Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
25 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1914–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bond v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2015App. Ct. 1992) (noting “[the pathologist’s] opinion as to homicide, caused by the defendant’s body being positioned on top of her sleeping son, did not in any way add to the evidence already presented to the jury or assist them in reaching their own conclusions,” but upholding the conviction because error was harmless); State v. Vining, 645 A.2d 20 , 20–21 (Me. 1994) (concluding “the medical examiner’s opinion that [the victim’s] death was a homicide was not a product of her expertise” and “amounted 27 to an assessment of the credibility and investigatory acumen of the police” when “[she] conc 2015App. Ct. 1992) (noting “[the pathologist’s] opinion as to homicide, caused by the defendant’s body being positioned on top of her sleeping son, did not in any way add to the evidence already presented to the jury or assist them in reaching their own conclusions,” but upholding the conviction because error was harmless); State v. Vining, 645 A.2d 20 , 20–21 (Me. 1994) (concluding “the medical examiner’s opinion that [the victim’s] death was a homicide was not a product of her expertise” and “amounted 26 to an assessment of the credibility and investigatory acumen of the police” when “[she] conc | 3 | 3 |
State v. Jamersongreen2 sentences2015App. Ct. 1992) (noting “[the pathologist’s] opinion as to homicide, caused by the defendant’s body being positioned on top of her sleeping son, did not in any way add to the evidence already presented to the jury or assist them in reaching their own conclusions,” but upholding the conviction because error was harmless); State v. Vining, 645 A.2d 20 , 20–21 (Me. 1994) (concluding “the medical examiner’s opinion that [the victim’s] death was a homicide was not a product of her expertise” and “amounted 27 to an assessment of the credibility and investigatory acumen of the police” when “[she] conc 2015App. Ct. 1992) (noting “[the pathologist’s] opinion as to homicide, caused by the defendant’s body being positioned on top of her sleeping son, did not in any way add to the evidence already presented to the jury or assist them in reaching their own conclusions,” but upholding the conviction because error was harmless); State v. Vining, 645 A.2d 20 , 20–21 (Me. 1994) (concluding “the medical examiner’s opinion that [the victim’s] death was a homicide was not a product of her expertise” and “amounted 26 to an assessment of the credibility and investigatory acumen of the police” when “[she] conc | 3 | 3 |
People v. Eberlegreen2 sentences2015App. Ct. 1992) (noting “[the pathologist’s] opinion as to homicide, caused by the defendant’s body being positioned on top of her sleeping son, did not in any way add to the evidence already presented to the jury or assist them in reaching their own conclusions,” but upholding the conviction because error was harmless); State v. Vining, 645 A.2d 20 , 20–21 (Me. 1994) (concluding “the medical examiner’s opinion that [the victim’s] death was a homicide was not a product of her expertise” and “amounted 27 to an assessment of the credibility and investigatory acumen of the police” when “[she] conc 2015App. Ct. 1992) (noting “[the pathologist’s] opinion as to homicide, caused by the defendant’s body being positioned on top of her sleeping son, did not in any way add to the evidence already presented to the jury or assist them in reaching their own conclusions,” but upholding the conviction because error was harmless); State v. Vining, 645 A.2d 20 , 20–21 (Me. 1994) (concluding “the medical examiner’s opinion that [the victim’s] death was a homicide was not a product of her expertise” and “amounted 26 to an assessment of the credibility and investigatory acumen of the police” when “[she] conc | 3 | 3 |
