7 Alaska opinions name it 1 courts 1961–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
S.J.S. Ex Rel. L.S. v. Faribault Countygreen1 sentence2010Corp., 65 Haw. 58 , 647 P.2d 713, 717 (1982) (holding that under respondeat superior "if the employee has immunity from suit, it follows that the employer would also be immune" and noting "[t]he reasoning which justifies this rule is based primarily on public policy") (internal citations omitted); S.J.S. v. Faribault Co., 556 N.W.2d 563, 566 (Minn.App.1996) ("The policy considerations that support extending absolute immunity to prosecutors also support extending absolute immunity vicariously to the county.... [T]he threat of litigation against the county ... could deter prosecutors from vigoro | 1 | 1 |
Hulsman v. Hemmeter Development Corp.green2 sentences2010Corp., 65 Haw. 58 , 647 P.2d 713, 717 (1982) (holding that under respondeat superior "if the employee has immunity from suit, it follows that the employer would also be immune" and noting "[t]he reasoning which justifies this rule is based primarily on public policy") (internal citations omitted); S.J.S. v. Faribault Co., 556 N.W.2d 563, 566 (Minn.App.1996) ("The policy considerations that support extending absolute immunity to prosecutors also support extending absolute immunity vicariously to the county.... [T]he threat of litigation against the county ... could deter prosecutors from vigoro 2010Corp., 65 Haw. 58 , 647 P.2d 713, 717 (1982) (holding that under respondeat superior "if the employee has immunity from suit, it follows that the employer would also be immune" and noting "[t]he reasoning which justifies this rule is based primarily on public policy") (internal citations omitted); S.J.S. v. Faribault Co., 556 N.W.2d 563, 566 (Minn.App.1996) ("The policy considerations that support extending absolute immunity to prosecutors also support extending absolute immunity vicariously to the county.... [T]he threat of litigation against the county ... could deter prosecutors from vigoro | 1 | 1 |
Reddy v. Karrgreen1 sentence2010Corp., 65 Haw. 58 , 647 P.2d 713, 717 (1982) (holding that under respondeat superior "if the employee has immunity from suit, it follows that the employer would also be immune" and noting "[t]he reasoning which justifies this rule is based primarily on public policy") (internal citations omitted); S.J.S. v. Faribault Co., 556 N.W.2d 563, 566 (Minn.App.1996) ("The policy considerations that support extending absolute immunity to prosecutors also support extending absolute immunity vicariously to the county.... [T]he threat of litigation against the county ... could deter prosecutors from vigoro | 1 | 1 |
Fielder v. Southco, Inc. of South Carolinagreen1 sentence2004See, e.g., Fielder v. Southco, Inc. of South Carolina, 699 F.Supp. 577, 578 (W.D.Va.1988) (public policy doctrine enforced in claim for wrongful discharge in retaliation for filing sexual harassment claim); Cabesuela v. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Calif., Inc., 68 Cal.App.4th 101 , 80 Cal.Rptr.2d 60, 63 (1998) (tort remedy available to employee who was terminated for protesting unsafe working conditions); Hobson v. McLean Hosp. | 1 | 1 |
Cabesuela v. Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc.green2 sentences2004See, e.g., Fielder v. Southco, Inc. of South Carolina, 699 F.Supp. 577, 578 (W.D.Va.1988) (public policy doctrine enforced in claim for wrongful discharge in retaliation for filing sexual harassment claim); Cabesuela v. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Calif., Inc., 68 Cal.App.4th 101 , 80 Cal.Rptr.2d 60, 63 (1998) (tort remedy available to employee who was terminated for protesting unsafe working conditions); Hobson v. McLean Hosp. 2004See, e.g., Fielder v. Southco, Inc. of South Carolina, 699 F.Supp. 577, 578 (W.D.Va.1988) (public policy doctrine enforced in claim for wrongful discharge in retaliation for filing sexual harassment claim); Cabesuela v. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Calif., Inc., 68 Cal.App.4th 101 , 80 Cal.Rptr.2d 60, 63 (1998) (tort remedy available to employee who was terminated for protesting unsafe working conditions); Hobson v. McLean Hosp. | 1 | 1 |
Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.green1 sentence2001See Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc., 768 P.2d 1123, 1130 (Alaska 1989). 20 . | 1 | 1 |
Eales v. Tanana Valley Medical-Surgical Group, Inc.green1 sentence1998See Eales v. Tanana Valley Medical-Surgical Group, Inc., 663 P.2d 958, 959 (Alaska 1983) (ruling that an employee who alleges that he was fired without cause in violation of the terms of his contract has a claim of wrongful discharge). | 1 | 1 |
International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1987Id.; see also Teamsters, 431 U.S. at 349 , 97 S.Ct. at 1861 , 52 L.Ed.2d at 423 . 1987Id.; see also Teamsters, 431 U.S. at 349 , 97 S.Ct. at 1861 , 52 L.Ed.2d at 423 . | 1 | 1 |
