14 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1946–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Raul Dominguezgreen2 sentences2006As a matter of fact, we specifically state that circumstantial evidence may be sufficient (citing Delmarter, 124 Wash.App. at 163-64 , 101 P.3d 111 , (even without a laboratory test, an independent field test and confession support a conviction for possession of a controlled substance); Hernandez, 85 Wash.App. at 675 , 935 P.2d 623 (circumstantial evidence and lay testimony may be sufficient to establish the identity of a controlled substance); and Dominguez, 992 F.2d at 681 (circumstantial evidence establishing a controlled substance beyond a reasonable doubt may include lay experience based 2006App. at 675 (circumstantial evidence and lay testimony may be sufficient to establish the identity of a controlled substance); and Dominguez, 992 F.2d at 681 (circumstantial evidence establishing a controlled substance beyond a reasonable doubt may include lay experience based on familiarity through prior use, trading, or law enforcement)). ¶22 But the problem here is the paucity of information supporting the officer’s identification of the white, rock-like items. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Hernandezgreen2 sentences2006As a matter of fact, we specifically state that circumstantial evidence may be sufficient (citing Delmarter, 124 Wash.App. at 163-64 , 101 P.3d 111 , (even without a laboratory test, an independent field test and confession support a conviction for possession of a controlled substance); Hernandez, 85 Wash.App. at 675 , 935 P.2d 623 (circumstantial evidence and lay testimony may be sufficient to establish the identity of a controlled substance); and Dominguez, 992 F.2d at 681 (circumstantial evidence establishing a controlled substance beyond a reasonable doubt may include lay experience based 2006App. at 163-64 (even without a laboratory test, an independent field test and confession support a conviction for possession of a controlled substance); Hernandez, 85 Wn. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hundley
green
2 sentences2006Hundley, 126 Wash.2d at 420-21 , 895 P.2d 403 . 2006Hundley, 126 Wn.2d at 420-21 . | 2 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Roche
green
2 sentences2006Roche, 114 Wn. 2006Roche, 114 Wn. | 2 | 2006–2006 |
In re the Personal Restraint of Delmarter
green
2 sentences2006As a matter of fact, we specifically state that circumstantial evidence may be sufficient (citing Delmarter, 124 Wash.App. at 163-64 , 101 P.3d 111 , (even without a laboratory test, an independent field test and confession support a conviction for possession of a controlled substance); Hernandez, 85 Wash.App. at 675 , 935 P.2d 623 (circumstantial evidence and lay testimony may be sufficient to establish the identity of a controlled substance); and Dominguez, 992 F.2d at 681 (circumstantial evidence establishing a controlled substance beyond a reasonable doubt may include lay experience based 2006Delmarter, 124 Wn. | 2 | 2006–2006 |
In re the Personal Restraint of Brennan
neutral
2 sentences2004This court found three significant differences that distinguished Roche: (1) Brennan pleaded guilty whereas Roche and Sweeney went to trial; (2) independent evidence, including a field test and Brennan’s confession, established that the substance taken from Brennan’s person was methamphetamine, whereas Roche did not admit that the substances found in his home were methamphetamines, despite a positive field test; and (3) there was no temporal connection between Hoover’s misconduct in 1998 and his test of the substance found on Brennan in 1996, whereas there was compelling evidence that Hoover w 2004This court found three significant differences that distinguished Roche: (1) Brennan pleaded guilty whereas Roche and Sweeney went to trial; (2) independent evidence including a field test and Brennan's confession established that the substance taken from Brennan's person was methamphetamine, whereas Roche did not admit that the substances found in his home were methamphetamines, despite a positive field test; and (3) there was no temporal connection between Hoover's misconduct in 1998 and his test of the substance found on Brennan in 1996, whereas there was compelling evidence that Hoover was | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Washington Freightliner, Inc. v. Shantytown Pier, Inc.
