Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2024 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ciak v. Stategreen2 sentences2020See id. at 651 (1). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Ciak v. State, 278 Ga. 27, 30 (3) ( 597 SE2d 392 ) (2004). 8 (Punctuation omitted.) Christy v. State, 315 Ga. App. 647, 650-651 (1) ( 727 SE2d 269 ) (2012). 8 officer’s belief that a suspect’s window tint violates OCGA § 40-8-73.1 is sufficient to justify an investigatory stop, even if the officer later determines from a field test that the window tint did not in fact violate the statute.9 OCGA § 40-8-73.1 (b) provides: Except as provided in this Code section, it shall be unlawful for any person to operate a motor vehicle in this state: (1) Which ha 2020See id. at 651 (1). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Ciak v. State, 278 Ga. 27, 30 (3) ( 597 SE2d 392 ) (2004). 8 (Punctuation omitted.) Christy v. State, 315 Ga. App. 647, 650-651 (1) ( 727 SE2d 269 ) (2012). 8 officer’s belief that a suspect’s window tint violates OCGA § 40-8-73.1 is sufficient to justify an investigatory stop, even if the officer later determines from a field test that the window tint did not in fact violate the statute.9 OCGA § 40-8-73.1 (b) provides: Except as provided in this Code section, it shall be unlawful for any person to operate a motor vehicle in this state: (1) Which ha | 2 | 3 |
Jackson v. Virginiared2 sentences2022The informant provided the substance he had purchased to Officer Woodall, who conducted a field test of the substance, which tested positive for cocaine. 2 See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307, 319 (III) (B) ( 99 SCt 2781 , 61 LE2d 560) (1979); Rankin v. State, 278 Ga. 704, 705 ( 606 SE2d 269 ) (2004). 2 Waller was arrested in December 2017, and indicted on one count of the sale of cocaine. 2022The informant provided the substance he had purchased to Officer Woodall, who conducted a field test of the substance, which tested positive for cocaine. 2 See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307, 319 (III) (B) ( 99 SCt 2781 , 61 LE2d 560) (1979); Rankin v. State, 278 Ga. 704, 705 ( 606 SE2d 269 ) (2004). 2 Waller was arrested in December 2017, and indicted on one count of the sale of cocaine. | 1 | 2 |
Thurmond v. Stategreen2 sentences2024See Thurmond v. State, 304 Ga. App. 587, 588, 590 (1) (b) ( 696 SE2d 516 ) (2010). 2024See Thurmond v. State, 304 Ga. App. 587, 588, 590 (1) (b) ( 696 SE2d 516 ) (2010). | 1 | 1 |
Lowery v. Stategreen2 sentences2023Champion argues that, for the same reasons the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions, the jury’s verdict was contrary to the principles of justice and equity under OCGA § 5-5-20. “[N]o court except the trial court is vested by OCGA §§ 5-5-20 and 5-5-21 with the authority to grant a new trial in a matter relating to the weight of the evidence.”14 The trial court here properly exercised its discretion as the “thirteenth juror.”15 Accordingly, this claim of error is without merit. 13 See Holmes v. State, 301 Ga. 143, 145-146 (1) ( 800 SE2d 353 ) (2017) (holding that a field test in 2023Champion argues that, for the same reasons the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions, the jury’s verdict was contrary to the principles of justice and equity under OCGA § 5-5-20. “[N]o court except the trial court is vested by OCGA §§ 5-5-20 and 5-5-21 with the authority to grant a new trial in a matter relating to the weight of the evidence.”14 The trial court here properly exercised its discretion as the “thirteenth juror.”15 Accordingly, this claim of error is without merit. 13 See Holmes v. State, 301 Ga. 143, 145-146 (1) ( 800 SE2d 353 ) (2017) (holding that a field test in | 1 | 1 |
Holmes v. Stategreen2 sentences2023Champion argues that, for the same reasons the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions, the jury’s verdict was contrary to the principles of justice and equity under OCGA § 5-5-20. “[N]o court except the trial court is vested by OCGA §§ 5-5-20 and 5-5-21 with the authority to grant a new trial in a matter relating to the weight of the evidence.”14 The trial court here properly exercised its discretion as the “thirteenth juror.”15 Accordingly, this claim of error is without merit. 13 See Holmes v. State, 301 Ga. 143, 145-146 (1) ( 800 SE2d 353 ) (2017) (holding that a field test in 2023Champion argues that, for the same reasons the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions, the jury’s verdict was contrary to the principles of justice and equity under OCGA § 5-5-20. “[N]o court except the trial court is vested by OCGA §§ 5-5-20 and 5-5-21 with the authority to grant a new trial in a matter relating to the weight of the evidence.”14 The trial court here properly exercised its discretion as the “thirteenth juror.”15 Accordingly, this claim of error is without merit. 