Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1900–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dickinson v. Talbottgreen2 sentences2004In Dickinson v. Talbott, 114 W.Va. 1 , 170 S.E. 425 (1933), we discussed how invocation of the “previous liability” exception to the debt clause is directly tied to the discharge of an indebtedness. 2004In Dickinson v. Talbott, 114 W.Va. 1 , 170 S.E. 425 (1933), we discussed how invocation of the “previous liability” exception to the debt clause is directly tied to the discharge of an indebtedness. | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Johnsongreen2 sentences1985This distinction was stated in the following manner in Johnson v. Johnson, 111 R.I. 183, 188 , 300 A.2d 642, 645 (1973) (collecting cases at n. 1): Garnishment is allowed on an unliqui-dated claim where there is a certainty as to liability but a contingency as to amount. 1985This distinction was stated in the following manner in Johnson v. Johnson, 111 R.I. 183, 188 , 300 A.2d 642, 645 (1973) (collecting cases at n. 1): Garnishment is allowed on an unliqui-dated claim where there is a certainty as to liability but a contingency as to amount. | 1 | 1 |
American Nat. Ins. Co. v. United States Fidelity & G. Co.green1 sentence1985American National Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 215 So.2d 245, 248 (Miss.1968); 38 C.J.S. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commercial Bank of Bluefield v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
green
2 sentences2017Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 175 W.Va. 588 , 336 S.E.2d 552 (1985), [i]n general, a debt or claim which is uncertain or contingent, in the sense that it may never become due and payable, is not garnishable.... 2017Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 175 W.Va. 588 , 336 S.E.2d 552 (1985), [i]n general, a debt or claim which is uncertain or contingent, in the sense that it may never become due and payable, is not garnishable.... | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State Ex Rel. Board of Governors of West Virginia University v. O'Brien
green
2 sentences2003Our decision made clear that the constitutional concern presented by article ten, section four is the levying of a tax to satisfy the obligation of debt undertaken by the state. 142 W.Va. at 97, 94 S.E.2d at 451 . 2003Our decision made clear that the constitutional concern presented by article ten, section four is the levying of a tax to satisfy the obligation of debt undertaken by the state. 142 W.Va. at 97, 94 S.E.2d at 451 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Russell
green
2 sentences1982Moyers v. State, 186 Ga. 446 , 197 S.E. 846 (1938); People v. Uselding, 107 Ill.App.2d 305 , 247 N.E.2d 35 (1969); State v. Russell, 217 Kan. 481 , 536 P.2d 1392 (1975); State v. Ortiz, 124 N.J.Super. 189 , 305 A.2d 800 (1973); Elliott v. State, 2 Tenn.Cr.App. 418, 454 S.W.2d 187 (1970); Edwards v. State, 49 Wis.2d 105 , 181 N.W.2d 383 (1970); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 1309 (1978). 1982Moyers v. State, 186 Ga. 446 , 197 S.E. 846 (1938); People v. Uselding, 107 Ill.App.2d 305 , 247 N.E.2d 35 (1969); State v. Russell, 217 Kan. 481 , 536 P.2d 1392 (1975); State v. Ortiz, 124 N.J.Super. 189 , 305 A.2d 800 (1973); Elliott v. State, 2 Tenn.Cr.App. 418, 454 S.W.2d 187 (1970); Edwards v. State, 49 Wis.2d 105 , 181 N.W.2d 383 (1970); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 1309 (1978). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Moyers v. State
green
2 sentences1982Moyers v. State, 186 Ga. 446 , 197 S.E. 846 (1938); People v. Uselding, 107 Ill.App.2d 305 , 247 N.E.2d 35 (1969); State v. Russell, 217 Kan. 481 , 536 P.2d 1392 (1975); State v. Ortiz, 124 N.J.Super. 189 , 305 A.2d 800 (1973); Elliott v. State, 2 Tenn.Cr.App. 418, 454 S.W.2d 187 (1970); Edwards v. State, 49 Wis.2d 105 , 181 N.W.2d 383 (1970); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 1309 (1978). 1982Moyers v. State, 186 Ga. 446 , 197 S.E. 846 (1938); People v. Uselding, 107 Ill.App.2d 305 , 247 N.E.2d 35 (1969); State v. Russell, 217 Kan. 481 , 536 P.2d 1392 (1975); State v. Ortiz, 124 N.J.Super. 189 , 305 A.2d 800 (1973); Elliott v. State, 2 Tenn.Cr.App. 418, 454 S.W.2d 187 (1970); Edwards v. State, 49 Wis.2d 105 , 181 N.W.2d 383 (1970); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 1309 (1978). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
People v. Uselding
green