green
2 sentences2001Wash. Freightliner, 351 Md. at 631-37 , 719 A.2d 541 . 2001Wash. Freightliner, 719 A.2d at 548-51 . | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
green
2 sentences1996Cipollone, 505 U.S. at 2617 . 1996Cipollone, 505 U.S. at 515-16 , 112 S.Ct. at 2617 . | 2 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Colquitt
green
1 sentence2024Id. at 792 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Colquitt
green
1 sentence2014App. 789 , 137 P.3d 892 (2006), Mr. Amezola contends that the field test conducted by the officer was not sufficient evidence to establish the substance was methamphetamine, absent other supporting evidence such as a laboratory report. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Hutton
green
2 sentences2006State v. Hutton, 7 Wash.App. 726, 728 , 502 P.2d 1037 (1972) (citing State v. Carter, 5 Wash.App. 802 , 490 P.2d 1346 (1971)). [14] The majority cites Hundley, in which the field test and all but one of the laboratory tests failed to detect the presence of marijuana, heroin, and cocaine. 2006State v. Hutton, 7 Wash.App. 726, 728 , 502 P.2d 1037 (1972) (citing State v. Carter, 5 Wash.App. 802 , 490 P.2d 1346 (1971)). [14] The majority cites Hundley, in which the field test and all but one of the laboratory tests failed to detect the presence of marijuana, heroin, and cocaine. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Hernandez
green
1 sentence2006As a matter of fact, we specifically state that circumstantial evidence may be sufficient (citing Delmarter, 124 Wash.App. at 163-64 , 101 P.3d 111 , (even without a laboratory test, an independent field test and confession support a conviction for possession of a controlled substance); Hernandez, 85 Wash.App. at 675 , 935 P.2d 623 (circumstantial evidence and lay testimony may be sufficient to establish the identity of a controlled substance); and Dominguez, 992 F.2d at 681 (circumstantial evidence establishing a controlled substance beyond a reasonable doubt may include lay experience based | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Carter
green
2 sentences2006State v. Hutton, 7 Wash.App. 726, 728 , 502 P.2d 1037 (1972) (citing State v. Carter, 5 Wash.App. 802 , 490 P.2d 1346 (1971)). [14] The majority cites Hundley, in which the field test and all but one of the laboratory tests failed to detect the presence of marijuana, heroin, and cocaine. 2006State v. Hutton, 7 Wash.App. 726, 728 , 502 P.2d 1037 (1972) (citing State v. Carter, 5 Wash.App. 802 , 490 P.2d 1346 (1971)). [14] The majority cites Hundley, in which the field test and all but one of the laboratory tests failed to detect the presence of marijuana, heroin, and cocaine. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Roche
green
2 sentences2006Roche, 114 Wash.App. at 431-32 , 59 P.3d 682 . 2006Roche, 114 Wash.App. at 437-38 , 59 P.3d 682 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
In Re Delmarter
green
2 sentences2006Delmarter, 124 Wash.App. at 163-64 , 101 P.3d 111 . 2006As a matter of fact, we specifically state that circumstantial evidence may be sufficient (citing Delmarter, 124 Wash.App. at 163-64 , 101 P.3d 111 , (even without a laboratory test, an independent field test and confession support a conviction for possession of a controlled substance); Hernandez, 85 Wash.App. at 675 , 935 P.2d 623 (circumstantial evidence and lay testimony may be sufficient to establish the identity of a controlled substance); and Dominguez, 992 F.2d at 681 (circumstantial evidence establishing a controlled substance beyond a reasonable doubt may include lay experience based | 1 | 2006–2006 |
In Re Brennan
green
1 sentence2004This court found three significant differences that distinguished Roche: (1) Brennan pleaded guilty whereas Roche and Sweeney went to trial; (2) independent evidence including a field test and Brennan's confession established that the substance taken from Brennan's person was methamphetamine, whereas Roche did not admit that the substances found in his home were methamphetamines, despite a positive field test; and (3) there was no temporal connection between Hoover's misconduct in 1998 and his test of the substance found on Brennan in 1996, whereas there was compelling evidence that Hoover was | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Kinzy
green
2 sentences2004Id. at 378 . 2004Id. at 379 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Kinzy
green
2 sentences2004Id. at 378, 5 P.3d 668 . 2004Id. at 379, 5 P.3d 668 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Smith
green
2 sentences1976State v. Smythe, 148 Wash. 65 , 268 P. 133 (1928); State v. Smith, 103 Wash. 267 , 174 P. 9 (1918); State v. Schuman, 89 Wash. 9 , 153 P. 1084 (1915); Annot., 20 A.L.R.2d 687 (1968). 1976State v. Smythe, 148 Wash. 65 , 268 P. 133 (1928); State v. Smith, 103 Wash. 267 , 174 P. 9 (1918); State v. Schuman, 89 Wash. 9 , 153 P. 1084 (1915); Annot., 20 A.L.R.2d 687 (1968). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
State v. Smythe
green
2 sentences1976State v. Smythe, 148 Wash. 65 , 268 P. 133 (1928); State v. Smith, 103 Wash. 267 , 174 P. 9 (1918); State v. Schuman, 89 Wash. 9 , 153 P. 1084 (1915); Annot., 20 A.L.R.2d 687 (1968). 1976State v. Smythe, 148 Wash. 65 , 268 P. 133 (1928); State v. Smith, 103 Wash. 267 , 174 P. 9 (1918); State v. Schuman, 89 Wash. 9 , 153 P. 1084 (1915); Annot., 20 A.L.R.2d 687 (1968). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
State v. Schuman
green
2 sentences1976State v. Smythe, 148 Wash. 65 , 268 P. 133 (1928); State v. Smith, 103 Wash. 267 , 174 P. 9 (1918); State v. Schuman, 89 Wash. 9 , 153 P. 1084 (1915); Annot., 20 A.L.R.2d 687 (1968). 1976State v. Smythe, 148 Wash. 65 , 268 P. 133 (1928); State v. Smith, 103 Wash. 267 , 174 P. 9 (1918); State v. Schuman, 89 Wash. 9 , 153 P. 1084 (1915); Annot., 20 A.L.R.2d 687 (1968). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co.
green
1 sentence1946We revert to the case of Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co., 13 Wn. (2d) 75, 123 P. (2d) 771 , and quote *706 therefrom certain fundamental propositions, omitting, however, the supporting citations. | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.