17 South Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1982–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Mouttetgreen2 sentences1989Another formulation is that an information is sufficient if it "(1) contains the elements of the offense charged and fairly informs the defendant of the charge against him, and (2) enables him to plead an acquittal of the conviction in bar of future prosecutions." State v. Mouttet, 372 N.W.2d 121, 123 (S.D.1985). 1989Another formulation is that an information is sufficient if it “(1) contains the elements of the offense charged and fairly informs the defendant of the charge against him, and (2) enables him to plead an acquittal of the conviction in bar of future prosecutions.” State v. Mouttet, 372 N.W.2d 121, 123 (S.D.1985). | 1 | 3 |
State v. Kleinsassergreen2 sentences1995In State v. Kleinsasser, 436 N.W.2d 279, 281 (S.D.1989), we held that failure to name the victim in the information, among other things, is not a fatal flaw: It is settled law in this state that an indictment or information is sufficient if it (1) contains the elements of the offense charged, and informs him of the charge against him, and (2) enables the defendant to plead an acquittal of the conviction and bar future prosecutions. 1992Kleinsasser, 436 N.W.2d at 281 ; State v. Loop, 422 N.W.2d 420 (S.D.1988). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Pentecostgreen1 sentence2016However, we remanded the case to the circuit court for the court to apply SDCL 23A-27-51 and to make factual findings regarding whether Pentecost “was denied the right to appeal from an original conviction in violation of the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of South Dakota.” State v. Pentecost (Pentecost I), 2015 S.D. 71 , ¶ 10, 868 N.W.2d 590, 593 (quoting SDCL *881 23A-27-51). | 1 | 1 |
Middlebrook v. Stategreen2 sentences2009Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure § 3950.9 (2008). [5] Under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255, a federal court may "vacate and set the judgment aside and [] discharge the prisoner or resentence him or grant a new trial or correct the sentence as may appear appropriate" if the court finds "that there has been such a denial or infringement of the constitutional rights of the prisoner as to render the judgment vulnerable to collateral attack[.]" [6] The Tennessee statute provides in relevant part: (a) When the trial judge conducting a hearing pursuant to this part finds that the petitioner was denied the ri 2009See, e.g., Middlebrook v. State, 815 A.2d 739, 743 (Del.2003). | 1 | 1 |
Application of Deserlygreen2 sentences1995He claims impeachment with this conviction was a violation of due process, citing Loper v. Beto, 405 U.S. 473 , 92 S.Ct. 1014 , 31 L.Ed.2d 374 (1972). “ ‘[A]n attorney must make reasonable investigations or make reasonable decisions to forego particular investigations.’ ” Two Eagle v. Leapley, 522 N.W.2d 765, 770 (S.D.1994) (quoting Application of Deserly, 507 N.W.2d 905, 907 (S.D.1993)). 1995There is no “clear standard to determine how deeply counsel is required to investigate into a defendant’s ... prior convictions.” Id. | 1 | 1 |
Two Eagle v. Leapleygreen1 sentence1995He claims impeachment with this conviction was a violation of due process, citing Loper v. Beto, 405 U.S. 473 , 92 S.Ct. 1014 , 31 L.Ed.2d 374 (1972). “ ‘[A]n attorney must make reasonable investigations or make reasonable decisions to forego particular investigations.’ ” Two Eagle v. Leapley, 522 N.W.2d 765, 770 (S.D.1994) (quoting Application of Deserly, 507 N.W.2d 905, 907 (S.D.1993)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Floodygreen2 sentences1994See State v. Wurtz, 436 N.W.2d 839, 843 (S.D.1989) (holding a defendant need not derive his only protection from double jeopardy from an information, proof beyond an information may be raised); State v. Floody, 481 N.W.2d 242, 247 (S.D.1992). 