Anchorage Roofing Co., Inc. v. Gonzalesgreen1 sentence1978Anchorage Roofing Co. Inc. v. Gonzales, 507 P.2d 501, 505 (Alaska 1973); Lizama v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 40 Cal.App.3d 363 , 115 Cal.Rptr. 267, 271 (1974); Ross v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 21 Cal.App.3d 949 , 99 Cal.Rptr. 79, 83 (1971); see Northern Corp. v. Saari, 409 P.2d 845 (Alaska 1966). | 1 | 1 |
Northern Corporation v. Saarigreen1 sentence1978Anchorage Roofing Co. Inc. v. Gonzales, 507 P.2d 501, 505 (Alaska 1973); Lizama v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 40 Cal.App.3d 363 , 115 Cal.Rptr. 267, 271 (1974); Ross v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 21 Cal.App.3d 949 , 99 Cal.Rptr. 79, 83 (1971); see Northern Corp. v. Saari, 409 P.2d 845 (Alaska 1966). | 1 | 1 |
Ross v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Boardgreen2 sentences1978Anchorage Roofing Co. Inc. v. Gonzales, 507 P.2d 501, 505 (Alaska 1973); Lizama v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 40 Cal.App.3d 363 , 115 Cal.Rptr. 267, 271 (1974); Ross v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 21 Cal.App.3d 949 , 99 Cal.Rptr. 79, 83 (1971); see Northern Corp. v. Saari, 409 P.2d 845 (Alaska 1966). 1978Anchorage Roofing Co. Inc. v. Gonzales, 507 P.2d 501, 505 (Alaska 1973); Lizama v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 40 Cal.App.3d 363 , 115 Cal.Rptr. 267, 271 (1974); Ross v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 21 Cal.App.3d 949 , 99 Cal.Rptr. 79, 83 (1971); see Northern Corp. v. Saari, 409 P.2d 845 (Alaska 1966). | 1 | 1 |
Lizama v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Boardgreen2 sentences1978Anchorage Roofing Co. Inc. v. Gonzales, 507 P.2d 501, 505 (Alaska 1973); Lizama v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 40 Cal.App.3d 363 , 115 Cal.Rptr. 267, 271 (1974); Ross v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 21 Cal.App.3d 949 , 99 Cal.Rptr. 79, 83 (1971); see Northern Corp. v. Saari, 409 P.2d 845 (Alaska 1966). 1978Anchorage Roofing Co. Inc. v. Gonzales, 507 P.2d 501, 505 (Alaska 1973); Lizama v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 40 Cal.App.3d 363 , 115 Cal.Rptr. 267, 271 (1974); Ross v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 21 Cal.App.3d 949 , 99 Cal.Rptr. 79, 83 (1971); see Northern Corp. v. Saari, 409 P.2d 845 (Alaska 1966). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lythgoe v. Guinn
green
1 sentence2010Corp., 65 Haw. 58 , 647 P.2d 713, 717 (1982) (holding that under respondeat superior "if the employee has immunity from suit, it follows that the employer would also be immune" and noting "[t]he reasoning which justifies this rule is based primarily on public policy") (internal citations omitted); S.J.S. v. Faribault Co., 556 N.W.2d 563, 566 (Minn.App.1996) ("The policy considerations that support extending absolute immunity to prosecutors also support extending absolute immunity vicariously to the county.... [T]he threat of litigation against the county ... could deter prosecutors from vigoro | 1 | 2010–2010 |
LaLonde v. Eissner
green
1 sentence2010Corp., 65 Haw. 58 , 647 P.2d 713, 717 (1982) (holding that under respondeat superior "if the employee has immunity from suit, it follows that the employer would also be immune" and noting "[t]he reasoning which justifies this rule is based primarily on public policy") (internal citations omitted); S.J.S. v. Faribault Co., 556 N.W.2d 563, 566 (Minn.App.1996) ("The policy considerations that support extending absolute immunity to prosecutors also support extending absolute immunity vicariously to the county.... [T]he threat of litigation against the county ... could deter prosecutors from vigoro | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Reddy v. Karr
green
1 sentence2010Corp., 65 Haw. 58 , 647 P.2d 713, 717 (1982) (holding that under respondeat superior "if the employee has immunity from suit, it follows that the employer would also be immune" and noting "[t]he reasoning which justifies this rule is based primarily on public policy") (internal citations omitted); S.J.S. v. Faribault Co., 556 N.W.2d 563, 566 (Minn.App.1996) ("The policy considerations that support extending absolute immunity to prosecutors also support extending absolute immunity vicariously to the county.... [T]he threat of litigation against the county ... could deter prosecutors from vigoro | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776
green
2 sentences1961Cf. Garner v. Teamsters Union, 346 U.S. 485 , 74 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed. 228 (1953). 23 .San Diego Bldg. 1961Cf. Garner v. Teamsters Union, 346 U.S. 485 , 74 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed. 228 (1953). 23 .San Diego Bldg. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.