State of Iowa v. Valentin Velezgreen2 sentences2016See generally State v. Ross, 845 N.W.2d 692, 700-01 (Iowa 2014); State v. Copenhaver, 844 N.W.2d 442, 447-52 (Iowa 2014); State v. Velez, 829 N.W.2d 572, 584 (Iowa 2013); State v. Kidd, 562 N.W.2d 764, 765-66 (Iowa 1997); State v. Constable, 505 N.W.2d 473, 477-78 (Iowa 1993). 2015See generally State v. Ross, 845 N.W.2d 692 , 700- 01 (Iowa 2014); State v. Copenhaver, 844 N.W.2d 442, 447-52 (Iowa 2014); State v. Velez, 829 N.W.2d 572, 584 (Iowa 2013); State v. Kidd, 562 N.W.2d 4 764, 765-66 (Iowa 1997); State v. Constable, 505 N.W.2d 473, 477-78 (Iowa 1993). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Constablegreen2 sentences2016See generally State v. Ross, 845 N.W.2d 692, 700-01 (Iowa 2014); State v. Copenhaver, 844 N.W.2d 442, 447-52 (Iowa 2014); State v. Velez, 829 N.W.2d 572, 584 (Iowa 2013); State v. Kidd, 562 N.W.2d 764, 765-66 (Iowa 1997); State v. Constable, 505 N.W.2d 473, 477-78 (Iowa 1993). 2015See generally State v. Ross, 845 N.W.2d 692 , 700- 01 (Iowa 2014); State v. Copenhaver, 844 N.W.2d 442, 447-52 (Iowa 2014); State v. Velez, 829 N.W.2d 572, 584 (Iowa 2013); State v. Kidd, 562 N.W.2d 4 764, 765-66 (Iowa 1997); State v. Constable, 505 N.W.2d 473, 477-78 (Iowa 1993). | 2 | 2 |
State of Iowa v. Randy Mitchell Copenhavergreen2 sentences2016See generally State v. Ross, 845 N.W.2d 692, 700-01 (Iowa 2014); State v. Copenhaver, 844 N.W.2d 442, 447-52 (Iowa 2014); State v. Velez, 829 N.W.2d 572, 584 (Iowa 2013); State v. Kidd, 562 N.W.2d 764, 765-66 (Iowa 1997); State v. Constable, 505 N.W.2d 473, 477-78 (Iowa 1993). 2015See generally State v. Ross, 845 N.W.2d 692 , 700- 01 (Iowa 2014); State v. Copenhaver, 844 N.W.2d 442, 447-52 (Iowa 2014); State v. Velez, 829 N.W.2d 572, 584 (Iowa 2013); State v. Kidd, 562 N.W.2d 4 764, 765-66 (Iowa 1997); State v. Constable, 505 N.W.2d 473, 477-78 (Iowa 1993). | 2 | 2 |
State of Iowa v. Aki Malik Rossgreen2 sentences2016See generally State v. Ross, 845 N.W.2d 692, 700-01 (Iowa 2014); State v. Copenhaver, 844 N.W.2d 442, 447-52 (Iowa 2014); State v. Velez, 829 N.W.2d 572, 584 (Iowa 2013); State v. Kidd, 562 N.W.2d 764, 765-66 (Iowa 1997); State v. Constable, 505 N.W.2d 473, 477-78 (Iowa 1993). 2015See generally State v. Ross, 845 N.W.2d 692 , 700- 01 (Iowa 2014); State v. Copenhaver, 844 N.W.2d 442, 447-52 (Iowa 2014); State v. Velez, 829 N.W.2d 572, 584 (Iowa 2013); State v. Kidd, 562 N.W.2d 4 764, 765-66 (Iowa 1997); State v. Constable, 505 N.W.2d 473, 477-78 (Iowa 1993). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Robygreen2 sentences2008Rule 5.609(b) “creates a rebuttable presumption that convictions over ten years old are more prejudicial than probative and are therefore inadmissible.” State v. Roby, 495 N.W.2d 773, 775 (Iowa Ct. App.1992). 2008Rule 5.609(b) “creates a rebuttable presumption that convictions over ten years old are more prejudicial than probative and are therefore inadmissible.” State v. Roby, 495 N.W.2d 773, 775 (Iowa Ct. App. 1992). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Mouagreen1 sentence2022The test for harmless error “is whether the rights of the objecting party have been ‘injuriously affected by the error’ or whether the party has ‘suffered a miscarriage of justice.’ ” State v. Parker, 747 N.W.2d 196, 209 (Iowa 2008) (quoting Sullivan, 678 N.W.2d at 29). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Parkergreen1 sentence2022The test for harmless error “is whether the rights of the objecting party have been ‘injuriously affected by the error’ or whether the party has ‘suffered a miscarriage of justice.’ ” State v. Parker, 747 N.W.2d 196, 209 (Iowa 2008) (quoting Sullivan, 678 N.W.2d at 29). | 1 | 1 |
