7 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1980–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sanders v. Smithermangreen2 sentences2007See Sanders v. Smitherman, 776 So.2d 68, 71 (Ala.2000); Finebaum, 854 So.2d at 1124 ; see also Revell v. Hoffman, 309 F.3d 1228, 1233 (10th Cir. 2002); Flowers v. Carville, 310 F.3d 1118, 1131 (9th Cir.2002); Chafoulias v. Peterson, 668 N.W.2d 642, 654 (Minn. 2003). 2004See Sanders v. Smitherman , 776 So.2d 68 , 71 (Ala. 2000); Finebaum , 854 So.2d at 1124 ; see also Revell v. Hoffman , 309 F.3d 1228 , 1233 (10th Cir. 2002); Flowers v. Carville , 310 F.3d 1118 , 1131 (9th Cir. 2002); Chafoulias v. Peterson , 668 N.W.2d 642 , 654 (Minn. 2003). | 2 | 2 |
Oliver \Buck\" Revell v. David Hoffmangreen2 sentences2007See Sanders v. Smitherman, 776 So.2d 68, 71 (Ala.2000); Finebaum, 854 So.2d at 1124 ; see also Revell v. Hoffman, 309 F.3d 1228, 1233 (10th Cir. 2002); Flowers v. Carville, 310 F.3d 1118, 1131 (9th Cir.2002); Chafoulias v. Peterson, 668 N.W.2d 642, 654 (Minn. 2003). 2004See Sanders v. Smitherman , 776 So.2d 68 , 71 (Ala. 2000); Finebaum , 854 So.2d at 1124 ; see also Revell v. Hoffman , 309 F.3d 1228 , 1233 (10th Cir. 2002); Flowers v. Carville , 310 F.3d 1118 , 1131 (9th Cir. 2002); Chafoulias v. Peterson , 668 N.W.2d 642 , 654 (Minn. 2003). | 2 | 2 |
Chafoulias v. Petersongreen2 sentences2007See Sanders v. Smitherman, 776 So.2d 68, 71 (Ala.2000); Finebaum, 854 So.2d at 1124 ; see also Revell v. Hoffman, 309 F.3d 1228, 1233 (10th Cir. 2002); Flowers v. Carville, 310 F.3d 1118, 1131 (9th Cir.2002); Chafoulias v. Peterson, 668 N.W.2d 642, 654 (Minn. 2003). 2004See Sanders v. Smitherman , 776 So.2d 68 , 71 (Ala. 2000); Finebaum , 854 So.2d at 1124 ; see also Revell v. Hoffman , 309 F.3d 1228 , 1233 (10th Cir. 2002); Flowers v. Carville , 310 F.3d 1118 , 1131 (9th Cir. 2002); Chafoulias v. Peterson , 668 N.W.2d 642 , 654 (Minn. 2003). | 1 | 2 |
Gennifer Flowers v. James Carville Hillary Rodham Clinton Little, Brown & Co. George Stephanopoulosgreen2 sentences2007See Sanders v. Smitherman, 776 So.2d 68, 71 (Ala.2000); Finebaum, 854 So.2d at 1124 ; see also Revell v. Hoffman, 309 F.3d 1228, 1233 (10th Cir. 2002); Flowers v. Carville, 310 F.3d 1118, 1131 (9th Cir.2002); Chafoulias v. Peterson, 668 N.W.2d 642, 654 (Minn. 2003). 2004See Sanders v. Smitherman , 776 So.2d 68 , 71 (Ala. 2000); Finebaum , 854 So.2d at 1124 ; see also Revell v. Hoffman , 309 F.3d 1228 , 1233 (10th Cir. 2002); Flowers v. Carville , 310 F.3d 1118 , 1131 (9th Cir. 2002); Chafoulias v. Peterson , 668 N.W.2d 642 , 654 (Minn. 2003). | 1 | 2 |
Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. Connaughtongreen2 sentences2005"The actual malice standard is satisfied `by proof that a false statement was made with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.' Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. Connaughton, 491 U.S. 657, 659 (1989). 2005"The actual malice standard is satisfied `by proof that a false statement was made with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.' Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. Connaughton , 491 U.S. 657 , 659 (1989). | 1 | 1 |
Curtis Publishing Co. v. Buttsgreen2 sentences1985Butts , 388 U.S. at 165 , 169-70 , 87 S.Ct. at 1998-99 (Warren, C.J., concurring in the result). 3 The lead article stated: "As an attorney, Pemberton can represent clients before the parole board for a fee if he files the proper papers with the Ethics Commission each time he does so." See Code of 1975, § 36-25-10 . 4 At trial, there was introduced a letter from plaintiff to Melvin Cooper of the Ethics Commission, which stated: "I have been retained to represent Mr. James Harding at a hearing to be held before the Pardon and Parole Board. 1985Butts , 388 U.S. at 165 , 169-70 , 87 S.Ct. at 1998-99 (Warren, C.J., concurring in the result). 3 The lead article stated: "As an attorney, Pemberton can represent clients before the parole board for a fee if he files the proper papers with the Ethics Commission each time he does so." See Code of 1975, § 36-25-10 . 4 At trial, there was introduced a letter from plaintiff to Melvin Cooper of the Ethics Commission, which stated: "I have been retained to represent Mr. James Harding at a hearing to be held before the Pardon and Parole Board. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
