5 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1967–1995 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Candy Braz, Inc.green2 sentences1995The trial court relied on In re Candy Braz, Inc., 98 B.R. at 375, which involved a creditor who filed a proof of claim for additional taxes after the bar date. 1995The trial court relied on In re Candy Braz, Inc., 98 B.R. at 375, which involved a creditor who filed a proof of claim for additional taxes after the bar date. | 1 | 1 |
Thornton Ex Rel. Thornton v. Pendergreen1 sentence1980See also Thornton v. Pender (1978), Ind., 377 N.E.2d 613 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Vega
green
1 sentence1989The court in In re Vega (W.D.Ok.1981) 15 B.R. 174 , considered the issue of whether a debt was duly scheduled. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Marriage of Poret v. Martin
green
1 sentence1983IC 31-1-11.5-22(d). - Such strict showing promotes the stability of the child, therefore ensuring the child's best interests will be paramount." (Footnote omitted.) The Supreme Court, in Poret v. Martin, (1982) Ind., 434 N.E.2d 885, 888 , further refined the standard of proof and factors amounting to a substantial and continuing change of circumstances: "In the case before us, the Court of Appeals predicated its holding upon Ind. Code § 81-1-11.5 -22(d) (Burns Code Ed.) which allows the trial court to modify custody provisions only upon 'a showing of changed cireumstances so substantial and co | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Sorrentino v. Cunningham
green
2 sentences1967Citing Yager, supra, with approval, is Sorrentino v. Cunningham (1942), 111 Ind. App. 212 , 39 N. E. 2d 473 . 1967Citing Yager, supra, with approval, is Sorrentino v. Cunningham (1942), 111 Ind. App. 212 , 39 N. E. 2d 473 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.