Pearce presumption (Iowa) · Go Syfert
← Iowa issues

Pearce presumption in Iowa

5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (27)

CaseFollowedCited
Alabama v. Smithgreen
scotus · 1989 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006This decision limited Pearce’s presumption of vindictiveness to circumstances “in which there is a ‘reasonable likelihood’ that the increase in sentence is the product of actual vindictiveness on the part of the sentencing authority.” Id. at 799 , 109 S.Ct. at 2205 , 104 L.Ed.2d at 873 (citation omitted).

2006This decision limited Pearce’s presumption of vindictiveness to circumstances “in which there is a ‘reasonable likelihood’ that the increase in sentence is the product of actual vindictiveness on the part of the sentencing authority.” Id. at 799 , 109 S.Ct. at 2205 , 104 L.Ed.2d at 873 (citation omitted).

22
United States v. Campbellgreen
ca5 · 1997 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2007–2011
2 sentences

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

12
State v. Nevillegreen
lactapp · 1990 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

11
Adams v. Stategreen
ga · 2010 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

11
United States v. Thaeeb Baygreen
ca9 · 1987 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

11
State v. Kinggreen
neb · 2008 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

11
Owens v. Stategreen
indctapp · 2009 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

11
White v. Stategreen
del · 1990 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

11
State v. Bolsingergreen
iowactapp · 2007 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011State v. Bolsinger, 738 N.W.2d 643, 646 (Iowa Ct.App.2007).

2011State v. Bolsinger, 738 N.W.2d 643, 646 (Iowa Ct.App.2007).

11
Commonwealth v. McHalered
pasuperct · 2007 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

11
People v. Woellhafgreen
coloctapp · 2007 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

11
People v. Savalared
calctapp · 1983 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

11
People v. Foleygreen
calctapp · 1985 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

11
Commonwealth v. Robinsonred
pasuperct · 2007 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

11
State v. Mirandagreen
conn · 2002 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

11
United States v. Linwood Gray, United States of America v. Harry L. Staleygreen
ca4 · 1988 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

11
United States v. Juan Pimienta-Redondo, United States of America v. Alfredo Pupogreen
ca1 · 1989 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

11
Ronald Kelly v. E. Calvin Neubert, Administrator, and W. Carey Edwards, the Attorney General of the State of New Jerseygreen
ca3 · 1990 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

11
United States v. Bruno Mancarigreen
ca7 · 1990 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

11
United States v. Russell Sullivan, United States of America v. Mary Ann Sullivangreen
ca10 · 1992 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

2011United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Mancan, 914 F.2d 1014, 1020 (7th Cir.1990); Kelly v. Neubert, 898 F.2d 15, 18 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Gray, 852 F.2d 136, 138 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Bay, 820 F.2d 1511, 1514 (9th Cir.1987); People v. Savala, 147 Cal.App.3d 63 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 193, 197 (1983), overruled on other grounds by People v. Foley, 170 Cal.App.3d 1039 , 216 Cal.Rptr. 865, 867 (1985); People v. Woellhaf,

11
State v. Robbinsgreen
idaho · 1993 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003Subsequent interpretations of the McCullough approach to questions of judicial vindictiveness in sentencing have resulted in the conclusion that “when a different judge sentences a defendant after a retrial, and that judge articulates logical, nonvindietive reasons for the sentence, there simply is no sound basis to presume that the sentence is the product of judicial vindictiveness.” Connelly, 780 A.2d at 901 ; see also State v. Robbins, 123 Idaho 527 , 850 P.2d 176, 180-81 (1993); State v. Colwell, 127 Idaho 854 , 908 P.2d 156, 161 (Ct.App.1995); State v. Forsyth, 233 Mont. 389 , 761 P.2d 36

2003Subsequent interpretations of the McCullough approach to questions of judicial vindictiveness in sentencing have resulted in the conclusion that “when a different judge sentences a defendant after a retrial, and that judge articulates logical, nonvindietive reasons for the sentence, there simply is no sound basis to presume that the sentence is the product of judicial vindictiveness.” Connelly, 780 A.2d at 901 ; see also State v. Robbins, 123 Idaho 527 , 850 P.2d 176, 180-81 (1993); State v. Colwell, 127 Idaho 854 , 908 P.2d 156, 161 (Ct.App.1995); State v. Forsyth, 233 Mont. 389 , 761 P.2d 36

