles of comity. | 1 | 1 |
Durfee v. Dukegreen2 sentences1986The general rule is “that a judgment is entitled to full faith and credit — even as to questions of jurisdiction — when the second court’s inquiry discloses that those questions have been fully and fairly litigated and finally decided in the court which rendered the original judgment.” Durfee v. Duke, 375 U.S. 106, 111 , 84 S.Ct. 242, 245 , 11 L.Ed.2d 186, 191 (1963). 1986The general rule is “that a judgment is entitled to full faith and credit — even as to questions of jurisdiction — when the second court’s inquiry discloses that those questions have been fully and fairly litigated and finally decided in the court which rendered the original judgment.” Durfee v. Duke, 375 U.S. 106, 111 , 84 S.Ct. 242, 245 , 11 L.Ed.2d 186, 191 (1963). | 1 | 1 |
Clarke v. Clarkegreen2 sentences1985Such views as to the full faith and credit clause in probate matters are consistent with those of the Supreme Court in Clarke v. Clarke, 178 U.S. 186, 193 , 20 S.Ct. 873, 875 , 44 L.Ed. 1028, 1032 (1900). 1985Such views as to the full faith and credit clause in probate matters are consistent with those of the Supreme Court in Clarke v. Clarke, 178 U.S. 186, 193 , 20 S.Ct. 873, 875 , 44 L.Ed. 1028, 1032 (1900). | 1 | 1 |
La Verne v. Jackmangreen2 sentences1971Coffee v. Na tional Equipment Rental Limited, 9 Ariz. App. 249 , 451 P.2d 329, 331 (1969); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo.1965); LaVerne v. Jackman, 84 Ill.App.2d 445 , 228 N.E.2d 249, 254 (1967); Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corporation, 402 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky.App.1966); Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc., 173 S.E.2d 383, 388 (W.Va.1970); Lee v. Carroll, 146 So.2d 242, 243 (La.App.1962); Britton v. Gannon, 285 P.2d 407, 409 (Okl.1955); Levin v. Gladstein, 142 N.C. 482 , 55 S.E. 371 (1906); Zelek v. Brosseau, 47 N.J. 1971Coffee v. Na tional Equipment Rental Limited, 9 Ariz. App. 249 , 451 P.2d 329, 331 (1969); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo.1965); LaVerne v. Jackman, 84 Ill.App.2d 445 , 228 N.E.2d 249, 254 (1967); Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corporation, 402 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky.App.1966); Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc., 173 S.E.2d 383, 388 (W.Va.1970); Lee v. Carroll, 146 So.2d 242, 243 (La.App.1962); Britton v. Gannon, 285 P.2d 407, 409 (Okl.1955); Levin v. Gladstein, 142 N.C. 482 , 55 S.E. 371 (1906); Zelek v. Brosseau, 47 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Lee v. Carrollgreen2 sentences1971Coffee v. National *736 Equipment Rental Limited, 9 Ariz. App. 249 , 451 P.2d 329, 331 (1969); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo. 1965); LaVerne v. Jackman, 84 Ill.App.2d 445 , 228 N.E.2d 249, 254 (1967); Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corporation, 402 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky.App.1966); Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc., 173 S.E.2d 383, 388 (W.Va.1970); Lee v. Carroll, 146 So.2d 242, 243 (La.App.1962); Britton v. Gannon, 285 P.2d 407, 409 (Okl.1955); Levin v. Gladstein, 142 N.C. 482 , 55 S.E. 371 (1906); Zelek v. Brosseau, 47 N.J. 1971Coffee v. Na tional Equipment Rental Limited, 9 Ariz. App. 249 , 451 P.2d 329, 331 (1969); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo.1965); LaVerne v. Jackman, 84 Ill.App.2d 445 , 228 N.E.2d 249, 254 (1967); Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corporation, 402 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky.App.1966); Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc., 173 S.E.2d 383, 388 (W.Va.1970); Lee v. Carroll, 146 So.2d 242, 243 (La.App.1962); Britton v. Gannon, 285 P.2d 407, 409 (Okl.1955); Levin v. Gladstein, 142 N.C. 482 , 55 S.E. 371 (1906); Zelek v. Brosseau, 47 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corp. of Port Charlottegreen2 sentences1971Coffee v. National *736 Equipment Rental Limited, 9 Ariz. App. 249 , 451 P.2d 329, 331 (1969); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo. 1965); LaVerne v. Jackman, 84 Ill.App.2d 445 , 228 