Jae Lee v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2020For purposes of this clause, the term ‘protection order’ means any injunction issued for the purpose of preventing violent or threatening acts of domestic violence, including temporary or final orders issued by civil or criminal courts (other than support or child custody orders or provisions) whether obtained by filing an independent action or as a pendente lite order in another proceeding.”). 12 Still, Geimah’s plea allowed him to avoid being convicted of an “aggravated felony” and avoid a term of imprisonment.4 “[A] noncitizen convicted of [an aggravated felony] is subject to mandatory depo | 1 | 1 |
State Of Iowa Vs. Robert L. Hanesgreen1 sentence2019See State v. Hanes, 790 N.W.2d 545 , 551 n.2 (Iowa 2010). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Strawgreen1 sentence2017See State v. Straw, 709 N.W.2d 128 , 3 133 (Iowa 2006) (stating a defendant’s failure to move in arrest of judgment bars direct appeal of a conviction but not a claim that the failure was a result of ineffective assistance of counsel). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Simpsongreen1 sentence2017A conviction does not bar a prosecution of the convicted person for an indictable offense when the acts which caused or contributed to the delinquency or dependency of the child are indictable.” See Simpson, 118 N.W.2d at 609 (describing legislature’s recognition that conviction of contributing to delinquency, a non-indictable misdemeanor, “should not bar a 21 prosecution for an indictable offense”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kiddgreen1 sentence2016See generally State v. Ross, 845 N.W.2d 692, 700-01 (Iowa 2014); State v. Copenhaver, 844 N.W.2d 442, 447-52 (Iowa 2014); State v. Velez, 829 N.W.2d 572, 584 (Iowa 2013); State v. Kidd, 562 N.W.2d 764, 765-66 (Iowa 1997); State v. Constable, 505 N.W.2d 473, 477-78 (Iowa 1993). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rankingreen1 sentence2013Therefore, pursuant to Rankin , Jentz does not fall within the purview of the second paragraph, because he was not “convicted two or more times of a violation of this subsection....” Iowa Code § 124.401 (5) (emphasis added); see also Rankin, 666 N.W.2d at 611 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Reavesgreen1 sentence2013Id. at 493. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hensleygreen1 sentence1999State v. Hensley, 534 N.W.2d 379, 382 (Iowa 1995). | 1 | 1 |
Arizona v. Fulminantegreen2 sentences1995Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 306 , 111 S.Ct. 1246, 1263 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302, 329 (1991) (citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 23 , 87 S.Ct. 824, 827 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705, 709 (1967)); State v. Lanphear, 220 N.W.2d 618, 622 (Iowa 1974). 1995Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 306 , 111 S.Ct. 1246, 1263 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302, 329 (1991) (citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 23 , 87 S.Ct. 824, 827 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705, 709 (1967)); State v. Lanphear, 220 N.W.2d 618, 622 (Iowa 1974). | 1 | 1 |
