Edwards rule in Kansas

16 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Nashgreen kan · 2006 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010See State v. Nash, 281 Kan. 600, 602 , 133 P.3d 836 (2006) (appellate courts will not reverse where district court reaches correct result, albeit for the wrong reason). 2010See State v. Nash, 281 Kan. 600, 602 , 133 P.3d 836 (2006) (appellate courts will not reverse where district court reaches correct result, albeit for the wrong reason).	1	1
State v. Adamsgreen kan · 2007 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010See State v. Adams, 283 Kan. 365, 369 , 153 P.3d 512 (2007) (“The State bears the responsibility for ensuring that the accused is provided with a speedy trial in accordance with K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 22-3402.”). 2010See State v. Adams, 283 Kan. 365, 369 , 153 P.3d 512 (2007) (“The State bears the responsibility for ensuring that the accused is provided with a speedy trial in accordance with K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 22-3402.”).	1	1
State v. Walkergreen kan · 2007 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010See State v. Walker, 283 Kan. 587, 594 , 153 P.3d 1257 (2007). 2010See State v. Walker, 283 Kan. 587, 594 , 153 P.3d 1257 (2007).	1	1
Montejo v. Louisianagreen scotus · 2009 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 2 sentences 2009Specifically, it overruled Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625 , 106 S.Ct. 1404 , 89 L.Ed.2d 631 (1986), because of that decision's "`wholesale importation of the Edwards rule into the Sixth Amendment.'" Montejo, ___ U.S. at ___, 129 S.Ct. at 2085, 173 L.Ed.2d at 964 ; ___ U.S. at ___, 129 S.Ct. at 2091, 173 L.Ed.2d at 970 (overruling Jackson ). 2009Specifically, it overruled Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625 , 106 S.Ct. 1404 , 89 L.Ed.2d 631 (1986), because of that decision's "`wholesale importation of the Edwards rule into the Sixth Amendment.'" Montejo, ___ U.S. at ___, 129 S.Ct. at 2085, 173 L.Ed.2d at 964 ; ___ U.S. at ___, 129 S.Ct. at 2091, 173 L.Ed.2d at 970 (overruling Jackson ).	1	1
Davis v. United Statesgreen scotus · 1994 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 2 sentences 2002See Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 458 , 129 L. 2002See Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 458 , 129 L.	1	1
Michael Kelley v. Stephen Kaiser and Attorney Generalgreen ca10 · 1993 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 1 sentence 2002In Kelley v. Kaiser, 992 F.2d 1509, 1516 (10th Cir. 1993), the Tenth Circuit held that because the petitioner was denied an evidentiary hearing after applying the Edwards requirement, the State’s factfinding procedure was not adequate to afford a full and fair hearing on the certification issue.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (15)