N.E.2d 249, 254 (1967); Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corporation, 402 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky.App.1966); Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc., 173 S.E.2d 383, 388 (W.Va.1970); Lee v. Carroll, 146 So.2d 242, 243 (La.App.1962); Britton v. Gannon, 285 P.2d 407, 409 (Okl.1955); Levin v. Gladstein, 142 N.C. 482 , 55 S.E. 371 (1906); Zelek v. Brosseau, 47 N.J. 1971Coffee v. Na tional Equipment Rental Limited, 9 Ariz. App. 249 , 451 P.2d 329, 331 (1969); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo.1965); LaVerne v. Jackman, 84 Ill.App.2d 445 , 228 N.E.2d 249, 254 (1967); Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corporation, 402 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky.App.1966); Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc., 173 S.E.2d 383, 388 (W.Va.1970); Lee v. Carroll, 146 So.2d 242, 243 (La.App.1962); Britton v. Gannon, 285 P.2d 407, 409 (Okl.1955); Levin v. Gladstein, 142 N.C. 482 , 55 S.E. 371 (1906); Zelek v. Brosseau, 47 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Nelson v. Browninggreen2 sentences1971Coffee v. National *736 Equipment Rental Limited, 9 Ariz. App. 249 , 451 P.2d 329, 331 (1969); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo. 1965); LaVerne v. Jackman, 84 Ill.App.2d 445 , 228 N.E.2d 249, 254 (1967); Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corporation, 402 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky.App.1966); Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc., 173 S.E.2d 383, 388 (W.Va.1970); Lee v. Carroll, 146 So.2d 242, 243 (La.App.1962); Britton v. Gannon, 285 P.2d 407, 409 (Okl.1955); Levin v. Gladstein, 142 N.C. 482 , 55 S.E. 371 (1906); Zelek v. Brosseau, 47 N.J. 1971Coffee v. Na tional Equipment Rental Limited, 9 Ariz. App. 249 , 451 P.2d 329, 331 (1969); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo.1965); LaVerne v. Jackman, 84 Ill.App.2d 445 , 228 N.E.2d 249, 254 (1967); Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corporation, 402 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky.App.1966); Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc., 173 S.E.2d 383, 388 (W.Va.1970); Lee v. Carroll, 146 So.2d 242, 243 (La.App.1962); Britton v. Gannon, 285 P.2d 407, 409 (Okl.1955); Levin v. Gladstein, 142 N.C. 482 , 55 S.E. 371 (1906); Zelek v. Brosseau, 47 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Coffee v. National Equipment Rental, Ltd.green2 sentences1971Coffee v. Na tional Equipment Rental Limited, 9 Ariz. App. 249 , 451 P.2d 329, 331 (1969); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo.1965); LaVerne v. Jackman, 84 Ill.App.2d 445 , 228 N.E.2d 249, 254 (1967); Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corporation, 402 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky.App.1966); Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc., 173 S.E.2d 383, 388 (W.Va.1970); Lee v. Carroll, 146 So.2d 242, 243 (La.App.1962); Britton v. Gannon, 285 P.2d 407, 409 (Okl.1955); Levin v. Gladstein, 142 N.C. 482 , 55 S.E. 371 (1906); Zelek v. Brosseau, 47 N.J. 1971Coffee v. Na tional Equipment Rental Limited, 9 Ariz. App. 249 , 451 P.2d 329, 331 (1969); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo.1965); LaVerne v. Jackman, 84 Ill.App.2d 445 , 228 N.E.2d 249, 254 (1967); Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corporation, 402 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky.App.1966); Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc., 173 S.E.2d 383, 388 (W.Va.1970); Lee v. Carroll, 146 So.2d 242, 243 (La.App.1962); Britton v. Gannon, 285 P.2d 407, 409 (Okl.1955); Levin v. Gladstein, 142 N.C. 482 , 55 S.E. 371 (1906); Zelek v. Brosseau, 47 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc.green2 sentences1971Coffee v. National *736 Equipment Rental Limited, 9 Ariz. App. 249 , 451 P.2d 329, 331 (1969); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo. 1965); LaVerne v. Jackman, 84 Ill.App.2d 445 , 228 N.E.2d 249, 254 (1967); Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corporation, 402 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky.App.1966); Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc., 