Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Oklahoma opinions name it 3 courts 1931–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wiley v. Stategreen1 sentence1979See Brewer v. State, 96 Okl.Cr. 374 , 255 P.2d 954 (1953) and Wiley v. State, Okl.Cr., 349 P.2d 30 (1960). | 1 | 1 |
Brewer v. Stategreen2 sentences1979See Brewer v. State, 96 Okl.Cr. 374 , 255 P.2d 954 (1953) and Wiley v. State, Okl.Cr., 349 P.2d 30 (1960). 1979See Brewer v. State, 96 Okl.Cr. 374 , 255 P.2d 954 (1953) and Wiley v. State, Okl.Cr., 349 P.2d 30 (1960). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ashinsky v. State
green
2 sentences2004Ashinsky v. State, 1989 OK CR 59 , ถ 15, 780 P.2d 201, 206 . ถ 128 A review of the record shows that prior to the testimony of Officer Ledford, the defense presented testimony from Charles Harris, Tag Supervisor for the Oklahoma Correctional Industries at RBD Connors Correctional Facility. 2004Ashinsky v. State, 1989 OK CR 59 , ถ 15, 780 P.2d 201, 206 . ถ 128 A review of the record shows that prior to the testimony of Officer Ledford, the defense presented testimony from Charles Harris, Tag Supervisor for the Oklahoma Correctional Industries at RBD Connors Correctional Facility. | 2 | 1991–2004 |
Burney v. State
green
2 sentences1989Wimberly v. State, 698 P.2d 27 (Okl.Cr.1985); Burney v. State, 594 P.2d 1226 (Okl.Cr.1979). 1985Burney v. State, 594 P.2d 1226 (Okl.Cr.1979). | 2 | 1985–1989 |
Wimberly v. State
green
1 sentence1989Wimberly v. State, 698 P.2d 27 (Okl.Cr.1985); Burney v. State, 594 P.2d 1226 (Okl.Cr.1979). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Board of Regents Ex Rel. Murray State College of Agriculture & Applied Science v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education
green
1 sentence1988Some years later, our Supreme Court reviewed the prerogatives of the State Regents, vis-a-vis those of the Board of Regents for the Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical Colleges, in Board of Regents For Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical Colleges v. Oklahoma State Regents For Higher Education, 497 P.2d 1062 (Okla. 1972). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Box v. State
green
2 sentences1977In Box v. State, Okl.Cr., 541 P.2d 262 (1975), a similar case involving marijuana, we held the results of such a field test are admissible. 1977In Box v. State, Okl.Cr., 541 P.2d 262 (1975), a similar case involving marijuana, we held the results of such a field test are admissible. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Application of Gooding
neutral
1 sentence1960In Application of Gooding, Okl.Cr., 338 P.2d 1114 , we extended this rule further and said in the syllabus: “Where eighteen-year-old minor farm boy, inexperienced in court procedure, was arraigned on a charge of burglary in the second degree, and although the court advised the accused that he was entitled to be represented by counsel, failed to make inquiry as to ability of parents or guardian to employ counsel, and failed to advise minor that if he lacked funds, the State would furnish counsel without expense to him, Held that defendant (was) entitled to have proceedings after filing of infor | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Lyons v. Campbell
neutral
1 sentence1931The suspicion excited by the fact that the 'beneficiary drew the will gains strength when, it appears that he is a stranger to the blood of the testatrix (Lyons v. Campbell, 88 Ala. 462 , 7 South. 250 ; Richmond’s Appeal, 59 Conn. 226 , 22 Atl. 82 , 21 Am. | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Mooney v. Olsen
green
1 sentence1931“The trial of this issue, as was said in Miller’s Estate, 31, Utah, 415, 88 Pac. 338 , quoting from Mooney v. Olsen, 22 Kan. 69 , opens a broad field of inquiry. | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Richmond Appeal from Probate
neutral
2 sentences1931The suspicion excited by the fact that the 'beneficiary drew the will gains strength when, it appears that he is a stranger to the blood of the testatrix (Lyons v. Campbell, 88 Ala. 462 , 7 South. 250 ; Richmond’s Appeal, 59 Conn. 226 , 22 Atl. 82 , 21 Am. 1931The suspicion excited by the fact that the 'beneficiary drew the will gains strength when, it appears that he is a stranger to the blood of the testatrix (Lyons v. Campbell, 88 Ala. 462 , 7 South. 250 ; Richmond’s Appeal, 59 Conn. 226 , 22 Atl. 82 , 21 Am. | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Miller v. Livingstone
green
1 sentence1931“The trial of this issue, as was said in Miller’s Estate, 31, Utah, 415, 88 Pac. 338 , quoting from Mooney v. Olsen, 22 Kan. 69 , opens a broad field of inquiry. | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.