8 South Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Osloond v. Farriergreen2 sentences2018"To establish a procedural due process violation, a plaintiff must demonstrate that he has a protected property or liberty interest at stake and that he was deprived of that interest without due process of law." Osloond v. Farrier , 2003 S.D. 28 , ¶ 16, 659 N.W.2d 20 , 24 (per curiam) (quoting Hopkins v. Saunders , 199 F.3d 968 , 975 (8th Cir. 1999) ). 2016“To establish a procedural due process violation, a plaintiff must demonstrate that he has a protected property or liberty interest at stake and that he was deprived of that interest without due process of law.” Osloond v. Farrier, 2003 S.D. 28 , ¶ 16, 659 N.W.2d 20, 24 (quoting Hopkins v. Saunders, 199 F.3d 968 , 975 (8th Cir.1999)). “[T]he individual must be deprived of this right by a state actor.” Id. [¶ 16.] Plaintiffs invite us to weigh the public policy of peer review confidentiality against their need for evidence and of revealing instances of bad faith peer review. | 4 | 5 |
Strain v. Rapid City School Boardgreen1 sentence2011Bd., 447 N.W.2d 332, 336 (S.D.1989)). “ ‘To establish a procedural due process violation, [an individual] must demonstrate that he has a protected property or liberty interest at stake and that he was deprived of that interest without due process of law.’ ” Osloond v. Farrier, 2003 S.D. 28 , ¶ 16, 659 N.W.2d 20, 24 (quoting Hopkins v. Saunders, 199 F.3d 968 , 975 (8th Cir.1999)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
cluster 767166
green
2 sentences2018"To establish a procedural due process violation, a plaintiff must demonstrate that he has a protected property or liberty interest at stake and that he was deprived of that interest without due process of law." Osloond v. Farrier , 2003 S.D. 28 , ¶ 16, 659 N.W.2d 20 , 24 (per curiam) (quoting Hopkins v. Saunders , 199 F.3d 968 , 975 (8th Cir. 1999) ). 2016“To establish a procedural due process violation, a plaintiff must demonstrate that he has a protected property or liberty interest at stake and that he was deprived of that interest without due process of law.” Osloond v. Farrier, 2003 S.D. 28 , ¶ 16, 659 N.W.2d 20, 24 (quoting Hopkins v. Saunders, 199 F.3d 968 , 975 (8th Cir.1999)). “[T]he individual must be deprived of this right by a state actor.” Id. [¶ 16.] Plaintiffs invite us to weigh the public policy of peer review confidentiality against their need for evidence and of revealing instances of bad faith peer review. | 7 | 2001–2018 |
Chem-Age Industries, Inc. v. Glover
green
1 sentence2014Accordingly, Morris Family has failed to meet its burden of showing “that [it] will be able to place sufficient evidence in the record at trial to support findings on all the elements on which [it has] the burden of proof.” Bordeaux, 2005 S.D. 117 , ¶ 14, 707 N.W.2d at 127 (quoting Chem-Age Indus., Inc., 2002 S.D. 122 , ¶ 18, 652 N.W.2d at 765 ) (internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Bordeaux v. Shannon County Schools
green
1 sentence2014Accordingly, Morris Family has failed to meet its burden of showing “that [it] will be able to place sufficient evidence in the record at trial to support findings on all the elements on which [it has] the burden of proof.” Bordeaux, 2005 S.D. 117 , ¶ 14, 707 N.W.2d at 127 (quoting Chem-Age Indus., Inc., 2002 S.D. 122 , ¶ 18, 652 N.W.2d at 765 ) (internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Krentz v. Robertson Fire Protection District
green
1 sentence2014Dist., 282 N.W.2d 610 , 613 n. 1, 614 (S.D.1979) (explaining that the Department of Labor’s “jurisdictional base is lost if appellant’s grievance is not timely filed in accordance with the grievance procedure”; and noting that “the trial court could have no better jurisdiction than that of the [Department]”); Krentz v. Robertson, 228 F.3d 897 , 904 (8th Cir. *434 2000) (citations omitted) (“[A]n employee waives a procedural due process claim by refusing to participate in post-termination administrative or grievance procedures made available by the state.”). [¶ 31.] We reverse the circuit court | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Schloe v. Lead-Deadwood Independent School District No. 106
green
1 sentence2014Dist., 282 N.W.2d 610 , 613 n. 1, 614 (S.D.1979) (explaining that the Department of Labor’s “jurisdictional base is lost if appellant’s grievance is not timely filed in accordance with the grievance procedure”; and noting that “the trial court could have no better jurisdiction than that of the [Department]”); Krentz v. Robertson, 228 F.3d 897 , 904 (8th Cir. *434 2000) (citations omitted) (“[A]n employee waives a procedural due process claim by refusing to participate in post-termination administrative or grievance procedures made available by the state.”). [¶ 31.] We reverse the circuit court | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.