173 S.E.2d 383, 388 (W.Va.1970); Lee v. Carroll, 146 So.2d 242, 243 (La.App.1962); Britton v. Gannon, 285 P.2d 407, 409 (Okl.1955); Levin v. Gladstein, 142 N.C. 482 , 55 S.E. 371 (1906); Zelek v. Brosseau, 47 N.J. 1971Coffee v. Na tional Equipment Rental Limited, 9 Ariz. App. 249 , 451 P.2d 329, 331 (1969); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo.1965); LaVerne v. Jackman, 84 Ill.App.2d 445 , 228 N.E.2d 249, 254 (1967); Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corporation, 402 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky.App.1966); Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc., 173 S.E.2d 383, 388 (W.Va.1970); Lee v. Carroll, 146 So.2d 242, 243 (La.App.1962); Britton v. Gannon, 285 P.2d 407, 409 (Okl.1955); Levin v. Gladstein, 142 N.C. 482 , 55 S.E. 371 (1906); Zelek v. Brosseau, 47 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Britton v. Gannongreen2 sentences1971Coffee v. National *736 Equipment Rental Limited, 9 Ariz. App. 249 , 451 P.2d 329, 331 (1969); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo. 1965); LaVerne v. Jackman, 84 Ill.App.2d 445 , 228 N.E.2d 249, 254 (1967); Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corporation, 402 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky.App.1966); Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc., 173 S.E.2d 383, 388 (W.Va.1970); Lee v. Carroll, 146 So.2d 242, 243 (La.App.1962); Britton v. Gannon, 285 P.2d 407, 409 (Okl.1955); Levin v. Gladstein, 142 N.C. 482 , 55 S.E. 371 (1906); Zelek v. Brosseau, 47 N.J. 1971Coffee v. Na tional Equipment Rental Limited, 9 Ariz. App. 249 , 451 P.2d 329, 331 (1969); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo.1965); LaVerne v. Jackman, 84 Ill.App.2d 445 , 228 N.E.2d 249, 254 (1967); Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corporation, 402 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky.App.1966); Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc., 173 S.E.2d 383, 388 (W.Va.1970); Lee v. Carroll, 146 So.2d 242, 243 (La.App.1962); Britton v. Gannon, 285 P.2d 407, 409 (Okl.1955); Levin v. Gladstein, 142 N.C. 482 , 55 S.E. 371 (1906); Zelek v. Brosseau, 47 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nevada v. Hall
red
2 sentences1986“A judgment entered in one State must be respected in another [under the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution] provided that the first State had jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter.” Hall, 440 U.S. at 421 , 99 S.Ct. at 1188 , 59 L.Ed.2d at 425 ; see National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Estherville Ford, Inc., 313 N.W.2d 538, 541 (Iowa 1981). 1986“A judgment entered in one State must be respected in another [under the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution] provided that the first State had jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter.” Hall, 440 U.S. at 421 , 99 S.Ct. at 1188 , 59 L.Ed.2d at 425 ; see National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Estherville Ford, Inc., 313 N.W.2d 538, 541 (Iowa 1981). | 3 | 1986–1992 |
Bowen v. Bowen
green
2 sentences1961The section provides: “Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. * * Bowen v. Bowen, 219 Iowa 550 , 258 N.W. 882 ; Martin Bros. 1961The section provides: “Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. * * Bowen v. Bowen, 219 Iowa 550 , 258 N.W. 882 ; Martin Bros. | 2 | 1940–1961 |
Secor v. Siver
green
2 sentences1940Bowen v. Bowen, 219 Iowa 550, 552 , 258 N. W. 882 ; In re Guardianship of Baxter, 191 Iowa 407 , 182 N. W. 217 ; Secor v. Siver, 165 Iowa 673 , 146 N. W. 845 . 1940Bowen v. Bowen, 219 Iowa 550, 552 , 258 N. W. 882 ; In re Guardianship of Baxter, 191 Iowa 407 , 182 N. W. 217 ; Secor v. Siver, 165 Iowa 673 , 146 N. W. 845 . | 2 | 1935–1940 |
Baxter v. Chandler
neutral
2 sentences1940Bowen v. Bowen, 219 Iowa 550, 552 , 258 N. W. 882 ; In re Guardianship of Baxter, 191 Iowa 407 , 182 N. W. 217 ; Secor v. Siver, 165 Iowa 673 , 146 N. W. 845 . 1935In re Guardianship of Baxter, 191 Iowa 407 , 182 N. W. 217 ; Secor v. Siver, 165 Iowa 673 , 146 N. W. 845 . | 2 | 1935–1940 |