Chapman v. Californiared2 sentences1995Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 306 , 111 S.Ct. 1246, 1263 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302, 329 (1991) (citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 23 , 87 S.Ct. 824, 827 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705, 709 (1967)); State v. Lanphear, 220 N.W.2d 618, 622 (Iowa 1974). 1995Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 306 , 111 S.Ct. 1246, 1263 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302, 329 (1991) (citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 23 , 87 S.Ct. 824, 827 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705, 709 (1967)); State v. Lanphear, 220 N.W.2d 618, 622 (Iowa 1974). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lanpheargreen1 sentence1995Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 306 , 111 S.Ct. 1246, 1263 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302, 329 (1991) (citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 23 , 87 S.Ct. 824, 827 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705, 709 (1967)); State v. Lanphear, 220 N.W.2d 618, 622 (Iowa 1974). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Nunngreen2 sentences1981See, e. g., Kimoktoak v. State, 584 P.2d 25, 31 (Alaska 1978); People v. Nunn, 77 Ill.2d 243, 251-52 , 32 Ill.Dec. 914, 917-18 , 396 N.E.2d 27, 30-31 (1979); State v. Feintuch, 150 N.J.Super. 414, 420-21 , 375 A.2d 1223, 1226-27 (1977); State v. Lemme, 104 R.I. 416, 423 , 244 A.2d 585, 589 (1968); 7 Am.Jur.2d Automobiles and Highway Traffic § 247 (1963); Annot., 23 A.L.R.2d 497 (1969). 1981See, e. g., Kimoktoak v. State, 584 P.2d 25, 31 (Alaska 1978); People v. Nunn, 77 Ill.2d 243, 251-52 , 32 Ill.Dec. 914, 917-18 , 396 N.E.2d 27, 30-31 (1979); State v. Feintuch, 150 N.J.Super. 414, 420-21 , 375 A.2d 1223, 1226-27 (1977); State v. Lemme, 104 R.I. 416, 423 , 244 A.2d 585, 589 (1968); 7 Am.Jur.2d Automobiles and Highway Traffic § 247 (1963); Annot., 23 A.L.R.2d 497 (1969). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lemmegreen2 sentences1981See, e. g., Kimoktoak v. State, 584 P.2d 25, 31 (Alaska 1978); People v. Nunn, 77 Ill.2d 243, 251-52 , 32 Ill.Dec. 914, 917-18 , 396 N.E.2d 27, 30-31 (1979); State v. Feintuch, 150 N.J.Super. 414, 420-21 , 375 A.2d 1223, 1226-27 (1977); State v. Lemme, 104 R.I. 416, 423 , 244 A.2d 585, 589 (1968); 7 Am.Jur.2d Automobiles and Highway Traffic § 247 (1963); Annot., 23 A.L.R.2d 497 (1969). 1981See, e. g., Kimoktoak v. State, 584 P.2d 25, 31 (Alaska 1978); People v. Nunn, 77 Ill.2d 243, 251-52 , 32 Ill.Dec. 914, 917-18 , 396 N.E.2d 27, 30-31 (1979); State v. Feintuch, 150 N.J.Super. 414, 420-21 , 375 A.2d 1223, 1226-27 (1977); State v. Lemme, 104 R.I. 416, 423 , 244 A.2d 585, 589 (1968); 7 Am.Jur.2d Automobiles and Highway Traffic § 247 (1963); Annot., 23 A.L.R.2d 497 (1969). | 1 | 1 |
Kimoktoak v. Stategreen1 sentence1981See, e. g., Kimoktoak v. State, 584 P.2d 25, 31 (Alaska 1978); People v. Nunn, 77 Ill.2d 243, 251-52 , 32 Ill.Dec. 914, 917-18 , 396 N.E.2d 27, 30-31 (1979); State v. Feintuch, 150 N.J.Super. 414, 420-21 , 375 A.2d 1223, 1226-27 (1977); State v. Lemme, 104 R.I. 416, 423 , 244 A.2d 585, 589 (1968); 7 Am.Jur.2d Automobiles and Highway Traffic § 247 (1963); Annot., 23 A.L.R.2d 497 (1969). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Feintuchgreen2 sentences1981See, e. g., Kimoktoak v. State, 584 P.2d 25, 31 (Alaska 1978); People v. Nunn, 77 Ill.2d 243, 251-52 , 32 Ill.Dec. 914, 917-18 , 396 N.E.2d 27, 30-31 (1979); State v. Feintuch, 150 N.J.Super. 414, 420-21 , 375 A.2d 1223, 1226-27 (1977); State v. Lemme, 104 R.I. 416, 423 , 244 A.2d 585, 589 (1968); 7 Am.Jur.2d Automobiles and Highway Traffic § 247 (1963); Annot., 23 A.L.R.2d 497 (1969). 1981See, e. g., Kimoktoak v. State, 584 P.2d 25, 31 (Alaska 1978); People v. Nunn, 77 Ill.2d 243, 251-52 , 32 Ill.Dec. 914, 917-18 , 396 N.E.2d 27, 30-31 (1979); State v. Feintuch, 150 N.J.Super. 414, 420-21 , 375 A.2d 1223, 1226-27 (1977); State v. Lemme, 104 R.I. 416, 423 , 244 A.2d 585, 589 (1968); 7 Am.Jur.2d Automobiles and Highway Traffic § 247 (1963); Annot., 23 A.L.R.2d 497 (1969). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Vining
