11 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Superior Court of California Ex Rel. Jones v. Rickettsgreen2 sentences2007In general, there are four “categories” of due process actions: “(1) a procedural due process claim premised on the deprivation of a property interest; (2) a procedural due process claim premised on the deprivation of a liberty interest; (3) a substantive due process claim premised on the deprivation of a property interest; and (4) a substantive due process claim premised on the deprivation of a liberty interest.” Samuels v. Tschechtelin, 135 Md.App. 483, 523 , 763 A.2d 209 (2000); see Superior Court of California, County of Stanislaus v. Ricketts, 153 Md.App. 281, 336 , 836 A.2d 707 (2003). 2007In general, there are four “categories” of due process actions: “(1) a procedural due process claim premised on the deprivation of a property interest; (2) a procedural due process claim premised on the deprivation of a liberty interest; (3) a substantive due process claim premised on the deprivation of a property interest; and (4) a substantive due process claim premised on the deprivation of a liberty interest.” Samuels v. Tschechtelin, 135 Md.App. 483, 523 , 763 A.2d 209 (2000); see Superior Court of California, County of Stanislaus v. Ricketts, 153 Md.App. 281, 336 , 836 A.2d 707 (2003). | 1 | 1 |
Owens v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See 352 Md. at 679-80, 724 A.2d at 51-52. 1999See 352 Md. at 679-80, 724 A.2d at 51-52. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Samuels v. Tschechtelin
green
2 sentences2013In Samuels v. Tschechtelin, 135 Md.App. 483, 523 , 763 A.2d 209 (2000), we identified four categories of due process claims: a procedural due process claim premised on the deprivation of a property interest; a procedural due process claim premised on the deprivation of a liberty interest; a substantive due process claim premised on the deprivation of a property interest; and a substantive due process claim premised on the deprivation of a liberty interest. 2013In Samuels v. Tschechtelin, 135 Md.App. 483, 523 , 763 A.2d 209 (2000), we identified four categories of due process claims: a procedural due process claim premised on the deprivation of a property interest; a procedural due process claim premised on the deprivation of a liberty interest; a substantive due process claim premised on the deprivation of a property interest; and a substantive due process claim premised on the deprivation of a liberty interest. | 4 | 2001–2013 |
Lodowski v. State
green
2 sentences2013The majority cites three additional cases, Parren v. State, 309 Md. 260, 262 , 523 A.2d 597 (1987); Lodowski v. State, 307 Md. 233, 248 , 513 A.2d 299 (1986); Williams v. State, 292 Md. 201, 218 , 438 A.2d 1301 (1981), for the same proposition. 2013The majority cites three additional cases, Parren v. State, 309 Md. 260, 262 , 523 A.2d 597 (1987); Lodowski v. State, 307 Md. 233, 248 , 513 A.2d 299 (1986); Williams v. State, 292 Md. 201, 218 , 438 A.2d 1301 (1981), for the same proposition. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Williams v. State
green
2 sentences2013The majority cites three additional cases, Parren v. State, 309 Md. 260, 262 , 523 A.2d 597 (1987); Lodowski v. State, 307 Md. 233, 248 , 513 A.2d 299 (1986); Williams v. State, 292 Md. 201, 218 , 438 A.2d 1301 (1981), for the same proposition. 2013The majority cites three additional cases, Parren v. State, 309 Md. 260, 262 , 523 A.2d 597 (1987); Lodowski v. State, 307 Md. 233, 248 , 513 A.2d 299 (1986); Williams v. State, 292 Md. 201, 218 , 438 A.2d 1301 (1981), for the same proposition. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Parren v. State
green
2 sentences2013The majority cites three additional cases, Parren v. State, 309 Md. 260, 262 , 523 A.2d 597 (1987); Lodowski v. State, 307 Md. 233, 248 , 513 A.2d 299 (1986); Williams v. State, 292 Md. 201, 218 , 438 A.2d 1301 (1981), for the same proposition. 2013The majority cites three additional cases, Parren v. State, 309 Md. 260, 262 , 523 A.2d 597 (1987); Lodowski v. State, 307 Md. 233, 248 , 513 A.2d 299 (1986); Williams v. State, 292 Md. 201, 218 , 438 A.2d 1301 (1981), for the same proposition. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Noble v. Kootenai County
green
1 sentence2012After rejecting the procedural due process challenge because, for among other reasons, “a record was made of the site visit,” id. at 1039 , the court nevertheless *168 determined that open meeting requirements had been disregarded: It cannot be said that the Board made a good faith effort to conduct its site visit in a manner that was open to the public in any meaningful way. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
City of Annapolis v. Rowe
green
2 sentences2008We begin — and in this instance end — the procedural due process analysis by asking whether Oltman “was deprived of a protected property interest.” See City of Annapolis v. Rowe, 123 Md.App. 267, 276 , 717 A.2d 976 (1998). 2008We begin — and in this instance end — the procedural due process analysis by asking whether Oltman “was deprived of a protected property interest.” See City of Annapolis v. Rowe, 123 Md.App. 267, 276 , 717 A.2d 976 (1998). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Dembeck v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.
green
1 sentence2006In Dembeck , the Court reviewed the decision from the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, affirming an order of a workman’s compensation board discontinuing the payments of the claimant. 170 A. at 158 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Demesme v. Montgomery County Government
green
1 sentence2006The United States District Court for the District of Maryland has opined that the rule espoused in Harrington "essentially restates the traditional procedural due process standard with a heightened 'arbitrary or capricious’ standard.” Demesme v. Montgomery County Government, 63 F.Supp.2d 678 , 682 n. 7 (D.Md.1999). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Mathews v. Eldridge
green
2 sentences2003“Procedural due process imposes constraints on governmental decisions [that] deprive individuals of ‘liberty’ or ‘property’ interests within the meaning of the Due Process Clause.” Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 332 , 96 S.Ct. 893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976). 2003“Procedural due process imposes constraints on governmental decisions [that] deprive individuals of ‘liberty’ or ‘property’ interests within the meaning of the Due Process Clause.” Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 332 , 96 S.Ct. 893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Regan v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners
green
2 sentences2002Regan v. Board of Chiropractic Exam'rs, 120 Md.App. 494, 510 , 707 A.2d 891 (1998), aff'd, 355 Md. 397 , 735 A.2d 991 (1999). 2002Regan v. Board of Chiropractic Exam'rs, 120 Md.App. 494, 510 , 707 A.2d 891 (1998), aff'd, 355 Md. 397 , 735 A.2d 991 (1999). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Regan v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners
green
2 sentences2002Regan v. Board of Chiropractic Exam'rs, 120 Md.App. 494, 510 , 707 A.2d 891 (1998), aff'd, 355 Md. 397 , 735 A.2d 991 (1999). 2002Regan v. Board of Chiropractic Exam'rs, 120 Md.App. 494, 510 , 707 A.2d 891 (1998), aff'd, 355 Md. 397 , 735 A.2d 991 (1999). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.