proof violation in North Carolina

11 North Carolina opinions name it 3 courts 1897–2026 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Freemangreen ncctapp · 1980 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2005–2007 2 sentences 2007Stat. § 14-208.9 (a) "could not be a violation of probation unless and until [she] either pled guilty to such an act or was found guilty by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt." In order for the court to find that a defendant has violated her probation, "a jury is not required . . . nor must the proof of violation be beyond a reasonable doubt." State v. Freeman, 47 N.C. 2005A probation revocation hearing “is not governed by the rules of a criminal trial[,]” and therefore “a jury is not required ... nor must the proof of violation be beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Freeman, 47 N.C.	1	2
State v. Tisdalegreen ncctapp · 2002 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014 1 sentence 2014See -7- State v. Tisdale, 153 N.C.	1	1
Wilkins v. J.P. Stevens & Co.green nc · 1993 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 2 sentences 2008E.g., Wilkins v. J.R Stevens & Co., 333 N.C. 449, 453 , 426 S.E.2d 675, 677 (1993); James v. Perdue Farms, Inc., 160 N.C. 2008E.g., Wilkins v. J.R Stevens & Co., 333 N.C. 449, 453 , 426 S.E.2d 675, 677 (1993); James v. Perdue Farms, Inc., 160 N.C.	1	1
Cato v. Catogreen ncctapp · 1995 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 2 sentences 1996In Cato v. Cato, 118 N.C.App. 569, 570 , 455 S.E.2d 918, 918 (1995), the plaintiff filed an action requesting that the court order the defendant to perform his debt obligations under the parties' separation agreement. 1996In Cato v. Cato, 118 N.C.App. 569, 570 , 455 S.E.2d 918, 918 (1995), the plaintiff filed an action requesting that the court order the defendant to perform his debt obligations under the parties' separation agreement.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Duncan green nc · 1967 2 sentences 1987Consequently, a jury is not required . . . nor must the proof of violation be beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. (citing State v. Ducan, 270 N.C. 241 , 154 S.E. 2d 53 (1967)). 1987Consequently, a jury is not required . . . nor must the proof of violation be beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. (citing State v. Ducan, 270 N.C. 241 , 154 S.E. 2d 53 (1967)).	2	1980–1987
Shelton v. STEELCASE, INC. green ncctapp · 2009 1 sentence 2026It cites the “more than a scintilla rule,” and asserts a motion for directed verdict “‘should be denied if there is more than a scintilla of evidence supporting each element of the non-movant’s claim.’” Shelton v. Steelcase, Inc., 197 N.C.	1	2026–2026
International Shoe Co. v. Washington green scotus · 1945 1 sentence 2021Regardless, these courts conclude that when a plaintiff files its lawsuit in the forum, it “purposefully avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum State,” Hanson, 357 U.S. at 253 (citing Int’l Shoe, 326 U.S. at 319 ), subjecting it to the forum court’s jurisdiction.	1	2021–2021
Hanson v. Denckla green scotus · 1958 1 sentence 2021Regardless, these courts conclude that when a plaintiff files its lawsuit in the forum, it “purposefully avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum State,” Hanson, 357 U.S. at 253 (citing Int’l Shoe, 326 U.S. at 319 ), subjecting it to the forum court’s jurisdiction.	1	2021–2021
James v. Perdue Farms, Inc. green ncctapp · 2003 1 sentence 2008E.g., Wilkins v. J.R Stevens & Co., 333 N.C. 449, 453 , 426 S.E.2d 675, 677 (1993); James v. Perdue Farms, Inc., 160 N.C.	1	2008–2008
State v. Emanuel neutral nc · 1980 1 sentence 2005App. 171, 175 , 266 S.E.2d 723, 725 , disc. review denied, 301 N.C. 99 , 273 S.E.2d 304 (1980).	1	2005–2005
