12 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dickson v. Dicksongreen2 sentences2020See Dickson v. Dickson, 2018 ND 130, ¶ 7 , 912 N.W.2d 321 ; Mairs v. Mairs, 2014 ND 132, ¶ 7 , 847 N.W.2d 785 . 2020See Dickson v. Dickson, 2018 ND 130, ¶ 7 , 912 N.W.2d 321 ; Mairs v. Mairs, 2014 ND 132, ¶ 7 , 847 N.W.2d 785 . | 1 | 1 |
Anderson v. Hensrudgreen1 sentence2017She did something before that.” He later advised the father not to hit someone even if that person “push[es] a button.” [¶26] This Court has reversed district courts for rationalizing an individual’s acts of physical violence because the victim “pushed a button.” Huesers v. Huesers, 1997 ND 33, ¶¶ 10-11 , 560 N.W.2d 219 ; Anderson v. Hensrud, 548 N.W.2d 410, 413-14 (N.D.1996) (quoting Heck v. Reed, 529 N.W.2d 155, 164 (N.D.1995)). | 1 | 1 |
Heck v. Reedgreen1 sentence2017She did something before that.” He later advised the father not to hit someone even if that person “push[es] a button.” [¶26] This Court has reversed district courts for rationalizing an individual’s acts of physical violence because the victim “pushed a button.” Huesers v. Huesers, 1997 ND 33, ¶¶ 10-11 , 560 N.W.2d 219 ; Anderson v. Hensrud, 548 N.W.2d 410, 413-14 (N.D.1996) (quoting Heck v. Reed, 529 N.W.2d 155, 164 (N.D.1995)). | 1 | 1 |
O'Hara v. Schneidergreen2 sentences2017See O’Hara , 2017 ND 53, ¶ 29 , 890 N.W.2d 831 . 2017See O’Hara , 2017 ND 53, ¶ 29 , 890 N.W.2d 831 . | 1 | 1 |
Ludwig v. Burchillgreen2 sentences1997See, e.g., Ludwig v. Burchill, 514 N.W.2d 674, 675 (N.D.1994); Dalin, 512 N.W.2d at 687 ; Hagel v. Hagel, 512 N.W.2d 465, 467 (N.D.1994). 1997See, e.g., Ludwig v. Burchill, 514 N.W.2d 674, 675 (N.D.1994); Dalin, 512 N.W.2d at 687 ; Hagel v. Hagel, 512 N.W.2d 465, 467 (N.D.1994). | 1 | 1 |
Hagel v. Hagelgreen2 sentences1997See, e.g., Ludwig v. Burchill, 514 N.W.2d 674, 675 (N.D.1994); Dalin, 512 N.W.2d at 687 ; Hagel v. Hagel, 512 N.W.2d 465, 467 (N.D.1994). 1997See, e.g., Ludwig v. Burchill, 514 N.W.2d 674, 675 (N.D.1994); Dalin, 512 N.W.2d at 687 ; Hagel v. Hagel, 512 N.W.2d 465, 467 (N.D.1994). | 1 | 1 |
Cook v. Cookgreen2 sentences1994See Cook v. Cook, 364 N.W.2d 74 (N.D.1985). 1994Cook, 364 N.W.2d 74 . | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Schlotmangreen2 sentences1994In Johnson, we stated that "a motion for a new trial based upon the discovery of new evidence in custody and visitation cases is inappropriate because the continuing jurisdiction of the trial court in custody matters allows for a modification hearing when new evidence is adduced." Id. at 836. 1994In Johnson, we stated that “a motion for a new trial based upon the discovery of new evidence in custody and visitation cases is inappropriate because the continuing jurisdiction of the trial court in custody matters allows for a modification hearing when new evidence is adduced.” Id. at 836. | 1 | 1 |
Klose v. Klosegreen2 sentences1994Distinguishing between the two stages in the modification analysis, we held in Klose v. Klose, 524 N.W.2d 94, 96 (N.D.1994), and Mertz, 439 N.W.2d at 96 , that, although the child’s preference is relevant on best interests, it is less important on whether there has been a significant change of circumstances. 1994Distinguishing between the two stages in the modification analysis, we held in Klose v. Klose, 524 N.W.2d 94, 96 (N.D.1994), and Mertz, 439 N.W.2d at 96 , that, although the child's preference is relevant on best interests, it is less important on whether there has been a significant change of circumstances. | 1 | 1 |
Bloom v. Fyllesvoldgreen2 sentences1993Compare Bloom v. Fyllesvold, 420 N.W.2d 327, 330 (N.D.1988) (“[T]he hearing was on an ‘order affecting a child support obligation,’ and the trial court did not combine a withholding hearing with a modification hearing.”). 1993Bloom, 420 N.W.2d at 330 . | 1 | 1 |
Blotske v. Leidholmgreen2 sentences1993See Blotske, supra; Vande Hoven, supra; Voskuil v. Voskuil, 256 N.W.2d 526 (N.D.1977). 1993See Blotske, supra ; Vande Hoven, supra ; Voskuil v. Voskuil, 256 N.W.2d 526 (N.D.1977). | 1 | 1 |
Sateren v. Saterengreen1 sentence1992See Sateren v. Sateren, 488 N.W.2d 631 (N.D.1992): “Our remand will permit the trial court to examine and resolve together the overlapping issues of the property division and spousal support.” Because we remand for reconsideration of the method of implementing the property division, the trial court will have an opportunity to properly consider the spousal support award in light of the distribution of marital property that is finally made. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mairs v. Mairs
green
2 sentences2020See Dickson v. Dickson, 2018 ND 130, ¶ 7 , 912 N.W.2d 321 ; Mairs v. Mairs, 2014 ND 132, ¶ 7 , 847 N.W.2d 785 . 2020See Dickson v. Dickson, 2018 ND 130, ¶ 7 , 912 N.W.2d 321 ; Mairs v. Mairs, 2014 ND 132, ¶ 7 , 847 N.W.2d 785 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Hageman v. Hageman
