13 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1850–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pilot Life Insurance v. Dedeauxgreen2 sentences1989See Pilot Life, 481 U.S. at 45 , 107 S.Ct. at 1552 , 95 L.Ed.2d at 46 (“The saving clause excepts from the preemption clause laws that ‘regulate insurance.’ ”). 1989See Pilot Life, 481 U.S. at 45 , 107 S.Ct. at 1552 , 95 L.Ed.2d at 46 (“The saving clause excepts from the preemption clause laws that ‘regulate insurance.’ ”). | 1 | 1 |
Jennings v. Schmitzgreen2 sentences1979More recently, we stated in Jennings v. Schmitz, 237 Iowa 580, 588 , 20 N.W.2d 897, 902 (1945): The fact that proceedings in rem might have been instituted against property of the [defendants] in this state does not render the saving clause found in 11013 [now section 614.6, The Code 1977] inapplicable. 1979More recently, we stated in Jennings v. Schmitz, 237 Iowa 580, 588 , 20 N.W.2d 897, 902 (1945): The fact that proceedings in rem might have been instituted against property of the [defendants] in this state does not render the saving clause found in 11013 [now section 614.6, The Code 1977] inapplicable. | 1 | 1 |
Board of Education v. Iowa State Board of Public Instructiongreen1 sentence1968See Board of Education of Green Mountain Independent School District et al. v. Iowa State Board, Iowa, 157 N.W.2d 919 , at pages 920 and 921 of opinion filed April 9, 1968. | 1 | 1 |
Adams v. Bealegreen1 sentence1866See Adams v. Beale and Wife, 19 Iowa, 61 . 3. mobtaAa5¿íar‘ It is a universal rule that the interest of any person in mortgaged property, although acquired subsequent to the mortgage (unless the mortgage contains a power of sale), can only, be divested or barred, by making such person a party to the foreclosure proceedings. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Easterwood v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
green
1 sentence2021Id. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Grant v. Norris
green
2 sentences1959Certiorari proceeding was brought to test the legality of the formation of the consolidated district, trial was had and on appeal the questions then at issue were decided by this court in Grant v. Norris, 249 Iowa 236 , 85 N.W.2d 261 . 1959Certiorari proceeding was brought to test the legality of the formation of the consolidated district, trial was had and on appeal the questions then at issue were decided by this court in Grant v. Norris, 249 Iowa 236 , 85 N.W.2d 261 . | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Newgirg v. Black
green
1 sentence1945Newgirg v. Black, 174 Iowa 636, 645 , 156 N. W. 708 . | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Chambers v. State
green
1 sentence1933App.) 531, which case is bottomed on Holden v. State, 1 Texas Appeals 225; Harold v. State, 16 Texas Appeals 157; Chambers v. State, 25 Texas 307 . ■While the revived statute of the state of Texas has a general saving clause somewhat stronger than that in the Iowa statute, no reference whatever to such saving clause is made in any of these Texas cases, and each of the opinions is based upon the general rule that, if a penal statute is repealed, without a saving clause, there can be no prosecution or punishment for a violation of it before repeal. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
State v. Sipes
green
2 sentences1930State v. Townsend, 66 Iowa 741 ; State v. Perigo, 70 Iowa 657 ; State v. Sipes, 202 Iowa 173 . 1930As. heretofore stated, the saving clause in an instruction of this kind is the phrase “in the absence of other proof to the contrary.” See State v. Hayden, supra. In State v. Sipes, 202 Iowa 173 , l. c. 187, it is said: “This instruction (the one then under consideration) should have been qualified by saying that, in the absence of any evidence showing justification or excuse, the presumption is conclusive. ’ ’ The instruction in the instant. case respected the proper limitation and consequently the alleged error in this particular avails nothing. | 1 | 1930–1930 |
State v. Townsend
green
1 sentence1930State v. Townsend, 66 Iowa 741 ; State v. Perigo, 70 Iowa 657 ; State v. Sipes, 202 Iowa 173 . | 1 | 1930–1930 |
State v. Perigo
green
1 sentence1930State v. Townsend, 66 Iowa 741 ; State v. Perigo, 70 Iowa 657 ; State v. Sipes, 202 Iowa 173 . | 1 | 1930–1930 |
State v. Hayden
green
1 sentence1930As. heretofore stated, the saving clause in an instruction of this kind is the phrase “in the absence of other proof to the contrary.” See State v. Hayden, supra. In State v. Sipes, 202 Iowa 173 , l. c. 187, it is said: “This instruction (the one then under consideration) should have been qualified by saying that, in the absence of any evidence showing justification or excuse, the presumption is conclusive. ’ ’ The instruction in the instant. case respected the proper limitation and consequently the alleged error in this particular avails nothing. | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Van Liew v. Norwood-White Coal Co.
neutral
1 sentence1923The provision in the lease considered in Van Liew v. Norwood-White Coal Co., 190 Iowa 79 , contained the following provision: “Or until such time prior thereto as the minable coal under said premises shall have become exhausted.” We' said, in interpreting this language of the contract, that: “It is not necessary that the lessee should remove all the merchantable coal. | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Thatcher v. Haun
neutral
1 sentence1875Thatcher v. Hann, 12 Iowa, 303 . | 1 | 1875–1875 |
Jackson v. Bradt
green
1 sentence1872Jackson v. Brandt, 2 Caines, 169 ; Angell on Lim., § 484; Moore v. Armstrong, 10 Ohio, 11; Bronson v. Adams, id. 135. | 1 | 1872–1872 |
Shelby v. Guy
green
1 sentence1850See also, 13 N. H. 80; 14 Peters 141 ; 11 Wheat. 361 . | 1 | 1850–1850 |
The Bank of Alexandria, in Error v. Edward and Francis Dyer, in Error
neutral
1 sentence1850See also, 13 N. H. 80; 14 Peters 141 ; 11 Wheat. 361 . | 1 | 1850–1850 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.