19 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ross v. Indiana State Board of Nursinggreen2 sentences2012For § 1983 claims premised upon a procedural due process violation, we consider two factors: “first, there must be a deprivation of a constitutionally protected liberty or property interest; and second, a determination of what procedural safeguards are then required.” Ross v. Indiana State Bd. of Nursing, 790 N.E.2d 110, 120 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003). 2012For § 1983 claims premised upon a procedural due process violation, we consider two factors: “first, there must be a deprivation of a constitutionally protected liberty or property interest; and second, a determination of what procedural safeguards are then required.” Ross v. Indiana State Bd. of Nursing, 790 N.E.2d 110, 120 (Ind.Ct.App. 2003). | 2 | 2 |
In the Matter of: S.G., L.G., D.G., & A.W. and S.S. (Mother) v. Indiana Department of Child Servcies, and Child Advocates, Inc.green2 sentences2026Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 25A-JC-2526 | May 12, 2026 Page 12 of 22 must provide ‘the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.’” Id. (quoting Mathews, 424 U.S. at 333 , 96 S.Ct. 893 ). 2026See Matter of S.G., 67 N.E.3d 1138, 1146-47 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017). 4 On appeal, Father labels his as applied challenge as a procedural due process violation; however, the content of his argument focuses on both his substantive right to parent Child and his procedural right to fair proceedings. | 1 | 1 |
Snyder v. Smithgreen1 sentence2024Snyder v. Smith, 7 F. Supp. 3d 842, 858 (S.D. | 1 | 1 |
Hudson v. Palmergreen1 sentence2018Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A02-1711-CT-2557 | July 25, 2018 Page 7 of 12 Regarding [Hill’s] Procedural Due Process claim under the Fourteenth Amendment for destruction of property the Court FINDS that the Defendants named in this claim were not personally involved, and even if they were the claim would fail as it falls within the Supreme Court’s holding in Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 533 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
Perdue v. Garganogreen1 sentence2015Only after finding Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 93A02-1409-EX-682 | August 25, 2015 Page 10 of 19 the deprivation of a protected interest do we look to see if the State’s procedures comport with due process.’” Perdue v. Gargano, 964 N.E.2d 825, 832 (Ind. 2012) (quoting Am. | 1 | 1 |
Jones v. Housing Authority of the City of South Bendgreen1 sentence2011Auth. of City of South Bend, 915 N.E.2d 490, 497 (Ind.Ct.App.2009) (noting that the claimant had been provided full opportunity to present defenses and holding that the claimant failed to demonstrate how he was prejudiced by a procedural due process error), reh’g denied, trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
TeWalt v. TeWaltgreen1 sentence2009See TeWalt v. TeWalt, 421 N.E.2d 415, 420 (Ind.Ct.App.1981)(applying harmless error doctrine to a claim of deficient notice). | 1 | 1 |
Thompson v. Stategreen1 sentence1983See, eg., Thompson v. State, (1981) Ind.App., 425 N.E.2d 167 , trans. denied, for a discussion of the salient distinctions between the two types of analysis. | 1 | 1 |
Fuentes v. Shevingreen2 sentences1976For a discussion as to the form of a procedural due process hearing, See, Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 , 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975); North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc., 419 U.S. 601 , 95 S.Ct. 719 , 42 L.Ed.2d 751 (1975); Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 , 92 S.Ct. 1983, 1996, 1997, 1998, n. 18, 1999, n. 21 , 32 L.Ed.2d 556 ; Note, 48 Ind. L.J. 126 , 131, n. 30 (1972). 1976For a discussion as to the form of a procedural due process hearing, See, Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 , 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975); North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc., 419 U.S. 601 , 95 S.Ct. 719 , 42 L.Ed.2d 751 (1975); Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 , 92 S.Ct. 1983, 1996, 1997, 1998, n. 18, 1999, n. 21 , 32 L.Ed.2d 556 ; Note, 48 Ind. L.J. 126 , 131, n. 30 (1972). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mathews v. Eldridge
green
2 sentences1985In recognizing a due process right to blood tests in state initiated support actions, we have applied the procedural due process analysis established by the United States Supreme Court in Mathews v. Eldridge (1976), 424 U.S. 319 , 96 S.Ct. 893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 . 1985In recognizing a due process right to blood tests in state initiated support actions, we have applied the procedural due process analysis established by the United States Supreme Court in Mathews v. Eldridge (1976), 424 U.S. 319 , 96 S.Ct. 893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 . | 2 | 1985–2026 |
Bishop v. Wood
green
2 sentences1993However, it is clear that Executrix's claim cannot fall under the penumbra of a procedural due process violation. 1 The Due Process Clause "is not a guarantee against incorrect or ill-advised personnel decisions." Bishop v. Wood (1976), 426 U.S. 341, 350 , 96 S.Ct. 2074, 2080 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 . 1993However, it is clear that Executrix's claim cannot fall under the penumbra of a procedural due process violation. 1 The Due Process Clause "is not a guarantee against incorrect or ill-advised personnel decisions." Bishop v. Wood (1976), 426 U.S. 341, 350 , 96 S.Ct. 2074, 2080 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 . | 2 | 1993–1993 |
Phelps v. Sybinsky
green
1 sentence2019In re C.G. , 954 N.E.2d at 918 ; Phelps , 736 N.E.2d at 814 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
In Re CG
green
1 sentence2019In re C.G. , 954 N.E.2d at 918 ; Phelps , 736 N.E.2d at 814 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Garwood v. Indiana Department of State Revenue
green
1 sentence2017One of the Garwoods' three theories of a procedural due process violation at trial—that DOR unconstitutionally denied them a post-deprivation hearing by its June 22, 2009, letter—was in fact asserted before the tax court in Garwood II as a basis for invalidating the jeopardy assessments. 953 N.E.2d at 683 . 5 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Carter v. REV. BD. OF IND. DEPT. OF EMPLOY.