1994See State v. Wurtz, 436 N.W.2d 839, 843 (S.D.1989) (holding a defendant need not derive his only protection from double jeopardy from an information, proof beyond an information may be raised); State v. Floody, 481 N.W.2d 242, 247 (S.D.1992). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wurtzgreen2 sentences1994See State v. Wurtz, 436 N.W.2d 839, 843 (S.D.1989) (holding a defendant need not derive his only protection from double jeopardy from an information, proof beyond an information may be raised); State v. Floody, 481 N.W.2d 242, 247 (S.D.1992). 1994See State v. Wurtz, 436 N.W.2d 839, 843 (S.D.1989) (holding a defendant need not derive his only protection from double jeopardy from an information, proof beyond an information may be raised); State v. Floody, 481 N.W.2d 242, 247 (S.D.1992). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Baskergreen2 sentences1992An indictment is sufficient if it “contains the elements of the offense charged such that it apprises the defendant with reasonable certainty of the accusations against him, and it must enable him to plead an acquittal of conviction as a bar to future prosecutions for the same offense.” State v. Basker, 468 N.W.2d 413, 416 (S.D.1991). 1992An indictment is sufficient if it "contains the elements of the offense charged such that it apprises the defendant with reasonable certainty of the accusations against him, and it must enable him to plead an acquittal of conviction as a bar to future prosecutions for the same offense." State v. Basker, 468 N.W.2d 413, 416 (S.D.1991). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Laytongreen1 sentence1984See State v. Layton, 337 N.W.2d 809 (S.D.1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Reutter
green
2 sentences1995State v. Reutter, 374 N.W.2d 617 (S.D.1985); State v. Mouttet, 372 N.W.2d 121 (S.D.1985). 1989State v. Reutter, 374 N.W.2d 617 (S.D.1985); State v. Mouttet, 372 N.W.2d 121 (S.D.1985). | 2 | 1989–1995 |
State v. Loop
green
2 sentences1992SDCL 23A-6-4; State v. Loop, 422 N.W.2d 420 (S.D.1988). 1992Kleinsasser, 436 N.W.2d at 281 ; State v. Loop, 422 N.W.2d 420 (S.D.1988). | 2 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Quist
green
1 sentence2023“When conducting our review, we ‘determine whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction.’” Stone, 2019 S.D. 18, ¶ 38 , 925 N.W.2d at 500 (quoting State v. Quist, 2018 S.D. 30 , ¶ 13, 910 N.W.2d 900, 904 ). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Stone
green
1 sentence2023“When conducting our review, we ‘determine whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction.’” Stone, 2019 S.D. 18, ¶ 38 , 925 N.W.2d at 500 (quoting State v. Quist, 2018 S.D. 30 , ¶ 13, 910 N.W.2d 900, 904 ). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Stone
green
1 sentence2023“When conducting our review, we ‘determine whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction.’” Stone, 2019 S.D. 18, ¶ 38 , 925 N.W.2d at 500 (quoting State v. Quist, 2018 S.D. 30 , ¶ 13, 910 N.W.2d 900, 904 ). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of Social Services Ex Rel. B.H.
green
1 sentence2015Then, the court “shall issue a new judgment and impose the same sentence if such relief is requested within a reasonable time and an adequate record of the original trial proceeding is available for review.” Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Larson
green
1 sentence1995State v. Frey, 440 N.W.2d 721 (S.D.1989); State v. Huber, 356 N.W.2d 468 (S.D.1984); State v. Larson, 294 N.W.2d 801 (S.D.1980); State v. Barber, 83 S.D. 289 , 158 N.W.2d 870 (S.D.1968). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Huber
green
1 sentence1995State v. Frey, 440 N.W.2d 721 (S.D.1989); State v. Huber, 356 N.W.2d 468 (S.D.1984); State v. Larson, 294 N.W.2d 801 (S.D.1980); State v. Barber, 83 S.D. 289 , 158 N.W.2d 870 (S.D.1968). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Barber
