Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1928–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Estin v. Estingreen2 sentences2006Along with Coe, the Supreme Court handed down Estin v. Estin, 334 U.S. 541 , 68 S.Ct. 1213 , 92 L.Ed. 1561 (1948), and again applied the full faith and credit clause in a divorce action. 2006Along with Coe, the Supreme Court handed down Estin v. Estin, 334 U.S. 541 , 68 S.Ct. 1213 , 92 L.Ed. 1561 (1948), and again applied the full faith and credit clause in a divorce action. | 1 | 2 |
Sollitt v. Robertsongreen1 sentence2024Ct. App. 2006) (citing Reeves Royalty Co. Ltd. v. ANB Pump Truck Serv., 513 So. 2d 595, 598 (Miss. 1987); Sollitt v. Robertson, 544 So. 2d 1378, 1381 (Miss. 1989)). 6 ¶10. | 1 | 1 |
Schwartz v. Hynumgreen1 sentence2024Safety v. Stringer, 748 So. 2d 662, 665 (¶13) (Miss. 1999)). 7 The full faith and credit clause has only two exceptions: “(1) the foreign judgment itself was obtained as a result of some false representation without which the judgment would not have been rendered . . . or (2) the rendering court did not have jurisdiction over the parties in the subject matter.” Schwartz v. Hynum, 933 So. 2d 1039, 1042 (¶9) (Miss. | 1 | 1 |
Miss. Dept. of Public Safety v. Stringergreen1 sentence2024Safety v. Stringer, 748 So. 2d 662, 665 (¶13) (Miss. 1999)). 7 The full faith and credit clause has only two exceptions: “(1) the foreign judgment itself was obtained as a result of some false representation without which the judgment would not have been rendered . . . or (2) the rendering court did not have jurisdiction over the parties in the subject matter.” Schwartz v. Hynum, 933 So. 2d 1039, 1042 (¶9) (Miss. | 1 | 1 |
Reeves Royalty Co. v. ANB Pump Truck Servicegreen1 sentence2024Ct. App. 2006) (citing Reeves Royalty Co. Ltd. v. ANB Pump Truck Serv., 513 So. 2d 595, 598 (Miss. 1987); Sollitt v. Robertson, 544 So. 2d 1378, 1381 (Miss. 1989)). 6 ¶10. | 1 | 1 |
Kountouris v. Varvarisgreen1 sentence1992Kountouris v. Varvaris, 476 So.2d 599, 607 (Miss. 1985); see U.S. Const. art. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Woodville v. Pizzati
green
2 sentences1987Woodville v. Pizzati, 119 Miss. 442 , 81 So. 127 (1919), in which we held that the judgment of another state establishing an instrument as a will, is not rendered, by the full faith and credit clause, conclusive as to real estate in Mississippi. 1987Woodville v. Pizzati, 119 Miss. 442 , 81 So. 127 (1919), in which we held that the judgment of another state establishing an instrument as a will, is not rendered, by the full faith and credit clause, conclusive as to real estate in Mississippi. | 2 | 1987–1987 |
Haddock v. Haddock
red
2 sentences1935Under these facts, without reference to whether the appellant was a mere temporary resident of the state of Arkansas for the purpose of securing a divorce, or had acquired a new domicile in that state, the full faith and credit clause of the Federal Constitution does not require that the decree of divorce rendered by the Arkansas court should be recognized or enforced in the courts of this state, and the Supreme Court of the United States so held in the case of Haddock v. Haddock, 201 U. S. 562 , 26 S. Ct. 525 , 50 L. 1935Under these facts, without reference to whether the appellant was a mere temporary resident of the state of Arkansas for the purpose of securing a divorce, or had acquired a new domicile in that state, the full faith and credit clause of the Federal Constitution does not require that the decree of divorce rendered by the Arkansas court should be recognized or enforced in the courts of this state, and the Supreme Court of the United States so held in the case of Haddock v. Haddock, 201 U. S. 562 , 26 S. Ct. 525 , 50 L. | 2 | 1928–1935 |
Vanderbilt v. Vanderbilt
green
2 sentences2006In Vanderbilt v. Vanderbilt, 354 U.S. 416 , 77 S.Ct. 1360 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1456 (1957), the Supreme Court once again applied the full faith and credit clause incident to a divorce action. 2006In Vanderbilt v. Vanderbilt, 354 U.S. 416 , 77 S.Ct. 1360 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1456 (1957), the Supreme Court once again applied the full faith and credit clause incident to a divorce action. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Hunt
green
2 sentences1981The appellants rely upon Magnolia Petroleum Company v. Hunt, 320 U.S. 430 , 64 S.Ct. 208 , 88 L.Ed.2d 149 (1943), which held: But when the employee who has recovered compensation for his injury in one state seeks a second recovery in another he may be met by the plea that full faith and credit requires that his demand, which has become res judicata in one state, must be recognized as such in every other. ( 320 U.S. at 437 , 64 S.Ct. at 213 ). * * * * * * Because there is a full faith and credit clause a defendant may not a second time challenge the validity of the plaintiff’s right which has r 1981The appellants rely upon Magnolia Petroleum Company v. Hunt, 320 U.S. 430 , 64 S.Ct. 208 , 88 L.Ed.2d 149 (1943), which held: But when the employee who has recovered compensation for his injury in one state seeks a second recovery in another he may be met by the plea that full faith and credit requires that his demand, which has become res judicata in one state, must be recognized as such in every other. ( 320 U.S. at 437 , 64 S.Ct. at 213 ). * * * * * * Because there is a full faith and credit clause a defendant may not a second time challenge the validity of the plaintiff’s right which has r | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co.