green
1 sentence2000In addressing the notice issue, we said that “Carter cannot be found to have been afforded an opportunity to be heard as mandated by the doctrine of procedural due process, if he was not apprised of the time and place of the referee’s hearing.” Carter, 526 N.E.2d at 719 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Board of Zoning Appeals v. Leisz
green
1 sentence1998As stated by the trial court in its order granting the Leiszs’ motion to correct error, which was also quoted in the Court of Appeals opinion: “[The Leiszs’] right to nonconforming use would be very nohow indeed if it could be lost to a grandfa *1033 thering requirement, the notice of which was sent only to specific recipients, and which required registration within a very short period of time.” Leisz, 686 N.E.2d at 938 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Collins v. City of Harker Heights
green
1 sentence1993Id. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Erdelyi v. O'brien
green
2 sentences1990The city once again cites Erdelyi v. O'Brien (9th Cir.1982), 680 F.2d 61 , where the Ninth Circuit addressed, in a footnote, the precise factual issue presented in the instant case: Under [California] state law Erdelyi is entitled to mandamus from a state court if her claim that O'Brien had a policy of denying all applications is true. 1990The city once again cites Erdelyi v. O'Brien (9th Cir.1982), 680 F.2d 61 , where the Ninth Circuit addressed, in a footnote, the precise factual issue presented in the instant case: Under [California] state law Erdelyi is entitled to mandamus from a state court if her claim that O'Brien had a policy of denying all applications is true. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Zinermon v. Burch
green
2 sentences1990This three-part analysis was most recently articulated by the Supreme Court in Zinermon v. Burch (1990), 494 U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 975 , 108 L.Ed.2d 100 , a case involving the procedural due process rights of a mental patient who successfully claimed he had been improperly admitted and detained at Florida State Hospital We now turn to each of the three components of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as set forth above. 1990This three-part analysis was most recently articulated by the Supreme Court in Zinermon v. Burch (1990), 494 U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 975 , 108 L.Ed.2d 100 , a case involving the procedural due process rights of a mental patient who successfully claimed he had been improperly admitted and detained at Florida State Hospital We now turn to each of the three components of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as set forth above. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Perry v. Sindermann
green
1 sentence1980Perry v. Sindermann (1972), 408 U.S. 598 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 833 L.Ed.2d 570 ; Board of Regents v. Roth (1972), 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 83 L.Ed.2d 548 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth
green
2 sentences1980Perry v. Sindermann (1972), 408 U.S. 598 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 833 L.Ed.2d 570 ; Board of Regents v. Roth (1972), 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 83 L.Ed.2d 548 . 1980Perry v. Sindermann (1972), 408 U.S. 598 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 833 L.Ed.2d 570 ; Board of Regents v. Roth (1972), 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 83 L.Ed.2d 548 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Goss v. Lopez
green
2 sentences1976For a discussion as to the form of a procedural due process hearing, See, Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 , 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975); North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc., 419 U.S. 601 , 95 S.Ct. 719 , 42 L.Ed.2d 751 (1975); Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 , 92 S.Ct. 1983, 1996, 1997, 1998, n. 18, 1999, n. 21 , 32 L.Ed.2d 556 ; Note, 48 Ind. L.J. 126 , 131, n. 30 (1972). 1976For a discussion as to the form of a procedural due process hearing, See, Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 , 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975); North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc., 419 U.S. 601 , 95 S.Ct. 719 , 42 L.Ed.2d 751 (1975); Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 , 92 S.Ct. 1983, 1996, 1997, 1998, n. 18, 1999, n. 21 , 32 L.Ed.2d 556 ; Note, 48 Ind. L.J. 126 , 131, n. 30 (1972). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.
green
2 sentences1976For a discussion as to the form of a procedural due process hearing, See, Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 , 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975); North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc., 419 U.S. 601 , 95 S.Ct. 719 , 42 L.Ed.2d 751 (1975); Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 , 92 S.Ct. 1983, 1996, 1997, 1998, n. 18, 1999, n. 21 , 32 L.Ed.2d 556 ; Note, 48 Ind. L.J. 126 , 131, n. 30 (1972). 1976For a discussion as to the form of a procedural due process hearing, See, Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 , 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975); North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc., 419 U.S. 601 , 95 S.Ct. 719 , 42 L.Ed.2d 751 (1975); Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 , 92 S.Ct. 1983, 1996, 1997, 1998, n. 18, 1999, n. 21 , 32 L.Ed.2d 556 ; Note, 48 Ind. L.J. 126 , 131, n. 30 (1972). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.