Smith v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence2024Ins., 867 P.2d 1260 , 1266 n.20 (Okla. 1994) (barring second suit in Oklahoma after first litigating policy coverage in Arkansas, despite the second suit purportedly being under Oklahoma law, because “the issue of which state’s law applies has been litigated” and “[w]hether the Arkansas court correctly decided which law applied is inconsequential”); R.S. v. PacifiCare Life & Health Ins., 128 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1, 12 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011) (barring second suit in California after first litigating in Missouri, despite second suit bringing an insurance tort claim not cognizable under Missouri law, becau | 1 | 2024–2024 |
May v. Anderson
green
2 sentences1979The right of parents to the custody of their children was acknowledged in May v. Anderson, 345 U.S. 528 , 73 S.Ct. 840 , 97 L.Ed. 1221 (1953), where the Supreme Court reviewed the impact of the full faith and credit doctrine on an ex parte divorce decree awarding custody of children to their father. 1979The right of parents to the custody of their children was acknowledged in May v. Anderson, 345 U.S. 528 , 73 S.Ct. 840 , 97 L.Ed. 1221 (1953), where the Supreme Court reviewed the impact of the full faith and credit doctrine on an ex parte divorce decree awarding custody of children to their father. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Levin v. Gladstein.
neutral
2 sentences1971Coffee v. Na tional Equipment Rental Limited, 9 Ariz. App. 249 , 451 P.2d 329, 331 (1969); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo.1965); LaVerne v. Jackman, 84 Ill.App.2d 445 , 228 N.E.2d 249, 254 (1967); Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corporation, 402 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky.App.1966); Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc., 173 S.E.2d 383, 388 (W.Va.1970); Lee v. Carroll, 146 So.2d 242, 243 (La.App.1962); Britton v. Gannon, 285 P.2d 407, 409 (Okl.1955); Levin v. Gladstein, 142 N.C. 482 , 55 S.E. 371 (1906); Zelek v. Brosseau, 47 N.J. 1971Coffee v. Na tional Equipment Rental Limited, 9 Ariz. App. 249 , 451 P.2d 329, 331 (1969); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo.1965); LaVerne v. Jackman, 84 Ill.App.2d 445 , 228 N.E.2d 249, 254 (1967); Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corporation, 402 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky.App.1966); Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc., 173 S.E.2d 383, 388 (W.Va.1970); Lee v. Carroll, 146 So.2d 242, 243 (La.App.1962); Britton v. Gannon, 285 P.2d 407, 409 (Okl.1955); Levin v. Gladstein, 142 N.C. 482 , 55 S.E. 371 (1906); Zelek v. Brosseau, 47 N.J. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Zelek v. Brosseau
green
2 sentences1971Coffee v. National *736 Equipment Rental Limited, 9 Ariz. App. 249 , 451 P.2d 329, 331 (1969); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo. 1965); LaVerne v. Jackman, 84 Ill.App.2d 445 , 228 N.E.2d 249, 254 (1967); Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corporation, 402 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky.App.1966); Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc., 173 S.E.2d 383, 388 (W.Va.1970); Lee v. Carroll, 146 So.2d 242, 243 (La.App.1962); Britton v. Gannon, 285 P.2d 407, 409 (Okl.1955); Levin v. Gladstein, 142 N.C. 482 , 55 S.E. 371 (1906); Zelek v. Brosseau, 47 N.J. 1971Coffee v. Na tional Equipment Rental Limited, 9 Ariz. App. 249 , 451 P.2d 329, 331 (1969); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo.1965); LaVerne v. Jackman, 84 Ill.App.2d 445 , 228 N.E.2d 249, 254 (1967); Mullenax v. Lighthouse Realty Corporation, 402 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Ky.App.1966); Axelrod v. Premier Photo Service, Inc., 173 S.E.2d 383, 388 (W.Va.1970); Lee v. Carroll, 146 So.2d 242, 243 (La.App.1962); Britton v. Gannon, 285 P.2d 407, 409 (Okl.1955); Levin v. Gladstein, 142 N.C. 482 , 55 S.E. 371 (1906); Zelek v. Brosseau, 47 N.J. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Ohio v. Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Co.
