Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1878–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jacksongreen2 sentences2017See State v. Jackson, 380 N.W.2d 420, 424 (Iowa 1986); State v. Johnson, 318 N.W.2d 417 , 434–35 (Iowa 1982). 2017See State v. Jackson, 380 N.W.2d 420, 424 (Iowa 1986); State v. Johnson, 318 N.W.2d 417 , 434–35 (Iowa 1982). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2017See State v. Jackson, 380 N.W.2d 420, 424 (Iowa 1986); State v. Johnson, 318 N.W.2d 417 , 434–35 (Iowa 1982). 2017See State v. Jackson, 380 N.W.2d 420, 424 (Iowa 1986); State v. Johnson, 318 N.W.2d 417 , 434–35 (Iowa 1982). | 1 | 2 |
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Gerald Anthony Lyman Moothartgreen2 sentences2024The text of the rule “makes it clear that the rule may be violated even if there is no attorney–client relationship between the lawyer and the person subject to sexual harassment, as long as the attorney is engaged in the practice of law.” Iowa Sup. Ct. Att’y Disciplinary Bd. v. Moothart, 860 N.W.2d 598, 603 (Iowa 2015). 2024The rule “may be violated if a lawyer sexually harasses witnesses, court personnel, law partners, law-office employees, or other third parties that come into contact with a lawyer engaged in the practice of law.” Id. | 1 | 1 |
Hearity v. BOARD OF SUP'RS FOR FAYETTE COUNTYgreen1 sentence2022But our supreme court has said “such motions must be filed expeditiously without undue delay.” Hearity v. Bd. of Sup’rs For Fayette Cnty., 437 N.W.2d 907, 909 (Iowa 1989). | 1 | 1 |
Coles v. Kennedygreen1 sentence1910See, also, Coles v. Kennedy, 81 Iowa, 360 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Houston v. Lack
green
1 sentence2026But in his view, the text of the rule in question, which required a notice of appeal to be “filed with the clerk of the district court within 30 days,” cannot be interpreted so that the phrase “filed with the clerk” means “delivered to the clerk or, if you are a prisoner, delivered to your warden.” Id. at 277–78 (quoting Fed. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State of Iowa v. Trent D. Smith
green
1 sentence2024Id. (emphases added). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
City of Johnston v. Christenson
green
1 sentence2018An aggrieved party has “thirty days after the filing of the decision in the office of the board.” Iowa Code § 414.15 . 3Another one of our prior cases that does not speak to the present controversy is City of Johnston v. Christenson, 718 N.W.2d 290 (Iowa 2006). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
green
1 sentence1993Meredith, 572 F.2d at 603 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Scott County v. Johnson
green
1 sentence1931On the other hand, a mere expectancy of future benefit, or a contingent interest in property founded on anticipated continuance of existing laws, does not constitute a vested right. * * * The term ‘vested rights’ relates to property rights only, and does not apply to personal rights.” (Writer’s italics.) In Scott County v. Johnson, 209 Iowa 213 , this court had before it the constitutionality of this same statute upon a case, however, brought by a county instead of a school district. | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Herrick v. Cherokee County
neutral
