Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Arkansas opinions name it 3 courts 1989–1997 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hill v. Pattersongreen2 sentences1997See Hill v. Patterson, 313 Ark. 322 , 855 S.W.2d 297 (1993). 1997See Hill v. Patterson, 313 Ark. 322 , 855 S.W.2d 297 (1993). | 2 | 2 |
Cabezas v. ADM'R, DIV. OF EMP. SEC.green2 sentences1995See also Cabezas v. Administrator, 557 So.2d 985 (La.App. 4th Cir.1990) ("Whether a violation of the employer's rule, resulting in discharge warrants the withholding of unemployment compensation benefits must be determined, not by the employer's rules, but by the statute."). 1995See also Cabezes v. Administrator, 557 So.2d 985 (La. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Andrews v. Victor Metal Products
neutral
2 sentences1995Andrews v. Victor Metal Products, 237 Ark. 540 , 374 S.W.2d 816 (1964). 1995Andrews v. Victor Metal Products, 237 Ark. 540 , 374 S.W.2d 816 (1964). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Oxford
green
2 sentences1989For example, in Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Oxford, 294 Ark. 239 , 743 S.W.2d 380 (1988), we declared that if an employer’s conduct in breaching an employment contract is sufficiently egregious or extreme, the employee may claim tort damages in a cause of action for outrage. 1989For example, in Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Oxford, 294 Ark. 239 , 743 S.W.2d 380 (1988), we declared that if an employer’s conduct in breaching an employment contract is sufficiently egregious or extreme, the employee may claim tort damages in a cause of action for outrage. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Robinson v. Beaumont
green
2 sentences1989Robinson v. Beaumont, 291 Ark. 345 [ 291 Ark. 477 ], 658 S.W.2d 374 [ 725 S.W.2d 839 ] (1983) [(1987)]. 1989Robinson v. Beaumont, 291 Ark. 345 [ 291 Ark. 477 ], 658 S.W.2d 374 [ 725 S.W.2d 839 ] (1983) [(1987)]. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Matthews v. Martin
green
1 sentence1989Robinson v. Beaumont, 291 Ark. 345 [ 291 Ark. 477 ], 658 S.W.2d 374 [ 725 S.W.2d 839 ] (1983) [(1987)]. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.