course standard in Minnesota

14 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1922–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (9)

Case	Followed	Cited
Dallas Airmotive, Inc. v. FlightSafety International, Inc.green moctapp · 2008 · cited in 2 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011 2 sentences 2011The district court concluded that appellant’s breach-of-contract and promissory-estoppel claims were “barred because they are essentially claims for educational malpractice.... ” “ “Where the court is asked to evaluate the course of instruction or the soundness of the method of teaching that has been adopted by an educational institution, the claim is one of educational malpractice.’ ” Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp., 796 N.W.2d 541, 553 (Minn.App.2011) (quoting Dallas Airmotive, Inc. v. FlightSafety Int’l, Inc., 277 S.W.3d 696, 700 (Mo.Ct.App.2008)). 2011Id. at 700 (quotation and citations omitted).	2	2
Dykhoff v. Xcel Energygreen minn · 2013 · cited in 2 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 2 sentences 2017"The 'arising out of requirement ‘connote[s] a causal connection' and the 'in the course of requirement ‘refers to the time, place, and circumstances of the incident causing the injury.’ ” Dykhoff, 840 N.W.2d at 826 (quoting Gibberd, 424 N.W.2d at 780 ); see also Foley v. Honeywell, Inc., 488 N.W.2d 268, 271 (Minn. 1992) ("The phrase ‘arising out of’ means that there must be some causal connection between the injury and the employment.”); Kirchner v. Cty. of Anoka, 339 N.W.2d 908, 911 (Minn. 1983) ("The 'arising out of' requirement refers to the causal connection between the employment and the 2017In Dykhoff , we rejected the WCCA’s “work-connection balancing test” because it “col-lapsefd] the ‘arising out of requirement into the ‘in the course of requirement.” Dykhoff, 840 N.W.2d at 825, 829 .	1	2
Lassen v. First Bank Eden Prairiegreen minnctapp · 1994 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024 2 sentences 2024In the course of our analysis in Sterling Capital, we stated that bad faith “is defined as a party’s refusal to fulfill some duty or contractual obligation based on an ulterior motive, not an honest mistake regarding one’s rights or duties,” id. at 125 (citing Lassen v. First Bank, 514 N.W.2d 831, 837 (Minn. App. 1994), rev. denied (Minn. June 29, 1994)), and that good faith means that a person’s actions are “done honestly, whether it be negligently or not,” id. (quoting Minn. Stat. § 520.01 , subd. 6 (1996)). 2024In the course of our analysis in Sterling Capital, we stated that bad faith “is defined as a party’s refusal to fulfill some duty or contractual obligation based on an ulterior motive, not an honest mistake regarding one’s rights or duties,” id. at 125 (citing Lassen v. First Bank, 514 N.W.2d 831, 837 (Minn. App. 1994), rev. denied (Minn. June 29, 1994)), and that good faith means that a person’s actions are “done honestly, whether it be negligently or not,” id. (quoting Minn. Stat. § 520.01 , subd. 6 (1996)).	1	1
Kirchner v. County of Anokagreen minn · 1983 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 1 sentence 2017"The 'arising out of requirement ‘connote[s] a causal connection' and the 'in the course of requirement ‘refers to the time, place, and circumstances of the incident causing the injury.’ ” Dykhoff, 840 N.W.2d at 826 (quoting Gibberd, 424 N.W.2d at 780 ); see also Foley v. Honeywell, Inc., 488 N.W.2d 268, 271 (Minn. 1992) ("The phrase ‘arising out of’ means that there must be some causal connection between the injury and the employment.”); Kirchner v. Cty. of Anoka, 339 N.W.2d 908, 911 (Minn. 1983) ("The 'arising out of' requirement refers to the causal connection between the employment and the	1	1
Swenson v. Zachergreen minn · 1962 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 2 sentences 2017This requirement requires a showing of some hazard that increases the employee’s exposure to injury beyond that of the general public.”); Swenson v. Zacher, 264 Minn. 203 , 118 N.W.2d 786, 789 (1962) (same). . 2017This requirement requires a showing of some hazard that increases the employee’s exposure to injury beyond that of the general public.”); Swenson v. Zacher, 264 Minn. 203 , 118 N.W.2d 786, 789 (1962) (same). .	1	1