St. Amant v. Thompson
green
2 sentences2007Amant [ v. Thompson ], 390 U.S. [727] at 731, 88 S.Ct. 1323 [(1968)])(emphasis added). `The actual malice standard is subjective; the plaintiff must prove that the defendant actually entertained a serious doubt.' Id. (emphasis added). 2007Amant [ v. Thompson ], 390 U.S. [727] at 731, 88 S.Ct. 1323 [(1968)])(emphasis added). `The actual malice standard is subjective; the plaintiff must prove that the defendant actually entertained a serious doubt.' Id. (emphasis added). | 4 | 1980–2007 |
Finebaum v. Coulter
green
2 sentences2007See Sanders v. Smitherman, 776 So.2d 68, 71 (Ala.2000); Finebaum, 854 So.2d at 1124 ; see also Revell v. Hoffman, 309 F.3d 1228, 1233 (10th Cir. 2002); Flowers v. Carville, 310 F.3d 1118, 1131 (9th Cir.2002); Chafoulias v. Peterson, 668 N.W.2d 642, 654 (Minn. 2003). 2004See Sanders v. Smitherman , 776 So.2d 68 , 71 (Ala. 2000); Finebaum , 854 So.2d at 1124 ; see also Revell v. Hoffman , 309 F.3d 1228 , 1233 (10th Cir. 2002); Flowers v. Carville , 310 F.3d 1118 , 1131 (9th Cir. 2002); Chafoulias v. Peterson , 668 N.W.2d 642 , 654 (Minn. 2003). | 2 | 2004–2007 |
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
green
2 sentences1980For a publication to fall within the actual malice standard of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan , 376 U.S. 254 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964), it must have been made with a knowledge of its falsity or with a reckless disregard as to whether it was false or not. 1980For a publication to fall within the actual malice standard of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan , 376 U.S. 254 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964), it must have been made with a knowledge of its falsity or with a reckless disregard as to whether it was false or not. | 2 | 1980–2005 |
Ex Parte Salter
green
1 sentence2004Ex parte Salter , 520 So.2d 213 , 216 (Ala.Crim.App. 1987). 14 The laundry list of those issues, as stated in Giles's brief, are: failure to object to the malice instruction, failure to object to the particularized-intent instruction, failure to secure the suppression of Giles's allegedly inadmissible statement and to raise the issue on appeal, failure to object to the presence of his codefendant at Giles's trial, failure to secure an impartial jury, failure to investigate the culpability of Aaron Jones, failure to present mitigation evidence in support of a case for life imprisonment without | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.
green
2 sentences1980Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. , 418 U.S. 323 , 94 S.Ct. 2997 , 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974). (footnotes omitted) As Justice Almon noted in the recent decision of Gray v. WALA-TV , 384 So.2d 1062 (Ala. 1980): "This actual malice standard was further elaborated on in St. 1980Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. , 418 U.S. 323 , 94 S.Ct. 2997 , 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974). (footnotes omitted) As Justice Almon noted in the recent decision of Gray v. WALA-TV , 384 So.2d 1062 (Ala. 1980): "This actual malice standard was further elaborated on in St. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Gray v. WALA-TV
green
1 sentence1980Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. , 418 U.S. 323 , 94 S.Ct. 2997 , 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974). (footnotes omitted) As Justice Almon noted in the recent decision of Gray v. WALA-TV , 384 So.2d 1062 (Ala. 1980): "This actual malice standard was further elaborated on in St. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.