11
People v. Bestgreen
nyappdiv · 1987 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003Subsequent interpretations of the McCullough approach to questions of judicial vindictiveness in sentencing have resulted in the conclusion that “when a different judge sentences a defendant after a retrial, and that judge articulates logical, nonvindietive reasons for the sentence, there simply is no sound basis to presume that the sentence is the product of judicial vindictiveness.” Connelly, 780 A.2d at 901 ; see also State v. Robbins, 123 Idaho 527 , 850 P.2d 176, 180-81 (1993); State v. Colwell, 127 Idaho 854 , 908 P.2d 156, 161 (Ct.App.1995); State v. Forsyth, 233 Mont. 389 , 761 P.2d 36

2003Subsequent interpretations of the McCullough approach to questions of judicial vindictiveness in sentencing have resulted in the conclusion that “when a different judge sentences a defendant after a retrial, and that judge articulates logical, nonvindietive reasons for the sentence, there simply is no sound basis to presume that the sentence is the product of judicial vindictiveness.” Connelly, 780 A.2d at 901 ; see also State v. Robbins, 123 Idaho 527 , 850 P.2d 176, 180-81 (1993); State v. Colwell, 127 Idaho 854 , 908 P.2d 156, 161 (Ct.App.1995); State v. Forsyth, 233 Mont. 389 , 761 P.2d 36

11
State v. Forsythgreen
mont · 1988 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003Subsequent interpretations of the McCullough approach to questions of judicial vindictiveness in sentencing have resulted in the conclusion that “when a different judge sentences a defendant after a retrial, and that judge articulates logical, nonvindietive reasons for the sentence, there simply is no sound basis to presume that the sentence is the product of judicial vindictiveness.” Connelly, 780 A.2d at 901 ; see also State v. Robbins, 123 Idaho 527 , 850 P.2d 176, 180-81 (1993); State v. Colwell, 127 Idaho 854 , 908 P.2d 156, 161 (Ct.App.1995); State v. Forsyth, 233 Mont. 389 , 761 P.2d 36

2003Subsequent interpretations of the McCullough approach to questions of judicial vindictiveness in sentencing have resulted in the conclusion that “when a different judge sentences a defendant after a retrial, and that judge articulates logical, nonvindietive reasons for the sentence, there simply is no sound basis to presume that the sentence is the product of judicial vindictiveness.” Connelly, 780 A.2d at 901 ; see also State v. Robbins, 123 Idaho 527 , 850 P.2d 176, 180-81 (1993); State v. Colwell, 127 Idaho 854 , 908 P.2d 156, 161 (Ct.App.1995); State v. Forsyth, 233 Mont. 389 , 761 P.2d 36

11
State v. Curtisgreen
mont · 1990 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003Subsequent interpretations of the McCullough approach to questions of judicial vindictiveness in sentencing have resulted in the conclusion that “when a different judge sentences a defendant after a retrial, and that judge articulates logical, nonvindietive reasons for the sentence, there simply is no sound basis to presume that the sentence is the product of judicial vindictiveness.” Connelly, 780 A.2d at 901 ; see also State v. Robbins, 123 Idaho 527 , 850 P.2d 176, 180-81 (1993); State v. Colwell, 127 Idaho 854 , 908 P.2d 156, 161 (Ct.App.1995); State v. Forsyth, 233 Mont. 389 , 761 P.2d 36

2003Subsequent interpretations of the McCullough approach to questions of judicial vindictiveness in sentencing have resulted in the conclusion that “when a different judge sentences a defendant after a retrial, and that judge articulates logical, nonvindietive reasons for the sentence, there simply is no sound basis to presume that the sentence is the product of judicial vindictiveness.” Connelly, 780 A.2d at 901 ; see also State v. Robbins, 123 Idaho 527 , 850 P.2d 176, 180-81 (1993); State v. Colwell, 127 Idaho 854 , 908 P.2d 156, 161 (Ct.App.1995); State v. Forsyth, 233 Mont. 389 , 761 P.2d 36

11
State v. Colwellgreen
idahoctapp · 1995 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003Subsequent interpretations of the McCullough approach to questions of judicial vindictiveness in sentencing have resulted in the conclusion that “when a different judge sentences a defendant after a retrial, and that judge articulates logical, nonvindietive reasons for the sentence, there simply is no sound basis to presume that the sentence is the product of judicial vindictiveness.” Connelly, 780 A.2d at 901 ; see also State v. Robbins, 123 Idaho 527 , 850 P.2d 176, 180-81 (1993); State v. Colwell, 127 Idaho 854 , 908 P.2d 156, 161 (Ct.App.1995); State v. Forsyth, 233 Mont. 389 , 761 P.2d 36

