Pearce presumption (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

Pearce presumption in Connecticut

10 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (11)

CaseFollowedCited
Texas v. McCulloughgreen
scotus · 1986 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1988–2001
2 sentences

2001See, e.g., Texas v. McCullough, 475 U.S. 134 , [136, 138, 141] 106 S. Ct. 976 , 89 L.

2001See, e.g., Texas v. McCullough, 475 U.S. 134 , [136, 138, 141] 106 S. Ct. 976 , 89 L.

33
State v. Colemangreen
conn · 1997 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2000–2021
2 sentences

2021In the present case, however, the defendant himself affirmatively requested that Judge Murray consider Judge Kulawiz’s thirty year offer, albeit in support of his appeal for leniency. 17 Although the defendant has disavowed any reliance on the presumption of vindictiveness adopted in North Carolina v. Pearce, supra, 395 U.S. 726 ; see footnote 15 of this opinion; it is difficult, as a practical matter, to distinguish the inference of vindictiveness on which the defendant does rely from the Pearce presumption of vindictiveness. 18 It bears emphasis that, despite the length of the sentence impos

2021In the present case, however, the defendant himself affirmatively requested that Judge Murray consider Judge Kulawiz’s thirty year offer, albeit in support of his appeal for leniency. 17 Although the defendant has disavowed any reliance on the presumption of vindictiveness adopted in North Carolina v. Pearce, supra, 395 U.S. 726 ; see footnote 15 of this opinion; it is difficult, as a practical matter, to distinguish the inference of vindictiveness on which the defendant does rely from the Pearce presumption of vindictiveness. 18 It bears emphasis that, despite the length of the sentence impos

12
Arborio v. Windham Police Departmentgreen
connappct · 2007 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
1 sentence

2010See id. [17] Indeed, in Pearce , the board affirmed the decision of the workers' compensation commissioner for the third district even though, as the board explained, the commissioner had applied an incorrect legal standard in concluding that Pearce's claim was untimely.

11
United States v. John L. Cheekgreen
ca7 · 1993 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001See, e.g., Macomber v. Hannigan, supra, 15 F.3d 157 ; United States v. Newman, 6 F.3d 623, 630 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Cheek, 3 F.3d 1057, 1064 (7th Cir. 1993); Rock v. Zimmerman, supra, 959 F.2d 1257 ; United States v. Perez, 904 F.2d 142, 146 (2d Cir. 1990); Gauntlett v. Kelley, supra, 849 F.2d 217 ; Commonwealth v. Hyatt, 419 Mass. 815, 821 , 647 N.E.2d 1168 (1995); State v. Hurlburt, 135 N.H. 143, 147 , 603 A.2d 493 (1991); People v. Young, 94 N.Y.2d 171, 178 , 723 N.E.2d 58 , 701 N.Y.S.2d 309 (1999); see also Hurlburt v. Cunningham, 996 F.2d 1273 , 1274 n.2 (1st Cir. 1993) (“res

2001See, e.g., Macomber v. Hannigan, supra, 15 F.3d 157 ; United States v. Newman, 6 F.3d 623, 630 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Cheek, 3 F.3d 1057, 1064 (7th Cir. 1993); Rock v. Zimmerman, supra, 959 F.2d 1257 ; United States v. Perez, 904 F.2d 142, 146 (2d Cir. 1990); Gauntlett v. Kelley, supra, 849 F.2d 217 ; Commonwealth v. Hyatt, 419 Mass. 815, 821 , 647 N.E.2d 1168 (1995); State v. Hurlburt, 135 N.H. 143, 147 , 603 A.2d 493 (1991); People v. Young, 94 N.Y.2d 171, 178 , 723 N.E.2d 58 , 701 N.Y.S.2d 309 (1999); see also Hurlburt v. Cunningham, 996 F.2d 1273 , 1274 n.2 (1st Cir. 1993) (“res