green
2 sentences2015App. Ct. 1992) (noting “[the pathologist’s] opinion as to homicide, caused by the defendant’s body being positioned on top of her sleeping son, did not in any way add to the evidence already presented to the jury or assist them in reaching their own conclusions,” but upholding the conviction because error was harmless); State v. Vining, 645 A.2d 20 , 20–21 (Me. 1994) (concluding “the medical examiner’s opinion that [the victim’s] death was a homicide was not a product of her expertise” and “amounted 27 to an assessment of the credibility and investigatory acumen of the police” when “[she] conc 2015App. Ct. 1992) (noting “[the pathologist’s] opinion as to homicide, caused by the defendant’s body being positioned on top of her sleeping son, did not in any way add to the evidence already presented to the jury or assist them in reaching their own conclusions,” but upholding the conviction because error was harmless); State v. Vining, 645 A.2d 20 , 20–21 (Me. 1994) (concluding “the medical examiner’s opinion that [the victim’s] death was a homicide was not a product of her expertise” and “amounted 26 to an assessment of the credibility and investigatory acumen of the police” when “[she] conc | 3 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Truesdell
green
1 sentence2019State v. Truesdell , 679 N.W.2d 611 , 616 (Iowa 2004), superseded by statutory amendment on other grounds , 2004 Iowa Acts ch. 1057, § 1 (codified at Iowa Code § 124.401 (4) (2005) ), as recognized in State v. Milom , 744 N.W.2d 117 , 121-22 (Iowa App. 2007). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Milom
green
1 sentence2019State v. Truesdell , 679 N.W.2d 611 , 616 (Iowa 2004), superseded by statutory amendment on other grounds , 2004 Iowa Acts ch. 1057, § 1 (codified at Iowa Code § 124.401 (4) (2005) ), as recognized in State v. Milom , 744 N.W.2d 117 , 121-22 (Iowa App. 2007). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
David M. Robinson v. United States
green
2 sentences1977In Robinson v. United States, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 58 , 459 F.2d 847 (1972), the court refused to upset a conviction on the claim that defendant’s deceased sister might have been able to help reconstruct the pattern of defendant’s activities. 1977In Robinson v. United States, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 58 , 459 F.2d 847 (1972), the court refused to upset a conviction on the claim that defendant’s deceased sister might have been able to help reconstruct the pattern of defendant’s activities. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
State v. Sheffey
green
1 sentence1976State v. Sheffey, supra. Viewed in this manner, the record discloses ample evidence to support a conviction for violation of § 712.1. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| State v. Jones green | 1 | 1969–1969 |
| State ex rel. City of Dubuque v. Steger neutral | 1 | 1969–1969 |
| Rosenblum v. Griffin green | 1 | 1965–1965 |
| State v. Parris green | 1 | 1928–1928 |
| State v. Witham neutral | 1 | 1915–1915 |
| State v. . Dunston neutral | 1 | 1915–1915 |
| State v. Morgan green | 1 | 1915–1915 |
| Smith v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co. green | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.