Foley v. Honeywell, Inc.green minn · 1992 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 1 sentence 2017"The 'arising out of requirement ‘connote[s] a causal connection' and the 'in the course of requirement ‘refers to the time, place, and circumstances of the incident causing the injury.’ ” Dykhoff, 840 N.W.2d at 826 (quoting Gibberd, 424 N.W.2d at 780 ); see also Foley v. Honeywell, Inc., 488 N.W.2d 268, 271 (Minn. 1992) ("The phrase ‘arising out of’ means that there must be some causal connection between the injury and the employment.”); Kirchner v. Cty. of Anoka, 339 N.W.2d 908, 911 (Minn. 1983) ("The 'arising out of' requirement refers to the causal connection between the employment and the	1	1
Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp.green minnctapp · 2011 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011 1 sentence 2011The district court concluded that appellant’s breach-of-contract and promissory-estoppel claims were “barred because they are essentially claims for educational malpractice.... ” “ “Where the court is asked to evaluate the course of instruction or the soundness of the method of teaching that has been adopted by an educational institution, the claim is one of educational malpractice.’ ” Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp., 796 N.W.2d 541, 553 (Minn.App.2011) (quoting Dallas Airmotive, Inc. v. FlightSafety Int’l, Inc., 277 S.W.3d 696, 700 (Mo.Ct.App.2008)).	1	1
Sigurdson v. Isanti Countygreen minn · 1989 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 1 sentence 1996See Sigurdson v. Isanti County, 448 N.W.2d 62, 68 (Minn.1989) (stating that employer’s gender discrimination in failing to promote employee was a continuing violation, which was not barred by statute of limitations).	1	1
Bailey v. University of Minnesotagreen minn · 1971 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993 2 sentences 1993Further, the university has broad authority to “appoint professors, regulate the course of instruction, and otherwise generally enact laws for the government of the university.” 909 Bailey v. University of Minn., 290 Minn. 359, 360 , 187 N.W.2d 702, 703-04 (Minn.1971) (emphasis added). 1993Further, the university has broad authority to “appoint professors, regulate the course of instruction, and otherwise generally enact laws for the government of the university.” 909 Bailey v. University of Minn., 290 Minn. 359, 360 , 187 N.W.2d 702, 703-04 (Minn.1971) (emphasis added).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (14)

Case	Cited	Years
Burgmeier v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul green minnctapp · 1993 1 sentence 2024In the course of our analysis in Sterling Capital, we stated that bad faith “is defined as a party’s refusal to fulfill some duty or contractual obligation based on an ulterior motive, not an honest mistake regarding one’s rights or duties,” id. at 125 (citing Lassen v. First Bank, 514 N.W.2d 831, 837 (Minn. App. 1994), rev. denied (Minn. June 29, 1994)), and that good faith means that a person’s actions are “done honestly, whether it be negligently or not,” id. (quoting Minn. Stat. § 520.01 , subd. 6 (1996)).	1	2024–2024
Curryer v. Merrill green minn · 1878 1 sentence 2018As we stated in Curryer : [T]he whole matter of the establishment of public schools, the course of instruction to be pursued therein, how they shall be supported, upon what terms and conditions people shall be permitted to participate in the benefits they afford-in fine, all matters pertaining to their government and administration-come clearly within the range of proper legislative authority. 25 Minn. at 5 .	1	2018–2018