green
2 sentences1995State v. Frey, 440 N.W.2d 721 (S.D.1989); State v. Huber, 356 N.W.2d 468 (S.D.1984); State v. Larson, 294 N.W.2d 801 (S.D.1980); State v. Barber, 83 S.D. 289 , 158 N.W.2d 870 (S.D.1968). 1995State v. Frey, 440 N.W.2d 721 (S.D.1989); State v. Huber, 356 N.W.2d 468 (S.D.1984); State v. Larson, 294 N.W.2d 801 (S.D.1980); State v. Barber, 83 S.D. 289 , 158 N.W.2d 870 (S.D.1968). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Loper v. Beto
green
2 sentences1995He claims impeachment with this conviction was a violation of due process, citing Loper v. Beto, 405 U.S. 473 , 92 S.Ct. 1014 , 31 L.Ed.2d 374 (1972). “ ‘[A]n attorney must make reasonable investigations or make reasonable decisions to forego particular investigations.’ ” Two Eagle v. Leapley, 522 N.W.2d 765, 770 (S.D.1994) (quoting Application of Deserly, 507 N.W.2d 905, 907 (S.D.1993)). 1995He claims impeachment with this conviction was a violation of due process, citing Loper v. Beto, 405 U.S. 473 , 92 S.Ct. 1014 , 31 L.Ed.2d 374 (1972). “ ‘[A]n attorney must make reasonable investigations or make reasonable decisions to forego particular investigations.’ ” Two Eagle v. Leapley, 522 N.W.2d 765, 770 (S.D.1994) (quoting Application of Deserly, 507 N.W.2d 905, 907 (S.D.1993)). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Frey
green
1 sentence1995State v. Frey, 440 N.W.2d 721 (S.D.1989); State v. Huber, 356 N.W.2d 468 (S.D.1984); State v. Larson, 294 N.W.2d 801 (S.D.1980); State v. Barber, 83 S.D. 289 , 158 N.W.2d 870 (S.D.1968). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Traversie
green
2 sentences1989In State v. Traversie, 387 N.W.2d 2 (S.D. 1986), the court affirmed a conviction because the instruction created a permissive inference as opposed to a mandatory presumption. 1989In State v. Traversie, 387 N.W.2d 2 (S.D.1986), the court affirmed a conviction because the instruction created a permissive inference as opposed to a mandatory presumption. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Brown
green
2 sentences1985State v. Brown, 285 N.W.2d 843 (S.D.1979); State v. Lange, 82 S.D. 666 , 152 N.W.2d 635 (1967); State v. Blue Fox Bar, Inc., 80 S.D. 565 , 128 N.W.2d 561 (1964); State v. Belt, 79 S.D. 324 , 111 N.W.2d 588 (1961); State v. Smith, 77 S.D. 5 , 84 N.W.2d 247 (1957); State v. Strauser, 75 S.D. 266 , 63 N.W.2d 345 (1954). 1985State v. Brown, 285 N.W.2d 843 (S.D.1979); State v. Lange, 82 S.D. 666 , 152 N.W.2d 635 (1967); State v. Blue Fox Bar, Inc., 80 S.D. 565 , 128 N.W.2d 561 (1964); State v. Belt, 79 S.D. 324 , 111 N.W.2d 588 (1961); State v. Smith, 77 S.D. 5 , 84 N.W.2d 247 (1957); State v. Strauser, 75 S.D. 266 , 63 N.W.2d 345 (1954). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Smith
neutral
2 sentences1985State v. Brown, 285 N.W.2d 843 (S.D.1979); State v. Lange, 82 S.D. 666 , 152 N.W.2d 635 (1967); State v. Blue Fox Bar, Inc., 80 S.D. 565 , 128 N.W.2d 561 (1964); State v. Belt, 79 S.D. 324 , 111 N.W.2d 588 (1961); State v. Smith, 77 S.D. 5 , 84 N.W.2d 247 (1957); State v. Strauser, 75 S.D. 266 , 63 N.W.2d 345 (1954). 1985State v. Brown, 285 N.W.2d 843 (S.D.1979); State v. Lange, 82 S.D. 666 , 152 N.W.2d 635 (1967); State v. Blue Fox Bar, Inc., 80 S.D. 565 , 128 N.W.2d 561 (1964); State v. Belt, 79 S.D. 324 , 111 N.W.2d 588 (1961); State v. Smith, 77 S.D. 5 , 84 N.W.2d 247 (1957); State v. Strauser, 75 S.D. 266 , 63 N.W.2d 345 (1954). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Blue Fox Bar, Inc.
green
2 sentences1985State v. Brown, 285 N.W.2d 843 (S.D.1979); State v. Lange, 82 S.D. 666 , 152 N.W.2d 635 (1967); State v. Blue Fox Bar, Inc., 80 S.D. 565 , 128 N.W.2d 561 (1964); State v. Belt, 79 S.D. 324 , 111 N.W.2d 588 (1961); State v. Smith, 77 S.D. 5 , 84 N.W.2d 247 (1957); State v. Strauser, 75 S.D. 266 , 63 N.W.2d 345 (1954). 1985State v. Brown, 285 N.W.2d 843 (S.D.1979); State v. Lange, 82 S.D. 666 , 152 N.W.2d 635 (1967); State v. Blue Fox Bar, Inc., 80 S.D. 565 , 128 N.W.2d 561 (1964); State v. Belt, 79 S.D. 324 , 111 N.W.2d 588 (1961); State v. Smith, 77 S.D. 5 , 84 N.W.2d 247 (1957); State v. Strauser, 75 S.D. 266 , 63 N.W.2d 345 (1954). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Strauser