11
United States v. Gary A. Newmangreen
ca9 · 1993 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001See, e.g., Macomber v. Hannigan, supra, 15 F.3d 157 ; United States v. Newman, 6 F.3d 623, 630 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Cheek, 3 F.3d 1057, 1064 (7th Cir. 1993); Rock v. Zimmerman, supra, 959 F.2d 1257 ; United States v. Perez, 904 F.2d 142, 146 (2d Cir. 1990); Gauntlett v. Kelley, supra, 849 F.2d 217 ; Commonwealth v. Hyatt, 419 Mass. 815, 821 , 647 N.E.2d 1168 (1995); State v. Hurlburt, 135 N.H. 143, 147 , 603 A.2d 493 (1991); People v. Young, 94 N.Y.2d 171, 178 , 723 N.E.2d 58 , 701 N.Y.S.2d 309 (1999); see also Hurlburt v. Cunningham, 996 F.2d 1273 , 1274 n.2 (1st Cir. 1993) (“res

2001See, e.g., Macomber v. Hannigan, supra, 15 F.3d 157 ; United States v. Newman, 6 F.3d 623, 630 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Cheek, 3 F.3d 1057, 1064 (7th Cir. 1993); Rock v. Zimmerman, supra, 959 F.2d 1257 ; United States v. Perez, 904 F.2d 142, 146 (2d Cir. 1990); Gauntlett v. Kelley, supra, 849 F.2d 217 ; Commonwealth v. Hyatt, 419 Mass. 815, 821 , 647 N.E.2d 1168 (1995); State v. Hurlburt, 135 N.H. 143, 147 , 603 A.2d 493 (1991); People v. Young, 94 N.Y.2d 171, 178 , 723 N.E.2d 58 , 701 N.Y.S.2d 309 (1999); see also Hurlburt v. Cunningham, 996 F.2d 1273 , 1274 n.2 (1st Cir. 1993) (“res

11
Jesus John Hernandez v. National Transportation Safety Board, Federal Aviation Administrationgreen
ca10 · 1994 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001See, e.g., Macomber v. Hannigan, supra, 15 F.3d 157 ; United States v. Newman, 6 F.3d 623, 630 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Cheek, 3 F.3d 1057, 1064 (7th Cir. 1993); Rock v. Zimmerman, supra, 959 F.2d 1257 ; United States v. Perez, 904 F.2d 142, 146 (2d Cir. 1990); Gauntlett v. Kelley, supra, 849 F.2d 217 ; Commonwealth v. Hyatt, 419 Mass. 815, 821 , 647 N.E.2d 1168 (1995); State v. Hurlburt, 135 N.H. 143, 147 , 603 A.2d 493 (1991); People v. Young, 94 N.Y.2d 171, 178 , 723 N.E.2d 58 , 701 N.Y.S.2d 309 (1999); see also Hurlburt v. Cunningham, 996 F.2d 1273 , 1274 n.2 (1st Cir. 1993) (“res

2001See, e.g., Macomber v. Hannigan, supra, 15 F.3d 157 ; United States v. Newman, 6 F.3d 623, 630 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Cheek, 3 F.3d 1057, 1064 (7th Cir. 1993); Rock v. Zimmerman, supra, 959 F.2d 1257 ; United States v. Perez, 904 F.2d 142, 146 (2d Cir. 1990); Gauntlett v. Kelley, supra, 849 F.2d 217 ; Commonwealth v. Hyatt, 419 Mass. 815, 821 , 647 N.E.2d 1168 (1995); State v. Hurlburt, 135 N.H. 143, 147 , 603 A.2d 493 (1991); People v. Young, 94 N.Y.2d 171, 178 , 723 N.E.2d 58 , 701 N.Y.S.2d 309 (1999); see also Hurlburt v. Cunningham, 996 F.2d 1273 , 1274 n.2 (1st Cir. 1993) (“res

11
Roger A. Gauntlett v. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, Respondentgreen
ca6 · 1988 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
1 sentence

