7 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1913–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ruffin v. Stategreen2 sentences2007See Ruffin v. State, 243 Ga. 95 (14) ( 252 SE2d 472 ) (1979). 2007See Ruffin v. State, 243 Ga. 95 (14) ( 252 SE2d 472 ) (1979). | 1 | 1 |
Turner v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1979In this connection, see County Court of Ulster County, New York v. Allen, 47 USLW 4618 at 4622 (June 4, 1979); Turner v. United States, 396 U. S. 398, 423 (90 SC 642, 24 LE2d 610) (1970); IX Wigmore on Evidence 293, § 2494 (1940). 2 We note that the fact that the notice was returned undelivered could be prima facie evidence of knowledge that the check would not be honored given a provision that the notice be mailed within a reasonable time, because it could tend to show the accused gave a false address or intended to leave with no forwarding address. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Michelson v. Cunningham
neutral
2 sentences1924While it is the better and safer practice for the mortgagor, if he has a defense, to file the same on the first day of the term to which the rule nisi is returnable, he has the right to make such defense “at any time during the term, before or when his case is called for trial, but not afterwards.” Michelson v. Cunningham, 96 Ga. 601 ( 24 S. E. 144 ). 1924While it is the better and safer practice for the mortgagor, if he has a defense, to file the same on the first day of the term to which the rule nisi is returnable, he has the right to make such defense “at any time during the term, before or when his case is called for trial, but not afterwards.” Michelson v. Cunningham, 96 Ga. 601 ( 24 S. E. 144 ). | 2 | 1917–1924 |
Pritchett v. King
green
2 sentences1980As was said in Pritchett v. King, 56 Ga. App. 788 ( 194 SE 44 ) at p. 792: “ ‘The view has been taken that a lease for a specific term with the privilege of a renewal on the same terms is equivalent, where such privilege is exercised, to a demise for the full period of the two terms, without any necessity for the execution of a new lease.’ ” We are *297 persuaded by the logic of these cases and hold that we are dealing here with the extension of the lease and not a renewal thereof. 1980As was said in Pritchett v. King, 56 Ga. App. 788 ( 194 SE 44 ) at p. 792: “ ‘The view has been taken that a lease for a specific term with the privilege of a renewal on the same terms is equivalent, where such privilege is exercised, to a demise for the full period of the two terms, without any necessity for the execution of a new lease.’ ” We are *297 persuaded by the logic of these cases and hold that we are dealing here with the extension of the lease and not a renewal thereof. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Massey v. Allen
green
1 sentence1917Massey v. Allen, 48 Ga. 21 . 4. | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Manley v. McKenzie
green
1 sentence1913Manley v. McKenzie, 128 Ga. 348 ( 57 S. E. 705 ); Thornton v. Hitchcock, ante, 749 ( 78 S. E. 179 ). 2. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Thornton v. Hitchcock
neutral
1 sentence1913Manley v. McKenzie, 128 Ga. 348 ( 57 S. E. 705 ); Thornton v. Hitchcock, ante, 749 ( 78 S. E. 179 ). 2. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.