25 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1901–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Doe v. Yale Universitygreen2 sentences2015Dallas Airmotive, Inc., 277 S.W.3d at 700 -701 (citing Doe v. Yale Univ., 252 Conn. 641 , 748 A.2d 834, 846-50 (2000)), 9 . 2015Dallas Airmotive, Inc., 277 S.W.3d at 700 -701 (citing Doe v. Yale Univ., 252 Conn. 641 , 748 A.2d 834, 846-50 (2000)), 9 . | 2 | 2 |
State v. Brinkleygreen2 sentences2009Thereafter, Judge Henry recused himself from the matter followed by the recusal of other assigned judges such that Judge Gary Witt ultimately became the trial judge in this matter. 3 . "[T]he law is settled that where there are several assignments of perjury in an information, substantial proof of any one of them will support a conviction.” State v. Brinkley, 354 Mo. 337 , 189 S.W.2d 314, 325 (1945). 4 . 2009Thereafter, Judge Henry recused himself from the matter followed by the recusal of other assigned judges such that Judge Gary Witt ultimately became the trial judge in this matter. 3 . "[T]he law is settled that where there are several assignments of perjury in an information, substantial proof of any one of them will support a conviction.” State v. Brinkley, 354 Mo. 337 , 189 S.W.2d 314, 325 (1945). 4 . | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Stategreen1 sentence2002See Williams v. State, 740 S.W.2d 297, 298 (Mo.App.1987). | 1 | 1 |
Casey v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Artsgreen1 sentence2002See Casey v. State Bd. of Registration of Healing Arts, 830 S.W.2d 478, 479 (Mo.App.1992). | 1 | 1 |
Burwick v. Woodgreen1 sentence2002See Burwick, 959 S.W.2d at 952 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kindergreen1 sentence1997See id. at 322 . | 1 | 1 |
Moore v. Stampsgreen1 sentence1992See Moore v. Stamps, supra. An additional factor to be considered in the balancing process is whether the parolee challenges the accuracy of the hearsay evidence during the course of the hearing. | 1 | 1 |
Koenig v. Babkagreen1 sentence1987Through counsel, Roeder objected, stating that under Koenig v. Babka, 682 S.W.2d 96, 100 (Mo.App.1984), medical records are to be accorded the dignity equal to a similar opinion offered by a witness at trial. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Carrollgreen1 sentence1986See also State v. Carroll, 543 S.W.2d 48, 51 (Mo.App.1976). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Wilfredo Alvarez Appeal of John A/K/A Jorge Martinezgreen2 sentences1982United States v. Alvarez, supra, 519 F.2d at 1046-47 (3d Cir.1975) (emphasis added). 1982United States v. Alvarez, supra, 519 F.2d at 1046-47 (3d Cir.1975) (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
Simms v. Ford Motor Credit Co.green1 sentence1981See Simms v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 605 S.W.2d 212, 214 (Mo.App.1980) and Bayer v. Associated Underwriters, Inc., 402 S.W.2d 11, 13 (Mo.App.1966) (error for trial court to dismiss petition for injunction at show cause hearing for temporary injunction); Acha v. Beame, 531 F.2d 648, 651 (2d Cir. 1976); Dry Creek Lodge, Inc. v. United States, 515 F.2d 926, 935-936 (10th Cir. 1975); But see present Rule 92.02(a)(2); and see e.g., Atlantic Richfield Co. v. F.T.C., 546 F.2d 646, 651 (5th Cir. 1977). 5 However, assuming, without deciding, the court had this authority, the court still was obliged to i | 1 | 1 |
Bayer v. Associated Underwriters, Inc.green1 sentence1981See Simms v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 605 S.W.2d 212, 214 (Mo.App.1980) and Bayer v. Associated Underwriters, Inc., 402 S.W.2d 11, 13 (Mo.App.1966) (error for trial court to dismiss petition for injunction at show cause hearing for temporary injunction); Acha v. Beame, 531 F.2d 648, 651 (2d Cir. 1976); Dry Creek Lodge, Inc. v. United States, 515 F.2d 926, 935-936 (10th Cir. 1975); But see present Rule 92.02(a)(2); and see e.g., Atlantic Richfield Co. v. F.T.C., 546 F.2d 646, 651 (5th Cir. 1977). 5 However, assuming, without deciding, the court had this authority, the court still was obliged to i | 1 | 1 |