1 sentence1931Based upon these authorities, the text states the rule as follows: * * Before a law can be attacked by any person on the ground that it is unconstitutional, he must show that he has an interest in the question, in that the enforcement of the law would be an infringement on his rights. * * * It has been said that courts cannot pass on the question of the constitutionality of a- statute abstractly, but only as it applies and is sought to be enforced in the government of a particular ease before the court; for the power to revoke or repeal a statute is not judicial in its character.’ ” (Writer’s | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Wilson v. State
green
1 sentence1923Other eases in line with the Parker case, supra, are State v. Akin, 94 Iowa 50 ; Watson v. State, supra; Territory v. Dooley, 4 Mont. 295 ; Bush v. Commonwealth, 78 Ky. 268 ; People v. McDonnell, 92 N. Y. 657 ; Davis v. State, 45 Ark. 464 ; State v. Burk, 89 Mo. 635 ; People v. Warner, 53 Mich. 78 ; People v. Adams, 52 Mich. 24 ; Powers v. State, 87 Ind. 144 ; Bryant v. State, 41 Ark. 359 ; State v. O’Kane, 23 Kan. 244 ; People v. Fine, 53 Cal. 263 ; Wilson v. State, 53 Ga. 205 ; Bean v. State, supra. See, also, 31 Corpus Juris 854, 861, 862; 1 Bishop’s New Criminal Law (8th Ed.), Section 780, | 1 | 1923–1923 |
State v. Burk
neutral
1 sentence1923Other eases in line with the Parker case, supra, are State v. Akin, 94 Iowa 50 ; Watson v. State, supra; Territory v. Dooley, 4 Mont. 295 ; Bush v. Commonwealth, 78 Ky. 268 ; People v. McDonnell, 92 N. Y. 657 ; Davis v. State, 45 Ark. 464 ; State v. Burk, 89 Mo. 635 ; People v. Warner, 53 Mich. 78 ; People v. Adams, 52 Mich. 24 ; Powers v. State, 87 Ind. 144 ; Bryant v. State, 41 Ark. 359 ; State v. O’Kane, 23 Kan. 244 ; People v. Fine, 53 Cal. 263 ; Wilson v. State, 53 Ga. 205 ; Bean v. State, supra. See, also, 31 Corpus Juris 854, 861, 862; 1 Bishop’s New Criminal Law (8th Ed.), Section 780, | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Bryant v. State
neutral
1 sentence1923Other eases in line with the Parker case, supra, are State v. Akin, 94 Iowa 50 ; Watson v. State, supra; Territory v. Dooley, 4 Mont. 295 ; Bush v. Commonwealth, 78 Ky. 268 ; People v. McDonnell, 92 N. Y. 657 ; Davis v. State, 45 Ark. 464 ; State v. Burk, 89 Mo. 635 ; People v. Warner, 53 Mich. 78 ; People v. Adams, 52 Mich. 24 ; Powers v. State, 87 Ind. 144 ; Bryant v. State, 41 Ark. 359 ; State v. O’Kane, 23 Kan. 244 ; People v. Fine, 53 Cal. 263 ; Wilson v. State, 53 Ga. 205 ; Bean v. State, supra. See, also, 31 Corpus Juris 854, 861, 862; 1 Bishop’s New Criminal Law (8th Ed.), Section 780, | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Davis v. State
neutral
1 sentence1923Other eases in line with the Parker case, supra, are State v. Akin, 94 Iowa 50 ; Watson v. State, supra; Territory v. Dooley, 4 Mont. 295 ; Bush v. Commonwealth, 78 Ky. 268 ; People v. McDonnell, 92 N. Y. 657 ; Davis v. State, 45 Ark. 464 ; State v. Burk, 89 Mo. 635 ; People v. Warner, 53 Mich. 78 ; People v. Adams, 52 Mich. 24 ; Powers v. State, 87 Ind. 144 ; Bryant v. State, 41 Ark. 359 ; State v. O’Kane, 23 Kan. 244 ; People v. Fine, 53 Cal. 263 ; Wilson v. State, 53 Ga. 205 ; Bean v. State, supra. See, also, 31 Corpus Juris 854, 861, 862; 1 Bishop’s New Criminal Law (8th Ed.), Section 780, | 1 | 1923–1923 |
State v. O'Kane
neutral
1 sentence1923Other eases in line with the Parker case, supra, are State v. Akin, 94 Iowa 50 ; Watson v. State, supra; Territory v. Dooley, 4 Mont. 295 ; Bush v. Commonwealth, 78 Ky. 268 ; People v. McDonnell, 92 N. Y. 657 ; Davis v. State, 45 Ark. 464 ; State v. Burk, 89 Mo. 635 ; People v. Warner, 53 Mich. 78 ; People v. Adams, 52 Mich. 24 ; Powers v. State, 87 Ind. 144 ; Bryant v. State, 41 Ark. 359 ; State v. O’Kane, 23 Kan. 244 ; People v. Fine, 53 Cal. 263 ; Wilson v. State, 53 Ga. 205 ; Bean v. State, supra. See, also, 31 Corpus Juris 854, 861, 862; 1 Bishop’s New Criminal Law (8th Ed.), Section 780, | 1 | 1923–1923 |