neutral
2 sentences1985State v. Brown, 285 N.W.2d 843 (S.D.1979); State v. Lange, 82 S.D. 666 , 152 N.W.2d 635 (1967); State v. Blue Fox Bar, Inc., 80 S.D. 565 , 128 N.W.2d 561 (1964); State v. Belt, 79 S.D. 324 , 111 N.W.2d 588 (1961); State v. Smith, 77 S.D. 5 , 84 N.W.2d 247 (1957); State v. Strauser, 75 S.D. 266 , 63 N.W.2d 345 (1954). 1985State v. Brown, 285 N.W.2d 843 (S.D.1979); State v. Lange, 82 S.D. 666 , 152 N.W.2d 635 (1967); State v. Blue Fox Bar, Inc., 80 S.D. 565 , 128 N.W.2d 561 (1964); State v. Belt, 79 S.D. 324 , 111 N.W.2d 588 (1961); State v. Smith, 77 S.D. 5 , 84 N.W.2d 247 (1957); State v. Strauser, 75 S.D. 266 , 63 N.W.2d 345 (1954). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Lange
green
2 sentences1985State v. Brown, 285 N.W.2d 843 (S.D.1979); State v. Lange, 82 S.D. 666 , 152 N.W.2d 635 (1967); State v. Blue Fox Bar, Inc., 80 S.D. 565 , 128 N.W.2d 561 (1964); State v. Belt, 79 S.D. 324 , 111 N.W.2d 588 (1961); State v. Smith, 77 S.D. 5 , 84 N.W.2d 247 (1957); State v. Strauser, 75 S.D. 266 , 63 N.W.2d 345 (1954). 1985State v. Brown, 285 N.W.2d 843 (S.D.1979); State v. Lange, 82 S.D. 666 , 152 N.W.2d 635 (1967); State v. Blue Fox Bar, Inc., 80 S.D. 565 , 128 N.W.2d 561 (1964); State v. Belt, 79 S.D. 324 , 111 N.W.2d 588 (1961); State v. Smith, 77 S.D. 5 , 84 N.W.2d 247 (1957); State v. Strauser, 75 S.D. 266 , 63 N.W.2d 345 (1954). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Belt
green
2 sentences1985State v. Brown, 285 N.W.2d 843 (S.D.1979); State v. Lange, 82 S.D. 666 , 152 N.W.2d 635 (1967); State v. Blue Fox Bar, Inc., 80 S.D. 565 , 128 N.W.2d 561 (1964); State v. Belt, 79 S.D. 324 , 111 N.W.2d 588 (1961); State v. Smith, 77 S.D. 5 , 84 N.W.2d 247 (1957); State v. Strauser, 75 S.D. 266 , 63 N.W.2d 345 (1954). 1985State v. Brown, 285 N.W.2d 843 (S.D.1979); State v. Lange, 82 S.D. 666 , 152 N.W.2d 635 (1967); State v. Blue Fox Bar, Inc., 80 S.D. 565 , 128 N.W.2d 561 (1964); State v. Belt, 79 S.D. 324 , 111 N.W.2d 588 (1961); State v. Smith, 77 S.D. 5 , 84 N.W.2d 247 (1957); State v. Strauser, 75 S.D. 266 , 63 N.W.2d 345 (1954). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. STBAUSER
green
2 sentences1985State v. Brown, 285 N.W.2d 843 (S.D.1979); State v. Lange, 82 S.D. 666 , 152 N.W.2d 635 (1967); State v. Blue Fox Bar, Inc., 80 S.D. 565 , 128 N.W.2d 561 (1964); State v. Belt, 79 S.D. 324 , 111 N.W.2d 588 (1961); State v. Smith, 77 S.D. 5 , 84 N.W.2d 247 (1957); State v. Strauser, 75 S.D. 266 , 63 N.W.2d 345 (1954). 1985State v. Brown, 285 N.W.2d 843 (S.D.1979); State v. Lange, 82 S.D. 666 , 152 N.W.2d 635 (1967); State v. Blue Fox Bar, Inc., 80 S.D. 565 , 128 N.W.2d 561 (1964); State v. Belt, 79 S.D. 324 , 111 N.W.2d 588 (1961); State v. Smith, 77 S.D. 5 , 84 N.W.2d 247 (1957); State v. Strauser, 75 S.D. 266 , 63 N.W.2d 345 (1954). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Quinn
green
2 sentences1982Subsequently, in State v. Quinn, 286 N.W.2d 320 (S.D.1979), this court again examined SDCL 19-14-12. 2 In Quinn , we cautioned “trial courts to make a definite finding that the evidence is more probative than prejudicial before allowing prior convictions into evidence.” Id., 286 N.W.2d at 323 . 1982Subsequently, in State v. Quinn, 286 N.W.2d 320 (S.D.1979), this court again examined SDCL 19-14-12. 2 In Quinn , we cautioned “trial courts to make a definite finding that the evidence is more probative than prejudicial before allowing prior convictions into evidence.” Id., 286 N.W.2d at 323 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.