9 Rhode Island opinions name it 1 courts 1928–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cullen v. Town Council of the Lincolngreen1 sentence2017See id. at 904-05 ; see also Cranston Print Works Co., 684 A.2d at 691 . | 1 | 1 |
Cranston Print Works Co. v. City of Cranstongreen1 sentence2017See id. at 904-05 ; see also Cranston Print Works Co., 684 A.2d at 691 . | 1 | 1 |
In Re John P.green1 sentence2001We have held that a parent was adequately represented by her guardian ad litem although the parent’s attorney was permitted to withdraw when “[djuring the course of the hearing the guardian ad li-tem was present, examined witnesses and took other steps to represent his absent ward.” In re John P., 458 A.2d 1085, 1085 (R.I.1983) (per curiam). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hoylegreen1 sentence1980See State v. O’Brien, R.I., 412 A.2d 231, 233 (1980) (cross-examination of defendant); State v. Hoyle, R.I., 404 A.2d 69, 70 (1979) (prejudicial remarks). | 1 | 1 |
State v. O'BRIENgreen1 sentence1980See State v. O’Brien, R.I., 412 A.2d 231, 233 (1980) (cross-examination of defendant); State v. Hoyle, R.I., 404 A.2d 69, 70 (1979) (prejudicial remarks). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Shatney v. State
green
2 sentences2018On April 1, 2015, Mr. Jefferson’s court-appointed counsel (having entered his appearance on October 1, 2014) filed both a motion to withdraw as counsel3 and a memorandum in support of that motion pursuant to this Court’s opinion in Shatney v. State, 755 A.2d 130 (R.I. 2000);4 the grounds for the motion to withdraw were that the issues raised in petitioner’s application for postconviction relief were “wholly frivolous, and not supported by existing law, or by a good faith basis for the reversal, extension, or modification of existing law * * *.” On April 14, 2015, a hearing was held on court-ap 2018On April 1, 2015, Mr. Jefferson's court-appointed counsel (having entered his appearance on October 1, 2014) filed both a motion to withdraw as counsel 3 and a memorandum in support of that motion pursuant to this Court's opinion in Shatney v. State , 755 A.2d 130 (R.I. 2000) ; 4 the grounds for the motion to withdraw were that the issues raised in petitioner's application for postconviction relief were "wholly frivolous, and not supported by existing law, or by a good faith basis for the reversal, extension, or modification of existing law * * *." On April 14, 2015, a hearing was held on cour | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Sun Oil Co. v. Wortman
green
2 sentences2011The issue * * * can be characterized as whether a statute of limitations may be considered as a procedural matter for *538 purposes of the Full Faith and Credit Clause." [33] Id. at 722-23 , 108 S.Ct. 2117 . 2011The issue * * * can be characterized as whether a statute of limitations may be considered as a procedural matter for *538 purposes of the Full Faith and Credit Clause." [33] Id. at 722-23 , 108 S.Ct. 2117 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Simpson
green
1 sentence2007We concluded that “[w]hen, because of a failure to furnish discovery on the part of the state, a highly significant piece of information, hitherto unexpected, becomes available and when that information has a potential to alter the course of the defense completely, counsel is reasonably entitled to an effective remedy.” Id. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Mignone v. Shapewood Design, Inc.
green
1 sentence1990However there is also a smaller probability that people with a previous injury and a more chronic problem could get an acute exacerbation without doing this.’ ” Mignone v. Shapewood Design, Inc., 525 A.2d at 1300 , was a case in which the attending physician’s testimony was “ambiguous at best.” The physician refused to classify the employee’s injury as either an aggravation or a recurrence. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Gordon v. Gordon
neutral
1 sentence1965I. 299, 186 A.2d 732 . | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Estate of Brackey v. Jensen
green
1 sentence1928Re Brackey, 166 Iowa, 109 ; 24 C. | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.