Gibberd Ex Rel. Gibberd v. Control Data Corp. green minn · 1988 1 sentence 2017"The 'arising out of requirement ‘connote[s] a causal connection' and the 'in the course of requirement ‘refers to the time, place, and circumstances of the incident causing the injury.’ ” Dykhoff, 840 N.W.2d at 826 (quoting Gibberd, 424 N.W.2d at 780 ); see also Foley v. Honeywell, Inc., 488 N.W.2d 268, 271 (Minn. 1992) ("The phrase ‘arising out of’ means that there must be some causal connection between the injury and the employment.”); Kirchner v. Cty. of Anoka, 339 N.W.2d 908, 911 (Minn. 1983) ("The 'arising out of' requirement refers to the causal connection between the employment and the	1	2017–2017
Continental Can Co. Ex Rel. Wilson v. State red minn · 1980 1 sentence 2013Our conclusion that the conduct at issue there "amounted to ... sexual harassment" was reached after "[o]ur independent review of the record.” Id. at 249 .	1	2013–2013
State v. Vance green minn · 2007 1 sentence 2012Vance, 734 N.W.2d at 656 .	1	2012–2012
United States v. Bagley green scotus · 1985 2 sentences 1999Bagley, 473 U.S. at 683 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 . 1999Bagley, 473 U.S. at 683 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 .	1	1999–1999
Levitt v. Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty green scotus · 1973 2 sentences 1974On June 25, 1973, the following decisions were handed down by the United States Supreme Court: Committee for Public Education v. Nyquist, 413 U. S. 756 , 93 S. Ct. 2955 , 37 L. ed. 2d 948 (1973); Sloan v. Lemon, 413 U. S. 825 , 93 S. Ct. 2982 , 37 L. ed. 2d 939 (1973); Levitt v. Committee for Public Education, 413 U. S. 472 , 93 S. Ct. 2814 , 37 L. ed. 2d 736 (1973); Hunt v. McNair, 413 U. S. 734 , 93 S. Ct. 2868 , 37 L. ed. 2d 923 (1973). 1974On June 25, 1973, the following decisions were handed down by the United States Supreme Court: Committee for Public Education v. Nyquist, 413 U. S. 756 , 93 S. Ct. 2955 , 37 L. ed. 2d 948 (1973); Sloan v. Lemon, 413 U. S. 825 , 93 S. Ct. 2982 , 37 L. ed. 2d 939 (1973); Levitt v. Committee for Public Education, 413 U. S. 472 , 93 S. Ct. 2814 , 37 L. ed. 2d 736 (1973); Hunt v. McNair, 413 U. S. 734 , 93 S. Ct. 2868 , 37 L. ed. 2d 923 (1973).	1	1974–1974
Sloan v. Lemon green scotus · 1973 2 sentences 1974On June 25, 1973, the following decisions were handed down by the United States Supreme Court: Committee for Public Education v. Nyquist, 413 U. S. 756 , 93 S. Ct. 2955 , 37 L. ed. 2d 948 (1973); Sloan v. Lemon, 413 U. S. 825 , 93 S. Ct. 2982 , 37 L. ed. 2d 939 (1973); Levitt v. Committee for Public Education, 413 U. S. 472 , 93 S. Ct. 2814 , 37 L. ed. 2d 736 (1973); Hunt v. McNair, 413 U. S. 734 , 93 S. Ct. 2868 , 37 L. ed. 2d 923 (1973). 1974On June 25, 1973, the following decisions were handed down by the United States Supreme Court: Committee for Public Education v. Nyquist, 413 U. S. 756 , 93 S. Ct. 2955 , 37 L. ed. 2d 948 (1973); Sloan v. Lemon, 413 U. S. 825 , 93 S. Ct. 2982 , 37 L. ed. 2d 939 (1973); Levitt v. Committee for Public Education, 413 U. S. 472 , 93 S. Ct. 2814 , 37 L. ed. 2d 736 (1973); Hunt v. McNair, 413 U. S. 734 , 93 S. Ct. 2868 , 37 L. ed. 2d 923 (1973).	1	1974–1974
Hunt v. McNair green scotus · 1973 2 sentences 1974On June 25, 1973, the following decisions were handed down by the United States Supreme Court: Committee for Public Education v. Nyquist, 413 U. S. 756 , 93 S. Ct. 2955 , 37 L. ed. 2d 948 (1973); Sloan v. Lemon, 413 U. S. 825 , 93 S. Ct. 2982 , 37 L. ed. 2d 939 (1973); Levitt v. Committee for Public Education, 413 U. S. 472 , 93 S. Ct. 2814 , 37 L. ed. 2d 736 (1973); Hunt v. McNair, 413 U. S. 734 , 93 S. Ct. 2868 , 37 L. ed. 2d 923 (1973). 1974On June 25, 1973, the following decisions were handed down by the United States Supreme Court: Committee for Public Education v. Nyquist, 413 U. S. 756 , 93 S. Ct. 2955 , 37 L. ed. 2d 948 (1973); Sloan v. Lemon, 413 U. S. 825 , 93 S. Ct. 2982 , 37 L. ed. 2d 939 (1973); Levitt v. Committee for Public Education, 413 U. S. 472 , 93 S. Ct. 2814 , 37 L. ed. 2d 736 (1973); Hunt v. McNair, 413 U. S. 734 , 93 S. Ct. 2868 , 37 L. ed. 2d 923 (1973).	1	1974–1974
Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Nyquist green scotus · 1973 2 sentences 1974On June 25, 1973, the following decisions were handed down by the United States Supreme Court: Committee for Public Education v. Nyquist, 413 U. S. 756 , 93 S. Ct. 2955 , 37 L. ed. 2d 948 (1973); Sloan v. Lemon, 413 U. S. 825 , 93 S. Ct. 2982 , 37 L. ed. 2d 939 (1973); Levitt v. Committee for Public Education, 413 U. S. 472 , 93 S. Ct. 2814 , 37 L. ed. 2d 736 (1973); Hunt v. McNair, 413 U. S. 734 , 93 S. Ct. 2868 , 37 L. ed. 2d 923 (1973). 1974On June 25, 1973, the following decisions were handed down by the United States Supreme Court: Committee for Public Education v. Nyquist, 413 U. S. 756 , 93 S. Ct. 2955 , 37 L. ed. 2d 948 (1973); Sloan v. Lemon, 413 U. S. 825 , 93 S. Ct. 2982 , 37 L. ed. 2d 939 (1973); Levitt v. Committee for Public Education, 413 U. S. 472 , 93 S. Ct. 2814 , 37 L. ed. 2d 736 (1973); Hunt v. McNair, 413 U. S. 734 , 93 S. Ct. 2868 , 37 L. ed. 2d 923 (1973).	1	1974–1974
Gillette v. Harold, Inc. green minn · 1960 2 sentences 1966However, during the course of the hearing before the referee, a motion to join the fund was granted. 2 Gillette v. Harold, Inc. 257 Minn. 313 , 101 N. W. (2d) 200 . 3 Hommerding v. Clarence Landwehr Heavy Moving, 272 Minn. 40 , 139 N. W. (2d) 482 . 4 Asserted for the first time on oral argument before this court. 5 Minn. St. 176.411, subd. 1; Danussi v. Easy Wash, Inc. 270 Minn. 465 , 134 N. W. (2d) 138 . 1966However, during the course of the hearing before the referee, a motion to join the fund was granted. 2 Gillette v. Harold, Inc. 257 Minn. 313 , 101 N. W. (2d) 200 . 3 Hommerding v. Clarence Landwehr Heavy Moving, 272 Minn. 40 , 139 N. W. (2d) 482 . 4 Asserted for the first time on oral argument before this court. 5 Minn. St. 176.411, subd. 1; Danussi v. Easy Wash, Inc. 270 Minn. 465 , 134 N. W. (2d) 138 .	1	1966–1966
Danussi v. Easy Wash, Inc. green minn · 1965 2 sentences 1966However, during the course of the hearing before the referee, a motion to join the fund was granted. 2 Gillette v. Harold, Inc. 257 Minn. 313 , 101 N. W. (2d) 200 . 3 Hommerding v. Clarence Landwehr Heavy Moving, 272 Minn. 40 , 139 N. W. (2d) 482 . 4 Asserted for the first time on oral argument before this court. 5 Minn. St. 176.411, subd. 1; Danussi v. Easy Wash, Inc. 270 Minn. 465 , 134 N. W. (2d) 138 . 1966However, during the course of the hearing before the referee, a motion to join the fund was granted. 2 Gillette v. Harold, Inc. 257 Minn. 313 , 101 N. W. (2d) 200 . 3 Hommerding v. Clarence Landwehr Heavy Moving, 272 Minn. 40 , 139 N. W. (2d) 482 . 4 Asserted for the first time on oral argument before this court. 5 Minn. St. 176.411, subd. 1; Danussi v. Easy Wash, Inc. 270 Minn. 465 , 134 N. W. (2d) 138 .	1	1966–1966
Hommerding v. Clarence Landwehr Heavy Moving neutral minn · 1966 1 sentence 1966However, during the course of the hearing before the referee, a motion to join the fund was granted. 2 Gillette v. Harold, Inc. 257 Minn. 313 , 101 N. W. (2d) 200 . 3 Hommerding v. Clarence Landwehr Heavy Moving, 272 Minn. 40 , 139 N. W. (2d) 482 . 4 Asserted for the first time on oral argument before this court. 5 Minn. St. 176.411, subd. 1; Danussi v. Easy Wash, Inc. 270 Minn. 465 , 134 N. W. (2d) 138 .	1	1966–1966
United States v. Baker neutral scotus · 1888 2 sentences 1922Relator cites United States v. Baker, 125 U. S. 646 , 8 Sup. Ct. 1022, 31 L. 1922Relator cites United States v. Baker, 125 U. S. 646 , 8 Sup. Ct. 1022, 31 L.	1	1922–1922

Where else courts name it

CA 150 (1902–2025) NY 128 (1863–2025) IL 92 (1891–2026) PA 69 (1906–2026) TX 66 (1922–2023) OR 52 (1970–2025) MD 47 (1940–2025) WA 46 (1980–2026) CT 42 (1942–2024) FL 36 (1941–2025) NJ 36 (1938–2026) OH 35 (1985–2023) MI 33 (1921–2025) TN 25 (1977–2025) MO 25 (1901–2022) MA 22 (1876–2024) VA 20 (1887–2021) LA 20 (1963–2018) WI 19 (1946–2026) GA 19 (1979–2019) NC 19 (1950–2021) CO 16 (1963–2021) MN 14 (1922–2024) IN 14 (1891–2013) NE 13 (1910–2022) AZ 11 (1971–2024) AL 11 (1937–2004) UT 10 (1951–2026) IA 10 (1862–2023) HI 9 (1979–2022) DC 9 (1959–2011) RI 9 (1928–2018) AK 8 (1975–2023) OK 8 (1896–2006) DE 7 (1954–2020) MT 7 (1976–2021) WV 7 (1949–2019) WY 6 (1987–2017) MS 6 (1956–2024) SD 6 (1910–2019) AR 5 (1928–2001) ME 5 (1989–2017) KY 4 (2002–2026) KS 4 (1915–2021) VT 3 (1969–2016) NM 3 (1999–2025) NH 3 (1982–1995) ND 3 (1985–1998) SC 3 (1964–1992) NV 2 (1994–2020) ID 2 (1986–1993)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check