2 sentences1982Moyers v. State, 186 Ga. 446 , 197 S.E. 846 (1938); People v. Uselding, 107 Ill.App.2d 305 , 247 N.E.2d 35 (1969); State v. Russell, 217 Kan. 481 , 536 P.2d 1392 (1975); State v. Ortiz, 124 N.J.Super. 189 , 305 A.2d 800 (1973); Elliott v. State, 2 Tenn.Cr.App. 418, 454 S.W.2d 187 (1970); Edwards v. State, 49 Wis.2d 105 , 181 N.W.2d 383 (1970); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 1309 (1978). 1982Moyers v. State, 186 Ga. 446 , 197 S.E. 846 (1938); People v. Uselding, 107 Ill.App.2d 305 , 247 N.E.2d 35 (1969); State v. Russell, 217 Kan. 481 , 536 P.2d 1392 (1975); State v. Ortiz, 124 N.J.Super. 189 , 305 A.2d 800 (1973); Elliott v. State, 2 Tenn.Cr.App. 418, 454 S.W.2d 187 (1970); Edwards v. State, 49 Wis.2d 105 , 181 N.W.2d 383 (1970); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 1309 (1978). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
State v. Ortiz
green
2 sentences1982Moyers v. State, 186 Ga. 446 , 197 S.E. 846 (1938); People v. Uselding, 107 Ill.App.2d 305 , 247 N.E.2d 35 (1969); State v. Russell, 217 Kan. 481 , 536 P.2d 1392 (1975); State v. Ortiz, 124 N.J.Super. 189 , 305 A.2d 800 (1973); Elliott v. State, 2 Tenn.Cr.App. 418, 454 S.W.2d 187 (1970); Edwards v. State, 49 Wis.2d 105 , 181 N.W.2d 383 (1970); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 1309 (1978). 1982Moyers v. State, 186 Ga. 446 , 197 S.E. 846 (1938); People v. Uselding, 107 Ill.App.2d 305 , 247 N.E.2d 35 (1969); State v. Russell, 217 Kan. 481 , 536 P.2d 1392 (1975); State v. Ortiz, 124 N.J.Super. 189 , 305 A.2d 800 (1973); Elliott v. State, 2 Tenn.Cr.App. 418, 454 S.W.2d 187 (1970); Edwards v. State, 49 Wis.2d 105 , 181 N.W.2d 383 (1970); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 1309 (1978). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Edwards v. State
green
2 sentences1982Moyers v. State, 186 Ga. 446 , 197 S.E. 846 (1938); People v. Uselding, 107 Ill.App.2d 305 , 247 N.E.2d 35 (1969); State v. Russell, 217 Kan. 481 , 536 P.2d 1392 (1975); State v. Ortiz, 124 N.J.Super. 189 , 305 A.2d 800 (1973); Elliott v. State, 2 Tenn.Cr.App. 418, 454 S.W.2d 187 (1970); Edwards v. State, 49 Wis.2d 105 , 181 N.W.2d 383 (1970); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 1309 (1978). 1982Moyers v. State, 186 Ga. 446 , 197 S.E. 846 (1938); People v. Uselding, 107 Ill.App.2d 305 , 247 N.E.2d 35 (1969); State v. Russell, 217 Kan. 481 , 536 P.2d 1392 (1975); State v. Ortiz, 124 N.J.Super. 189 , 305 A.2d 800 (1973); Elliott v. State, 2 Tenn.Cr.App. 418, 454 S.W.2d 187 (1970); Edwards v. State, 49 Wis.2d 105 , 181 N.W.2d 383 (1970); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 1309 (1978). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Elliott v. State
green
1 sentence1982Moyers v. State, 186 Ga. 446 , 197 S.E. 846 (1938); People v. Uselding, 107 Ill.App.2d 305 , 247 N.E.2d 35 (1969); State v. Russell, 217 Kan. 481 , 536 P.2d 1392 (1975); State v. Ortiz, 124 N.J.Super. 189 , 305 A.2d 800 (1973); Elliott v. State, 2 Tenn.Cr.App. 418, 454 S.W.2d 187 (1970); Edwards v. State, 49 Wis.2d 105 , 181 N.W.2d 383 (1970); Annot., 88 A.L.R.3d 1309 (1978). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Conway's Executors & Devisees v. Alexander
green
1 sentence1904Va. 246 , this Court held that “The distinction between a mortgage and a conditional sale is that .where money is not loaned, but is advanced, with an agreement that if it be repaid at a given time the vendee will reconvey the land, and the whole transaction shows clearly that no debt really remained after the execution of the deed, such transaction is a conditional sale; but if, no matter in what form the papers might be drawn, the whole transaction shows that after the execution of the deed the debt still remained, such transaction will be held a mortgage.” Jones Mort., section 265, says: “T | 1 | 1904–1904 |
Chrislip v. Teter
neutral
1 sentence1903In so far as the cases of Chrislip v. Teter, 43 W. | 1 | 1903–1903 |
McKinsey v. Squires
neutral
2 sentences1900Our statute provides (section 1, chapter 106, Code) that such attachment “may be sued out in a court of equity for a debt or claim, legal or equitable, whether the same be due or not, upon any of the grounds aforesaid,” etc. It is contended by appellant, however, that this statute is in violation of the constitution, which provides, in Article III., section 13, that “in suits at common law where the value in controversy exceeds twenty dollars, exclusive of interest and costs, the right of trial by jury if required by either party shallbe preserved.” This question has been settled in this State 1900Va. 41 , ( 9 S. E. 55 ), (Syl., point 1), where it is held, “Our statute (Code 1887, chapter 106, section 1), which provides that an attachment may be issued out in equity for the recovery of damages for a wrong, is constitutional,” and in Cecil v. Clark, 44 W. | 1 | 1900–1900 |
Cecil v. Clark
neutral
1 sentence1900Va. 41 , ( 9 S. E. 55 ), (Syl., point 1), where it is held, “Our statute (Code 1887, chapter 106, section 1), which provides that an attachment may be issued out in equity for the recovery of damages for a wrong, is constitutional,” and in Cecil v. Clark, 44 W. | 1 | 1900–1900 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.