green
2 sentences2018Hageman v. Hageman , 2013 ND 29, ¶¶ 5-6 , 827 N.W.2d 23 . [¶8] Here, Jennifer moved the district court to modify residential responsibility within two years of the parties’ stipulation for joint residential responsibility, triggering the stricter modification standard. 2018Hageman v. Hageman , 2013 ND 29 , ¶¶ 5-6, 827 N.W.2d 23 . [¶ 8] Here, Jennifer moved the district court to modify residential responsibility within two years of the parties' stipulation for joint residential responsibility, triggering the stricter modification standard. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Hageman v. Hageman
green
2 sentences2018Hageman v. Hageman , 2013 ND 29, ¶¶ 5-6 , 827 N.W.2d 23 . [¶8] Here, Jennifer moved the district court to modify residential responsibility within two years of the parties’ stipulation for joint residential responsibility, triggering the stricter modification standard. 2018Hageman v. Hageman , 2013 ND 29 , ¶¶ 5-6, 827 N.W.2d 23 . [¶ 8] Here, Jennifer moved the district court to modify residential responsibility within two years of the parties' stipulation for joint residential responsibility, triggering the stricter modification standard. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Huesers v. Huesers
green
2 sentences2017She did something before that.” He later advised the father not to hit someone even if that person “push[es] a button.” [¶26] This Court has reversed district courts for rationalizing an individual’s acts of physical violence because the victim “pushed a button.” Huesers v. Huesers, 1997 ND 33, ¶¶ 10-11 , 560 N.W.2d 219 ; Anderson v. Hensrud, 548 N.W.2d 410, 413-14 (N.D.1996) (quoting Heck v. Reed, 529 N.W.2d 155, 164 (N.D.1995)). 2017She did something before that.” He later advised the father not to hit someone even if that person “push[es] a button.” [¶26] This Court has reversed district courts for rationalizing an individual’s acts of physical violence because the victim “pushed a button.” Huesers v. Huesers, 1997 ND 33, ¶¶ 10-11 , 560 N.W.2d 219 ; Anderson v. Hensrud, 548 N.W.2d 410, 413-14 (N.D.1996) (quoting Heck v. Reed, 529 N.W.2d 155, 164 (N.D.1995)). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Seibel v. Seibel
green
2 sentences2007Seibel v. Seibel, 2004 ND 41, ¶ 5 , 675 N.W.2d 182 . [¶ 24] A court may not 'modify a prior custody order within two years of the entry of an order establishing custody unless the court finds the modification is necessary to serve the best interests of the child and: a. 2007Seibel v. Seibel, 2004 ND 41, ¶ 5 , 675 N.W.2d 182 . [¶ 24] A court may not 'modify a prior custody order within two years of the entry of an order establishing custody unless the court finds the modification is necessary to serve the best interests of the child and: a. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Molitor v. Molitor
green
2 sentences2007Molitor v. Molitor, 2006 ND 163, ¶ 13 , 718 N.W.2d 13 . 2007Molitor v. Molitor, 2006 ND 163, ¶ 13 , 718 N.W.2d 13 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Dalin v. Dalin
green
2 sentences1997See, e.g., Ludwig v. Burchill, 514 N.W.2d 674, 675 (N.D.1994); Dalin, 512 N.W.2d at 687 ; Hagel v. Hagel, 512 N.W.2d 465, 467 (N.D.1994). 1997See, e.g., Ludwig v. Burchill, 514 N.W.2d 674, 675 (N.D.1994); Dalin, 512 N.W.2d at 687 ; Hagel v. Hagel, 512 N.W.2d 465, 467 (N.D.1994). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Mertz v. Mertz
green
2 sentences1994Distinguishing between the two stages in the modification analysis, we held in Klose v. Klose, 524 N.W.2d 94, 96 (N.D.1994), and Mertz, 439 N.W.2d at 96 , that, although the child’s preference is relevant on best interests, it is less important on whether there has been a significant change of circumstances. 1994Distinguishing between the two stages in the modification analysis, we held in Klose v. Klose, 524 N.W.2d 94, 96 (N.D.1994), and Mertz, 439 N.W.2d at 96 , that, although the child's preference is relevant on best interests, it is less important on whether there has been a significant change of circumstances. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Vande Hoven v. Vande Hoven
green
2 sentences1993See Blotske, supra; Vande Hoven, supra; Voskuil v. Voskuil, 256 N.W.2d 526 (N.D.1977). 1993See Blotske, supra ; Vande Hoven, supra ; Voskuil v. Voskuil, 256 N.W.2d 526 (N.D.1977). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Voskuil v. Voskuil
green
2 sentences1993See Blotske, supra; Vande Hoven, supra; Voskuil v. Voskuil, 256 N.W.2d 526 (N.D.1977). 1993See Blotske, supra ; Vande Hoven, supra ; Voskuil v. Voskuil, 256 N.W.2d 526 (N.D.1977). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.