People v. . McDonnell
neutral
1 sentence1923Other eases in line with the Parker case, supra, are State v. Akin, 94 Iowa 50 ; Watson v. State, supra; Territory v. Dooley, 4 Mont. 295 ; Bush v. Commonwealth, 78 Ky. 268 ; People v. McDonnell, 92 N. Y. 657 ; Davis v. State, 45 Ark. 464 ; State v. Burk, 89 Mo. 635 ; People v. Warner, 53 Mich. 78 ; People v. Adams, 52 Mich. 24 ; Powers v. State, 87 Ind. 144 ; Bryant v. State, 41 Ark. 359 ; State v. O’Kane, 23 Kan. 244 ; People v. Fine, 53 Cal. 263 ; Wilson v. State, 53 Ga. 205 ; Bean v. State, supra. See, also, 31 Corpus Juris 854, 861, 862; 1 Bishop’s New Criminal Law (8th Ed.), Section 780, | 1 | 1923–1923 |
People v. Adams
green
1 sentence1923Other eases in line with the Parker case, supra, are State v. Akin, 94 Iowa 50 ; Watson v. State, supra; Territory v. Dooley, 4 Mont. 295 ; Bush v. Commonwealth, 78 Ky. 268 ; People v. McDonnell, 92 N. Y. 657 ; Davis v. State, 45 Ark. 464 ; State v. Burk, 89 Mo. 635 ; People v. Warner, 53 Mich. 78 ; People v. Adams, 52 Mich. 24 ; Powers v. State, 87 Ind. 144 ; Bryant v. State, 41 Ark. 359 ; State v. O’Kane, 23 Kan. 244 ; People v. Fine, 53 Cal. 263 ; Wilson v. State, 53 Ga. 205 ; Bean v. State, supra. See, also, 31 Corpus Juris 854, 861, 862; 1 Bishop’s New Criminal Law (8th Ed.), Section 780, | 1 | 1923–1923 |
People v. Warner
neutral
1 sentence1923Other eases in line with the Parker case, supra, are State v. Akin, 94 Iowa 50 ; Watson v. State, supra; Territory v. Dooley, 4 Mont. 295 ; Bush v. Commonwealth, 78 Ky. 268 ; People v. McDonnell, 92 N. Y. 657 ; Davis v. State, 45 Ark. 464 ; State v. Burk, 89 Mo. 635 ; People v. Warner, 53 Mich. 78 ; People v. Adams, 52 Mich. 24 ; Powers v. State, 87 Ind. 144 ; Bryant v. State, 41 Ark. 359 ; State v. O’Kane, 23 Kan. 244 ; People v. Fine, 53 Cal. 263 ; Wilson v. State, 53 Ga. 205 ; Bean v. State, supra. See, also, 31 Corpus Juris 854, 861, 862; 1 Bishop’s New Criminal Law (8th Ed.), Section 780, | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Territory of Montana v. Dooley
neutral
1 sentence1923Other eases in line with the Parker case, supra, are State v. Akin, 94 Iowa 50 ; Watson v. State, supra; Territory v. Dooley, 4 Mont. 295 ; Bush v. Commonwealth, 78 Ky. 268 ; People v. McDonnell, 92 N. Y. 657 ; Davis v. State, 45 Ark. 464 ; State v. Burk, 89 Mo. 635 ; People v. Warner, 53 Mich. 78 ; People v. Adams, 52 Mich. 24 ; Powers v. State, 87 Ind. 144 ; Bryant v. State, 41 Ark. 359 ; State v. O’Kane, 23 Kan. 244 ; People v. Fine, 53 Cal. 263 ; Wilson v. State, 53 Ga. 205 ; Bean v. State, supra. See, also, 31 Corpus Juris 854, 861, 862; 1 Bishop’s New Criminal Law (8th Ed.), Section 780, | 1 | 1923–1923 |
People v. Fine
neutral
1 sentence1923Other eases in line with the Parker case, supra, are State v. Akin, 94 Iowa 50 ; Watson v. State, supra; Territory v. Dooley, 4 Mont. 295 ; Bush v. Commonwealth, 78 Ky. 268 ; People v. McDonnell, 92 N. Y. 657 ; Davis v. State, 45 Ark. 464 ; State v. Burk, 89 Mo. 635 ; People v. Warner, 53 Mich. 78 ; People v. Adams, 52 Mich. 24 ; Powers v. State, 87 Ind. 144 ; Bryant v. State, 41 Ark. 359 ; State v. O’Kane, 23 Kan. 244 ; People v. Fine, 53 Cal. 263 ; Wilson v. State, 53 Ga. 205 ; Bean v. State, supra. See, also, 31 Corpus Juris 854, 861, 862; 1 Bishop’s New Criminal Law (8th Ed.), Section 780, | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Powers v. State
green
