8 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Price v. Reedgreen2 sentences2017Since there is no automatic revocation of the license under SB 643 there is no need to take an individual's property and certainly no reason to destroy it, both of which occur without the due process protections of notice and an opportunity to be heard."( citing Price v. Reed , 1986 OK 43 , ¶ 11, 725 P.2d 1254, 1259-60 (a case without any substantive due process claim))); Pet'rs' Br.-in-Chief 10-11 (repeating the arguments in their Application and providing no authority in support of anything other than a procedural due process claim); Pet'rs' Reply Br. 14 (repeating their claim as one that SB 2017Since there is no automatic revocation of the license under SB 643 there is no need to take an individual's property and certainly no reason to destroy it, both of which occur without the due process protections of notice and an opportunity to be heard ."(citing Price v. Reed, 1986 OK 43 , ¶ 11, 725 P.2d 1254, 1259-60 (a case without any substantive due process claim))); Pet'rs’ Br.-in-Chief 10-11 (repeating the arguments in their Application and providing no authority in support of anything other than a procedural due process claim); Pet’rs’ Reply Br. 14 (re-, peating their claim as one that | 2 | 2 |
In Re Conservancy District No. 5, Lincoln Countygreen1 sentence2008Lincoln County, 471 P.2d at 881 (citations omitted) (emphasis added). ¶ 19 Thus, contrary to the COCA’s view, none of the three cases it relied on nor any others we have found, has upheld, over a procedural due process challenge, the constitutionality of publication notice alone at the appraisers’ report stage. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Western Heights Independent School District No. I-41 of Oklahoma County v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Department of Education
neutral
2 sentences2022Western Heights , 2007 OK CIV APP 21 156 P.3d 53 ¶75 These principles are important to the controversy for two reasons: (1) A procedural due process violation is based upon the absence or inadequacy of State procedure for the legal interest, ¶76 The trial court stated the following findings and conclusions of law in its order with respect to the school district's challenge to the exercise of authority by the State Board and the OSDE. . . . 2022Western Heights , 2007 OK CIV APP 21 156 P.3d 53 ¶75 These principles are important to the controversy for two reasons: (1) A procedural due process violation is based upon the absence or inadequacy of State procedure for the legal interest, ¶76 The trial court stated the following findings and conclusions of law in its order with respect to the school district's challenge to the exercise of authority by the State Board and the OSDE. . . . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Barnthouse v. City of Edmond
green
2 sentences2003Barnthouse v. City of Edmond, 2003 OK 42, ¶¶ 13-14 , 73 P.3d 840, 847 . 2003Barnthouse v. City of Edmond, 2003 OK 42, ¶¶ 13-14 , 73 P.3d 840, 847 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Michael H. v. Gerald D.
green
2 sentences1995Addressing the procedural due process claim the Court reasoned: ... “irrebuttable presumption” cases must ultimately be analyzed as calling into question not the adequacy of procedures but ... the fit between the classification and the policy that the classification serves. *1028 491 U.S. at 121 , 109 S.Ct. at 2340 . 1995Addressing the procedural due process claim the Court reasoned: ... “irrebuttable presumption” cases must ultimately be analyzed as calling into question not the adequacy of procedures but ... the fit between the classification and the policy that the classification serves. *1028 491 U.S. at 121 , 109 S.Ct. at 2340 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Paul v. Davis
green
2 sentences1990Id. 424 U.S. at 710 n. 5, 96 S.Ct. at 1165 n. 5. [1] A person's liberty interest is altered when a government employer forecloses a future opportunity to government employment in a manner that contravenes Due Process. 1990Id. 424 U.S. at 710 n. 5, 96 S.Ct. at 1165 n. 5. [1] A person's liberty interest is altered when a government employer forecloses a future opportunity to government employment in a manner that contravenes Due Process. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
King v. Board of Regents, Claremore Junior College
green
1 sentence1982King v. Board of Regents, Claremore Junior College, 541 P.2d 836 (Okl.1975); Board of Regents v. Roth, supra. See also, Perry v. Sinderman, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Perry v. Sindermann
green
2 sentences1982King v. Board of Regents, Claremore Junior College, 541 P.2d 836 (Okl.1975); Board of Regents v. Roth, supra. See also, Perry v. Sinderman, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972). 1982King v. Board of Regents, Claremore Junior College, 541 P.2d 836 (Okl.1975); Board of Regents v. Roth, supra. See also, Perry v. Sinderman, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.