6 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2001 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Minnick v. Mississippigreen2 sentences2001McNeil v. Wisconsin, supra. It is “designed to prevent police from badgering a defendant into waiving his previously asserted Miranda rights,” Minnick v. Mississippi, 498 U.S. 146, 150 (1990); Michigan v. Harvey, 494 U.S. 344 (1990); McNeil v. Wisconsin, supra. The suspect’s right to counsel cannot be adequately protected where the suspect is subject to “persistent attempts by officials to persuade him to waive his rights,” as Mr. Lacy was in the instant case. 2001McNeil v. Wisconsin, supra. It is “designed to prevent police from badgering a defendant into waiving his previously asserted Miranda rights,” Minnick v. Mississippi, 498 U.S. 146, 150 (1990); Michigan v. Harvey, 494 U.S. 344 (1990); McNeil v. Wisconsin, supra. The suspect’s right to counsel cannot be adequately protected where the suspect is subject to “persistent attempts by officials to persuade him to waive his rights,” as Mr. Lacy was in the instant case. | 1 | 2 |
Brenk v. Stategreen2 sentences2000Since appellant did not invoke his Fifth Amendment right to counsel by indicating that he wished to deal with the police only through counsel, the Edwards rule which appellant cites does not apply. 311 Ark. at 587 , 847 S.W.2d at 5-6 (citation omitted) (emphasis added). 2000Since appellant did not invoke his Fifth Amendment right to counsel by indicating that he wished to deal with the police only through counsel, the Edwards rule which appellant cites does not apply. 311 Ark. at 587 , 847 S.W.2d at 5-6 (citation omitted) (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
Robert Dale Henderson v. Harry K. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Correctionsgreen1 sentence1993See Henderson v. Singletary, 968 F.2d 1070 (11th Cir. 1992)(supp. op. on reh’g denied). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Bladelgreen2 sentences1988On these facts the Michigan Supreme Court concluded that the Edwards rule applies by analogy to those situations where the accused requests counsel before the arraigning magistrate. “ ‘The police cannot simply ignore a defendant’s unequivocal request for counsel.’ ” Michigan v. Jackson, supra, citing People v. Bladel, 421 Mich. 39, 66-67 , 365 N.W.2d 56, 69 (1984). 1988On these facts the Michigan Supreme Court concluded that the Edwards rule applies by analogy to those situations where the accused requests counsel before the arraigning magistrate. “ ‘The police cannot simply ignore a defendant’s unequivocal request for counsel.’ ” Michigan v. Jackson, supra, citing People v. Bladel, 421 Mich. 39, 66-67 , 365 N.W.2d 56, 69 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Edwards v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1997Under Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981), once a defendant invokes his Fifth Amendment right to counsel at a custodial interrogation, the police may not interrogate any further until counsel is provided, or the “[defendant] himself initiates further communication)].]” Michigan v. Jackson, supra, may be seen as an application of the Edwards rule to the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. 1997Under Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981), once a defendant invokes his Fifth Amendment right to counsel at a custodial interrogation, the police may not interrogate any further until counsel is provided, or the “[defendant] himself initiates further communication)].]” Michigan v. Jackson, supra, may be seen as an application of the Edwards rule to the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. | 2 | 1993–1997 |
McNeil v. Wisconsin
green
2 sentences2001McNeil v. Wisconsin, supra. It is “designed to prevent police from badgering a defendant into waiving his previously asserted Miranda rights,” Minnick v. Mississippi, 498 U.S. 146, 150 (1990); Michigan v. Harvey, 494 U.S. 344 (1990); McNeil v. Wisconsin, supra. The suspect’s right to counsel cannot be adequately protected where the suspect is subject to “persistent attempts by officials to persuade him to waive his rights,” as Mr. Lacy was in the instant case. 2001McNeil v. Wisconsin, supra. It is “designed to prevent police from badgering a defendant into waiving his previously asserted Miranda rights,” Minnick v. Mississippi, 498 U.S. 146, 150 (1990); Michigan v. Harvey, 494 U.S. 344 (1990); McNeil v. Wisconsin, supra. The suspect’s right to counsel cannot be adequately protected where the suspect is subject to “persistent attempts by officials to persuade him to waive his rights,” as Mr. Lacy was in the instant case. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Michigan v. Harvey
green
2 sentences2001McNeil v. Wisconsin, supra. It is “designed to prevent police from badgering a defendant into waiving his previously asserted Miranda rights,” Minnick v. Mississippi, 498 U.S. 146, 150 (1990); Michigan v. Harvey, 494 U.S. 344 (1990); McNeil v. Wisconsin, supra. The suspect’s right to counsel cannot be adequately protected where the suspect is subject to “persistent attempts by officials to persuade him to waive his rights,” as Mr. Lacy was in the instant case. 2001McNeil v. Wisconsin, supra. It is “designed to prevent police from badgering a defendant into waiving his previously asserted Miranda rights,” Minnick v. Mississippi, 498 U.S. 146, 150 (1990); Michigan v. Harvey, 494 U.S. 344 (1990); McNeil v. Wisconsin, supra. The suspect’s right to counsel cannot be adequately protected where the suspect is subject to “persistent attempts by officials to persuade him to waive his rights,” as Mr. Lacy was in the instant case. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Landrum v. State
green
2 sentences2000In Landrum v. State, 326 Ark. 994 , 936 S.W.2d 505 (1996), this court had yet another occasion to apply the holding in McNeil. 2000In Landrum v. State, 326 Ark. 994 , 936 S.W.2d 505 (1996), this court had yet another occasion to apply the holding in McNeil. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Michigan v. Jackson
red
2 sentences1997Under Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981), once a defendant invokes his Fifth Amendment right to counsel at a custodial interrogation, the police may not interrogate any further until counsel is provided, or the “[defendant] himself initiates further communication)].]” Michigan v. Jackson, supra, may be seen as an application of the Edwards rule to the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. 1997Under Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981), once a defendant invokes his Fifth Amendment right to counsel at a custodial interrogation, the police may not interrogate any further until counsel is provided, or the “[defendant] himself initiates further communication)].]” Michigan v. Jackson, supra, may be seen as an application of the Edwards rule to the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.