8 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1967–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
cluster 778521green1 sentence2006Under the dormant Commerce Clause, it is "[a]xiomatic . . . that a state cannot impede free market forces to shield in-state businesses from out-of-state competition." Cloverland I, 298 F.3d at 210. | 1 | 1 |
Baxter v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1994See Baxter, supra, 640 A.2d at 717 . 1994See Baxter, supra, 640 A.2d at 717 . | 1 | 1 |
Richbow v. District of Columbiagreen2 sentences1994Cates v. Wilson, 321 N.C. 1 , 361 S.E.2d 734 (1987); see also Richbow v. District of Columbia, 600 A.2d 1063, 1069-70 (D.C.1991). 1994Cates v. Wilson, 321 N.C. 1 , 361 S.E.2d 734 (1987); see also Richbow v. District of Columbia, 600 A.2d 1063, 1069-70 (D.C.1991). | 1 | 1 |
Washburn v. UNION NAT'L BANK & TR. CO.green2 sentences1993See Washburn v. Union Nat’l Bank & Trust Co., 151 Ill.App.3d 21 , 104 Ill.Dec. 242, 245 , 502 N.E.2d 739, 742 (1986). 6 Nor does the secured creditor necessarily waive its security interest by allowing the debtor to retain possession of collateral and use it in the ordinary course of business. 1993See Washburn v. Union Nat’l Bank & Trust Co., 151 Ill.App.3d 21 , 104 Ill.Dec. 242, 245 , 502 N.E.2d 739, 742 (1986). 6 Nor does the secured creditor necessarily waive its security interest by allowing the debtor to retain possession of collateral and use it in the ordinary course of business. | 1 | 1 |
Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.green2 sentences1993“To constitute implied waiver [of a security interest], there must exist unequivocal acts or conduct evidencing an intent to waive; waiver will not be inferred from doubtful or ambiguous factors.” Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc., 113 Wash.2d 346 , 779 P.2d 697, 701 (1989) (citations omitted). 5 Except in *834 cases where estoppel or laches may apply, a secured creditor’s mere inaction does not constitute an implied waiver of its rights. 1993“To constitute implied waiver [of a security interest], there must exist unequivocal acts or conduct evidencing an intent to waive; waiver will not be inferred from doubtful or ambiguous factors.” Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc., 113 Wash.2d 346 , 779 P.2d 697, 701 (1989) (citations omitted). 5 Except in *834 cases where estoppel or laches may apply, a secured creditor’s mere inaction does not constitute an implied waiver of its rights. | 1 | 1 |
Washburn v. Union National Bank & Trust Co.green1 sentence1993See Washburn v. Union Nat’l Bank & Trust Co., 151 Ill.App.3d 21 , 104 Ill.Dec. 242, 245 , 502 N.E.2d 739, 742 (1986). 6 Nor does the secured creditor necessarily waive its security interest by allowing the debtor to retain possession of collateral and use it in the ordinary course of business. | 1 | 1 |
Doyle v. Ohiogreen1 sentence1979Thus every post-arrest silence is insolubly ambiguous because of what the State is required to advise the person arrested. [Id. at 617, 96 S.Ct. at 2244 (footnote omitted).] The Court thus recognized in Doyle that a defendant’s silence after being read his rights does not necessarily indicate that he has no sufficient explanation of his conduct, since his silence might very well indicate that he is taking to heart the implied warning of the police that he should say nothing lest “anything he says may be used against him.” . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cates v. Wilson
green
2 sentences1991The court found an implied waiver in Cates based in part on the fact that “[p]laintiffs did not object when defendants called [the treating] physicians as witnesses and elicited from them detailed descriptions of the nature of plaintiffs’ injuries.” Id. at 15 , 361 S.E.2d at 743 . 1991The court found an implied waiver in Cates based in part on the fact that “[p]laintiffs did not object when defendants called [the treating] physicians as witnesses and elicited from them detailed descriptions of the nature of plaintiffs’ injuries.” Id. at 15 , 361 S.E.2d at 743 . | 2 | 1991–1994 |
Granholm v. Heald
green
2 sentences2006This clause also has an implied requirement (often called the "negative" or "dormant" aspect of the clause) that states not "mandate differential treatment of in-state and out-of-state economic interests that benefits the former and burdens the latter." Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460, 472 , 125 S.Ct. 1885 , 161 L.Ed.2d 796 (2005) (internal quotation marks omitted); West Lynn Creamery, 512 U.S. at 192-93 , 114 S.Ct. 2205 (same). 2006This clause also has an implied requirement (often called the "negative" or "dormant" aspect of the clause) that states not "mandate differential treatment of in-state and out-of-state economic interests that benefits the former and burdens the latter." Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460, 472 , 125 S.Ct. 1885 , 161 L.Ed.2d 796 (2005) (internal quotation marks omitted); West Lynn Creamery, 512 U.S. at 192-93 , 114 S.Ct. 2205 (same). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy
green
2 sentences2006This clause also has an implied requirement (often called the "negative" or "dormant" aspect of the clause) that states not "mandate differential treatment of in-state and out-of-state economic interests that benefits the former and burdens the latter." Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460, 472 , 125 S.Ct. 1885 , 161 L.Ed.2d 796 (2005) (internal quotation marks omitted); West Lynn Creamery, 512 U.S. at 192-93 , 114 S.Ct. 2205 (same). 2006This clause also has an implied requirement (often called the "negative" or "dormant" aspect of the clause) that states not "mandate differential treatment of in-state and out-of-state economic interests that benefits the former and burdens the latter." Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460, 472 , 125 S.Ct. 1885 , 161 L.Ed.2d 796 (2005) (internal quotation marks omitted); West Lynn Creamery, 512 U.S. at 192-93 , 114 S.Ct. 2205 (same). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
United States v. Christopher E. Griffin, A/K/A Chris E. Griffin, Chris Griffin
green
2 sentences2005As the Griffin court declared in refusing to accept a similar argument, “the government’s agreement to recommend a particular sentence does not carry with it an implied requirement that the prosecutor make the recommendation ‘enthusiastically’ .... ” Id. at 389 n. 2, 816 F.2d at 7 n. 2 (citing United States v. Benchimol, 471 U.S. 453, 455 , 105 S.Ct. 2103 , 85 L.Ed.2d 462 (1985)). 2005As the Griffin court declared in refusing to accept a similar argument, “the government’s agreement to recommend a particular sentence does not carry with it an implied requirement that the prosecutor make the recommendation ‘enthusiastically’ .... ” Id. at 389 n. 2, 816 F.2d at 7 n. 2 (citing United States v. Benchimol, 471 U.S. 453, 455 , 105 S.Ct. 2103 , 85 L.Ed.2d 462 (1985)). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
United States v. Benchimol
green
2 sentences2005As the Griffin court declared in refusing to accept a similar argument, “the government’s agreement to recommend a particular sentence does not carry with it an implied requirement that the prosecutor make the recommendation ‘enthusiastically’ .... ” Id. at 389 n. 2, 816 F.2d at 7 n. 2 (citing United States v. Benchimol, 471 U.S. 453, 455 , 105 S.Ct. 2103 , 85 L.Ed.2d 462 (1985)). 2005As the Griffin court declared in refusing to accept a similar argument, “the government’s agreement to recommend a particular sentence does not carry with it an implied requirement that the prosecutor make the recommendation ‘enthusiastically’ .... ” Id. at 389 n. 2, 816 F.2d at 7 n. 2 (citing United States v. Benchimol, 471 U.S. 453, 455 , 105 S.Ct. 2103 , 85 L.Ed.2d 462 (1985)). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Clifford v. United States
green
1 sentence1991We agree with the North Carolina court that an implied waiver exists when the patient discloses, or permits disclosure of information gained by the physician during the physician-patient relationship, see Clifford, 532 A.2d at 637 , and that in these circumstances there is no “divisible waiver.” Appellant introduced detailed evidence of Mr. Richbow’s medical history, including his treatment by Dr. Strudwick, and did not object to similar testimony adduced by the defense. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
United States v. N. Y. Rayon Importing Co.
green
2 sentences1989In New York Rayon Importing Co., cited in note 6, supra, for example, the first of the cases to which the majority alludes, the Court explained that even assuming that the equities of the situation all favor the owners of the refund claims, the Court of Claims did not thereby acquire power to carve out an implied exception to the plain words of [the statute]. 329 U.S. at 660 , 67 S.Ct. at 604 . 1989In New York Rayon Importing Co., cited in note 6, supra, for example, the first of the cases to which the majority alludes, the Court explained that even assuming that the equities of the situation all favor the owners of the refund claims, the Court of Claims did not thereby acquire power to carve out an implied exception to the plain words of [the statute]. 329 U.S. at 660 , 67 S.Ct. at 604 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
McGloin v. United States
green
1 sentence1967In McGloin v. United States, D.C.App., 232 A.2d 90 (1967), we held that even in a semi-public or public building one does not have a right to enter areas which are obviously not open to the public simply because there is no sign or warning forbidding entry as under such circumstances there is an implied warning not to enter. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.