1 sentence1923Other eases in line with the Parker case, supra, are State v. Akin, 94 Iowa 50 ; Watson v. State, supra; Territory v. Dooley, 4 Mont. 295 ; Bush v. Commonwealth, 78 Ky. 268 ; People v. McDonnell, 92 N. Y. 657 ; Davis v. State, 45 Ark. 464 ; State v. Burk, 89 Mo. 635 ; People v. Warner, 53 Mich. 78 ; People v. Adams, 52 Mich. 24 ; Powers v. State, 87 Ind. 144 ; Bryant v. State, 41 Ark. 359 ; State v. O’Kane, 23 Kan. 244 ; People v. Fine, 53 Cal. 263 ; Wilson v. State, 53 Ga. 205 ; Bean v. State, supra. See, also, 31 Corpus Juris 854, 861, 862; 1 Bishop’s New Criminal Law (8th Ed.), Section 780, | 1 | 1923–1923 |
State v. Akin
green
1 sentence1923Other eases in line with the Parker case, supra, are State v. Akin, 94 Iowa 50 ; Watson v. State, supra; Territory v. Dooley, 4 Mont. 295 ; Bush v. Commonwealth, 78 Ky. 268 ; People v. McDonnell, 92 N. Y. 657 ; Davis v. State, 45 Ark. 464 ; State v. Burk, 89 Mo. 635 ; People v. Warner, 53 Mich. 78 ; People v. Adams, 52 Mich. 24 ; Powers v. State, 87 Ind. 144 ; Bryant v. State, 41 Ark. 359 ; State v. O’Kane, 23 Kan. 244 ; People v. Fine, 53 Cal. 263 ; Wilson v. State, 53 Ga. 205 ; Bean v. State, supra. See, also, 31 Corpus Juris 854, 861, 862; 1 Bishop’s New Criminal Law (8th Ed.), Section 780, | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Bush v. Commonwealth
neutral
1 sentence1923Other eases in line with the Parker case, supra, are State v. Akin, 94 Iowa 50 ; Watson v. State, supra; Territory v. Dooley, 4 Mont. 295 ; Bush v. Commonwealth, 78 Ky. 268 ; People v. McDonnell, 92 N. Y. 657 ; Davis v. State, 45 Ark. 464 ; State v. Burk, 89 Mo. 635 ; People v. Warner, 53 Mich. 78 ; People v. Adams, 52 Mich. 24 ; Powers v. State, 87 Ind. 144 ; Bryant v. State, 41 Ark. 359 ; State v. O’Kane, 23 Kan. 244 ; People v. Fine, 53 Cal. 263 ; Wilson v. State, 53 Ga. 205 ; Bean v. State, supra. See, also, 31 Corpus Juris 854, 861, 862; 1 Bishop’s New Criminal Law (8th Ed.), Section 780, | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Collier v. Frierson
green
1 sentence1883But the will of the people to this end can only be expressed in the legitimate modes by which such a body politic can act, and which must either be prescribed by the constitution whose revision or amendment is sought, or by an act of the legislative department of the state, which alone would be authorized to speak for the people.upon this subject, and'to point out a mode for the expression of their will, in the absence of any provision for amendment or revision contained in the constitution itself.” The learned author cites in support of this doctrine of the text, Opinions of the Judges, 6 Cus | 1 | 1883–1883 |
State v. McBride
green
1 sentence1883But the will of the people to this end can only be expressed in the legitimate modes by which such a body politic can act, and which must either be prescribed by the constitution whose revision or amendment is sought, or by an act of the legislative department of the state, which alone would be authorized to speak for the people.upon this subject, and'to point out a mode for the expression of their will, in the absence of any provision for amendment or revision contained in the constitution itself.” The learned author cites in support of this doctrine of the text, Opinions of the Judges, 6 Cus | 1 | 1883–1883 |
State v. Shean
neutral
1 sentence1878The learned author cites, in support of the doctrine of the text, The State v. Shean, supra. The citation of this case is clearly made under a misapprehension of the point decided, which we have endeavored to correctly state in the foregoing discussion. | 1 | 1878–1878 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.