Puerto Rican Farm Workers Ex Rel. Felipe Pagan Vidal v. K. D. Eatmongreen1 sentence1981See, e.g., Puerto Rican Farm Workers v. Eatmon, 427 F.2d 210, 211 (5th Cir. 1970). | 1 | 1 |
Dry Creek Lodge, Inc., a Wyoming Corporation v. The United States of Americagreen1 sentence1981See Simms v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 605 S.W.2d 212, 214 (Mo.App.1980) and Bayer v. Associated Underwriters, Inc., 402 S.W.2d 11, 13 (Mo.App.1966) (error for trial court to dismiss petition for injunction at show cause hearing for temporary injunction); Acha v. Beame, 531 F.2d 648, 651 (2d Cir. 1976); Dry Creek Lodge, Inc. v. United States, 515 F.2d 926, 935-936 (10th Cir. 1975); But see present Rule 92.02(a)(2); and see e.g., Atlantic Richfield Co. v. F.T.C., 546 F.2d 646, 651 (5th Cir. 1977). 5 However, assuming, without deciding, the court had this authority, the court still was obliged to i | 1 | 1 |
cluster 333889green1 sentence1981See Simms v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 605 S.W.2d 212, 214 (Mo.App.1980) and Bayer v. Associated Underwriters, Inc., 402 S.W.2d 11, 13 (Mo.App.1966) (error for trial court to dismiss petition for injunction at show cause hearing for temporary injunction); Acha v. Beame, 531 F.2d 648, 651 (2d Cir. 1976); Dry Creek Lodge, Inc. v. United States, 515 F.2d 926, 935-936 (10th Cir. 1975); But see present Rule 92.02(a)(2); and see e.g., Atlantic Richfield Co. v. F.T.C., 546 F.2d 646, 651 (5th Cir. 1977). 5 However, assuming, without deciding, the court had this authority, the court still was obliged to i | 1 | 1 |
Atlantic Richfield Company v. Federal Trade Commissiongreen1 sentence1981See Simms v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 605 S.W.2d 212, 214 (Mo.App.1980) and Bayer v. Associated Underwriters, Inc., 402 S.W.2d 11, 13 (Mo.App.1966) (error for trial court to dismiss petition for injunction at show cause hearing for temporary injunction); Acha v. Beame, 531 F.2d 648, 651 (2d Cir. 1976); Dry Creek Lodge, Inc. v. United States, 515 F.2d 926, 935-936 (10th Cir. 1975); But see present Rule 92.02(a)(2); and see e.g., Atlantic Richfield Co. v. F.T.C., 546 F.2d 646, 651 (5th Cir. 1977). 5 However, assuming, without deciding, the court had this authority, the court still was obliged to i | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Timmonsgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Younggreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
RJJ by Johnson v. Shineman
green
1 sentence2022Id. at 911- 8 12. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
United States v. Bagley
green
2 sentences2015Importantly, this Court must analyze “the possibility that such effect might have occurred ⅛ light of the totality of the circumstances and with an awareness of the difficulty of reconstructing in a posttrial proceeding the course that the defense and the trial would have taken had the defense not been misled by the prosecutor’s incomplete response.” Bagley, 473 U.S. at 683 ; 105 S.Ct. 3375 . 2015Importantly, this Court must analyze “the possibility that such effect might have occurred ⅛ light of the totality of the circumstances and with an awareness of the difficulty of reconstructing in a posttrial proceeding the course that the defense and the trial would have taken had the defense not been misled by the prosecutor’s incomplete response.” Bagley, 473 U.S. at 683 ; 105 S.Ct. 3375 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Dallas Airmotive, Inc. v. FlightSafety International, Inc.
green
1 sentence2015Dallas Airmotive, Inc., 277 S.W.3d at 700 -701 (citing Doe v. Yale Univ., 252 Conn. 641 , 748 A.2d 834, 846-50 (2000)), 9 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Vogel v. Maimonides Academy of Western Connecticut, Inc.