13 See Holmes v. State, 301 Ga. 143, 145-146 (1) ( 800 SE2d 353 ) (2017) (holding that a field test in | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Stategreen2 sentences2023Champion argues that, for the same reasons the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions, the jury’s verdict was contrary to the principles of justice and equity under OCGA § 5-5-20. “[N]o court except the trial court is vested by OCGA §§ 5-5-20 and 5-5-21 with the authority to grant a new trial in a matter relating to the weight of the evidence.”14 The trial court here properly exercised its discretion as the “thirteenth juror.”15 Accordingly, this claim of error is without merit. 13 See Holmes v. State, 301 Ga. 143, 145-146 (1) ( 800 SE2d 353 ) (2017) (holding that a field test in 2023Champion argues that, for the same reasons the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions, the jury’s verdict was contrary to the principles of justice and equity under OCGA § 5-5-20. “[N]o court except the trial court is vested by OCGA §§ 5-5-20 and 5-5-21 with the authority to grant a new trial in a matter relating to the weight of the evidence.”14 The trial court here properly exercised its discretion as the “thirteenth juror.”15 Accordingly, this claim of error is without merit. 13 See Holmes v. State, 301 Ga. 143, 145-146 (1) ( 800 SE2d 353 ) (2017) (holding that a field test in | 1 | 1 |
Rankin v. Stategreen2 sentences2022The informant provided the substance he had purchased to Officer Woodall, who conducted a field test of the substance, which tested positive for cocaine. 2 See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307, 319 (III) (B) ( 99 SCt 2781 , 61 LE2d 560) (1979); Rankin v. State, 278 Ga. 704, 705 ( 606 SE2d 269 ) (2004). 2 Waller was arrested in December 2017, and indicted on one count of the sale of cocaine. 2022The informant provided the substance he had purchased to Officer Woodall, who conducted a field test of the substance, which tested positive for cocaine. 2 See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307, 319 (III) (B) ( 99 SCt 2781 , 61 LE2d 560) (1979); Rankin v. State, 278 Ga. 704, 705 ( 606 SE2d 269 ) (2004). 2 Waller was arrested in December 2017, and indicted on one count of the sale of cocaine. | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences2022According to Waller, his conviction was in error as the State failed to establish a chain of custody of the drugs purchased by the informant. 5 Rankin, 278 Ga. at 705 (additional citations omitted). 6 Williams v. State, 174 Ga. App. 56, 58 (3) ( 329 SE2d 226 ) (1985). 7 Cooper v. State, 352 Ga. App. 783 , 787 (2) ( 835 SE2d 724 ) (2019) (citations and punctuation omitted). 4 In order to show the chain of custody adequate to preserve the identity of fungible evidence, the State has the burden of proving with reasonable certainty that the evidence is the same as that seized and that there has be 2022According to Waller, his conviction was in error as the State failed to establish a chain of custody of the drugs purchased by the informant. 5 Rankin, 278 Ga. at 705 (additional citations omitted). 6 Williams v. State, 174 Ga. App. 56, 58 (3) ( 329 SE2d 226 ) (1985). 7 Cooper v. State, 352 Ga. App. 783 , 787 (2) ( 835 SE2d 724 ) (2019) (citations and punctuation omitted). 4 In order to show the chain of custody adequate to preserve the identity of fungible evidence, the State has the burden of proving with reasonable certainty that the evidence is the same as that seized and that there has be | 1 | 1 |
Gadson v. Stategreen2 sentences2021See generally Gadson v. State, 252 Ga. App. 347, 349 (4) ( 556 SE2d 449 ) (2001) (probable cause existed during the execution of a search warrant when the police found a substance which appeared to be cocaine and which a field test showed to be cocaine and defendant admitted to living at the address). 2021See generally Gadson v. State, 252 Ga. App. 347, 349 (4) ( 556 SE2d 449 ) (2001) (probable cause existed during the execution of a search warrant when the police found a substance which appeared to be cocaine and which a field test showed to be cocaine and defendant admitted to living at the address). | 1 | 1 |
Christy v. Stategreen2 sentences2020See id. at 651 (1). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Ciak v. State, 278 Ga. 27, 30 (3) ( 597 SE2d 392 ) (2004). 8 (Punctuation omitted.) Christy v. State, 315 Ga. App. 647, 650-651 (1) ( 727 SE2d 269 ) (2012). 8 officer’s belief that a suspect’s window tint violates OCGA § 40-8-73.1 is sufficient to justify an investigatory stop, even if the officer later determines from a field test that the window tint did not in fact violate the statute.9 OCGA § 40-8-73.1 (b) provides: Except as provided in this Code section, it shall be unlawful for any person to operate a motor vehicle in this state: (1) Which ha 2020See id. at 651 (1). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Ciak v. State, 278 Ga. 27, 30 (3) ( 597 SE2d 392 ) (2004). 8 (Punctuation omitted.) Christy v. State, 315 Ga. App. 647, 650-651 (1) ( 727 SE2d 269 ) (2012). 8 officer’s belief that a suspect’s window tint violates OCGA § 40-8-73.1 is sufficient to justify an investigatory stop, even if the officer later determines from a field test that the window tint did not in fact violate the statute.9 OCGA § 40-8-73.1 (b) provides: Except as provided in this Code section, it shall be unlawful for any person to operate a motor vehicle in this state: (1) Which ha | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2018See State v. Jones , 297 Ga. 156 , 158 (1), ( 773 S.E.2d 170 ) (2015). 2018See State v. Jones , 297 Ga. 156 , 158 (1), ( 773 S.E.2d 170 ) (2015). | 1 | 1 |