State v. Freeman neutral nc · 1980 1 sentence 2005App. 171, 175 , 266 S.E.2d 723, 725 , disc. review denied, 301 N.C. 99 , 273 S.E.2d 304 (1980).	1	2005–2005
State v. Harvey green nc · 1972 2 sentences 1977State v. Harvey, 281 N.C. 1 , 187 S.E. 2d 706 (1972) ; State v. Cooper, supra; State v. Bell, 270 N.C. 25 , 153 S.E. 2d 741 (1967) ; State v. Kimball, supra; State v. Overman, 257 N.C. 464 , 125 S.E. 2d 920 (1962); State v. Jackson, 218 N.C. 373 , 11 S.E. 2d 149 (1940). 1977State v. Harvey, 281 N.C. 1 , 187 S.E. 2d 706 (1972) ; State v. Cooper, supra; State v. Bell, 270 N.C. 25 , 153 S.E. 2d 741 (1967) ; State v. Kimball, supra; State v. Overman, 257 N.C. 464 , 125 S.E. 2d 920 (1962); State v. Jackson, 218 N.C. 373 , 11 S.E. 2d 149 (1940).	1	1977–1977
State v. . Jackson green nc · 1940 2 sentences 1977State v. Harvey, 281 N.C. 1 , 187 S.E. 2d 706 (1972) ; State v. Cooper, supra; State v. Bell, 270 N.C. 25 , 153 S.E. 2d 741 (1967) ; State v. Kimball, supra; State v. Overman, 257 N.C. 464 , 125 S.E. 2d 920 (1962); State v. Jackson, 218 N.C. 373 , 11 S.E. 2d 149 (1940). 1977State v. Harvey, 281 N.C. 1 , 187 S.E. 2d 706 (1972) ; State v. Cooper, supra; State v. Bell, 270 N.C. 25 , 153 S.E. 2d 741 (1967) ; State v. Kimball, supra; State v. Overman, 257 N.C. 464 , 125 S.E. 2d 920 (1962); State v. Jackson, 218 N.C. 373 , 11 S.E. 2d 149 (1940).	1	1977–1977
State v. Overman green nc · 1962 2 sentences 1977State v. Harvey, 281 N.C. 1 , 187 S.E. 2d 706 (1972) ; State v. Cooper, supra; State v. Bell, 270 N.C. 25 , 153 S.E. 2d 741 (1967) ; State v. Kimball, supra; State v. Overman, 257 N.C. 464 , 125 S.E. 2d 920 (1962); State v. Jackson, 218 N.C. 373 , 11 S.E. 2d 149 (1940). 1977State v. Harvey, 281 N.C. 1 , 187 S.E. 2d 706 (1972) ; State v. Cooper, supra; State v. Bell, 270 N.C. 25 , 153 S.E. 2d 741 (1967) ; State v. Kimball, supra; State v. Overman, 257 N.C. 464 , 125 S.E. 2d 920 (1962); State v. Jackson, 218 N.C. 373 , 11 S.E. 2d 149 (1940).	1	1977–1977
State v. Bell green nc · 1967 2 sentences 1977State v. Harvey, 281 N.C. 1 , 187 S.E. 2d 706 (1972) ; State v. Cooper, supra; State v. Bell, 270 N.C. 25 , 153 S.E. 2d 741 (1967) ; State v. Kimball, supra; State v. Overman, 257 N.C. 464 , 125 S.E. 2d 920 (1962); State v. Jackson, 218 N.C. 373 , 11 S.E. 2d 149 (1940). 1977State v. Harvey, 281 N.C. 1 , 187 S.E. 2d 706 (1972) ; State v. Cooper, supra; State v. Bell, 270 N.C. 25 , 153 S.E. 2d 741 (1967) ; State v. Kimball, supra; State v. Overman, 257 N.C. 464 , 125 S.E. 2d 920 (1962); State v. Jackson, 218 N.C. 373 , 11 S.E. 2d 149 (1940).	1	1977–1977
Insurance Co. v. Higginbotham green scotus · 1877 1 sentence 1897Insurance Co. v. Newton, 22 Wall., *151 32; Insurance Co. v. Higginbotham, 95 U. S., 380 .	1	1897–1897

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1344 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 115 (1897–2026) NY 112 (1877–2026) CA 78 (1931–2026) NJ 76 (1934–2026) IL 52 (1894–2024) TN 41 (1955–2025) LA 37 (1937–2025) PA 33 (1883–2025) NM 30 (1943–2021) OH 28 (1926–2026) MD 27 (1882–2015) MO 24 (1887–2019) CT 23 (1932–2025) FL 22 (1908–2025) MI 15 (1915–2023) OR 14 (1942–2020) WA 14 (1936–2024) MA 13 (1878–2003) WI 13 (1891–2018) KY 13 (1881–2025) GA 12 (1978–2026) IA 11 (1912–2022) KS 11 (1922–2026) NC 11 (1897–2026) DC 10 (1990–2024) WV 9 (1940–2023) AR 9 (1892–2024) OK 8 (1940–2016) MN 8 (1917–2016) AZ 8 (1945–2025) ME 8 (1926–2008) AL 8 (1939–2012) CO 8 (1946–2015) RI 8 (1902–2011) VA 7 (1922–2023) SC 6 (1936–2009) MS 6 (1940–2009) IN 5 (1967–1995) DE 5 (1989–2025) ND 5 (1925–2013) NE 5 (1994–2021) MT 4 (1914–2000) UT 4 (1995–2023) HI 4 (1994–2018) AK 4 (1970–2022) WY 3 (1988–2002) NH 3 (1928–2006) SD 3 (1931–2023) ID 3 (1967–1974) NV 3 (1873–2000) VT 2 (1981–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check