Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1952–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kottschade v. City of Rochestergreen1 sentence2016See Kottschade v. City of Rochester, 760 N.W.2d 342, 350 (Minn. App. 2009) (“Generally, when an event makes . . . a decision on the merits unnecessary, the appeal should be dismissed as moot.”), review denied (Minn. 4 Apr. 29, 2009). | 1 | 1 |
Vaubel Farms, Inc. v. Shelby Farmers Mutualgreen1 sentence2011See Vaubel Farms, Inc. v. Shelby Farmers Mut., 679 N.W.2d 407, 411 (Minn.App.2004) (finding a binding agreement to arbitrate where the contested clause is labeled “arbitration” and describes a process by which a third-party neutral will preside over an evidentiary hearing and determine the prevailing party). | 1 | 1 |
Manufactured Housing Institute v. Pettersengreen2 sentences1989See Manufactured Housing, 347 N.W.2d 238 . 1989See Manufactured Housing, 347 N.W.2d 238 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Manns
green
1 sentence2019The first step is to determine whether the language of the contested rule "is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation." State v. Fleck , 810 N.W.2d 303 , 307 (Minn. 2012). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Xiong
green
1 sentence2016We held in Xiong that when a probationer waives his right to a contested hearing the state need not prove the violation by clear and convincing evidence and the district court may “base its finding on the violation report and the probationer’s waiver, which serves as a stipulation to the state’s allegations in the violation report.” Id. at 503 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Thompson v. Commissioner of Health
green
1 sentence2015In Thompson, the relator had no conviction and thus there was no prior adjudication which the commissioner could rely upon to “lessen the risk of an erroneous determination.” 778 N.W.2d at 408 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Reichel v. Hefner
green
2 sentences2003Id. 2003Id. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Pennington v. Fourth National Bank of Cincinnati
green
2 sentences1952Bank, 243 U. S. 269, 271 , 37 S. Ct. 282, 283 , 61 L. ed. 713, 715, the United States Supreme Court said: “* * * ¡pbg power of the State to proceed against the property of an absent defendant is the same whether the obligation sought to be enforced is an admitted indebtedness or a contested claim. 1952Bank, 243 U. S. 269, 271 , 37 S. Ct. 282, 283 , 61 L. ed. 713, 715, the United States Supreme Court said: “* * * ¡pbg power of the State to proceed against the property of an absent defendant is the same whether the obligation sought to be enforced is an admitted indebtedness or a contested claim. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.