2003Subsequent interpretations of the McCullough approach to questions of judicial vindictiveness in sentencing have resulted in the conclusion that “when a different judge sentences a defendant after a retrial, and that judge articulates logical, nonvindietive reasons for the sentence, there simply is no sound basis to presume that the sentence is the product of judicial vindictiveness.” Connelly, 780 A.2d at 901 ; see also State v. Robbins, 123 Idaho 527 , 850 P.2d 176, 180-81 (1993); State v. Colwell, 127 Idaho 854 , 908 P.2d 156, 161 (Ct.App.1995); State v. Forsyth, 233 Mont. 389 , 761 P.2d 36

11
Commonwealth v. Mikesellgreen
pa · 1988 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003Subsequent interpretations of the McCullough approach to questions of judicial vindictiveness in sentencing have resulted in the conclusion that “when a different judge sentences a defendant after a retrial, and that judge articulates logical, nonvindietive reasons for the sentence, there simply is no sound basis to presume that the sentence is the product of judicial vindictiveness.” Connelly, 780 A.2d at 901 ; see also State v. Robbins, 123 Idaho 527 , 850 P.2d 176, 180-81 (1993); State v. Colwell, 127 Idaho 854 , 908 P.2d 156, 161 (Ct.App.1995); State v. Forsyth, 233 Mont. 389 , 761 P.2d 36

2003Subsequent interpretations of the McCullough approach to questions of judicial vindictiveness in sentencing have resulted in the conclusion that “when a different judge sentences a defendant after a retrial, and that judge articulates logical, nonvindietive reasons for the sentence, there simply is no sound basis to presume that the sentence is the product of judicial vindictiveness.” Connelly, 780 A.2d at 901 ; see also State v. Robbins, 123 Idaho 527 , 850 P.2d 176, 180-81 (1993); State v. Colwell, 127 Idaho 854 , 908 P.2d 156, 161 (Ct.App.1995); State v. Forsyth, 233 Mont. 389 , 761 P.2d 36

11
Connelly v. Commissioner of Correctiongreen
conn · 2001 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See Connelly, 780 A.2d at 896-98 (summarizing Court holdings related to the vindictiveness standard).

2003See Connelly, 780 A.2d at 896-98 (summarizing Court holdings related to the vindictiveness standard).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Texas v. McCullough green
scotus · 1986
2 sentences

2003In McCullough, the Court determined that the Pearce presumption was inapplicable, partially “because different sentencers [(a jury and then a judge)] assessed the varying sentences that McCullough received.” Id. at 140, 106 S.Ct. at 979 , 89 L.Ed.2d at 111-12 .

2003In McCullough, the Court determined that the Pearce presumption was inapplicable, partially “because different sentencers [(a jury and then a judge)] assessed the varying sentences that McCullough received.” Id. at 140, 106 S.Ct. at 979 , 89 L.Ed.2d at 111-12 .

12003–2003

Where else courts name it

TX 51 (1975–2024) OH 24 (1997–2023) FL 17 (1985–2018) PA 15 (1976–2026) GA 14 (2005–2024) WI 13 (1983–2026) IL 11 (1985–2019) CT 10 (1985–2021) LA 10 (1987–2012) MD 9 (1980–2018) MA 8 (1970–2014) MI 7 (1976–2025) OR 7 (2010–2019) WA 7 (1989–2023) MT 6 (1980–2026) NY 6 (1977–2023) MO 6 (1977–2005) NV 5 (2019–2025) NJ 5 (1981–2000) ID 5 (1993–2024) KS 5 (1982–2022) VT 5 (1990–2015) IA 5 (2003–2011) SC 5 (1987–2002) TN 4 (1990–2019) CA 4 (1998–2021) HI 4 (2003–2025) UT 4 (2002–2013) NM 4 (1988–2022) AZ 4 (1986–2019) CO 3 (2007–2015) ME 3 (1990–2026) MS 3 (1985–2018) AK 2 (2005–2011) AL 2 (1984–1999) SD 2 (1986–2010) DC 2 (1985–2000) NE 2 (2006–2016) DE 2 (1978–1980) AR 2 (1998–2011) WY 2 (2011–2013) VA 2 (2003–2003) IN 2 (1986–2009) NH 2 (1982–1991)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check