2001Ed. 2d 905 (1992) (Pearce presumption is inapplicable when “the second sentence is imposed by a different sentencer and the record provides an affirmative assurance that the harsher sentence reflects simply a fresh look at the facts and an independent exercise of discretion”); Gauntlett v. Kelley, 849 F.2d 213, 217 (6th Cir. 1988) (when “resentencing judge [relies] on objective information . . . justifying the increased sentence . . . the information [need] not relate to conduct of the defendant that occurred after the initial sentence” [citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted]); be

11
United States v. William Perez, A/K/A \Willogreen
· 1990 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001See, e.g., Macomber v. Hannigan, supra, 15 F.3d 157 ; United States v. Newman, 6 F.3d 623, 630 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Cheek, 3 F.3d 1057, 1064 (7th Cir. 1993); Rock v. Zimmerman, supra, 959 F.2d 1257 ; United States v. Perez, 904 F.2d 142, 146 (2d Cir. 1990); Gauntlett v. Kelley, supra, 849 F.2d 217 ; Commonwealth v. Hyatt, 419 Mass. 815, 821 , 647 N.E.2d 1168 (1995); State v. Hurlburt, 135 N.H. 143, 147 , 603 A.2d 493 (1991); People v. Young, 94 N.Y.2d 171, 178 , 723 N.E.2d 58 , 701 N.Y.S.2d 309 (1999); see also Hurlburt v. Cunningham, 996 F.2d 1273 , 1274 n.2 (1st Cir. 1993) (“res

2001See, e.g., Macomber v. Hannigan, supra, 15 F.3d 157 ; United States v. Newman, 6 F.3d 623, 630 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Cheek, 3 F.3d 1057, 1064 (7th Cir. 1993); Rock v. Zimmerman, supra, 959 F.2d 1257 ; United States v. Perez, 904 F.2d 142, 146 (2d Cir. 1990); Gauntlett v. Kelley, supra, 849 F.2d 217 ; Commonwealth v. Hyatt, 419 Mass. 815, 821 , 647 N.E.2d 1168 (1995); State v. Hurlburt, 135 N.H. 143, 147 , 603 A.2d 493 (1991); People v. Young, 94 N.Y.2d 171, 178 , 723 N.E.2d 58 , 701 N.Y.S.2d 309 (1999); see also Hurlburt v. Cunningham, 996 F.2d 1273 , 1274 n.2 (1st Cir. 1993) (“res

11
Robert C. Hurlburt v. Michael J. Cunninghamgreen
ca1 · 1993 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001See, e.g., Macomber v. Hannigan, supra, 15 F.3d 157 ; United States v. Newman, 6 F.3d 623, 630 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Cheek, 3 F.3d 1057, 1064 (7th Cir. 1993); Rock v. Zimmerman, supra, 959 F.2d 1257 ; United States v. Perez, 904 F.2d 142, 146 (2d Cir. 1990); Gauntlett v. Kelley, supra, 849 F.2d 217 ; Commonwealth v. Hyatt, 419 Mass. 815, 821 , 647 N.E.2d 1168 (1995); State v. Hurlburt, 135 N.H. 143, 147 , 603 A.2d 493 (1991); People v. Young, 94 N.Y.2d 171, 178 , 723 N.E.2d 58 , 701 N.Y.S.2d 309 (1999); see also Hurlburt v. Cunningham, 996 F.2d 1273 , 1274 n.2 (1st Cir. 1993) (“res