green
1 sentence2008Id. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
André v. Pace University
green
1 sentence2008Andre v. Pace Univ, 170 Misc.2d 893 , 655 N.Y.S.2d 777 , 779 (N.Y.App.Div.1996). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Kirchner v. Yale University
green
1 sentence2008Id. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State ex rel. Plaster v. Pinnell
green
2 sentences1995In the course of its analysis, the court further observed that assuming, without deciding, that then Rule 54.20(f) could be applied to service by mail, and further assuming that a postman could be considered a “server” as used in that rule, the “return” would have to satisfy Rule 54.20(a)(2) [for service within the state], which would in turn require an affidavit of the server “as to the time, place and manner of service thereof.” Id. 831 S.W.2d at 952 . 1995In the course of its analysis, the court further observed that assuming, without deciding, that then Rule 54.20(f) could be applied to service by mail, and further assuming that a postman could be considered a “server” as used in that rule, the “return” would have to satisfy Rule 54.20(a)(2) [for service within the state], which would in turn require an affidavit of the server “as to the time, place and manner of service thereof.” Id. 831 S.W.2d at 952 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Beard v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.
green
1 sentence1993The court disposed of the defense counsel’s argument that the responses to his question indicated a disqualifying prejudice or bias, stating: “Any supposed implication that any venireman was of a ‘deep-seated conscientious’ belief that in all circumstances the employer should pay and regardless of any question of the employer’s fault was self-drawn and injected by defendants’ counsel in the course of his inquiry.” Id. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
United States v. Bruce Bell
green
1 sentence1992United States v. Simmons, 812 F.2d at 564 ; United States v. Bell, 785 F.2d at 643 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
United States v. Rickey Dean Simmons
green
1 sentence1992United States v. Simmons, 812 F.2d at 564 ; United States v. Bell, 785 F.2d at 643 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Pratt
green
2 sentences1982The attorney must be free to make an informed judgment with respect to the best course of the defense without the inhibition of creating a potential government witness." The same situation was presented in State v. Pratt, 284 Md. 516 , 398 A.2d 421 (1979), with an identical holding. 1982The attorney must be free to make an informed judgment with respect to the best course of the defense without the inhibition of creating a potential government witness." The same situation was presented in State v. Pratt, 284 Md. 516 , 398 A.2d 421 (1979), with an identical holding. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Aufrichtig v. Columbia National Life Insurance
green
2 sentences1981In the course of their analysis, the court examined the instruction in Aufrichtig v. Columbia National Life Insurance Co., 298 Mo. 1 , 249 S.W. 912 (1923), wherein the following instruction defining insanity was upheld: [Insanity] ... mean[s] ... a deranged condition of the mind [such] as to render a person incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong or unconscious at the time of the nature of the act he is committing .. . and though able to distinguish between right and wrong, yet his will, that is, the governing power of his mind, is so far destroyed or impaired that he cannot contro 1981In the course of their analysis, the court examined the instruction in Aufrichtig v. Columbia National Life Insurance Co., 298 Mo. 1 , 249 S.W. 912 (1923), wherein the following instruction defining insanity was upheld: [Insanity] ... mean[s] ... a deranged condition of the mind [such] as to render a person incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong or unconscious at the time of the nature of the act he is committing .. . and though able to distinguish between right and wrong, yet his will, that is, the governing power of his mind, is so far destroyed or impaired that he cannot contro | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Application of Maples
green
1 sentence1981In his brief, the applicant posits error on the part of the trial court for failing to follow the mandate of Maples, supra, and contact the natural father of the applicant. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Kerr v. State
green
1 sentence1980Rule 27.26(j); Kerr v. State, 584 S.W.2d 626 (Mo.App.1979). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
| McQueen v. Chouteau's Heirs green | 1 | 1952–1952 |
| Gupton v. Gupton green | 1 | 1952–1952 |
| Hamilton v. Hamilton green | 1 | 1952–1952 |
| Robinson v. Smith neutral | 1 | 1952–1952 |
| Ryan v. Dunlap neutral | 1 | 1952–1952 |
| Hagan v. Continental National Bank neutral | 1 | 1952–1952 |
| Standard Scale & Foundry Co. v. Kansas City Furnace Co. neutral | 1 | 1913–1913 |
| Jackson v. Hardin green | 1 | 1908–1908 |
| State v. Partlow green | 1 | 1908–1908 |
| State v. Hopper neutral | 1 | 1908–1908 |
| State v. Goddard green | 1 | 1908–1908 |
| State v. Murray green | 1 | 1901–1901 |
| Casey v. State neutral | 1 | 1901–1901 |
| Keenan v. People neutral | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.