11 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1972–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Withrow v. Larkingreen2 sentences2018See Withrow, 421 U.S. at 58 , 95 S.Ct. at 1470 . 2018See Withrow, 421 U.S. at 58 , 95 S.Ct. at 1470 . | 1 | 1 |
Babineaux v. Judiciary Commissiongreen1 sentence1997The essence of substantive due process is protection from arbitrary and unreasonable action." Babineaux v. Judiciary Commission, 341 So.2d 396, 400 (La.1976). [15] In the section of the reasons for judgment where the trial court discusses the substantive due process claim, mention is made of Standard's right to "notice and an opportunity to be heard;" however, this discussion is inapposite because notice and an opportunity to be heard are components of a procedural due process claim, rather than a substantive due process claim. [16] We note that the property interest at issue in Standard's tak | 1 | 1 |
Paillot v. Wootongreen1 sentence1993Paillot v. Wooton, 559 So.2d 758, 760 (La.1990). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McGee v. International Life Insurance
green
2 sentences2011Company, 355 U.S. 220 , 78 S.Ct. 199 , 2 L.Ed.2d 223 (1957); and 2) to provide a means by which service of process could be made which would not offend the procedural due process requirement of notice reasonably designed to apprise the corporation of a pending lawsuit. [Emphasis added.] In Michael H. 2011Company, 355 U.S. 220 , 78 S.Ct. 199 , 2 L.Ed.2d 223 (1957); and 2) to provide a means by which service of process could be made which would not offend the procedural due process requirement of notice reasonably designed to apprise the corporation of a pending lawsuit. [Emphasis added.] In Michael H. | 2 | 1972–2011 |
Zinermon v. Burch
green
2 sentences2000In Zinermon v. Burch, 494 U.S. 113 , 110 S.Ct. 975 , 108 L.Ed.2d 100 (1990), the United States Supreme Court set forth the complete procedural due process analysis when a state actor deprives a person of a liberty interest. 2000In Zinermon v. Burch, 494 U.S. 113 , 110 S.Ct. 975 , 108 L.Ed.2d 100 (1990), the United States Supreme Court set forth the complete procedural due process analysis when a state actor deprives a person of a liberty interest. | 2 | 1998–2000 |
Hudson v. Palmer
green
2 sentences2004In Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 , 104 S.Ct. 3194 , 82 L.Ed.2d 393 (1984), and Parrott v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527 , 101 S.Ct. 1908 , 68 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981) the Court enunciated the Parratt/Hudson doctrine applicable to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 actions as follows. 2004In Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 , 104 S.Ct. 3194 , 82 L.Ed.2d 393 (1984), and Parrott v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527 , 101 S.Ct. 1908 , 68 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981) the Court enunciated the Parratt/Hudson doctrine applicable to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 actions as follows. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Parratt v. Taylor
red
2 sentences2004In Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 , 104 S.Ct. 3194 , 82 L.Ed.2d 393 (1984), and Parrott v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527 , 101 S.Ct. 1908 , 68 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981) the Court enunciated the Parratt/Hudson doctrine applicable to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 actions as follows. 2004In Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 , 104 S.Ct. 3194 , 82 L.Ed.2d 393 (1984), and Parrott v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527 , 101 S.Ct. 1908 , 68 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981) the Court enunciated the Parratt/Hudson doctrine applicable to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 actions as follows. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Jones v. Dane County
green
2 sentences1998Jones v. Dane County, 537 N.W.2d 74 , 195 Wis.2d 892 (App.1995), review denied, 540 N.W.2d 200 (Wis.S.Ct. 1995). 1998Jones v. Dane County, 537 N.W.2d 74 , 195 Wis.2d 892 (App.1995), review denied, 540 N.W.2d 200 (Wis.S.Ct. 1995). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Welch v. Thompson
green
1 sentence1997Welch v. Thompson, 92 -3525 (5th Cir. 5/13/94), 20 F.3d 636, 639 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Libretti v. United States
green
2 sentences1996They nevertheless predict "that when presented the proper case the United States Supreme Court will eventually conclude that the burden shifting scheme violates the procedural due process clause of the Federal Constitution." We can perceive no trend in that direction in the latest expression of the Supreme Court on the subject of forfeiture, Libretti v. United States, ___ U.S.___, 116 S.Ct. 356 , 133 L.Ed.2d 271 (1995). 1996They nevertheless predict "that when presented the proper case the United States Supreme Court will eventually conclude that the burden shifting scheme violates the procedural due process clause of the Federal Constitution." We can perceive no trend in that direction in the latest expression of the Supreme Court on the subject of forfeiture, Libretti v. United States, ___ U.S.___, 116 S.Ct. 356 , 133 L.Ed.2d 271 (1995). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Hicks v. Schouest
green
1 sentence1988In Hicks v. Schouest, 381 So.2d 977 (La. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.