Harper v. Stategreen2 sentences2012Indeed, in prior cases involving 11 249 Ga. 519, 525-526 (1) ( 292 SE2d 389 ) (1982) (affirming the exclusion of expert testimony regarding the defendant’s statements made while under the influence of “truth serum”). 12 Id. at 525 (1). 13 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Fortune, 304 Ga. App. at 298-299 (2). 5 such chemical field testing, we have expressly stated that we have found no case where the results of a chemical field test have been held inadmissible, and instead have indicated that the proper trial procedure is to admit the chemical field test results and then allow for a thorough 2012Indeed, in prior cases involving 11 249 Ga. 519, 525-526 (1) ( 292 SE2d 389 ) (1982) (affirming the exclusion of expert testimony regarding the defendant’s statements made while under the influence of “truth serum”). 12 Id. at 525 (1). 13 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Fortune, 304 Ga. App. at 298-299 (2). 5 such chemical field testing, we have expressly stated that we have found no case where the results of a chemical field test have been held inadmissible, and instead have indicated that the proper trial procedure is to admit the chemical field test results and then allow for a thorough | 1 | 1 |
Fortune v. Stategreen1 sentence2012Indeed, in prior cases involving 11 249 Ga. 519, 525-526 (1) ( 292 SE2d 389 ) (1982) (affirming the exclusion of expert testimony regarding the defendant’s statements made while under the influence of “truth serum”). 12 Id. at 525 (1). 13 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Fortune, 304 Ga. App. at 298-299 (2). 5 such chemical field testing, we have expressly stated that we have found no case where the results of a chemical field test have been held inadmissible, and instead have indicated that the proper trial procedure is to admit the chemical field test results and then allow for a thorough | 1 | 1 |
Griffin v. Stategreen2 sentences2011See State v. Webb, 193 Ga. App. 2, 5 (2) ( 386 SE2d 891 ) (1989) (the plain view doctrine supports a warrantless search and seizure if the officers are lawfully in position to obtain the view, the discovery is inadvertent, and the object viewed is immediately seen to be incriminating); Griffin v. State, 180 Ga. App. 189, 190 ( 348 SE2d 577 ) (1986) (arrest and *122 search are predicated on probable cause where officer relies on his senses to “see” contraband in plain view). 2011See State v. Webb, 193 Ga. App. 2, 5 (2) ( 386 SE2d 891 ) (1989) (the plain view doctrine supports a warrantless search and seizure if the officers are lawfully in position to obtain the view, the discovery is inadvertent, and the object viewed is immediately seen to be incriminating); Griffin v. State, 180 Ga. App. 189, 190 ( 348 SE2d 577 ) (1986) (arrest and *122 search are predicated on probable cause where officer relies on his senses to “see” contraband in plain view). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Webbgreen2 sentences2011See State v. Webb, 193 Ga. App. 2, 5 (2) ( 386 SE2d 891 ) (1989) (the plain view doctrine supports a warrantless search and seizure if the officers are lawfully in position to obtain the view, the discovery is inadvertent, and the object viewed is immediately seen to be incriminating); Griffin v. State, 180 Ga. App. 189, 190 ( 348 SE2d 577 ) (1986) (arrest and *122 search are predicated on probable cause where officer relies on his senses to “see” contraband in plain view). 2011See State v. Webb, 193 Ga. App. 2, 5 (2) ( 386 SE2d 891 ) (1989) (the plain view doctrine supports a warrantless search and seizure if the officers are lawfully in position to obtain the view, the discovery is inadvertent, and the object viewed is immediately seen to be incriminating); Griffin v. State, 180 Ga. App. 189, 190 ( 348 SE2d 577 ) (1986) (arrest and *122 search are predicated on probable cause where officer relies on his senses to “see” contraband in plain view). | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Stategreen2 sentences2011She further testified that she prepared samples of the substance for testing, that the substance was tested in accordance with lab procedures, that the crime lab ran two different tests on the substance (one that she personally ran), that the results were peer reviewed, and that, in her opinion, the substance found in White’s pocket consisted of 10.36 grams of cocaine. 