2001See, e.g., Macomber v. Hannigan, supra, 15 F.3d 157 ; United States v. Newman, 6 F.3d 623, 630 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Cheek, 3 F.3d 1057, 1064 (7th Cir. 1993); Rock v. Zimmerman, supra, 959 F.2d 1257 ; United States v. Perez, 904 F.2d 142, 146 (2d Cir. 1990); Gauntlett v. Kelley, supra, 849 F.2d 217 ; Commonwealth v. Hyatt, 419 Mass. 815, 821 , 647 N.E.2d 1168 (1995); State v. Hurlburt, 135 N.H. 143, 147 , 603 A.2d 493 (1991); People v. Young, 94 N.Y.2d 171, 178 , 723 N.E.2d 58 , 701 N.Y.S.2d 309 (1999); see also Hurlburt v. Cunningham, 996 F.2d 1273 , 1274 n.2 (1st Cir. 1993) (“res

11
People v. Younggreen
ny · 1999 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001See, e.g., Macomber v. Hannigan, supra, 15 F.3d 157 ; United States v. Newman, 6 F.3d 623, 630 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Cheek, 3 F.3d 1057, 1064 (7th Cir. 1993); Rock v. Zimmerman, supra, 959 F.2d 1257 ; United States v. Perez, 904 F.2d 142, 146 (2d Cir. 1990); Gauntlett v. Kelley, supra, 849 F.2d 217 ; Commonwealth v. Hyatt, 419 Mass. 815, 821 , 647 N.E.2d 1168 (1995); State v. Hurlburt, 135 N.H. 143, 147 , 603 A.2d 493 (1991); People v. Young, 94 N.Y.2d 171, 178 , 723 N.E.2d 58 , 701 N.Y.S.2d 309 (1999); see also Hurlburt v. Cunningham, 996 F.2d 1273 , 1274 n.2 (1st Cir. 1993) (“res

2001See, e.g., Macomber v. Hannigan, supra, 15 F.3d 157 ; United States v. Newman, 6 F.3d 623, 630 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Cheek, 3 F.3d 1057, 1064 (7th Cir. 1993); Rock v. Zimmerman, supra, 959 F.2d 1257 ; United States v. Perez, 904 F.2d 142, 146 (2d Cir. 1990); Gauntlett v. Kelley, supra, 849 F.2d 217 ; Commonwealth v. Hyatt, 419 Mass. 815, 821 , 647 N.E.2d 1168 (1995); State v. Hurlburt, 135 N.H. 143, 147 , 603 A.2d 493 (1991); People v. Young, 94 N.Y.2d 171, 178 , 723 N.E.2d 58 , 701 N.Y.S.2d 309 (1999); see also Hurlburt v. Cunningham, 996 F.2d 1273 , 1274 n.2 (1st Cir. 1993) (“res

11
Milton L. Jacobs v. Supt. Walter Redman, Milton Lewis Jacobsgreen
ca3 · 1980 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
1 sentence

1985“The goal of the Pearce rule, that apprehension of vindictiveness be allayed, does not permit a defendant to be left to speculate as to the true reason for an increased sentence.” Jacobs v. Redman, 616 F.2d 1251, 1259 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 944 , 100 S. Ct. 2170 , 64 L.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (15)

CaseCitedYears
United States v. Goodwin green
scotus · 1982
2 sentences

2001Ed. 2d 104 (1986) (defendant originally sentenced by jury; judge concluded defendant entitled to new trial; upon retrial defendant chose sentencing by judge; Pearce presumption inapplicable and even if it were to apply, court’s findings overcame presumption); Wasman v. United States, [supra, 468 U.S. 569 -70] (presumption of vindictiveness applies since petitioner received greater sentence following retrial than that he had originally received; consideration by court of conviction between original sentencing and sentencing after retrial rebuts presumption); United States v. Goodwin, 457 U.S. 3

2001Ed. 2d 104 (1986) (defendant originally sentenced by jury; judge concluded defendant entitled to new trial; upon retrial defendant chose sentencing by judge; Pearce presumption inapplicable and even if it were to apply, court’s findings overcame presumption); Wasman v. United States, [supra, 468 U.S. 569 -70] (presumption of vindictiveness applies since petitioner received greater sentence following retrial than that he had originally received; consideration by court of conviction between original sentencing and sentencing after retrial rebuts presumption); United States v. Goodwin, 457 U.S. 3

41988–2001
Wasman v. United States green
scotus · 1984
2 sentences

1997Ed. 2d 104 (1986) (defendant originally sentenced by jury; judge concluded defendant entitled to new trial; upon retrial defendant chose sentencing by judge; Pearce presumption inapplicable and even if it were to apply, court’s findings overcame presumption); Wasman v. United States, 468 U.S. 559, 569 , 104 S. Ct. 3217 , 82 L.