green
2 sentences1952Jur., Workmen’s Compensation, section 69, it is said: “But the full faith and credit clause * * * does not operate to make the compensation act of the state where the contract * * * was made, and in which the parties reside, * * * a defense to a proceeding brought under the compensation act of the state in which the injury occurred, where the statute does not preclude recovery under the Jaw of another state”, citing Ohio v. Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Co., 289 U. S. 439 , 53 S. Ct. 663 , 77 L. 1952Jur., Workmen’s Compensation, section 69, it is said: “But the full faith and credit clause * * * does not operate to make the compensation act of the state where the contract * * * was made, and in which the parties reside, * * * a defense to a proceeding brought under the compensation act of the state in which the injury occurred, where the statute does not preclude recovery under the Jaw of another state”, citing Ohio v. Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Co., 289 U. S. 439 , 53 S. Ct. 663 , 77 L. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.
green
2 sentences1952The decision held the full faith and credit clause did not apply, saying: “The very nature of the federal union of states, to which are reserved some of the attributes of sovereignty, precludes resort to the full faith and credit clause as the means for compelling a state to substitute the statutes of other states for its own statutes dealing with a subject matter concerning which it is competent to legislate.” The opinion quotes from Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm., 294 U. S. 532, 547 , 55 S. Ct. 518, 523 , 79 L. 1952The decision held the full faith and credit clause did not apply, saying: “The very nature of the federal union of states, to which are reserved some of the attributes of sovereignty, precludes resort to the full faith and credit clause as the means for compelling a state to substitute the statutes of other states for its own statutes dealing with a subject matter concerning which it is competent to legislate.” The opinion quotes from Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm., 294 U. S. 532, 547 , 55 S. Ct. 518, 523 , 79 L. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Hughes v. Fetter
green
2 sentences1952Defendant cites a later decision, Hughes v. Fetter, 341 U. S. 609, 612 , 71 S. Ct. 980, 982 , 95 L. 1952Defendant cites a later decision, Hughes v. Fetter, 341 U. S. 609, 612 , 71 S. Ct. 980, 982 , 95 L. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Dibble v. Winter
green
2 sentences1949Dibble v. Winter, 247 Ill. 243 , 93 N. E. 145 ; Norris v. Loyd, supra; McCormick v. Sullivant, 10 Wheat. 1949Dibble v. Winter, 247 Ill. 243 , 93 N. E. 145 ; Norris v. Loyd, supra; McCormick v. Sullivant, 10 Wheat. | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Wisconsin v. Pelican Insurance
green
2 sentences1936Co., 127 U. S. 265, 291 , 8 S. Ct. 1370 , 32 L. 1936Co., 127 U. S. 265, 291 , 8 S. Ct. 1370 , 32 L. | 1 | 1936–1936 |
Gasquet v. Lapeyre
green
2 sentences1919Here, the law or usage in Tennessee, where the judgment was rendered, was not in any way brought to the attention of the Louisiana court, and therefore an essential step in invoking the full faith and credit clause was omitted.” Gasquet v. Lapeyre, 242 U. S. 367 ( 61 L. 1919Here, the law or usage in Tennessee, where the judgment was rendered, was not in any way brought to the attention of the Louisiana court, and therefore an essential step in invoking the full faith and credit clause was omitted.” Gasquet v. Lapeyre, 242 U. S. 367 ( 61 L. | 1 | 1919–1919 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.