green
2 sentences1981The quoted language in Magnolia would seemingly be support for the argument of the appellants, but that case has recently been overruled by Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co., - U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 2647 , 65 L.Ed.2d 757 (1980). 1981The quoted language in Magnolia would seemingly be support for the argument of the appellants, but that case has recently been overruled by Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co., - U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 2647 , 65 L.Ed.2d 757 (1980). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Gallant v. Gallant
neutral
2 sentences1978In Gallant v. Gallant, 154 Miss. 832 , 123 So. 883 (1929), this Court held that the alimony decree of a Louisiana court was one which could be annulled, varied or modified by the Louisiana court and therefore was not enforceable in Mississippi under the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution. 1978In Gallant v. Gallant, 154 Miss. 832 , 123 So. 883 (1929), this Court held that the alimony decree of a Louisiana court was one which could be annulled, varied or modified by the Louisiana court and therefore was not enforceable in Mississippi under the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Ex Parte Jeter
green
1 sentence1978The holding was broadly based upon the inherent power of an equity court “. . .to make such changes in the amount of alimony originally granted by the Court for a wife’s support and separate maintenance, as the altered conditions of the parties may show to be equitable and necessary . . . ( 8 S.E.2d at 492 .) Because the decree of the South Carolina court in the case at bar was modifiable as to past due child support payments and future payments, we hold that said decree is not enforceable in Mississippi under the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Coe v. Coe
green
2 sentences1976Coe v. Coe, 334 U.S. 378 , 68 S.Ct. 1094 , 92 L.Ed. 1451 (1945). 1976Coe v. Coe, 334 U.S. 378 , 68 S.Ct. 1094 , 92 L.Ed. 1451 (1945). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Safeway Stores v. Shwayder Brothers
green
2 sentences1966Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Shwayder Bros., Inc., 238 Ark. 768 , 384 S.W.2d 473 (1964). 1966Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Shwayder Bros., Inc., 238 Ark. 768 , 384 S.W.2d 473 (1964). | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Industrial Comm'n of Wis. v. McCartin
green
2 sentences1962But later on the Hunt case was very nearly overruled by the holding in Industrial Comm. of Wisconsin v. McCartin, 330 U. S. 622 , 91 L. 1962But later on the Hunt case was very nearly overruled by the holding in Industrial Comm. of Wisconsin v. McCartin, 330 U. S. 622 , 91 L. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
LATHAM, GUARDIAN, ETC. v. Latham
green
2 sentences1959Latham v. Latham, 223 Miss. 263, 272-273 , 78 So. 2d 147 (1955). 1959Latham v. Latham, 223 Miss. 263, 272-273 , 78 So. 2d 147 (1955). | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'n
green
2 sentences1956Pacific Employers Insurance Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission, 306 U. S. 493 , 59 S. Ct. 629 , 83 L. 1956Pacific Employers Insurance Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission, 306 U. S. 493 , 59 S. Ct. 629 , 83 L. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. Halvey
green
2 sentences1955People of the State of New York v. Halvey, 330 U. S. 610 , 91 L. 1955People of the State of New York v. Halvey, 330 U. S. 610 , 91 L. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Bell v. Bell
green
2 sentences1935Bell v. Bell, 181 U. S. 175 , 21 S. Ct. 551 , 45 L. 1935Bell v. Bell, 181 U. S. 175 , 21 S. Ct. 551 , 45 L. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Barclay v. Barclay
green
1 sentence1929In the case of Barclay v. Barclay, 184 Ill. 375 , 56 N. E. 636 , 637, 51 L. | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.