1997Ed. 2d 104 (1986) (defendant originally sentenced by jury; judge concluded defendant entitled to new trial; upon retrial defendant chose sentencing by judge; Pearce presumption inapplicable and even if it were to apply, court’s findings overcame presumption); Wasman v. United States, 468 U.S. 559, 569 , 104 S. Ct. 3217 , 82 L.

31988–1997
Alabama v. Smith green
scotus · 1989
2 sentences

1997Smith clarified the scope of the Pearce rule, stating that “[w]hile the Pea/rce opinion appeared on its face to announce a rule of sweeping dimension, our subsequent cases have made clear that its presumption of vindictiveness do[es] not apply in every case where a convicted defendant receives a higher sentence on retrial.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 799 .

1997Smith clarified the scope of the Pearce rule, stating that “[w]hile the Pea/rce opinion appeared on its face to announce a rule of sweeping dimension, our subsequent cases have made clear that its presumption of vindictiveness do[es] not apply in every case where a convicted defendant receives a higher sentence on retrial.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 799 .

21997–2001
Bordenkircher v. Hayes green
scotus · 1978
2 sentences

2001In concluding that the plea agreement in this case violated the defendant’s due process rights, we emphasize that, under Bordenkircher v. Hayes, supra, 434 U.S. 357 , the prosecutor would not have been barred from threatening to recommend a greater sentence in the event the defendant refused to plead guilty prior to obtaining a ruling on his motion to suppress.

2001In concluding that the plea agreement in this case violated the defendant’s due process rights, we emphasize that, under Bordenkircher v. Hayes, supra, 434 U.S. 357 , the prosecutor would not have been barred from threatening to recommend a greater sentence in the event the defendant refused to plead guilty prior to obtaining a ruling on his motion to suppress.

22001–2001
Commonwealth v. Hyatt green
mass · 1995
2 sentences

2001See, e.g., Macomber v. Hannigan, supra, 15 F.3d 157 ; United States v. Newman, 6 F.3d 623, 630 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Cheek, 3 F.3d 1057, 1064 (7th Cir. 1993); Rock v. Zimmerman, supra, 959 F.2d 1257 ; United States v. Perez, 904 F.2d 142, 146 (2d Cir. 1990); Gauntlett v. Kelley, supra, 849 F.2d 217 ; Commonwealth v. Hyatt, 419 Mass. 815, 821 , 647 N.E.2d 1168 (1995); State v. Hurlburt, 135 N.H. 143, 147 , 603 A.2d 493 (1991); People v. Young, 94 N.Y.2d 171, 178 , 723 N.E.2d 58 , 701 N.Y.S.2d 309 (1999); see also Hurlburt v. Cunningham, 996 F.2d 1273 , 1274 n.2 (1st Cir. 1993) (“res

2001See, e.g., Macomber v. Hannigan, supra, 15 F.3d 157 ; United States v. Newman, 6 F.3d 623, 630 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Cheek, 3 F.3d 1057, 1064 (7th Cir. 1993); Rock v. Zimmerman, supra, 959 F.2d 1257 ; United States v. Perez, 904 F.2d 142, 146 (2d Cir. 1990); Gauntlett v. Kelley, supra, 849 F.2d 217 ; Commonwealth v. Hyatt, 419 Mass. 815, 821 , 647 N.E.2d 1168 (1995); State v. Hurlburt, 135 N.H. 143, 147 , 603 A.2d 493 (1991); People v. Young, 94 N.Y.2d 171, 178 , 723 N.E.2d 58 , 701 N.Y.S.2d 309 (1999); see also Hurlburt v. Cunningham, 996 F.2d 1273 , 1274 n.2 (1st Cir. 1993) (“res