Case	Cited	Years
Michigan v. Harvey green scotus · 1990 2 sentences 2018This so-called " Edwards rule" is "designed to prevent police from badgering a defendant into waiving his previously asserted Miranda rights." Michigan v. Harvey , 494 U.S. 344 , 350, 110 S.Ct. 1176 , 108 L.Ed. 2d 293 (1990). 2018This so-called " Edwards rule" is "designed to prevent police from badgering a defendant into waiving his previously asserted Miranda rights." Michigan v. Harvey , 494 U.S. 344 , 350, 110 S.Ct. 1176 , 108 L.Ed. 2d 293 (1990).	3	2003–2018
State v. Edwards green kan · 1994 2 sentences 2016State v. Edwards, 254 Kan. 489, 489 , 867 P.2d 355 (1994). 2016State v. Edwards, 254 Kan. 489, 489 , 867 P.2d 355 (1994).	1	2016–2016
State v. Edwards green kan · 2010 1 sentence 2013And the court went so far as to say that “perhaps the better practice would have been to modify the patterned instruction accordingly.” Edwards, 291 Kan. at 552 .	1	2013–2013
State v. Arnett green kan · 2010 2 sentences 2012State v. Arnett, 290 Kan. 41, 47 , 223 P.3d 780 (2010). 2012State v. Arnett, 290 Kan. 41, 47 , 223 P.3d 780 (2010).	1	2012–2012
State v. Rodriguez-Garcia green kanctapp · 1999 1 sentence 2010Further, the motion judge noted that in State v. Rodriguez-Garcia, 27 Kan.	1	2010–2010
State v. Moncla green kan · 2000 2 sentences 2010State v. Moncla, 269 Kan. 61, 65 , 4 P.3d 618 (2000); Supreme Court Rule 165 (2009 Kan. 2010State v. Moncla, 269 Kan. 61, 65 , 4 P.3d 618 (2000); Supreme Court Rule 165 (2009 Kan.	1	2010–2010
Michigan v. Jackson red scotus · 1986 2 sentences 2009Specifically, it overruled Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625 , 106 S.Ct. 1404 , 89 L.Ed.2d 631 (1986), because of that decision's "`wholesale importation of the Edwards rule into the Sixth Amendment.'" Montejo, ___ U.S. at ___, 129 S.Ct. at 2085, 173 L.Ed.2d at 964 ; ___ U.S. at ___, 129 S.Ct. at 2091, 173 L.Ed.2d at 970 (overruling Jackson ). 2009Specifically, it overruled Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625 , 106 S.Ct. 1404 , 89 L.Ed.2d 631 (1986), because of that decision's "`wholesale importation of the Edwards rule into the Sixth Amendment.'" Montejo, ___ U.S. at ___, 129 S.Ct. at 2085, 173 L.Ed.2d at 964 ; ___ U.S. at ___, 129 S.Ct. at 2091, 173 L.Ed.2d at 970 (overruling Jackson ).	1	2009–2009
State v. Paul green kan · 2008 2 sentences 2008State v. Paul, 285 Kan. 658, 670 , 175 P.3d 840 (2008). 2008State v. Paul, 285 Kan. 658, 670 , 175 P.3d 840 (2008).	1	2008–2008
State v. Alvarez neutral kanctapp · 2001 2 sentences 2006The Alvarez panel rejected the Edwards analysis because it “failed to mention K.S.A. 79-5204(c), which requires tihat a dealer affix a drug tax stamp ‘immediately after receiving the substance.’ ” Alvarez, 29 Kan. 2006The Alvarez panel rejected the Edwards analysis because it “failed to mention K.S.A. 79-5204(c), which requires tihat a dealer affix a drug tax stamp ‘immediately after receiving the substance.’ ” Alvarez, 29 Kan.	1	2006–2006
State v. Walker green kan · 2003 2 sentences 2005Ed. 2d 293 , 110 S. Ct. 1176 [1990].) See Henry, 273 Kan. at 613.” 276 Kan. at 944-46 . 2005Ed. 2d 293 , 110 S. Ct. 1176 [1990].) See Henry, 273 Kan. at 613.” 276 Kan. at 944-46 .	1	2005–2005
State v. Henry green kan · 2002 2 sentences 2003Ed. 2d 293 , 110 S. Ct. 1176 [1990].) See Henry, 273 Kan. at 613 . 2003Ed. 2d 293 , 110 S. Ct. 1176 [1990].) See Henry, 273 Kan. at 613 .	1	2003–2003
McNeil v. Wisconsin green scotus · 1991 2 sentences 2003The Edwards rule provides a “second layer of prophylaxis for the Miranda right to counsel.” (McNeil, 501 U.S. at 176 ) which is “designed to prevent police from badgering a defendant into waiving his previously asserted Miranda rights.” (Michigan v. Harvey, 494 U.S. 344, 350 , 108 L. 2003The Edwards rule provides a “second layer of prophylaxis for the Miranda right to counsel.” (McNeil, 501 U.S. at 176 ) which is “designed to prevent police from badgering a defendant into waiving his previously asserted Miranda rights.” (Michigan v. Harvey, 494 U.S. 344, 350 , 108 L.	1	2003–2003
Minnick v. Mississippi green scotus · 1990 2 sentences 2002Ed. 2d 489 , 111 S. Ct. 486 (1990), the State of Mississippi proposed an exception to the Edwards rule that police-instigated interrogations without counsel present after the suspect requests an attorney violate a suspect’s right to counsel under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. 2002Ed. 2d 489 , 111 S. Ct. 486 (1990), the State of Mississippi proposed an exception to the Edwards rule that police-instigated interrogations without counsel present after the suspect requests an attorney violate a suspect’s right to counsel under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.	1	2002–2002
Foulk v. Colonial Terrace green kanctapp · 1994 1 sentence 1999App. 2d 277 , 887 P.2d 140 (1994), rev. denied 257 Kan. 1091 (1995), the Board rejected Edwards’ claim that he did not voluntarily take himself out of the labor market or that he did not try to manipulate the workers compensation system.	1	1999–1999
Arizona v. Roberson green scotus · 1988 2 sentences 1994Arizona v. Roberson, 486 U.S. 675 , 100 L. 1994Arizona v. Roberson, 486 U.S. 675 , 100 L.	1	1994–1994

Statutes the citing opinions construe

KS § K.S.A. § 22-3601 (5) KS § K.S.A. § 21-3107 (3) KS § K.S.A. § 21-3401 (3) KS § K.S.A. § 21-3436 (3) KS § K.S.A. § 21-3812 (3) KS § K.S.A. § 60-401 (3) KS § K.S.A. § 60-455 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 92 (1986–2026) CA 77 (1981–2026) IL 57 (1980–2024) VA 52 (1986–2026) PA 35 (1986–2025) GA 31 (1986–2026) WI 30 (1973–2025) OH 25 (1988–2025) MS 23 (1992–2021) DC 20 (1977–2023) AL 20 (1980–2015) CO 18 (1989–2026) LA 18 (1982–2018) FL 17 (1981–2026) TN 16 (1985–2021) KS 16 (1994–2018) WA 15 (1982–2025) MI 13 (1983–2024) MO 13 (1912–2016) MN 13 (1989–2015) IN 13 (1987–2019) NJ 12 (1986–2025) DE 10 (1986–2017) AZ 10 (1977–2022) MD 10 (1993–2013) OR 9 (1986–2025) SC 9 (1978–2016) AK 8 (1983–2019) MA 8 (1991–2014) OK 8 (1974–2008) KY 6 (1973–2021) CT 6 (1991–2022) AR 6 (1988–2001) NC 6 (1985–2018) NV 5 (1985–2013) NY 5 (1979–2018) UT 4 (1984–2023) NE 4 (2018–2025) WY 4 (1991–2011) ME 4 (1990–2012) WV 4 (1995–2013) IA 4 (2003–2021) SD 4 (1990–2019) VT 3 (1986–1999) NM 3 (2012–2016) ID 3 (1982–2011) HI 2 (1983–2014) NH 2 (1983–2003) RI 2 (2002–2004) MT 2 (2009–2011)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check