11 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Good Hope Hospital, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human Servicesgreen2 sentences2022App. 266, 272 , 620 S.E.2d 873, 879 (2005). ¶ 16 The procedural due process violation: is not complete when the deprivation occurs; it is not complete unless and until the State fails to provide due process. 2022App. 266, 272 , 620 S.E.2d 873, 879 (2005). ¶ 16 The procedural due process violation: is not complete when the deprivation occurs; it is not complete unless and until the State fails to provide due process. | 2 | 2 |
Washington State Department of Social & Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of Keffelergreen2 sentences2007See Keffeler, 537 U.S. at 380 n. 4, 123 S.Ct. at 1023 n. 4, 154 L.Ed.2d at 982 (declining to reach the issue because the Washington Supreme Court did not reach the argument, "accepted in the alternative by the trial court, that the department violated procedural due process by failing to provide notice of the `intended result' of its appointment as representative, payee"). 2007See Keffeler, 537 U.S. at 380 n. 4, 123 S.Ct. at 1023 n. 4, 154 L.Ed.2d at 982 (declining to reach the issue because the Washington Supreme Court did not reach the argument, "accepted in the alternative by the trial court, that the department violated procedural due process by failing to provide notice of the `intended result' of its appointment as representative, payee"). | 2 | 2 |
Town & Country Civic Organization v. Winston-Salem Zoning Board of Adjustmentgreen1 sentence2010App. 516, 518-19 , 350 S.E.2d 893, 894-95 (1986), does address procedural due process issues, at least in dicta, it does not discuss the extent to which the organization and individuals objecting to the radio towers at issue in that proceeding had a constitutionally-protected property interest sufficient to support a procedural due process claim. | 1 | 1 |
Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Rothgreen2 sentences1997See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 33 L. 1997See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 33 L. | 1 | 1 |
Still v. Lancegreen2 sentences1984See Still v. Lance, 279 N.C. 254 , 182 S.E. 2d 403 (1971); Dyer v. Bradshaw, 54 N.C. 1984See Still v. Lance, 279 N.C. 254 , 182 S.E. 2d 403 (1971); Dyer v. Bradshaw, 54 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Presnell v. Pell
green
2 sentences2024Id. at 724 , 260 S.E.2d at 617 . 2024Id. at 724 , 260 S.E.2d at 617 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Nanny's Korner Care Center v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services — Division of Child Development
green
1 sentence2019HHS , 234 N.C. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Mathews v. Eldridge
green
2 sentences2013Thus, we will proceed to consider the constitutional adequacy of the procedures at issue. “[T]he degree of potential deprivation that may be created by a particular decision is afactor to be considered____” Mathews, 424 U.S. at 341 , 47 L.Ed. 2d at 37 . 2013Thus, we will proceed to consider the constitutional adequacy of the procedures at issue. “[T]he degree of potential deprivation that may be created by a particular decision is afactor to be considered____” Mathews, 424 U.S. at 341 , 47 L.Ed. 2d at 37 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Nazziola v. Landcraft Properties, Inc.
green
1 sentence2010App. 564 , 545 S.E.2d 801 (2001), did not involve a procedural due process claim. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Town & Country Civic Organization v. Winston-Salem Zoning Board of Adjustment
green
1 sentence2010Although Town & Country Civic Organization v. Winston-Salem, Zoning Board of Adjustment, 83 N.C. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
United States v. Allied Oil Corp.
green
1 sentence2000Salerno, 481 U.S. at 751 , 95 L. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
United States v. Salerno
green
1 sentence2000Salerno, 481 U.S. at 751 , 95 L. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Dyer v. Bradshaw
green
1 sentence1984See Still v. Lance, 279 N.C. 254 , 182 S.E. 2d 403 (1971); Dyer v. Bradshaw, 54 N.C. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.