12001–2001
State v. Hurlburt green
nh · 1991
2 sentences

2001See, e.g., Macomber v. Hannigan, supra, 15 F.3d 157 ; United States v. Newman, 6 F.3d 623, 630 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Cheek, 3 F.3d 1057, 1064 (7th Cir. 1993); Rock v. Zimmerman, supra, 959 F.2d 1257 ; United States v. Perez, 904 F.2d 142, 146 (2d Cir. 1990); Gauntlett v. Kelley, supra, 849 F.2d 217 ; Commonwealth v. Hyatt, 419 Mass. 815, 821 , 647 N.E.2d 1168 (1995); State v. Hurlburt, 135 N.H. 143, 147 , 603 A.2d 493 (1991); People v. Young, 94 N.Y.2d 171, 178 , 723 N.E.2d 58 , 701 N.Y.S.2d 309 (1999); see also Hurlburt v. Cunningham, 996 F.2d 1273 , 1274 n.2 (1st Cir. 1993) (“res

2001See, e.g., Macomber v. Hannigan, supra, 15 F.3d 157 ; United States v. Newman, 6 F.3d 623, 630 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Cheek, 3 F.3d 1057, 1064 (7th Cir. 1993); Rock v. Zimmerman, supra, 959 F.2d 1257 ; United States v. Perez, 904 F.2d 142, 146 (2d Cir. 1990); Gauntlett v. Kelley, supra, 849 F.2d 217 ; Commonwealth v. Hyatt, 419 Mass. 815, 821 , 647 N.E.2d 1168 (1995); State v. Hurlburt, 135 N.H. 143, 147 , 603 A.2d 493 (1991); People v. Young, 94 N.Y.2d 171, 178 , 723 N.E.2d 58 , 701 N.Y.S.2d 309 (1999); see also Hurlburt v. Cunningham, 996 F.2d 1273 , 1274 n.2 (1st Cir. 1993) (“res

12001–2001
State v. Carpenter green
conn · 1991
2 sentences

2000If it is not, application of the presumption of vindictiveness is not required.” State v. Carpenter, 220 Conn. 169, 174 , 595 A.2d 881 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1034 , 112 S. Ct. 877 , 116 L.

2000If it is not, application of the presumption of vindictiveness is not required.” State v. Carpenter, 220 Conn. 169, 174 , 595 A.2d 881 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1034 , 112 S. Ct. 877 , 116 L.

12000–2000
Schnabel v. Tyler green
conn · 1994
2 sentences

2000“In deciding to adopt the analysis of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, we recognize that the decisions of the federal circuit in which a state court, is located are entitled to great weight in the interpretation of [the federal constitution].” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Schnabel v. Tyler, 230 Conn. 735 , 743 n.4, 646 A.2d 152 (1994).

2000“In deciding to adopt the analysis of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, we recognize that the decisions of the federal circuit in which a state court, is located are entitled to great weight in the interpretation of [the federal constitution].” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Schnabel v. Tyler, 230 Conn. 735 , 743 n.4, 646 A.2d 152 (1994).

12000–2000
Joseph C. Kirchdorfer, Inc. v. Rice green
scotus · 1992
2 sentences

2000If it is not, application of the presumption of vindictiveness is not required.” State v. Carpenter, 220 Conn. 169, 174 , 595 A.2d 881 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1034 , 112 S. Ct. 877 , 116 L.

2000If it is not, application of the presumption of vindictiveness is not required.” State v. Carpenter, 220 Conn. 169, 174 , 595 A.2d 881 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1034 , 112 S. Ct. 877 , 116 L.