7 This evidence, coupled *390 with the testimony of the drug task force officer about the field test that indicated the presence of cocaine, was sufficient to permit a rational trier of fact to find White guilty beyond a reasona 2011She further testified that she prepared samples of the substance for testing, that the substance was tested in accordance with lab procedures, that the crime lab ran two different tests on the substance (one that she personally ran), that the results were peer reviewed, and that, in her opinion, the substance found in White’s pocket consisted of 10.36 grams of cocaine. 7 This evidence, coupled *390 with the testimony of the drug task force officer about the field test that indicated the presence of cocaine, was sufficient to permit a rational trier of fact to find White guilty beyond a reasona | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wrightgreen1 sentence2004State v. Wright, supra, 221 Ga. App. at 205 (fact that officer did not charge defendant with offenses on which stop based is immaterial). *31 Decided June 7, 2004. | 1 | 1 |
Magher v. Stategreen2 sentences1993Riley v. State, 175 Ga. App. 810 (1) ( 334 SE2d 863 ) (1985); Magher v. State, 199 Ga. App. 508, 509 (3) ( 405 SE2d 327 ) (1991). 3. 1993Riley v. State, 175 Ga. App. 810 (1) ( 334 SE2d 863 ) (1985); Magher v. State, 199 Ga. App. 508, 509 (3) ( 405 SE2d 327 ) (1991). 3. | 1 | 1 |
Collins v. Stategreen2 sentences1988Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560); Collins v. State, 177 Ga. App. 758, 759 (2) ( 341 SE2d 288 ). 1988Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560); Collins v. State, 177 Ga. App. 758, 759 (2) ( 341 SE2d 288 ). | 1 | 1 |
Hunter v. Stategreen2 sentences1985Hunter v. State, 143 Ga. App. 541, 543 (5) ( 239 SE2d 212 ) (1977). 1985Hunter v. State, 143 Ga. App. 541, 543 (5) ( 239 SE2d 212 ) (1977). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Walker v. State
green
2 sentences2018In any event, see Walker v. State , 322 Ga. App. 821 , 824 (1), 744 S.E.2d 385 (2013) (holding that when an officer witnesses a traffic offense, even a minor one such as a window tint violation, the resulting traffic stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment even if the officer has ulterior motives in initiating the stop) (physical precedent only); see also Ciak v. State , 278 Ga. 27 , 30 (3), 597 S.E.2d 392 (2004) (the fact that the officer determined from a field test of the window tint that a citation for violating OCGA § 40-8-73.1 was not warranted did not render the stop-which was based 2018In any event, see Walker v. State , 322 Ga. App. 821 , 824 (1), 744 S.E.2d 385 (2013) (holding that when an officer witnesses a traffic offense, even a minor one such as a window tint violation, the resulting traffic stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment even if the officer has ulterior motives in initiating the stop) (physical precedent only); see also Ciak v. State , 278 Ga. 27 , 30 (3), 597 S.E.2d 392 (2004) (the fact that the officer determined from a field test of the window tint that a citation for violating OCGA § 40-8-73.1 was not warranted did not render the stop-which was based | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Stafford
green
1 sentence2008State v. Stafford, supra, 288 Ga. App. at 310-311 . 5 Although neither the State nor Stafford argued the application of OCGA § 40-6-200, we *775 may nonetheless consider the statute, as it is incumbent on this Court to determine whether the trial court made an erroneous conclusion of law in its holding. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Atkins v. State
green
2 sentences1999“A police officer may legally conduct a brief investigatory stop without a showing of probable cause where the officer observes unusual conduct which, when viewed in the light of [her] experience, causes [her] to conclude that the individual is involved in criminal activity.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Atkins v. State, 209 Ga. App. 70 ( 432 SE2d 661 ) (1993). 1999“A police officer may legally conduct a brief investigatory stop without a showing of probable cause where the officer observes unusual conduct which, when viewed in the light of [her] experience, causes [her] to conclude that the individual is involved in criminal activity.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Atkins v. State, 209 Ga. App. 70 ( 432 SE2d 661 ) (1993). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Riley v. State
green
2 sentences1993Riley v. State, 175 Ga. App. 810 (1) ( 334 SE2d 863 ) (1985); Magher v. State, 199 Ga. App. 508, 509 (3) ( 405 SE2d 327 ) (1991). 3. 1993Riley v. State, 175 Ga. App. 810 (1) ( 334 SE2d 863 ) (1985); Magher v. State, 199 Ga. App. 508, 509 (3) ( 405 SE2d 327 ) (1991). 3. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.