term clause (Oregon) · Go Syfert
← Oregon issues

term clause in Oregon

7 Oregon opinions name it 3 courts 1954–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Turnidgegreen
or · 2016 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016The doctrine of chances applies to evidence offered to prove “intent” in the sense of “the absence of accident, inadvertence or [causality].” Turnidge, 359 Or at 436 (brackets in original; internal quotation marks omitted).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Duyck v. Northwest Chemical Corp. green
orctapp · 1988
2 sentences

1994Duyck v. Northwest Chemical Corp., 94 Or App 111, 116 , 764 P2d 943 (1988), rev den 307 Or 405 (1989).

1994Duyck v. Northwest Chemical Corp., 94 Or App 111, 116 , 764 P2d 943 (1988), rev den 307 Or 405 (1989).

21993–1994
Atlas Mutual Insurance v. Moore Dry Kiln Co. green
orctapp · 1979
2 sentences

2002In Atlas Mutual Ins. v. Moore Dry Kiln, 38 Or App 111 , 589 P2d 1134 (1979), the plaintiff sought indemnity for insurance benefits it had paid for a fire-damaged kiln that its insured had purchased from the defendant.

2002In Atlas Mutual Ins. v. Moore Dry Kiln, 38 Or App 111 , 589 P2d 1134 (1979), the plaintiff sought indemnity for insurance benefits it had paid for a fire-damaged kiln that its insured had purchased from the defendant.

12002–2002
Anderson v. Ashland Rental, Inc. green
orctapp · 1993
1 sentence

1995ORS 71.2010(10); Anderson, 122 Or App at 510 .

11995–1995
Silliman v. Silliman green
or · 1913
2 sentences

1958“The houses, buildings and other improvements on the ‘home property’ of the parties are all located on portions of land which, due to an error and mutual mistake, however, were not actually described or referred to in the judgment and decree entered in this cause on February 19, 1951.” The memorandum opinion then stated that the court had the inherent power to correct the decree to conform it to the actual decision that was announced, commenting that “to fail to do otherwise would be a travesty upon justice.” The opinion declared that the correction of the mistake could be made after the term

1958“The houses, buildings and other improvements on the ‘home property’ of the parties are all located on portions of land which, due to an error and mutual mistake, however, were not actually described or referred to in the judgment and decree entered in this cause on February 19, 1951.” The memorandum opinion then stated that the court had the inherent power to correct the decree to conform it to the actual decision that was announced, commenting that “to fail to do otherwise would be a travesty upon justice.” The opinion declared that the correction of the mistake could be made after the term

11958–1958
Wadsworth v. Brigham green
or · 1927
2 sentences

1954Our research produced but one instance, Wadsworth v. Brigham, et al. (1928) 125 Or 428 , 259 P 299 , 266 P 875 .

1954Our research produced but one instance, Wadsworth v. Brigham, et al. (1928) 125 Or 428 , 259 P 299 , 266 P 875 .

11954–1954

Where else courts name it

CA 66 (1865–2026) NY 25 (1901–2025) IL 24 (1907–2026) MO 22 (1892–2022) TX 22 (1911–2024) WI 19 (1988–2026) CT 13 (1972–2015) MA 13 (1973–2018) OH 12 (1943–2025) WY 11 (1971–2023) PA 9 (1930–2015) WA 9 (1893–2017) FL 9 (1939–2017) MD 8 (1977–2024) KS 8 (1952–2022) GA 7 (1913–2007) IN 7 (1881–2005) OR 7 (1954–2016) KY 7 (1961–2023) NC 6 (1957–2023) NH 5 (2006–2016) MI 4 (1942–2010) ME 4 (1960–2025) NM 4 (1998–2020) DC 4 (2012–2024) IA 4 (1972–2000) AR 3 (1941–2002) NE 3 (1952–1992) OK 3 (1926–1938) HI 3 (1899–2016) WV 3 (1926–2012) MS 3 (1881–2020) NV 2 (2002–2002) AK 2 (1981–1989) LA 2 (1979–2011) TN 2 (1946–1979) ID 2 (1976–1991) CO 2 (2012–2016) AL 2 (1911–1990)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check