12000–2000
Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics & Allied Workers International Union green
scotus · 1992
2 sentences

2000If it is not, application of the presumption of vindictiveness is not required.” State v. Carpenter, 220 Conn. 169, 174 , 595 A.2d 881 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1034 , 112 S. Ct. 877 , 116 L.

2000If it is not, application of the presumption of vindictiveness is not required.” State v. Carpenter, 220 Conn. 169, 174 , 595 A.2d 881 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1034 , 112 S. Ct. 877 , 116 L.

12000–2000
Clarke v. Loma Linda Foods, Inc. green
scotus · 1992
2 sentences

2000If it is not, application of the presumption of vindictiveness is not required.” State v. Carpenter, 220 Conn. 169, 174 , 595 A.2d 881 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1034 , 112 S. Ct. 877 , 116 L.

2000If it is not, application of the presumption of vindictiveness is not required.” State v. Carpenter, 220 Conn. 169, 174 , 595 A.2d 881 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1034 , 112 S. Ct. 877 , 116 L.

12000–2000
State v. Taylor green
conn · 1988
2 sentences

1996Moreover, our Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Taylor, supra, 207 Conn. 109 , persuades us that the Connecticut constitution does not require the Pearce presumption to apply to the situation in this case.

1996Moreover, our Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Taylor, supra, 207 Conn. 109 , persuades us that the Connecticut constitution does not require the Pearce presumption to apply to the situation in this case.

11996–1996
Clark v. Pennsylvania green
scotus · 1980
1 sentence

1985“The goal of the Pearce rule, that apprehension of vindictiveness be allayed, does not permit a defendant to be left to speculate as to the true reason for an increased sentence.” Jacobs v. Redman, 616 F.2d 1251, 1259 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 944 , 100 S. Ct. 2170 , 64 L.

11985–1985
Jacobs v. Redman green
scotus · 1980
1 sentence

1985“The goal of the Pearce rule, that apprehension of vindictiveness be allayed, does not permit a defendant to be left to speculate as to the true reason for an increased sentence.” Jacobs v. Redman, 616 F.2d 1251, 1259 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 944 , 100 S. Ct. 2170 , 64 L.

11985–1985
McDaniel v. Gunn green
scotus · 1980
1 sentence

1985“The goal of the Pearce rule, that apprehension of vindictiveness be allayed, does not permit a defendant to be left to speculate as to the true reason for an increased sentence.” Jacobs v. Redman, 616 F.2d 1251, 1259 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 944 , 100 S. Ct. 2170 , 64 L.

11985–1985

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-70 (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-199 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 49 (1975–2024) OH 24 (1997–2023) FL 17 (1985–2018) PA 14 (1976–2026) GA 14 (2005–2024) WI 12 (1983–2022) IL 11 (1985–2019) LA 10 (1987–2012) CT 10 (1985–2021) MD 9 (1980–2018) MA 8 (1970–2014) MI 7 (1976–2025) OR 7 (2010–2019) WA 7 (1989–2023) NY 6 (1977–2023) MO 6 (1977–2005) MT 5 (1980–2004) NJ 5 (1981–2000) ID 5 (1993–2024) KS 5 (1982–2022) IA 5 (2003–2011) NV 5 (2019–2025) SC 5 (1987–2002) UT 4 (2002–2013) HI 4 (2003–2025) NM 4 (1988–2022) VT 4 (1991–2015) CA 4 (1998–2021) AZ 4 (1986–2019) ME 3 (1983–1990) CO 3 (2007–2015) MS 3 (1985–2018) DC 2 (1985–2000) VA 2 (2003–2003) IN 2 (1986–2009) NE 2 (2006–2016) AL 2 (1984–1999) WY 2 (2011–2013) AK 2 (2005–2011) DE 2 (1978–1980) TN 2 (1990–1997) AR 2 (1998–2011) NH 2 (1982–1991) SD 2 (1986–2010)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check